1) Demand to remove any reference to Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) from LA
Superior Court “Case Summaries” online;
2) Demand to ensure that no Deputy Clerk be present in purported Case Conference
on September 23, 2009, and
3) Demand that no Deputy Clerk enter any additional Minute Orders in John
Clarke’s name in Sustain under such caption.
September 2, 2009
John A Clarke
Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court
Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles
<>
<>
(by fax and by email)
Timely compliance with the law is demanded, no later than Friday, September 4, 2009, 5:00 pm
Mr Clarke:
I have recently noticed that the “Case Summaries”[1] of the LA Superior Court still carries
reference to matter of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), moreover, a “Case
Conference” is listed there as a “Future Proceeding” on September 23, 2009.[ 2,3]
You have continuously refused to certify the case as an Action of the Superior Court
of California, refused to certify Judge Terry Friedman as duly assigned Presiding
Judge (and there never was an Assignment Order on file either), and refused to
certify the August 9, 2007 Judgment as a Judgment of the Superior Court of
California.
Additional credible evidence demonstrated that such matter was never a valid
effectual action of the Superior Court of California. The Grant Deeds issued by Att
David Pasternak on behalf of the court, likewise, were opined by decorated FBI
veteran, fraud expert James Wedick as “fraud”.[ 4] Likewise, period reports issued by
Att David Pasternak are primary evidence of the alleged racketeering predicated
acts of monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity.[ 5]
There simply is no explanation within the realm of the law for the ongoing conduct of
the court and Att David Pasternak.
For lack of better term, I refer to Samaan v Zernik (SC087400), and other similar
cases, such as Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737), [6] as the “Enterprise Track” of the
LA Superior Court. Upon review by a competent court of jurisdiction, such cases
surely would be deemed racketeering pursuant to RICO - Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC §1961-8.
_____________________________
1 “Case Summaries” are published by the LA Superior Court with a disclaimer (see Footnote #2) stating that such are not court records, and should not be relied upon. In parallel, the LA Superior Court denies for the past quarter century public access to the Registers of Actions – which are public records by law (see Footnote #3). Therefore, the “Case Summaries”, which should not be relied upon, are the only non-record available to the public.
2 Copy of the case summary of Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) can be viewed at:
3 Denial of access to Registers of Actions, to inspect and to copy:
4 December 7, 2007, and December 17, 2007 Grant Deeds issued by Att David Pasternak, opined as “fraud” by decorated FBI veteran James Wedick:
5 June 22, 2009 - The latest report by Att David Pasternak:
6 The central role in Galdjie v Darwish of Judge John Segal, listed anonymously as “Muni Judge”, and Att David Pasternak, parallels their roles in Samaan v Zernik. Other common features of the two cases can be viewed at:
_____________________________________________
The complete letter can be viewed at:
