13-01-25 Rampant Injustice: US police state - out of control

The video is clearly marked as a reenactment, but it is still worth watching. jz

21:48

Rampant INjustice

by Rampant Injustice•2 months ago•234,261 views

For more information, go to: www.rampantinjustice.com

6:18

Rampant INjustice Promo

by Rampant Injustice•2 months ago•6,993 views

This the the 6 minute promo for the full documentary coming Wednesday, October 31, 2012. The full version will be available at...

13-01-24 Nother Benghazi: Kerry - no protests in Benghazi...

All that is left to hope for is that Benghazi would become the defining Hillary moment... jz

_____

John Kerry Throws President Obama, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton Under the Bus…Claims Intelligent Reports He Saw Show No Protests In Benghazi (Video)

January 24, 2013 by Scotty Starnes

So Kerry admits that they all lied?

Obama blamed the YouTube video:
Susan Rice blamed the YouTube video:

Hillary Clinton blamed the YouTube video and lied under oath by claiming she didn’t:

Share this:

13-01-25 Hello World!

Recent:

25/1 @ 01:49 : Mountain View, California, US

25/1 @ 01:21 : West Grove, Pennsylvania, US

25/1 @ 00:54 : Colombes, FR

25/1 @ 00:37 : Norwalk, California, US

24/1 @ 23:50 : Dallas, Texas, US

24/1 @ 23:43 : Vienna, AT

24/1 @ 21:59 : Ljubljana, SI

24/1 @ 20:03 : Montclair, New Jersey, US

24/1 @ 19:52 : Germany, DE

24/1 @ 19:33 : Jerusalem, IL

13-01-24 Sibley (of Sibley v Obama) asks his fellow Americans for help...

Montgomery Blair Sibley asks whether you fellow Americans will act, and if so, how you will act, to require Obama to prove his natural born citizen status. He believes the courts will continue to give him short shrift till he has exhausted all juristic options.

What remains when those at the tiller/helm of machinery of government flout the Constitution?

See below (and attached)

Bob Hurt

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Sibley v. Obama: Update and Call to Action
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:02:43 -0500
From:	Montgomery Blair Sibley
To:	Montgomery Sibley

Greetings:

I have been fishing with all the bait I can find for 18 months.

Please see the attached memo and either come fish with me or cut bait.

Montgomery

Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
To: Undisclosed Recipients
From: Montgomery Blair Sibley (mbsibley@gmail.com)
Date: January 24, 2013
Re: Sibley v. Obama litigation & beyond . . . .
The litigation plan I developed eighteen months ago has now entered its final phase. Hence
I write to update you on what that final phase will look like and what I see on the horizon for our
mutual concern – the rule of law applied equally to all, including our recently sworn-in President.
Briefly:
a. In Sibley v. Obama, U.S. Supreme Court Case No.: 12-736, the Supremes will
Conference that matter on February 15, 2013, and likely deny my petition to review my first quo
warranto suit thus ending that litigation.
b. In Sibley v. Obama, D.C. Circuit Court Case No.: 13-5017, the Circuit Court
in my second quo warranto suit after pro forma briefing will likely grant Obama’s forthcoming
motion for summary affirmance in mid-March. I will again seek review with the Supremes, but they
have repeatedly refused to take up this issue of Obama’s legitimacy so I don’t expect them to in this
matter regardless of the merits.
c. In Sibley v. DC Board of Elections, D.C. Court of Appeals Case. No.:
12-AA-1906, the Court – from which curiously there is no right of appeal – has not addressed the
motion to dismiss for over 30 days. Practically, though I remain optimistic, the plain fact remains
that though the Court is statutorily authorized to allow me to demand documentary proof of Obama’s
eligibility, the likelihood of the judges of that Court having the fortitude to allow me to proceed is
unlikely as there is little profit to them to do so.
d. In Sibley v. Alexander et al., D.C. Superior Court Case No.: 2012-CA-008644,
my suit against the D.C. Electors, the matter has been remanded from U.S. District Court back to the
D.C. Superior Court with a gratuitous District Court opinion that the Superior Court must dismiss
the matter upon the grounds that I do not have “standing”. Though again, I will vigorously argue the
contrary and appeal an adverse decision, realistically, this judge – like all the others – looks at the
consequences of ruling in my favor and duck for the fear of the impact on their future government
careers that a vindictive Obama administration can inflict upon him.
Thus, I think it is time to raise the issue: What Now? I have clearly not only “talked the talk,
but walked the walk” to engage this fight and though I have a final litigation option I have not
revealed yet, it is time to ask everyone else: Are you ready to “walk the walk”?
Sibley v. Obama litigation & beyond . . . .
To that end, I propose a daunting task: Get 100,000 signatures on a Whitehouse.gov Petition
asking Mr. Obama to release the records I have heretofore unsuccessfully subpoenaed. The rules of
the White House Petition process requires 100,000 signature in 30 days and promises a response if
that milestone is reached. Hence, this campaign cannot start haphazardly. It must be promoted in
advance and rolled out with those signatures filed within the first 10 days. The media could not
ignore such a response.
Imagine a media blitz for this Petition: Radio, letters to the editors, blogs posts,
advertisements, press releases asking for the simple act of going on-line and signing a simple
request: Release your records Mr. Obama.
It would corner him.
Just as clear, to fail would likely marginalize this issue permanently.
So to each of you I issue this request & challenge:
Are you in?
If not, please let me know and I will take you off my update list.
If you are in, help me by committing to develop and promote this plan. Tell me what you can
do to develop the media plan. What media outlets can you promote this plan on. Ten radio shows,
100 blogs, 100 letters to the editor, press releases – all within one week. As John Lennon sang:
Imagine.
I would rather fail than wonder if we might have succeeded.

