09-11-20 The two fundamental Rules of Court re: Sham Court Actions

In reviewing the patterns of propagation of sham court actions, one notes the basic "Rules of Court":

1) Sham Court Action begets Sham Court Action.

2) An honest order or judgment of the court may be overturned in an appeal. A crooked one - Never!

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Crooked Houses

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 Sham Court Actions of the LA-JR at the LA Superior Court

The litigation in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) could not possibly be a matter of the Superior Court of California...

Just like Marina v LA County (BS109420) the litigation in which Richard Fine was purportedly arrested.

Also like Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286)

However, the true poster girl is Barbara Darwish. In Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737). She was dragged for 8 years in the courts (1998-2006), including two (2) Judgments, (3) Appeals, two of the appeals were denied, and one was dropped. There is no way to explain these appeals (B191327, B179667, B163970) and judgments in the framework of the law. The first Judgment was dated May 9, 2002. Ms Darwish came to the Santa Monica Courthouse, as noticed, but was then deceived to proceed to the Culver City Municipal Court, where a "Bench Trial" was conducted that afternoon, to take her Santa Monica 6-unit rental property. The person who presided in the deviant proceeding remained anonymous in the Register of Actions - listed only as "Muni Judge". However, I located Ms Darwish this year, and she provided me with a declaration under penalty of perjury that it was Judge John Segal. I sometimes cannot avoid entertaining the thought that it was his induction ceremony to the LA-JR. Today he is a judge in the Superior Court. He in turn, appointed, with no authority at all, Att David Pasternak as "Receiver" to execute the judgment. From such a case, and such judgment, the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, took an Appeal, and generated a published opinion! Of interest - even when I met her, Ms Darwish never suspected the fraud by the judges (mulitiple judges were involved). She thought that it was her mistake - of not spending more money on attorneys upfront!

In short: The claim is that the distinction of the LA County as " the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud" is the product of the collusion between the LA Superior Court, which perpetrates many or most of these frauds, and the FBI which refuses to investigate them.[1] As evidence let me mention that in a visit to the Office of Registrar/Recorder, and by running a simple search on the name of David Pasternak, I retrieved dozens of grant deeds that would qualify as fraud, and were executed by him for the courts. However, no grant deed at all was found for the Darwish property - a fraud in its own sake.

Linked Record:

1.http://inproperinla.com/08-08-21-refusal-to-investigate-fbi-wedick-letter-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 Rampart scandal - through the looking-glass.

- - - - - - - -- - - - -

[wikipedia]
Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1871) is a work of children's literature by Lewis Carroll (Charles Lutwidge Dodgson), generally categorized asliterary nonsense.[citation needed] It is the sequel to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (1865). Although it makes no reference to the events in the earlier book, the themes and settings of Through the Looking-Glass make it a kind of mirror image of Wonderland: the first book begins outdoors, in the warm month of May, (May 4),[1] uses frequent changes in size as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of playing cards; the second opens indoors on a snowy, wintry night exactly six months later, on November 4 (the day beforeGuy Fawkes Night),[2] uses frequent changes in time and spatial directions as a plot device, and draws on the imagery of chess. In it, there are many mirror themes, including opposites, time running backwards, and so on.

Jacqueline Connor

Central Figure in both affairs.

Extension:

• One way to show the direct extension- Judge Jacqueline Connor is again in the center of a racketeering scandal.
• This time, like last time, there are issues of the courts and police.
• In the original Rampart scandal it was claimed that police was corrupt, and the judges, like Judge Connor - were "duped".
• In this case, there were no police in the court room.

Mirror Image

• This case showed that the true criminal initiaive originated from the court - Judge Jacqueline Connor.
• Police were just playing assist, but very fastidiously

Sheriff Department:

• I take it back- there were Sheriff Deputies... after the first time I appeared in court, in January 2007, armed sheriff's were escorting me anywhere in the court, they would wait outside the men's room. I was told that Judge Connor issued the order. However, I was impressed by the honesty and openness of the sheriff deputies. After a few weeks they told me it was nonsense, and they told me also that it never happened as far back as they could remember (one said 14 years).
• In one case I was escorted by an armed sheriff with a German Sheppard.
• When I asked the court for access to inspect and to copy the order - I was not allowed... secret orders.
• It went on for about a year.
• I knew it was all fraud, and never cooperated. Therefore at the end - they had to use threat of force - unlawful but credible - Judge John Segal issued for Atty David Pasternak a false order to have the sheriff evict me from my own home. It was invalid, but I knew that they could have the sheriff act on it... That is exactly the story of Richard Fine.

Police

• I believe that my case was the exception, and Barbara Darwish was more of the standard, she was deceived for 8 years in the courts, (1998-2006), but when I met her in February 2009, she never suspected the judges. She knew that Plaintiff was engaged in real estate fraud on her, and likewise his attorney - Richard Green - Green and Marker - but she thought that her mistake was that she did not put more money into attorneys upfront. I figured out the fraud more or less in full a year before it was consummated, but Beverly Hills Police was involved in the scheme, and already then they were working hard to make sure that the crimianls would be successful. They would not allow me to file a complaint, no matter what .
• I finally came late at night on the weekend, and filed the complaint.
• When that detectives came back on Monday, they were outraged, they treated me as if I were a criminal... while in fact they were.
• I insisted on engaging them in thorough review, including Michaela- since retired. They refused to accept it as a crime compaint, and isisted that it was only a Business Dispute.
• Steve Seeger- Detective, and David Snowdon - Chief - were distinctive in their corruption.
• At that time I still did not have Fraud Expert letters. But the fraud was obvious. Only Beverly Hills Police could not see it. So what if the signatures were forged... Let's see, would you say it is a crime if you sign for your wife a check at the garage?
• Here it was financial and banking records, and no spousal relationship involved at all...
• One I got the fraud expert letters - Detective Steve Seeger just sent a letter that they have not changed heir position.
• The fraud expert, was a veteran FBI agent- possibly the most decorated alive, and he recommended "immediate investigation" - not in Beverly Hills.

La Verne

• In the last couple of months, I was trying to file a crime report against David Pasternak in La Verne.
• The jury is still out. I got a crime report, but it could look better.

Banking Regulators:

• My case was more complex than the Barbara Darwish case, since Countrywide was involved. However, that gave me the opportunity to seek Equal Protection through a variety of other law enforcement agencies, which are at the center of attention today. In a way i conducted an anonymous survey of the U.S Banking Regulation system...
• Trade Commision - is probably the most corrupt.
• Thrift Supervision - lags behind
• I issued Freedom of Informatin Act requests on these two agencies in 2007 - I could never retrieve my own complaints from a few months earlier. There were a couple of letters that indicated that there was a complaint.
• The standard procedure was probably to destroy complaints against Countrywide.
• SEC - similar- but more sophisticated.
• Countrywide, and later - Bank of America Corporation have been engaged in racketeering at the LA Superior Court for 2.5 years. It continues to this date - under the supervision of Sandor Samuels - through false appearances by Bryan Cave, LLP.
• The U.S. Government is trying to tell the world that Banking Regulation now works... Not really... Bank of America can continue racketeering in broad day light in the court , calling itself Pinocchio, or whatever, no banking regulator would do anything against Bank of America.
• My theory is that Bank of America inherited from Countrywide following the merger the Implied Judicial Immunity. That is what you get when you collude in racketeering with the Judiciary.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 California Court of Appeals, 2nd District

WELCOME TO THE
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

___________________________________________________________________

These pages are written as drats, would be cleaned up at a later time.

The role of the court of Appeals, 2nd District is multi faceted. Not only did it permit the perversion of the law and the conversion of the LA Superior Court into a racket. It also generated the long term infrastructure:

1. Filipescu v. California Housing Finance Agency (App. 2 Dist. 1995) it accepted as legitimate the fact that the LA County eliminated the Book of Judgments, which was the fundamental enabling cause that allowed the LA-JR in its current manifestation.
2. In the published opinion from Darwish, the court opened the way for a wide range of new real estate frauds. It accepted as reasonable "oral modifications of a written real estate contract:". The full impact of that was not yet realized....
3. In a series of other decisions over two decades, the court took what was an essential clear and unambiguous due process procedure - Notice of Entry of Judgment, and entirely ambiguated it, to pervert due process.

