12-09-07 NextTech2012 Debate: Large-scale Fraud in the Electronic Records of the Courts – A call for action by computing experts

Below is the outline for the debate panel in the upcoming NextTech2012 conference in Barcelona, Catalonia. The short introductory slide presentation in also linked below.
LINKS:
[1]12-09-07 NextTech2012 Debate: Large-scale Fraud in the Electronic Records of the Courts – A call for action by computing experts By Joseph Zernik, PhD - short opening presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105211070/
________________
1. Large-scale Fraud in the Electronic Records of the Courts – A call for action by computing experts
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert(NGO)

 • Specializing in data-mining of electronic government records: courts, prisons, banks
• The recent implementation of fraudulent electronic records systems in the courts converted them into rackets and undermined Human Rights and banking regulation.
Caution: Expect harsh retaliation.
________________
2. Supreme Court – United States

Richard Fine v Sheriff Lee Baca

The 70-year old, former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the
large-scale bribing of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles -the largest county court in the United States:
• Fine’s actions led to the signing of “retroactive immunities” (simulated pardons) for all judges of the California courts by the California Governor –in fact an admission of widespread criminality of the judiciary.
• Two weeks later, Richard Fine was arrested. He was falsely imprisoned for 18 months in
solitary confinement (considered by the United Nations torture). His electronic booking record listed him arrested and booked on location and by authority of the “Municipal Court of San Pedro”, which did not and does not exist.
• Richard Fine’s Habeas Corpus petitions were subjected to simulated review in the US District Court, Central District of California, the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and the US Supreme Court.
________________
3. District Court, SDNY –United States


Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America in the US District Court, SDNY,
was touted as enforcement of banking regulation by a tough US judge, after the unlawful taking of USD 5.8 billion by banking executives was discovered:
• SEC, BAC, and the US District Court colluded in fraud on the People through conduct of simulated litigation, in the outcome of which no individual was held accountable,
and the funds were never returned to the shareholders.
• Due to the unprecedented corruption of the US courts, today there is no way to institute effective banking regulation in the United States.
________________ 
4. Supreme Court -State of Israel

Undermining of the Supreme Court's certification of records in 2002

Former Chief Justice Aharon Barak was touted as the leader of a “Constitutional Revolution”:
• Data-mining shows that he presided over unprecedented corruption of the Supreme Court - hundreds of falsified decision records were discovered.
• Since 2003, none of the electronic decision records are certified, and none shows any reference to the Office of the Clerk. The Chief Clerk refuses to certify the Court’s records.
• The Administration of Courts refuses to disclose the legal foundation for such profound change in the records of the Supreme Court in 2001-2003, or to produce the appointment records of the Chief Clerks of the courts (including the Supreme Court).
________________
5. Tel Aviv District Court –State of Israel

Silman’s case, where he asked for his social security benefits was subjected to fraud by Judge Hagai Brenner

Initial review of the case of the July 2012, self-immolated social protest activist Moshe Silman shows:
• The complaint and initial decision were filed under a case number that never existed -index fraud.
• None of the records were signed, instead ¨Post-it Decisions” were issued -simulated, fraudulent judicial records.
• Judge Hagai Brenner denied an appeal from his own decision - judicial misconduct.
________________
6. Detainees Courts –State of Israel

Lack of correlation between dates of issuance and Detainee Numbers, and discontinuity in Detainee Numbers 

The records of the Detainees Courts should raise concern that “black hole” prisons and makeshift “field courts” have been established in the State of Israel
• Only a selection of the Detainees Courts records is published online, as insecure Word files, most of which were created a long time after the fact (at times – years). 
• The Ministry of Justice refuses to disclose, how many Detainees Courts are operating in the State of Israel today, their names and locations, and the names of the Chief Clerks, if any exist.