13-01-24 America: Prosecutor, Judge and Jury With Jurisdiction Over the World

Americans, true to form, are unlikely to wake up until the drones are operated by their own government against their own people, which may be sooner than most expect. jz

_____

By michael payne
America: Prosecutor, Judge and Jury With Jurisdiction Over the World

A new World Court, created by the U.S. government, has been given license to determine the fate of people in other nations of the world. This court, administered by the government, hears the prosecution's charges, declares the accused as guilty as charged, and then launches deadly Predator and Reaper drones in the skies over Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and countries yet to be identified to carry out the sentence.

READ MORE:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/America-Prosecutor-Judge-by-michael-payne-130124-123.html

13-01-24 Freedom Rider: The State Killing of Aaron Swartz

By Margaret Kimberley

Freedom Rider: The State Killing of Aaron Swartz

A brilliant young practitioner of human interconnectedness, Aaron Swartz "played a key role in defeating the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) which used the phony threat of online piracy to make the internet less open." He was hounded to death by venal prosecutors of "the worst judicial system on the face of the earth."

READ MORE:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Freedom-Rider-The-State-K-by-Margaret-Kimberley-130124-484.html

13-01-24 The only torture related prosecution in the US - of the whislteblower!

Kiriakou Defenders Hope to Get Whistle-Blower's Prison Sentence Commuted

High-profile defenders of John Kiriakou have written President Barack Obama to request that he commute the whistle-blower's sentence or pardon him. Kiriakou was charged with violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, allegedly disclosing classified information to members of the news media after speaking out against waterboarding in 2007. He pleaded guilty in October as part of an agreement that would sentence him to 30 months in prison.

READ MORE:

http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Kiriakou-Defenders-Hope-to-in-General_News-130124-692.html

13-03-24 FATCA: Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer establishes fabricated US banking laws in Jerusalem

  

Bank of Israel - Israel's banking regulator, Stanley Fischer showing off his newly acquired Israeli ID in 2005, and Bank HaPoalim, BM, logo.

Complaint #3, filed with Bank of Israel against Bank HaPoalim, BM, details the refusal of the Bank to permit cash withdrawal from customer's own funds, with no foundation in any law.

Bank of Israel has so far refused for over half a year to provide written confirmation of receipt of the complaints on FATCA-related matters, of responses by Bank HaPoalim, or of determinations on the complaints by Bank of Israel, if any.  Likewise, Bank of Israel has so far refused to confirm receipt of a Freedom of Information request by the complainant, pertaining to Bank of Israel records of his own complaints.

The Supreme Court of Israel refused to duly register petition to compel Stanley Fischer to perform his duties, pursuant to the law of the State of Israel.  The petition alleges that Stanley Fischer "exchanged his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another nation and its laws, and/or loyalty to financial institutions and their interests."