The conduct of the court in particular instances, was on the same level as Judge Jacqueline Connor:

1. The Court of Appeal, 2nd District, has double books, as is the standard now... the "docket" that they present online, and an entrely different program in-house.
2. The court of appeals 2nd District keeps inhouse terminals of Sustain - from the LA superior Court, and that way accepts in fact filing that was never noticed to the litigant.. moreover - court records that they never saw, and which are often the opposite of what they thought they saw.
3. The docket does not even have a field for noting the Date of Entry of Judgment - possibly the single most important piece of data in an appeal.
4. The conduct of the Court of Appeals in the case of Darwish cannot be explained within the real of the law, with two judgments, 3 appeasl, one published opinion, from a case that was a protracted criminal affair in its essence.
5. In my case, again- to cater to Sheppard Mullin, the court of Appeal, 2nd District, took an appeal from NOTHING. No order or judgment was listed as the basis for the appeal. But it passed review of the Pre docket, and was listed in the docket of that court. They had no credibility as a court at all.
6. In a series of small motions in my case it was clearly demonstrated that the court of appeals was dishonest, and I dropped my appeal: They refused to list the parties to the appeal, even after motion for reconsideration. The reason was obvious - to mislead, so that you do not write any claims in your brief against parties that were not listed. But immediately after I dropped my appeal - the listed them all. i have of course time stamped printouts before and after.
7. They tried to coerce me to engage in an appeal from a Judgment that was not entered.
8. They tried to engage me in appeal from an order that was fraud - They issued an order that stated: Defendant's true remedy is in appeal from the order appointing receiver. That order was and is fraud on its face.
9. The Court of Appeals, Second District allowed the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file as Record on Appeal, the online case summary, which the court defines as "not a court record" in lieu of Register of Actions, which is likely to be standard procedure. After I filed an objection, the Court of Appeal did not rule on my objection, instead, they issued an order to the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to withdraw his filing, and then they issued a ruling of "Moot" on my objection. Furthermore, they never asked the Clerk of the LA Superior Court to file the true Register of Actions. When I filed it, with a request for judicial notice - they denied the request.

In short - they are an essential part of the criminal network.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-110-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20 terry friedman

09-11-20-terry friedman

09-11-20 lisa hart-cole

09-11-20-patricia collins

09-11-20 judge rosenberg

09-11-20 judge rosenberg

09-11-20-reserved Judge Rosenberg

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Segal

09-11-20 -Judge John Segal the week of Oct 15-19, 2007

JOHN SEGAL

Judge, LA Superior Court.

Racketeering under the guise of court litigation was alleged.In Galdjie v Darwish, he ran a purported bench-trial in a real estate matter, on Defendant who was misled to appear in the Culver City Municipal Court for a purported case of the Superior Court of California.He remained anonymous in court records, listed only as -“Muni Judge.” was entered.

---

The week of Oct 15-19.
The week was overshadowed by the service, Monday, Oct 15, 2007, of filings on Judge John Segal.
These were not the typical filing per CCP 170.3, for immediate disqualification, such as served on Sept 10, 2007, on Judge Connor. Reminder: the filing on Judge Connor listed allegations amounting to: Fraud, Deceit, Adulteration of Court Records, Conspiracy, Dishonesty, Obstruction of Justice... etc. Combined, one may deem such as an allegation of Corruption of Office.

The filing on Judge Segal was titled as follows:
Notice to Judge Segal to Cease and Refrain from Acting as Presiding Judge in Samaan v Zernik Absent Due Assignment as Required by Law; Alternatively, If Such Assignment was Provided - Filing for the Purpose of Immediate Disqualification of the Honorable Judge Segal Pursuant to CCP 170.3, and Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in Support Thereof

The reason for the difference is that after Connor, neither Goodman, nor Biderman, nor Segal were duly assigned as Presiding Judges in Samaan v Zernik, as required by law. In two Ex Parte applications, on Oct 10 and Oct 11, 2007, Judge Segal was asked to correct this situation, which left him with no valid authority in Samaan v Zernik. On Oct 10, 2007, Judge Segal practically consented that he had no due assignment, but argued that it was unreasonable for me, Defendant, to expect him to get into a conflict with his supervisor, Judge Rosenberg, whose duty it was to issue such orders of assignment. On October 11, 2007, Judge Segal was more evasive, but in response to repeated questions if he received a Minute Order of Assignment he never responded with a "yes".

A person reviewing this case as a whole, may reasonably entertain the doubt, or even conclude, that such neglect to issue Assignment Orders, is part of a concerted effort not to allow any records documenting Connor's disqualification.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007, Judge Segal responded with an Order Striking Statement of Disqualification and Verified Answer of Judge John L Segal. This response does not at all address the question of the missing Assignment Order and the foundation for Judge Segal's authority. Neither does it address any of the specific examples of dishonesty and appearance of partiality that were listed in the filing. A person reviewing the case as a whole, is likely to entertain the doubt and also conclude that Judge Segal's response was dishonest.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Goodman

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-20 resreved -Judge Goodman

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of

judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most

serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"

said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.