Last New Visitor Ukraine  Visited 50 minutes ago |  |
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
12-03-29 Miami Heat in Hoodies
Miami Heat Tweets Team Pic of Hoodies To Support Trayvon Martin
LeBron James tweeted the picture Friday morning.
12-03-28 On March 7, 2002, Israel was set up for a “push button” regime change
On March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a “push button” regime change
In between, the Supreme Court considers all its records uncertified, and “subject to editing and phrasing changes”
Supreme Court, State of Israel, Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen (שמריהו כהן), Sarah Lifschitz
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 28 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), released further details, pertaining to data mining of records in the weeks before and after March 7, 2002.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a ‘push-button’ regime change.”
The findings have wide-range implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional and world violence.
Human Rights Alert’s Draft Submission is remarkable, in being narrowly focused on data mining and analysis of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel. [1]
The Recommendations include:- Resolution of the crisis would have to draw upon civil society agents within the legal profession, and also most likely computing experts and religious leaders. - Thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the March 7, 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen is warranted. - Truth and reconciliation commission may also be required to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
LINKS:12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...____________________Appendix 06a: Table Summary - Changes in the certification patterns of the Supreme around March 7, 2002 As further analysis of discontinuities in certification patters of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, ELYON1 was searched for decisions issued on each day, around March 7, 2002 (between February 22 and March 20, 2002). Date data should be deemed unreliable, until the systems are examined.
This period is characterized by increased irregularity in certification practices, and the joint appearance of various certification forms outside their normal sequence, at times several certification patterns on the same date. [,]
These irregularities appear on the background of the steady underlying trends, which started long before March 7, 2002, and ended around January 2003:
a) Elimination of the mention of the authority of the “Chief Clerk”;
b) Elimination of the mention of the name of the accountable individual;
c) Elimination of the certification statement, “True Copy of the Original”;
d) Addition of the disclaimer, “Subject to phrasing and editing changes”;
e) Increased dominance of an “Information Center”, “operated in the Supreme Court”;
f) Transition of the database to “COURT.DOT”, and “.doc” files.
Combined, the analysis of these longer-term trends [] and the certification patterns around March 7, 2002, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that a thorough, public investigation of the circumstances of the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen z”l, is fully warranted.
Otherwise: On or about March 7, 2002, a system was set, which may permit a “push button” regime change in the State of Israel.
Three senior Israel computing/cryptology experts independently reviewed the data previously generated by Dr Zernik. All three expressed alarm and concern. One of the three issued a formal request on a nationally decorated rabbinical authority, who is versed in math and physics, for a Halachic ruling:
Is the Supreme Court of the State of Israel engaged in Gneivat Ha-Da’at? [Widespread Public Deception jz]
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
In between, the Supreme Court considers all its records uncertified, and “subject to editing and phrasing changes”
Supreme Court, State of Israel, Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen (שמריהו כהן), Sarah Lifschitz
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 28 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), released further details, pertaining to data mining of records in the weeks before and after March 7, 2002.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a ‘push-button’ regime change.”
The findings have wide-range implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional and world violence.
Human Rights Alert’s Draft Submission is remarkable, in being narrowly focused on data mining and analysis of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel. [1]
The Recommendations include:- Resolution of the crisis would have to draw upon civil society agents within the legal profession, and also most likely computing experts and religious leaders. - Thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the March 7, 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen is warranted. - Truth and reconciliation commission may also be required to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
LINKS:12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...____________________Appendix 06a: Table Summary - Changes in the certification patterns of the Supreme around March 7, 2002 As further analysis of discontinuities in certification patters of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, ELYON1 was searched for decisions issued on each day, around March 7, 2002 (between February 22 and March 20, 2002). Date data should be deemed unreliable, until the systems are examined.
This period is characterized by increased irregularity in certification practices, and the joint appearance of various certification forms outside their normal sequence, at times several certification patterns on the same date. [,]
These irregularities appear on the background of the steady underlying trends, which started long before March 7, 2002, and ended around January 2003:
a) Elimination of the mention of the authority of the “Chief Clerk”;
b) Elimination of the mention of the name of the accountable individual;
c) Elimination of the certification statement, “True Copy of the Original”;
d) Addition of the disclaimer, “Subject to phrasing and editing changes”;
e) Increased dominance of an “Information Center”, “operated in the Supreme Court”;
f) Transition of the database to “COURT.DOT”, and “.doc” files.