A Washington, DC, attorney, who specializes in FATCA-related matters opined that conduct of Bank HaPoalim and the Israeli authorities in this matter has nothing to do with FATCA, and is likely to be retaliatory measures against a Human Rights activist.

Conditions, documented in this case, show how Stanley Fischer, like his student Bernanke, placed banks as untouchables, above the law. Such conditions must raise concerns regarding integrity and stability of the Israeli financial system.

LINKS:

[1] 12-08-25 Dr Zernik's Complaint #1, filed with Israeli banking regulation against Bank HaPoalim - for attempting to extort compliance with US IRS regulations in Jerusalem

http://es.scribd.com/doc/103922991/

[2] 13-01-04 FATCA-related Consumer Complaint No 2 against Bank HaPoalim, BM, and its Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach, filed with Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation

http://www.scribd.com/doc/118926904/

[3] 13-01-24 Complaint No 3 Against Bank HaPoalim, filed with Bank of Israel, alleging organized corporate crime

http://www.scribd.com/doc/122010443/

[4] 13-01-08 Freedom of Information on Bank of Israel, in re complaints filed with Bank of Israel by Dr Joseph Zernik against Bank HaPoalim, BM

http://www.scribd.com/doc/119446776/

[5] 12-12-27 PRESS RELEASE – FATCA, Stanley Fischer, and "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel

http://www.scribd.com/doc/118152545/

EXCERPT FROM COMPLAINT NO 3

Recent Chronology

 i.             The undersigned, Dr Joseph Zernik is a German and an Israeli citizen (no longer a US citizen).    

 ii.          On January 23, 2013, the undersigned provided Bank HaPoalim, BM, notice of intent to withdraw on January 24, 2013, cash from his funds, held by Bank HaPoalim in deposit accounts (copy enclosed below). The notice also requested that the Bank inform the undersigned in advance in case he would not be permitted to withdraw his own money.

iii.          On January 23, 2013, receipt of the undersigned notice was confirmed by the following Bank employees: Efrat Dahan, Mordechai Assouline (Deputy Branch Manager), Drora Bregman, Maya Amzallag (Branch Manager), Maya Shulyatsky, Shalom Barashi.

  iv.          On January 24, 2013, in the early evening, the undersigned appeared in the Beit HaKerem Branch and asked to withdraw NIS 20,000 from his deposit accounts.  The undersigned was made to wait for a while, and eventually Deputy Branch Manager Mordechai Assouline informed him that the undersigned was not permitted to withdraw any of his own money, held by the Bank.
v.          It should be noted that regardless of repeated requests, the Bank refuses to provide any written notice regarding the nature of its current conduct, its legal foundation (if any), and the status of the undersigned's account.

Allegations

It is by now evident that Bank HaPoalim's conduct in this matter, as detailed in Complaint #1, filed with Bank of Israel on August 25, 2012, in Complaint #2, filed with Bank of Israel on January 4, 2013, and in instant Complaint, is unlawful:

 i.      Such conduct has no basis in the law of the State of Israel.
ii.          Such conduct has no basis in the law of the United States (as falsely claimed by the Bank) – opinion on this matter by a Washington, DC- based attorney, who specializes in FATCA-related matters, is available upon request.
iii.          Correspondence with the Bank's Chief Internal Auditor clarifies that the Bank's FATCA-related "new policy" is a fabrication as well – no such record exists. [1-4]

Therefore, the undersigned alleges that Bank HaPoalim, BM, and its Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach are engaged in various violations of the law of the State of Israel, including, but not limited to:

 i.          Unlawful seizing of the undersigned's funds in deposit accounts:  Conduct of the Bank has no basis in the law of the State of Israel. Moreover, it has no basis in the law of the United States either.  The law of the United States, which the Bank purports to enact and enforce in the State of Israel, does not permit a bank to seize a customer's accounts.  At most, the relevant United States law permits a bank to withhold 30% of interest gained on United States securities of the account holder.  The undersigned holds no United States securities at all.

