09-11-25 - Requesting Sullivan Workman & Dee full refund of any moneys paid for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

- - -- - ---- -- - - - - -- - -- - -

Charles D. Cummings, Partner

Gary A. Kovacic, Partner

Karyn A. McCreary, Partner

D. Daniel Pranata, Partner

Roger M. Sullivan, Of Counsel

Henry K. Workman, Of Counsel

Thomas E. O'Sullivan, Of Counsel

SULLIVAN, WORKMAN, & DEE, LLP

Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:51:11 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Request for full refund within 10 days of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)

Charles D. Cummings Partner
Gary A. Kovacic Partner
Karyn A. McCreary Partner
D. Daniel Pranata Partner
Roger M. Sullivan Of Counsel
Henry K. Workman Of Counsel
Thomas E. O'Sullivan Of Counsel

Sullivan, Workman, and Dee, LLP
By email
By Fax: (213) 627-7128

RE: Request for full refund of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

Dear Attys Cummings, Kovacic, Parnata, Sullivan, Workman, O'Sullivan, and Sullivan, Workman, and Dee, LLP:

In reviewing Samaan v Zernik, I must come to the conclusion that Atty Cummings, was aware all along that the whole litigation was fraud and none of the records were valid and effectual. However, even after I raised such concerns with him, in December 2006, he led me to believe that there was no substance to my concerns. Surely, he never warned me that my concerns were true and valid, and never filed cross complaints for Fraud and Deceit.

In December 2006 - January 2007 I also raised my concerns with Mr Workman and others in your law-firm.

I therefore request that you review your books, and send me within 10 days, a full refund for any funds that were paid for legal services related to samaan v zernik. My mailing address: PO Box 526, La Verne, Ca 91750.

After reviewing the matter with a number of Los Angeles attorneys, and with fraud experts. I would also like to know if Mr Cummings would be willing to provide an affidavit regarding his experience in this case. The matter was of the highest public policy significance today, with the ongoing false imprisonment of Atty Richard Fine, since March 4, 2009, in solitary confinement, using the same fraud methods in Marina v LA County (BS109420) that were used in Samaan v Zernik, Similarly, ongoing litigation in Sturgeon v LA County, (BC351286), where the prospect of any integrity in the justice system in LA County was on the line, showed use of the same fraud methods as well.

Conduct of such fraud litigations in the LA County Justice system was deemed a direct extension of the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000), with Jacqueline Connor - the central figure in corruption of both civil and criminal courts. It was also likely to be deemed as severe violation of the Human Rights, pursuant to ratified International Law, of all 10 million residents of LA County, upon review by competent International Human Rights Courts of Jurisdiction..

Dated November 25, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se