09-11-23 Requests filed with Insepector General U.S. DOJ- Glenn A Fine.

Glenn Fine

Inspector General

U.S. DOJ

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:33:22 -0800
To: Chinese Embassy
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attention: His Excellency Ambassador of the People's Republic of China
Matter pertains to failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties in re; Banking Regulation and reckless conduct relative to failure to safeguard the stability of financial markets.
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph Zernik
_____________________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:02:08 -0800
To: joseph zernik
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions
Bcc: LIST Law Faculty

____________________________________
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:46:35 -0800
To: "Attention J van Cornewal-Harlaar", "Attention Mr Stefan Walter and Standards implementation-Mr Jos Mara Roldn, Validation Subgroup-Mr Maarten Gelderman, The Operational Risk Subgroup-Mr Kevin Bailey, Deputy Comptroller, Accounting Task Force-Ms Sylvie Mathrat"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions
Attention: Basel Committee
Matter pertains to failure of U.S. Government to perform its duties as a good faith signer of the Accords.
Joseph Zernik
__________________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:51:09 -0800
To: "U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attention: High Commissioner for Human Rights
Matter pertains to failure of U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law.
Joseph Zernik

______________________________
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:36:49 -0800
To: Prof Richard Posner, Univ of Chicago Law School
From: joseph zernik
Subject: FYI: Copy of letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine to reliably inform you of the issues.
November 23, 2009
Dear Prof Posner:
Attached and within is a copy of letter to IG-DOJ regarding judicial corruption, to reliably inform you in this matter.
Thanks,
Joseph Zernik
______________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:44:17 -0800
To: Office of Inspector General US Dept of Justice
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attached is a digitally signed copy.jz
_____________________________________________________________________

Dr Z
Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhD
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801.998.0917; E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

09-11-23 Request for urgent actions by IG-DOJ Glenn A Fine.

ATTY GLENN A FINE
Inspector General
Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530
By Certified Mail
By Email:
<List U.S. iG-DOJ>
By fax:

In the second request your immediate actions are requested. Response regarding your intent to take any actions regarding any of the requests below is kindly requested by December 4, 2009.

Dear Atty Fine:

I, Dr Joseph Zernik, write to request your actions regarding my case and the conduct of the U.S. Department of Justice in this regard. I was forced to leave my residence, my property, which was taken for private use with no compensation at all, in conjunction with fraud by the court, as opined by a decorated, veteran FBI agent. [i],[ii] It also involved fraud, as opined by yet another fraud expert by Countrywide Financial Corporation,[iii] and in the past year and a half - Bank of America Corporation. I was trapped in this scheme since 2004. Local FBI and USAO for the past three years, have denied my Human Rights for Equal Protection and to Own Property.[iv] Senior officers of FBI and US Department of Justice provided false and deliberately misleading responses to U.S. Congress in my case last year.[v]

I write to you to request that you free Atty Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, who was held in solitary confinement in LA for over 7 months, with no warrant, with no sentencing/judgment, from litigation at the LA Superior Court - with no Register of Actions (California docket). His Human Right for Liberty was denied.[vi], [vii] The pattern of false court records in all these cases was similar, and was considered the Finger Prints of the LA-JR (alleged LA-Judiciary Racket).

I also write to you regarding the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons). Over 10,000 of them, mostly blacks and latinos, who are still falsely imprisoned a decade after their innocence was documented. It was the principle evidence for the conduct of the LA-JR already a decade ago.[viii], [ix], [x] Their Human Rights for Liberty were denied.

I write on behalf of Ms Barbara Darwish, who was subjected over an 8 year period (1998-2006) to a real estate scheme by the courts that was the prototype of the scheme perpetrated on me. In May 2002 she appeared for trial at the LA Superior Court, but was deceived to proceed to the Municipal Court in Culver City, where a bench trial was conducted on her by an anonymous - listed only as Muni Judge in the records to take her 6-unit Santa Monica rental property. [xi], [xii], [xiii] Her Human Rights to Own Property and for a Fair and Impartial Hearing were denied.

I write to you to today on behalf of all 10 million residents of the County of Los Angeles, California, whose prospects for any honest court services in the future were on the line in false court action underway, where you could not even tell who was a judge, and who was a referee. [xiv] Their Human Rights were denied - for Fair and Impartial Hearings.

I write to you today to request that you investigate, prosecute and take corrective actions regarding the failure of the U.S. Justice Department in the past decade to protect the Human Rights of the residents of Los Angeles County. In particular - the disintegration of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, documented in this letter, which was considered a direct extension of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000).