                       ii.     Unlawfully causing the undersigned to incur interest charges on his checking account.
           iii.    Large-scale banking fraud:  The Bank falsely claims to have adopted a FATCA-related "New Policy".  The Bank's own response indicates that no such lawfully adopted Bank policy exists.  Under such false and deliberately misleading statements, regarding the Bank's FACTA-related "New Policy", the Bank engages in unlawful, harmful conduct.
          iv.     Entrapment:  The Bank extorts filing of United States Internal Revenue (IRS) tax returns by the Bank's "US Persons" customers in Israel, while refusing to provide the same customers the necessary documentation, pursuant to the same IRS Regulations.  Conduct of the Bank is likely to trigger IRS audits of such individuals, who submit to the Bank's extortion and cause them additional harm.
          v.     Refusal of the Bank to report to the customer the total interest gained in his account (no reporting at all was provided for foreign currency accounts, and regarding NIS deposits the Bank refuses to provide a single total sum of interest gained during the calendar year, as required by IRS regulations), stands contrary to any notion of honest banking in the State of Israel.
                   vi.    Undermining the rule of law and publicity of the law in the State of Israel: The Bank falsely claims to have established a secret, unpublished "New Policy".   The Bank's customers are left at the whim of the Bank's unlawful conduct, which is arbitrary and capricious.

To the degree that Bank HaPoalim, BM, claims to establish and enforce the law of the United States in Jerusalem, the undersigned alleges that Bank HaPoalim, BM, and its Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach are engaged in various violations of the law of the United States, including, but not limited to predicated acts, pursuant to RICO - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 USC § 1961–1968):

                             i.          Fraud
                           ii.          Financial institution fraud
                          iii.          Mail fraud
                         iv.          Wire fraud
                          v.          "…act or threat involving… extortion…"
                        vi.          Acts " relating to extortionate credit transactions"
                       vii.          Acts " relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant"
           viii.          Acts " relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant"

Given the number of such predicated acts by Bank HaPoalim, BM, and the number of Bank's personnel involved, their conduct should be deemed a pattern of racketeering activity, or organized corporate crime. 

Any specific requests:

                       i.          The undersigned requests that the Banking Regulation Unit of Bank of Israel immediate take action to restore the undersigned's access to his own deposit accounts, held by the Bank.

                     ii.          The undersigned requests that the Banking Regulation Unit of Bank of Israel initiate investigation of the conduct of Mr Jacob Orbach in this matter, relative to alleged violations of his lawful duties and obligations as the Bank's Chief Internal Auditor.

                   iii.          The undersigned requests that the Banking Regulation Unit of Bank of Israel accord the undersigned due process through timely written notice to the registration of instant complainant, response by the Bank on the instant complaint, and determination by Bank of Israel on instant complaint.

Jerusalem, January 24, 2013

                                                                       

                                                                        Joseph Zernik, PhD

דר' יוסף צרניק

 LINKED:

[1] 13-01-02 Letter to Bank HaPoalim, BM, Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach re: blocking of customer's accounts, failure to produce bank documents

http://www.scribd.com/doc/118782435/

[2] 12-11-16 Letter to Bank HaPoalim Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach Re: FATCA-related extortionist conduct - request for the Bank's "new policy" s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/113472942/ 

[3] 12-12-02 Reminder on FATCA-related request for Bank HaPoalim records from Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach

http://www.scribd.com/doc/115295169/

[4] 12-12-25 Bank HaPoalim response re FACTA-related new policy, interest gained

http://www.scribd.com/doc/118918634/  

13-01-24 Clinton - the Benghazi compound was a "Marine House"; General Boykin - a "gun running" center...

During Benghazi Testimony, Hillary Clinton Refers to Hollywood Movie “Argo” to Explain Why No Marines Were at Embassy (Video) by Scotty Starnes How inept is she? What the hell is a "Marine house?" Why is she referring to a Hollywood movie during her testimony about the mistakes and lies surrounding Benghazi? H/T to Weekly Standard _____ Amb. "Stephens Was Running Guns" Gen. Boykin's Claims U.S. Gun-Running to Syrian Rebels Through Benghazi By Billy Hallowell "I believe there has been significant information that has come out recently calling into question whether the ambassador was either involved in or making preparations for supplying material to the Syrian resistance forces." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33698.htm ______ 1/23/2013 Hillary: What Difference Does It Make If We Lied? Filed under: General — Patterico @ 6:18 pm That’s not quite the way she put it, of course. But that’s my takeaway. “What difference does it make”?! Followed by “it is our job to figure out what happened”? He should have called her on that. When you engage in righteously righteous outrage, sometimes you have to listen to what you’re actually saying as you pound on the table. Via Hot Air. After you watch that, you’ll be ready to watch Rand Paul rip her apart: Also via Hot Air. Look at the smirk on her face. He should have called her on that. This isn’t funny, Ms. Clinton. Still, good stuff. It’s satisfying to watch someone with nerve tear into her.

