09-11-21 Minimal outcomes from LA public perspective

Minimal outcomes for Los Angeles County, from the public perspective, under the current circumstances must include:

- - - - - -

Jacqueline Connor- - - - - - - - - - - - - David Yaffe- - - - - - - - - - - -Charles McCoy- - - - - - - - John Clarke

- -

1) Freeing Richard Fine from False Imprisonment

2) Restoring Public Access to Public Records in LA County, in particular - Sustain records, and criminal litigation records in the respective case management system.

3) Creating reasonable conditions for credible, non-profit, public organizations to speedily process habeas corpus petitions for judicial review and Freeing the Rampart FIPs based on review of such records.

4) Holding Accountable Individuals, Law Firms, Corporations, following investigation and prosecution if appropriate:

- - - - a) Removing Judges from the Bench

- - - - b) Removing the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Court from their offices

- - - - c) Conducting and publishing a Comprehensive Financial Audit of the LA Superior Court

- - - -d) Measures against Bank of America Corporation, and its Countrywide subsidiary

- - - -e) Holding large law firms, and their attorneys accountable -

- - - - - Bryan Cave, LLP, and Sheppard Mullin

- - - -f) Holding small law firms, and their attorneys accountable, such as -

- - - -- Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton; Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham

- - - -

- - - -g) Initiating a Training Program for Clerks, about their duties and liabilities

- - - -h) Initiating a Training Program for Judges, about their duties and liabilities in re: Sham Court Actions.

- - - -i) Initiating a Training Program for Police, about putting an end to support of corruption.

5) Creating a Model System for Public Accountability in Validation (logic verification) of Sustain

- which could serve as a national model system - there is not one CMS that was validated in the whole U.S.

6) Applying special consideration in placement of senior FBI and USAO officers in LA

- in currently vacant senior positions:

- - - -a) Candidates from other areas should be preferred.

- - - -b) Appointment letter should include special mandates and duties in re:

- - - -- Integrity of the justice system as highest priority

Mohammad Keshavarzi David Pasternak Sandor Samuels Kevin McCormick JOhn Amberg, Jenne Moldawsky

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-21 Why investigating this matter should be easy- Or - Heuristics work...

Investigation of this case should be easy, because the data is computrized... The issue would only be how far to go, and my suggestion would be to limit its scope, while allowing the public full access to public records, as provided by law.. Let the public do the rest of the job. It is an essential part of the lesson from this case.

The public must keep an eye on the public records at all times...

A. Some examples of my employment of heuristics on public records in the past:

1) Filing the Request to File as Party in Interest at the 9th Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, protesting in advance the future sham court action that was an unsigned invalid, ineffectual, false and misleading court order by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, and Circuit Judges Richard Tallman, Richard Paez, in Fine v Sheriff (09 )

2) Notice sent to Eric Sheptock, a homeless guy in Washington DC, regarding corruption of his case in U.S. District Court there, in Sheptock v Fenty et al. I knew practically nothing about the case to start out, I was just experimenting with heuristics, to see how effective they would be i scanning large numbers of cases. In that instance - in the U.S.District Court in Washington DC.

3) Once you got some initial hooks through such scans, you easily found other, at times more interesting cases, which were related - the case of Scooter Libby, for example, arising out of Plame v Cheney.

4) Notice provided to Steven Schaffer in re: Schaffer v Hartford Life (5:08-CV-01184) at the U.S. Court, Central District of California

B. Some examples of heuristics that could be utilized in investigating the LA Superior Court:

1) Search for cases with multiple judges involved:

• Most of these cases involved much larger number of judges than in a normal case.
• It may serve to produce deniabilities, lame as they may be.
• More likely- the large number of judges involved deter the USAO or FBI from taking any action.
• E.g. Michael Wilner, LA USAO - "You named too many names..." - as if it were my fault that this was a racket, and not a mom n pop operation as part of a cottage industry...