I request that you investigate the conduct of FBI and USAO during the past decade, which amounted to cover up of the scandal. I also request that you investigate the conduct of senior officers of the U.S. Department of Justice, surrounding false and deliberate responses, which they gave to the U.S. congress last year, after Congressional Inquiries on my behalf.[xv]

Conditions prevailing in Los Angeles County, California, were likely to be deemed serious failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law. Our Human Rights were denied for Liberty, to Own Property, for Public Access to Court Records, for Fair and Impartial Hearings, for National Tribunals to Protect our Human Rights, and for Equal Protection.[xvi]

Conditions described in this letter were also likely to be deemed serous failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to International Banking Accords that it claimed to be good faith party to.[xvii]

In short I am asking that you investigate the conduct of the U.S. Department of Justice:

1) Relative to the LA-JR alleged LAJudiciary Racket. The evidence is incontrovertible, and neither the local FBI, nor local USAO, nor the senior officers of U.S. Department of Justice ever denied my assertion of conduct of such enterprise in the Los Angeles County courts.

2) Relative to cover up and deception on the American People by the U.S. Department of Justice - of the criminality that underlies the sub-prime crisis, and with it the refusal to investigate my complaints on the matter since January 2007, and denial of my rights to access the courts in Qui Tam False Claims Act complaints, both at the U.S. District Court, LA and the U.S. District court Washington DC.[xviii]

In the second request your immediate actions are requested. Response regarding your intent to take any actions regarding any of the requests below is kindly requested by December 4, 2009.

Specific requests are kindly submitted to you: [Redacted]

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-23 Atty David Pasternak's notice that a "hearing" that was never "on calendar" is now "off caldendar".

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:10 -0800
To: "David J. Pasternak"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.

November 23, 2009
Mr Pasternak:
Thank you for your response. Calling it a "hearing" is additional evidence of wire fraud by you. There is nothing of a valid, effectual court actions in your conduct. It was fraud from A to Z, and I warned you of that in advance.
Joseph Zernik

At 02:55 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:

The hearing scheduled for Nov. 25 is off calendar.

From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:48 PM
To: Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge ; John A Clarke; Greg Drapac -Senior Administrator; David J. Pasternak
Subject: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.


Atty David Pasternak


Charles McCoy
Presiding Judge
12136177176@efaxsend.com

John Clarke
Clerk of the Court
12136217952@efaxsend.com

Greg Drapac
Senior Administrator
12136258536@efaxsend.com

RE: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.

Dear Atty David Pasternak, Presiding Judge McCoy, Clerk Clarke, and Senior Administrator Drapac:

Please accept this notice as a kindly request to ensure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.
Please remove from the online Case Summary the listing of any Future Proceeding on Wednesday, November 25, 2009, or any other "Proceeding" in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400). It never was and never will be a true litigation of the Superior Court of California. None of you was willing to state that much either, except for David Pasternak, and complaint is filed with FBI for mail and wire fraud for that reason.

Dated: November 22, 2009

Los Angeles County, California ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: (323) 515-4583
Fax:(801) 998-0917

CC: FBI Los Angeles


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4628 (20091122)

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4628 (20091122)

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-23 Letter to Prof Richard Posner, Univ of Chicago Law School

Prof Richard Posner

November 22, 2009

Dear Prof Posner:

RE: Kindly request to FBI - Complaint against Chief Judge, 9th Circuit, Alex Kozinski

I hoped that you would find at least some academic merit in this note, given your clerkship with the late Justice Brennan, who wrote:

"The basic principle of the Great Writ of habeas corpus is that, in a civilized society... if the imprisonment cannot be shown to conform with the fundamental requirements of law, the individual is entitled to his immediate release" . Fay v Noia 372 US 391 (1963) p399

Attorney Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, is held in solitary confinement in LA for over 7 months, with no warrant, with no sentencing/judgment, from litigation at the LA Superior Court - with no Register of Actions (California docket).
- -
In response to Ricahrd Fine's petition, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski served on Richard Fine and on me (as Party in Interest) a sham, false and deliberately misleading, unsigned court order denying the petition.

Under the watch of the 9th Circuit, we also have over 10,000 Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), almost exclusively Black and Latinos, documented a decade ago as falsely convicted and falsely sentenced to long prison terms - still never freed. It is a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions.

The case of Judge Kozinski, was in fact deemed as mail fraud, perversion of justice, and collusion with the LA-JR (alleged LA-Judiciary Racket). It was also a computer and internet fraud.

The case is not unique. The practice is structured in the implementation of PACER & CM/ECF - the dual systems of the U.S. courts, which replaced, with no authorization at all the traditional system of Proofs of Service, with automated response from the court's computer - the NEFs (notices of electronic filing). In principle, it could be a good idea, but the way it was implemented:
a) The NEFs were omitted from PACER - so that any person, who was not authorized for the particular court on CM/ECF, was denied access to critical court records that determined the validity and effect of court orders and judgments in any case. Two classes of persons were established in fact: (i)Those who were permitted to know which records were valid, and which ones were not, and (ii) Those who were deemed by the court unworthy of such knowledge.
b) It was never spelled out in FRCP or Criminal Procedures, neither in Rules of Court, it appeared in the various U.S. District Courts either in Manuals - with no legal effect, or in Standing Orders, themselves of dubious effect - you cannot view their NEFs either.
c) Judges and Clerks routinely posted in Pacer such orders and judgments, which were not deemed valid and effectual by the court itself. The posting of such records misled those who used Pacer to obtain such records.