13-01-23 Anfrage eines Menschenrechts- / Computerwissenschaftschriftstellers in Jerusalem nach Schutz durch den Deutschen Botschafter in Israel

 

 

Geehrte Frau, Geehrter Herr

Ich schreibe Ihnen um sie von einer neuen Geschichte in Kenntnis zu setzen in der Hoffnung, dass sie Interesse haben ueber die Geschichte zu berichten. Es handelt sich um die Anfrage eines Menschenrechts-/ Computerwissenschaftsschriftstellers in Jerusalem nach Schutz durch den Deutschen Botschafter in Israel.

Ich plane fuer diese und naechste Woche ein Treffen mit Konsulat Mitgliedern in der Botschaft in Tel Aviv bezueglich des oben benannten Themas.

Sehr gerne beantworte ich Ihnen Fragen nach weiterer Information,

Mit freundlichen Gruessen,

Josef Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

_______________________

Anfrage eines Menschenrechts-/ Computerwissenschaftsschriftstellers in Jerusalem nach Schutz durch den Deutschen Botschafter in Israel

Einem Deutschen Staatsbuerger in Jerusalem, nach internationalen Recht Corpus Separatum, wird von der U.S und der Israelischen Regierung Vergeltung unterstellt. Er archivierte Menschenrechtsberichte und veroeffentlichte in dem Internationalen Computerwissenschaftsjournal Berichte ueber Unvollstaendigkeit in den Computersystemen von Gerichten, Gefaegnissen und Banken. Zur Zeit sind seine Bankkonten in Jerusalem von der Israelischen Bank HaPoalim eingefroren, angeblich im Auftrage der U.S Regierung. Besorgnis um seine persoenliche Sicherheit ist durch unerklaerliches Verhalten des US Konsulats in Jerusalem aufgekommen. 

A.    Beruflicher Hintergrund

Im vergangenen Jahrzehnt wurde Joseph Zernik, PhD, in Human Rights Alert (NGO) ein international anerkannter Experte in Betruegen in Grossformat in den Computersystemen von Banken, Gerichten und Gefaegnissen.

Seine Arbeiten ueber diese Themen unterliefen Ueberpruefungen von anonymen Fachleuten auf der Internationalen Wissenschaftskonferenz  ueber Datamining (2010, Tschechien); auf dem 16ten Welt Kriminologie Kongress (2011, Japan); auf der Daten Analytik (2012, Spanien) und auf dem Onlinerecht (2013, Frankreich). [[i]]  Millionen habe ihre Berichten online gelesen. [[ii],[iii]]

Zwei seiner Berichte ueber das Thema wurden von den Vereinten Nationen in offizielle Menschenrechtsratberichte einbezogen:

1.     Vereinigten Staaten – die Vorlage von 2010 des Human Rights Alert fuer das Human Rights Council (HRC) der Vereinten Nationen wurde ueberprueft und aufgenommen in den offiziellen HRC Professional Staff Report mit einer Notiz ueber die Korruption der Gerichte und der legalen Berufe, sowie der Diskriminierung durch Gerichtsvollstreckungen in Kalifornien. [[iv]]

2.     Der Staat Israel – die Vorlage von 2013 des Human Rights Alert fuer das HRC, wurde in den HRC Staff Report aufgenommen mit einer Notiz ueber “die Unvollkommenheit des Elektronischen Aufnahmesystems des Obersten Gerichts, der Bezirksgerichte und der Haeftlingsgerichte in Israel.” [[v]]

B.    Kurze Geschichte der Vergeltung

Parallel findet die Vergeltung gegen Dr Zernik seit einigen Jahren statt:

1.     Sein Zuhause in Los Angeles wurde ihm ohne faelligen Prozess im Dezember 2007 weggenommen

2.     Mitte April 2010 wurde er zu einem “Interview” der Gerichte der Vereinigten Staaten “Threat Unit”geladen. Seine Nachbarn erzaehlten ihm, dass bewaffnete Agenten aufgetaucht waeren um ihn festzunehmen. Sie sahen erpircht darauf aus zu schiessen. Dr Zernik floh sofort aus den Staaten.