2) Search for cases that were much longer than average.

3) Non computerized quick heuristic: Search in the Clerk's office for volumes that were much thicker than average

• In Samaan v Zernik the clerk's office created the "Volume IV Continued", over 700 pages, compared to other volumes, which were around 200 pages - again - statistically a class of its own. It served to hide the "Non -Party" Countrywide/Bank of America Corporation papers. When I caught the hoax (October 2007?), the clerk was deeply embarrassed, and in way of apology, he mumbled - "This is not the only one, we have quite a few of them around here." I therefore suggest a heuristic for investigators: To save time and money, just quickly scan the clerk's office for any volumes that were much thicker than the average, they may be at higher likelihood significant to the investigations.

Linked Records

1) Message to Eric Sheptock

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2009/06/message-to-eric-sheptock-homeless-in.html

09-11-21 Greetings to brothers in spririt... Barbados Underground - documeting corruption in the courts over there...

http://bajan.files.wordpress.com/

About Us

The recent attack on the Press in Barbados by the government prompted this husband and wife team who lives in Barbados to start the Barbados Underground (BU). We hope that by resorting to the Wide World Web our views would not be affected by the censorship, similar to what the media in Barbados is currently experiencing. Both of us are approaching retirement soon, and hopefully this project will evolve in the Bajan landscape to assist in the dissemination of relevant information.

If you have information which you would want us to consider publishing, please email us at:

barbadosunderground@gmail.com

______________________

Recent Posting:

Medical Doctor Complicit In Torture Of 14 year-old by Guyana Police Disgraced His Profession, Should Be Prosecuted And Barred From Practicing Medicine

November 19, 2009 · 7 Comments

Email note:

Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:11:19 -0800
To: barbadosunderground@gmail.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Greetings to brothers in spirit...

I came across you blog by chance, googling for images to illustrate the phrase: Not nuff guddah... :)
Be strong, and keep it going... Please check out my blog - committed to documenting the infamous LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Claims to infamy include, but are not limited to:
1) The Rampart scandal (1998-2000), where over 10,000 people were recorded as falsely convicted and falsely sentenced to long prison terms, Hardly any of them was released a decade later. They are almost exclusively black and latinos. It is a Human Rights disaster of historic proportions, and should be advertised world-wide.
2) At present, we have Atty Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, anti corruption activist, falsely imprisoned in solitary confinement since March 4, 2009, with no Warrant, with no Sentencing or Judgment, and from litigation with no Docket.
Spreading the word would be appreciated.
References:
1) Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf
2) Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf
3) One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000 by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-first-trial-01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf
4) Full Disclosure Network video of a phone call request for assistance by Att Richard I Fine from jail
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/

Joseph Zernik, DMD PhD , Fax: (801) 998-0917;

09-11-21 In a community of criminals you lend a hand...

Not nuf guddah...

One thing that must strike anybody studying these cases, be it Samaan v Zernik, Galdjie v Darwish, Sturgeon v LA County, or Marina v LA County, is that the number of people that were involved, was so large that there couldn't possibly be sufficient money in profiteering in any of these cases to go around... And while each case must be examined on its own merits, as a general rule, one must conclude:

In a community of criminals you lend a hand, out of the goodness of your heart, when you see a crime scheme under way...

Just like raising a barn, in colonial times - it was a community affair...

Attorneys:

• Some of the participants benefited no matter what, the longer that it was protracted - attorneys, who were billing by the hour, by the 15, 10, or 6 minute increments... But even so, they could not be all considered in the same basket

Classes:

• Sheppard Mullin, Bryan Cave, LLP, Day Jones must be deemed a class of their own - law firms that were large, or very large, and were deeply involved in criminalities.
• Some small offices,that appeared specialized in criminalities - Pasternak, Pasternak, Patton, and Joshua L Rosen.