Combined, the analysis of these longer-term trends [] and the certification patterns around March 7, 2002, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that a thorough, public investigation of the circumstances of the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen z”l, is fully warranted.
Otherwise: On or about March 7, 2002, a system was set, which may permit a “push button” regime change in the State of Israel.
Three senior Israel computing/cryptology experts independently reviewed the data previously generated by Dr Zernik. All three expressed alarm and concern. One of the three issued a formal request on a nationally decorated rabbinical authority, who is versed in math and physics, for a Halachic ruling:
Is the Supreme Court of the State of Israel engaged in Gneivat Ha-Da’at? [Widespread Public Deception jz]
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
12-03-28 Revised Draft Report: Integrity of the electronic record system of the Israeli courts.
Supreme Court of Israel, Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz
Jerusalem, March 27 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) has published a new draft submission for the 2012 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations:
Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT (REVISED)
Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission:
Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts
The Human Rights Alert submission is narrowly focused on Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the: Supreme Court, District Courts, Detainees’ Courts.
Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the national courts of the State of Israel, are alleged as violations of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite.
The underlying research was inspired by data mining and zero knowledge proofs. Serious deficiencies were identified in all systems, which were inspected. Three senior Israeli computing/cryptology experts expressed their concern/alarm.
In the Supreme Court, on or about March 7, 2002, integrity of the electronic records was compromised. Two large US data processing corporations were involved: IBM, EDS, jointly with the Administration of Courts in this “flag project”.
Today:
- The identity of the Supreme Court's servers is uncertified;
- All electronic records are published online unsigned and uncertified, ‘subject to editing and phrasing changes’;
- Certifications by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen appear on judicial records, which were purportedly issued years after his death;
- The office of current Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz refuses to certify the decisions and other records of the Supreme Court;
- The Supreme Court routinely publishes simulated decisions and conducts simulated review; [[i]]
- “Sealing” is imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner;
- A fraudulent Apostille certification arrangement was jointly entered by the Ministry of Justice and the Courts to circumvent the refusal of the Chief Clerks to certify the courts’ records; the arrangement is published, unsigned and undated on the Judicial Authority’s web site, while invoking the authority of an unnamed Minister of Justice.
The findings are compounded by various conflicts of interests of legal and computing experts.
Such findings should require re-assessment of the validity of any other legal public records, provided by the State of Israel, and employed in the UPR process. Member nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should reassess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel.
Recommendation include, but are not limited to, the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
[i] "Simulated litigation" [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated decisions" [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to felonies, defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
12-03-12 Evidence Of Large-scale Fraud In The Electronic Systems And Electronic Records Of The Supreme Court Of The State Of Israel
The Appendices were prepared for filing with the Supreme Court itself, in hope that it addresses the issues by agreeing to have the systems reviewed by Israeli computing experts.
Probably the strongest and fastest to review evidence is in:
a) Record #00 - Excerpts from the Ombudsman's Report 60b
b) Record #03 - Certificates, or Lack Thereof, of the Servers of the Supreme Court of Israel
c) Record #06 - Invalid on their faces decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel.
It is hoped that computing experts would recognize it as their civic duty to oversee the integrity of the case management systems of the courts and prisons, which are critical for the safeguard of civil society in our time (included in that is also Banking Regulation). The evidence from the US courts indicates routine fraud in cases involving large banks.
Conditions in this regard in the United States are much worse, and no coputing expert in the United States agreed to review the evidence of large-scale fraud in the elecrtronic records of the US courts.
LINKS
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel - Appendix 00: Excerpts from the Ombudsman Report 60b s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180111/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 01: 12-03-20 Biographical Sketch – Joseph Zernik, PhD s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180312/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 02 Freedom of Information Request on the Administration of Courts and Response Re - Instruction Materials for Users of the Electronic Systems s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180439/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 03 Certificates, Or Lack Thereof, For the Servers of the Supreme Court of Israel s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180553/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 04 Table Summary - Changes in the Attestation Boxes of the Clerks of the Supreme Court in Chronological Order s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180751/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 05 Table Summary - Distribution of Word Combinations and Date Discrepancies in Records of the Supreme Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180815/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 06 Invalid on Their Faces Decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180892/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 07 Table Summaries of Papers Filed by Zernik and Their Disposition s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180969/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 08 Paper Filed by Zernik Face Pages-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86181020/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 09 Table Summary - Refusal of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel to Provide Clerk’s Certifications of the Court's Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86181102/
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 10 12-03-21 FOIA Requests on the Administration of Court and Their Dispositions s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86181226/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)