3.     Zwischen 2009-10, vor seiner Flucht aus den Staaten wendete Dr Zernik sich an das Deutsche Konsulat in Los Angeles. Zu dieser Zeit suchte er politisches Asyl in Deutschland. Alternativ bestand die Option nach Deutschland zu gehen um die Bewerbungsunterlagen fuer Wiedereinbuergerung und Staatsangehoerigkeits Deutschlands abzulegen. Es gab eine negative Antwort fuer beide Faelle.

4.     Im April 2010 floh Dr Zernik nach Jerusalem. Unverzueglich nach seiner Ankunft in Israel, bewarb er sich fuer die Deutsche Staatsbuergerschaft, die ihm 2010 gewaehrt wurde. In seinem letzten Interview fragte ihn das Deutschen Konsulat in Tel Aviv warum er die Deutsche Staatsbuergerschaft erwerben wolle (spaeter als seine gesamte Familie). Dr Zernik antwortete, dass er nach Schutz durch die Deutsche Regierung suche.

5.     Im Juli 2012 begann Dr Zerniks Israelische Bank in Jerusalem (HaPoalim) im Auftrag der U.S. Regierung ihm mit der Einfrierung seiner Bankkonten zu drohen, unterschriebe er nicht den “Verzicht auf Privatsphaere” fuer die U.S. Regierung ueber all sein Banking in Israel. Dieses Verhalten wurde auf die Durchsetzung eines neuen U.S. Gesetzes gestuetzt, das sog. FATCA. Allerdings wurde dieses Gesetz bisher nie oeffentlich gemacht (es wurden keine Rechtsverordnungen besprochen) -  noch nicht einmal in den Vereinigten Staaten und sicherlich besteht es nicht in Israel, vor allem nicht in Jerusalem, welches unter internationalem Gesetz nicht unter Israelischer Souveraenitaet steht.

6.     Im August 2012 unternahm Dr Zernik den Versuch der Anmeldung einer Beschwerde mit der Bank of Israel-Banking Regulations gegen das rechtswidrige Verhalten der Bank HaPoalim ihm gegenueber. Bis heute verweigert die Bank of Israel eine Antwort auf die Beschwerde.

7.     Im Oktober 2012 versuchte Dr Zernik eine Petition bei dem Obersten Gericht Israels einzureichen, die Bank of Israel dazu zu noetigen ihre Pflichten zu erfuellen und die Beschwerde gegen die Bank HaPoalim zu ueberpruefen. Das Buero der Justizbeamten des Obersten Gerichts weigert sich die Petition ordnungsgemaess zu registrieren. [[vi]]

8.     Am 1. Januar 2013 wurden die Bankkonten von Dr Zernik von der Israelischen Bank HaPoalim eingefroren, ohne Bescheid oder gesetzliche Basis. [[vii]]

9.     Am 7. und 14. Januar 2013 versuchte Dr Zernik seine U.S amerikanische Staatsangehoerigkeit aufzugeben um die Situation zu beenden. Dr Zernik wurde im US Konsulat in Jerusalem des Betrugs unterstellt. Sein U.S. amerikanischer Pass wurde ihm entzogen, doch es wurden falsche Akten des Verzichts der U.S amerikanischen Staatsangehoerigkeit bereitgestellt. [[viii]]

Allumfassend hat das Verhalten keine Basis in jeglichem Gesetz, weder im Staat Israel, noch in den Vereinigten Staaten. Auch die Meinung eines US amerikanischen Staatsanwaltes (Washington DC), spezialisiert auf FATCA, ist verfuegbar. Der Staatsanwalt schlussfolgert, dass ein Vergeltungsfall vorliegt, ohne Verbindung zur FATCA. [[ix]]

C.    Bedenken von Missbrauch und persoenlicher Sicherheit

Dr Zerniks Anliegen ist, dass seine Behandlung dem aehnelt, was auf Julian Assange, dem Wikileaks Gruender, zutrifft: im Dezember 2012 wurden die Bankkonten von Wikileaks ohne gesetzliche Basis eingefroren. Spaeter machten die Vereinigten Staaten klar, dass ihre Intention die Gefangenschaft, wenn nicht sogar die Toetung, Assange war. [[x]] Alles ohne gesetzliches Fundament. Letztendlich ist Assange heute in der Botschaft Londons in Ecuador verkrochen.