Bryan Cave, LLP -

• I forwarded routinely notices to the St Louis home base of Bryan Cave, LLP, to make sure that they were fully aware of what was taking place in LA, under Office Managing Partner Jeff Modisett, former State of Indiana Attorney General, White Collar Crime Expert.
• In one of the times, I was informed that the matter was reviewed by the central Risk Reduction Committee of Bryan Cave, LLP.
• There is no way that the predicated acts of racketeering escaped their attention:
• Numerous appearances over 2.5 years:
• "Non-Party" false self designation;
• Shifting designations by court;
• Being deliberately unauthorized to appear by the client;
• Most likely also with a "no communication with client" clause - as detailed in Texas by Judge Jeff Bohm;
• Engaging in obstructionist enforcement of a fictitious, non-existent Protective/Restraining Order;
• Generating false,void, not voidable Judgments of Contempt,
• Generating false, void, not voidable Serious Sanctions, exceeding $30,000.
• Gemeratomg Threats of Jailing.
• Monetary transactions with Atty David Pasternak - which must be deemed Money Laundering.
• Therefore, since the appearances continued, one must conclude that the Risk Reduction Committee concluded that the risk was low, or insignificant of engaging in such conduct in the LA court.
• I fully agree with their assessment - it appeared as business as usual for all involved.
• Anecdotal details for color:
• - Jeff Modisett LA Office Manager, former State of Indiana Attorney General, White Collar Crime Expert, was quoted in an interview as stating:
• - John Amberg, the senior attorney assigned to the case, was former Chair, Ethics and Professional Responsibilities Committee, LA County Bar Association.
• - Jenna Moldawsky - a novice, was assigned to the case almost straight out of Law School, UCLA

Sheppard Mullin

Mohammad Keshavarzi

Day Jones

Rhonda Walker

Ezer

Joshua L Rosen

Kevin McCormick

Sullivan Workman and Dee

Zachary Schorr

• Some were probably motivated by greed, others by fear.
• It was clear that Judge Jacqueline Connor was known for intimidating and threatening attorneys to coerce their cooperation against clients.
• It was clear that the LA judges operated as a group, and were advertised as retaliatory, as seen in the cases of Steve Yagman and Richard Fine.
• For that reason, I should not list here the few attorney who stood out in their conduct that was brave and honest.
• The corruption of the legal profession was deep in Los Angeles County, and entirely distorted the practice of law.
• Anecdotal details for color:
• - Mohammad Keshavarzi, an Associate at Sheppard Mullin, was no doubt acting out of enthusiastic conviction and commitment to the creed.
• - Charles Cummings, Managing Partner at Sullivan Workman & Dee, my first attorney, colluded with Judge Connor, but was coerced I believe.
• - In one of the first communications in November 2006, Atty Keshavarzi sent me an email, copied to Atty Cummings, reprimanding me for interfering in his excellent working relationship with Atty Cummings. Such comment was facetious, but also condescending coming from a young associate to a managing partner in a well established law firm.
• - In my first or second note to Atty Keshavarzi, in November 2006, clueless as I was, I stated that after reeading his papers for the first time, I realized that I had had no idea how crafty he was. He responded - I take that as a compliment.

Judges

• Large number of judges seem to be routinely involved in such cases.
• I surely do not have the data regarding fund transfers - if any. However, it is easy to make some logical inferences.
• It was the judges who held the ultimate control for the conduct of these cases
• These cases tended to drag much longer than the average.
• Therefore, it was likely that the judges as well, benefited from protracting the cases as long as possible.
• For that to happen, the most likely way that such benefits would be conferred is through the attorneys in the case.
• Not all judges could be viewed as falling in the same basket: Judge Jacqueline Connor was a class of her own
• What was striking was the number of judges that eagerly jumped to pitch in.
• Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, whom I saw on December 7, 2007, for about 2 hours total, on one day, most of it just waiting, managed in that short time period to engage in numerous acts of willful misconduct, eagerly.
• Judge Patricia Collins, whom I saw the same morning for about an hour, engaged in extreme abuse of the law and her office, with total indifference. The only thing she cared about was not being late for lunch.
• Some 10-12 judges were involved in my case, only one refused to collude - Joseph Biderman.
• Given that ratio of 10:1, and the fact that both Supervising and Presiding Judges were involved, I differ with the laudable Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) , which described in LA County justice system "a sub-cult of criminality tolerated in the ranks."
• In 2006 it was already "a dominant cult of criminality."