Even an experienced attorney, like Richard Fine, in jail, did not catch the deceit:The only thing that at the end makes any court order valid, is the RSA string, that appears to most lay persons as nonsense, on the cover sheet of the order (NEF). The judges, on their part, feel that if they sent an invalid order (with no RSA string on the cover) then it could be anything they wanted. The recipient, on the other hand, believes that it is a real court order, and is left puzzled how the judges could make such gross error on the law...
In short - it is seen as a very large scale shell-game fraud.

Any response would be appreciated.

Respectfully,

Joe Zernik
P.S..
1) RE: YOUR NYT PIECE IN JUNE 2009 IN RE: BANKING REGULATION,
As seen here, it is not only banking regulators. The current crisis should be considered an "INTEGRITY CRISIS" - investors lost faith in the integrity of U.S. financial markets, U.S. regulators, and U.S. courts. The regulators can be seen as only following the example set by the conduct of U.S. Courts.

* The January 8, 2008 collapse of Countrywide (not by chance - LA based) was the outcome of publication in NYT of the "recreated letters" filed as evidence in Pittsburgh PA court, case of Borrower Hill (01-22574). It was not any news related to financial performance that undermined investor confidence.

* In March 5, 2008, Judge Jeff Bohm, case of Borrower Parsley (4-05-bk-90374), in Houston Texas, issued a 72 page Memorandum Opinion, describing fraud on the court in employment of outside counsel, who appeared while not counsel of record, with "no communications with client" clause in its engagement by Countrywide.

* In the same record also U.S. Trustee report is cited - of litigation practices of Countrywide across the country.
* In May 09 the visit of U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Beijing, as has become an annual ceremony in recent years - was aimed to obtain Chinese agreement to devalue the dollar. It was described as "difficult". Media reported that the Chinese were concerned regarding integrity of U.S. banking regulation...

* August 2009 The litigation of SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829) is yet another point in case. Throughout the litigation, which was supposed to demonstrate effective enforcement by SEC, the summons were never posted in Pacer. When I inquired with the clerk of the NYC U.S District court, he explained to me that their custom is not to post the summons. I pointed out that it was in direct opposition to FRCP and asked both the Clerk and counsel in the case to view the summons. Request was denied. To the best of my understanding (you cannot see any of the NEFs in Pacer, of course), none of the orders of Judge Jed Rakoff in this case was with a valid NEF.

* November 09 The litigation in US v UBS AG (09-Cr-60033) in Southern District of Florida is yet another case of this sort. Pretending to appear as enforcement by IRS on the Swiss banking institution, the records appears anything but that.

* November 09 in Los Angeles,California, Bank of America subsidiary Countrywide continues to this date the same practices in the Superior Court in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400).
- With support of the judges it has been employing Bryan Cave, LLP - not counsel of record - who has been appearing for 2.5 years, falsely designating Bank of America "Non Party". The court itself uses shifting designations by the date - "Defendant", "Plaintiff", "Cross-Defendant", "Intervenor", "Real Party in Interest", etc.
- Countrywide'Bank of America filed false banking records . http://inproperinla.com/09-04-17-list-of-six-key-records-for-bac-audit-committee-review-s.pdf
- Bank of America has refused to answer in any way, includign complaints to the Audit Committee, pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002)
* When protection of civil rights was sought at the U.S. district court - Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
- A false case number was issued, linking the case to an unrelated criminal litigation, and
- The court falsely refused to issue summons.
* When petition was filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cicuit, in re: Denial of Access to the Courts by refusal to issue summons - Zernik v US Dist Ct, LA (08-72714)
- The response was exactly the same as in the case of Richard Fine, verbatim, and
- The response was delivered in an unsigned order as well.,

* To this date, FBI could never find any reason to indict anybody in Countrywide,
* Countrywide legal department, headed by Sandor Samuels, was incorporated intact into Bank of America, with predictable results.

2) OTHER CRITIQUE OF THE DUAL SYSTEMS (PACER AND CM/ECF),
Can be found in my blog:http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
The manner in which the system is operated today, is considered the largest shell game fraud in the history of mankind:

Joe Zernik
_____________________________________________
Complaint filed November 21, 2009 with FBI LA against Chief Judge, 9th Circuit Alex Kozinski

Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:20:54 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kindly request to FBI - Complaint against Alex Kozinski
Cc:
____________________________________________
To: FBI Field Office, Los Angeles, California
Kindly Request: Please accept this notice as a complaint against Chief Judge Alex Kozinski for serving on falsely imprisoned Richard Fine and on me an unsigned July 30, 2009 Order in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) (Dkt #4), with no NEF - an invalid, ineffectual, false and deliberately misleading court record. He did so in disregard of my protest of such habits by judges (Dkt #2) in the very same docket.
Such mailing allegedly amounted to:

• Perversion of Justice
• Mail Fraud
• Willful Misconduct

Dated: November 21, 2009
Los Angeles County, California ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: (323) 515-4583
Fax:(801) 998-0917

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.