Request for peer review of Affidavit (Dkt #10) by Prof Joseph Grundfest in SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829)

Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:59:55 -0700
To: [list of Stanford Law Faculty- redacted; jhz]
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Request for peer review of Affidavit (Dkt #10) by Prof Joseph Grundfest in SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829)

__________________________________________

To: Stanford Law School Faculty, and faculty of other law schools.

From: Joseph Zernik

RE: Affidavit (Dkt #10) by Prof. Joseph Grundfest, Stanford Law School, in SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829)

Links are provided below for the Affidavit referenced above [1], and for a letter I wrote today to Prof Grundfest and to Counsel for SEC and BAC, requesting a re-write or a withdrawal of the affidavit. [2]

As his peers, I request your help in assessing the integrity, including, but not limited to Academic Integrity, of the Affidavit. Included in such request is the request for assessment of the integrity of filing such paper in proceedings where there is no publicly visible Summons and no publicly visible Assignment to a Judge, and with no party filer appearing on the face of the paper.

Needless to say, the proceedings in SEC v BAC pertain to matters that are critical for the economic future of the U.S.

I would be grateful for your response in this matter, no later than Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 5:00pm, so that I may incorporate it in my letter to the Honorable Jed Rakoff, U.S. Judge.

Joseph Zernik

________________________________________


[1] Affidavit of Prof Joseph Grundfest in SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-08-24-doc-10-affidavit-joseph-grundfest.pdf

[2] September 2, 2009 Letter to Prof Grundfest, counsel for SEC and BAC, requesting re-write or withdrawal of the Affidavit
http://inproperinla.com/09-09-02-zernik-to-counsel-sec-v-bac-grundfest-re-affidavit-s.pdf

Please support our petition:
CALLING UPON PRESIDENT OBAMA -
FREE THE 10,000 RAMPART-FIPs, FREE ATTORNEY RICHARD I FINE
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/restore-justice-in-l-a
References
1) Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf
2) Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf
3) One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000 by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-first-trial-01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf
4) Full Disclosure Network video of a phone call request for assistance by Att Richard I Fine from jail
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Joseph Zernik, DMD PhD , Fax: (801) 998-0917;