Clerks

• A large number of clerks were involved in these cases. From the lowest level clerks in the public intake room, like Bryan, who was instructed to hide from me the "Volume IV Continued" in Samaan v Zernik where the "Non -Party" Countrywide/Bank of America Corporation papers were hidden, and all they way up, to Clerk of the Court John Clarke.
• They cannot be all clustered as one group.
• John Clarke must be deemed a Central Figure in the LA-JR, and must be separately investigated to figure out hie role and benefits.
• The lowest level Clerk Office staff, probably had to collude, just to keep their jobs, or be promoted.

Barn Raising Square -

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

08-11-21 Judge Friedman - Kindly request - no racketeering during business hours....

Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0800
To: "Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge " , "John A Clarke" , "Greg Drapac -Senior Administrator"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kindly request to prevent the conduct of racketeering activity on the grounds of the court during business hours, under the disguise of litigation.

Nov 20, 2009

Charles McCoy
Presiding Judge


John Clarke
Clerk of the Court

Greg Drapac
Senior Administrator

RE: Kindly Request to prevent the conduct of racketeering activity on the grounds of the court during business hours, under the disguise of litigation.

Dear Presiding Judge McCoy, Clerk Clarke, and Senior Administrator Drapac:

Please remove from the online Case Summary the listing of any additional "Proceeding" in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400). It never was and never will be a true litigation of the Superior Court of California. None of you was willing to state that much either.

Joseph Zernik

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 The two fundamental Rules of Court re: Sham Court Actions

In reviewing the patterns of propagation of sham court actions, one notes the basic "Rules of Court":

1) Sham Court Action begets Sham Court Action.

2) An honest order or judgment of the court may be overturned in an appeal. A crooked one - Never!

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Crooked Houses

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 Sham Court Actions of the LA-JR at the LA Superior Court

The litigation in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) could not possibly be a matter of the Superior Court of California...

Just like Marina v LA County (BS109420) the litigation in which Richard Fine was purportedly arrested.

Also like Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286)

However, the true poster girl is Barbara Darwish. In Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737). She was dragged for 8 years in the courts (1998-2006), including two (2) Judgments, (3) Appeals, two of the appeals were denied, and one was dropped. There is no way to explain these appeals (B191327, B179667, B163970) and judgments in the framework of the law. The first Judgment was dated May 9, 2002. Ms Darwish came to the Santa Monica Courthouse, as noticed, but was then deceived to proceed to the Culver City Municipal Court, where a "Bench Trial" was conducted that afternoon, to take her Santa Monica 6-unit rental property. The person who presided in the deviant proceeding remained anonymous in the Register of Actions - listed only as "Muni Judge". However, I located Ms Darwish this year, and she provided me with a declaration under penalty of perjury that it was Judge John Segal. I sometimes cannot avoid entertaining the thought that it was his induction ceremony to the LA-JR. Today he is a judge in the Superior Court. He in turn, appointed, with no authority at all, Att David Pasternak as "Receiver" to execute the judgment. From such a case, and such judgment, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, took an Appeal, and generated a published opinion! Of interest - even when I met her, Ms Darwish never suspected the fraud by the judges (mulitiple judges were involved). She thought that it was her mistake - of not spending more money on attorneys upfront!

In short: The claim is that the distinction of the LA County as " the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud" is the product of the collusion between the LA Superior Court, which perpetrates many or most of these frauds, and the FBI which refuses to investigate them.[1] As evidence let me mention that in a visit to the Office of Registrar/Recorder, and by running a simple search on the name of David Pasternak, I retrieved dozens of grant deeds that would qualify as fraud, and were executed by him for the courts. However, no grant deed at all was found for the Darwish property - a fraud in its own sake.

Linked Record:

1.http://inproperinla.com/08-08-21-refusal-to-investigate-fbi-wedick-letter-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 Rampart scandal - through the looking-glass.

- - - - - - - -- - - - -

[wikipedia]
Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1871) is a work of children's literature by Lewis Carroll (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson), generally categorized asliterary nonsense.[citation needed] It is the sequel to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865). Although it makes no reference to the events in the earlier book, the themes and settings of Through the Looking-Glass make it a kind of mirror image of Wonderland: the first book begins outdoors, in the warm month of May, (May 4),[1] uses frequent changes in size as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of playing cards; the second opens indoors on a snowy, wintry night exactly six months later, on November 4 (the day beforeGuy Fawkes Night),[2] uses frequent changes in time and spatial directions as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of chess. In it, there are many mirror themes, including opposites, time running backwards, and so on.

Jacqueline Connor

Central Figure in both affairs.

Extension:

• One way to show the direct extension- Judge Jacqueline Connor is again in the center of a racketeering scandal.
• This time, like last time, there are issues of the courts and police.
• In the original Rampart scandal it was claimed that police was corrupt, and the judges, like Judge Connor - were "duped".
• In this case, there were no police in the court room.

Mirror Image

• This case showed that the true criminal initiaive originated from the court - Judge Jacqueline Connor.
• Police were just playing assist, but very fastidiously

Sheriff Department:

• I take it back- there were Sheriff Deputies... after the first time I appeared in court, in January 2007, armed sheriff's were escorting me anywhere in the court, they would wait outside the men's room. I was told that Judge Connor issued the order. However, I was impressed by the honesty and openness of the sheriff deputies. After a few weeks they told me it was nonsense, and they told me also that it never happened as far back as they could remember (one said 14 years).
• In one case I was escorted by an armed sheriff with a German Sheppard.
• When I asked the court for access to inspect and to copy the order - I was not allowed... secret orders.
• It went on for about a year.
• I knew it was all fraud, and never cooperated. Therefore at the end - they had to use threat of force - unlawful but credible - Judge John Segal issued for Atty David Pasternak a false order to have the sheriff evict me from my own home. It was invalid, but I knew that they could have the sheriff act on it... That is exactly the story of Richard Fine.

Police

• I believe that my case was the exception, and Barbara Darwish was more of the standard, she was deceived for 8 years in the courts, (1998-2006), but when I met her in February 2009, she never suspected the judges. She knew that Plaintiff was engaged in real estate fraud on her, and likewise his attorney - Richard Green - Green and Marker - but she thought that her mistake was that she did not put more money into attorneys upfront. I figured out the fraud more or less in full a year before it was consummated, but Beverly Hills Police was involved in the scheme, and already then they were working hard to make sure that the crimianls would be successful. They would not allow me to file a complaint, no matter what .
• I finally came late at night on the weekend, and filed the complaint.
• When that detectives came back on Monday, they were outraged, they treated me as if I were a criminal... while in fact they were.
• I insisted on engaging them in thorough review, including Michaela- since retired. They refused to accept it as a crime compaint, and isisted that it was only a Business Dispute.
• Steve Seeger- Detective, and David Snowdon - Chief - were distinctive in their corruption.
• At that time I still did not have Fraud Expert letters. But the fraud was obvious. Only Beverly Hills Police could not see it. So what if the signatures were forged... Let's see, would you say it is a crime if you sign for your wife a check at the garage?
• Here it was financial and banking records, and no spousal relationship involved at all...
• One I got the fraud expert letters - Detective Steve Seeger just sent a letter that they have not changed heir position.
• The fraud expert, was a veteran FBI agent- possibly the most decorated alive, and he recommended "immediate investigation" - not in Beverly Hills.

La Verne

• In the last couple of months, I was trying to file a crime report against David Pasternak in La Verne.
• The jury is still out. I got a crime report, but it could look better.

Banking Regulators:

• My case was more complex than the Barbara Darwish case, since Countrywide was involved. However, that gave me the opportunity to seek Equal Protection through a variety of other law enforcement agencies, which are at the center of attention today. In a way i conducted an anonymous survey of the U.S Banking Regulation system...
• Trade Commision - is probably the most corrupt.
• Thrift Supervision - lags behind
• I issued Freedom of Informatin Act requests on these two agencies in 2007 - I could never retrieve my own complaints from a few months earlier. There were a couple of letters that indicated that there was a complaint.
• The standard procedure was probably to destroy complaints against Countrywide.
• SEC - similar- but more sophisticated.
• Countrywide, and later - Bank of America Corporation have been engaged in racketeering at the LA Superior Court for 2.5 years. It continues to this date - under the supervision of Sandor Samuels - through false appearances by Bryan Cave, LLP.
• The U.S. Government is trying to tell the world that Banking Regulation now works... Not really... Bank of America can continue racketeering in broad day light in the court , calling itself Pinocchio, or whatever, no banking regulator would do anything against Bank of America.
• My theory is that Bank of America inherited from Countrywide following the merger the Implied Judicial Immunity. That is what you get when you collude in racketeering with the Judiciary.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 California Court of Appeals, 2nd District

WELCOME TO THE
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

___________________________________________________________________

These pages are written as drats, would be cleaned up at a later time.

The role of the court of Appeals, 2nd District is multi faceted. Not only did it permit the perversion of the law and the conversion of the LA Superior Court into a racket. It also generated the long term infrastructure:

1. Filipescu v. California Housing Finance Agency (App. 2 Dist. 1995) it accepted as legitimate the fact that the LA County eliminated the Book of Judgments, which was the fundamental enabling cause that allowed the LA-JR in its current manifestation.
2. In the published opinion from Darwish, the court opened the way for a wide range of new real estate frauds. It accepted as reasonable "oral modifications of a written real estate contract:". The full impact of that was not yet realized....
3. In a series of other decisions over two decades, the court took what was an essential clear and unambiguous due process procedure - Notice of Entry of Judgment, and entirely ambiguated it, to pervert due process.

The conduct of the court in particular instances, was on the same level as Judge Jacqueline Connor:

1. The Court of Appeal, 2nd District, has double books, as is the standard now... the "docket" that they present online, and an entrely different program in-house.
2. The court of appeals 2nd District keeps inhouse terminals of Sustain - from the LA superior Court, and that way accepts in fact filing that was never noticed to the litigant.. moreover - court records that they never saw, and which are often the opposite of what they thought they saw.
3. The docket does not even have a field for noting the Date of Entry of Judgment - possibly the single most important piece of data in an appeal.
4. The conduct of the Court of Appeals in the case of Darwish cannot be explained within the real of the law, with two judgments, 3 appeasl, one published opinion, from a case that was a protracted criminal affair in its essence.
5. In my case, again- to cater to Sheppard Mullin, the court of Appeal, 2nd District, took an appeal from NOTHING. No order or judgment was listed as the basis for the appeal. But it passed review of the Pre docket, and was listed in the docket of that court. They had no credibility as a court at all.
6. In a series of small motions in my case it was clearly demonstrated that the court of appeals was dishonest, and I dropped my appeal: They refused to list the parties to the appeal, even after motion for reconsideration. The reason was obvious - to mislead, so that you do not write any claims in your brief against parties that were not listed. But immediately after I dropped my appeal - the listed them all. i have of course time stamped printouts before and after.
7. They tried to coerce me to engage in an appeal from a Judgment that was not entered.
8. They tried to engage me in appeal from an order that was fraud - They issued an order that stated: Defendant's true remedy is in appeal from the order appointing receiver. That order was and is fraud on its face.
9. The Court of Appeals, Second District allowed the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file as Record on Appeal, the online case summary, which the court defines as "not a court record" in lieu of Register of Actions, which is likely to be standard procedure. After I filed an objection, the Court of Appeal did not rule on my objection, instead, they issued an order to the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to withdraw his filing, and then they issued a ruling of "Moot" on my objection. Furthermore, they never asked the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file the true Register of Actions. When I filed it, with a request for judicial notice - they denied the request.

In short - they are an essential part of the criminal network.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-110-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20-terry friedman

09-11-20 lisa hart-cole

09-11-20-patricia collins

09-11-20 judge rosenberg

09-11-20 judge rosenberg

09-11-20-reserved Judge Rosenberg

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 -Judge John Segal the week of Oct 15-19, 2007

JOHN SEGAL

Judge, LA Superior Court.

Racketeering under the guise of court litigation was alleged.In Galdjie v Darwish, he ran a purported bench-trial in a real estate matter, on Defendant who was misled to appear in the Culver City Municipal Court for a purported case of the Superior Court of California.He remained anonymous in court records, listed only as -“Muni Judge.” was entered.

---

The week of Oct 15-19.
The week was overshadowed by the service, Monday, Oct 15, 2007, of filings on Judge John Segal.
These were not the typical filing per CCP 170.3, for immediate disqualification, such as served on Sept 10, 2007, on Judge Connor. Reminder: the filing on Judge Connor listed allegations amounting to: Fraud, Deceit, Adulteration of Court Records, Conspiracy, Dishonesty, Obstruction of Justice... etc. Combined, one may deem such as an allegation of Corruption of Office.

The filing on Judge Segal was titled as follows:
Notice to Judge Segal to Cease and Refrain from Acting as Presiding Judge in Samaan v Zernik Absent Due Assignment as Required by Law; Alternatively, If Such Assignment was Provided - Filing for the Purpose of Immediate Disqualification of the Honorable Judge Segal Pursuant to CCP 170.3, and Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in Support Thereof

The reason for the difference is that after Connor, neither Goodman, nor Biderman, nor Segal were duly assigned as Presiding Judges in Samaan v Zernik, as required by law. In two Ex Parte applications, on Oct 10 and Oct 11, 2007, Judge Segal was asked to correct this situation, which left him with no valid authority in Samaan v Zernik. On Oct 10, 2007, Judge Segal practically consented that he had no due assignment, but argued that it was unreasonable for me, Defendant, to expect him to get into a conflict with his supervisor, Judge Rosenberg, whose duty it was to issue such orders of assignment. On October 11, 2007, Judge Segal was more evasive, but in response to repeated questions if he received a Minute Order of Assignment he never responded with a "yes".

A person reviewing this case as a whole, may reasonably entertain the doubt, or even conclude, that such neglect to issue Assignment Orders, is part of a concerted effort not to allow any records documenting Connor's disqualification.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007, Judge Segal responded with an Order Striking Statement of Disqualification and Verified Answer of Judge John L Segal. This response does not at all address the question of the missing Assignment Order and the foundation for Judge Segal's authority. Neither does it address any of the specific examples of dishonesty and appearance of partiality that were listed in the filing. A person reviewing the case as a whole, is likely to entertain the doubt and also conclude that Judge Segal's response was dishonest.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Goodman

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Goodman

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-18 The photography of Lisa Kereszi - an array of sleazy, yet curious Americana

--- ----- --- ----- --- ------- --- -------

--- --- --Red--- --- ----- --- ------- --- ------- -Lisa Kereszi and Vik----- --- -------Racetrack----- --- ------- --- --

------- --- ---------------- --- --------- --- -------- --- ----

--- --- ----- --- ----- --- ------- --- ------- ------ --- ------- --- ------ ---