Auch der kuerzlichere tragische Tod von Aaron Schwartz, einem Internetpionier, ist von grossem Belangen. [[xi]]

Es soll unterstrichen warden, dass Dr Zerniks Nachforschungen und seine wissenschaftlichen Papiere nicht auf undichten oder geheimen Dokumenten basieren. Lediglich auf oeffentlichen Unterlagen – Gerichtsunterlagen von verschiedensten Gerichten in den Staaten und in Israel.

Darueberhinaus besteht dem heutigen US Gesetz entsprechend die Gefahr, dass Dr Zernik, wenn er von den Vereinigten Staaten verhaftet wird, einer “Extraordinary Rendition” unterstellt wird. Das meint den Transport in eines der vielen “Schwarzen Hoehlen” Gefaegnissen, die auf dem Globus verteilt in Zusammenarbeit mit verschiedenen Regierungen von der U.S. Regierung gehalten warden. U.S. Staatsbuerger untergingen zuvor solch illegaler Behandlung von der U.S. Regierung. [[xii]]

Ein weiteres Anliegen gehoert zu der Anwendung von undefinierter Gefangenschaft ohne gesetzlichen ordnungsgemaessen Prozess (nach dem neuen US Gesetz – NDAA). Schriftsteller stehen unter hoher Gefahr in der Anwendung solcher Gesetze, wie es in letzlichen Gerichtsunterlagen dokumentiert wird unter Hedges, Ellsberg et al v Obama et al. [[xiii]]

Weiteres Anliegen wird geschuert durch die jungen Berichte ueber Bedrohung und Vergeltung gegen Menschenrechtsaktivisten und NGOs in Jerusalem. [[xiv]]

D.    Anfrage nach Schutz fuer einen Deutschen Staatsbuerger in Jerusalem

Deshalb, will Dr Zernik die Deutsche Botschaft in Israel nach schutz fuer einen Deutsche Staatsbuerger in Jerusalem fragen.

Hilfe wurde gefragt bezueglich gruend rechte:

1.     Befreiung der Bankkonten des Deutsche staatsburger, eingfroren von der Israelischen Bank HaPoalim in Jerusalem, angeblich auf befehl der Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten, waehrend sie beschuetzt wird von der Israelische Regierung, unter einem Scharade Recht der Vereinigten Staaten (FATCA).

2.     Beratung von Reisesicherheit zu verschiedenen orten fuer wissenschaflich Conferenzen (z.B. reisen  while traveling unter deutscher Flagge), und schutz vor potentialer widerrechtlichen Inbesitznahme von der Regierung der Vereiningten Staaten und/oder undefinite Haft ohne Prozess (NDAA).

LINKS

---

[i] 12-07-07 Biographical Sketch  Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://es.scribd.com/doc/46421113/

[ii] Selected online sites:

1) Twitter http://twitter.com/inproperinla

2) Scribd.com http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert  Reads: 914,005; Followers: 1,587

3) Scribd.com http://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam  Reads: 61,621; Followers: 0

4) Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner

5) LiveLeak.com http://www.liveleak.com/c/HumanRightsAlert  Reads: 664,803+500,065;

6) Youtube http://www.youtube.com/user/now654321#p/u

7) Facebook http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik

8) Blog http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/  Reads: 93,429+39,574

9) OpEdNews.com www.opednews.com/author/author42343.html  http://www.opednews.com/author/author81971.html

[iii] 12-12-29 Human Rights Alert in the United States- most read on LiveLeak.com, Scrid.com in 2012

http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2012/12/12-12-29-human-rights-alert-in-united.html

[2] 12-12-29 Human Rights Alert (NGO) in Israel - most read on LiveLeak.com, Scrid.com in 2012

http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2012/12/12-12-29-human-rights-in-israel-most.html

[iv] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

[v] 13-01-15 "Lack of integrity of the electronic record systems of the ... Courts in Israel," noted in the 2013 Human Rights Council Staff Report
http://he.scribd.com/doc/120461368/

[vi]  12-12-27 PRESS RELEASE  FATCA, Stanley Fischer, and "Chief Clerk" Sarah Lifschitz in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118152545/

[vii] 13-01-07 FACTA, Stanley Fischer, seizing "US Person's" accounts in Israel - story is gaining traction
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/13-01-07-facta-stanley-fischer-seizing.html

[viii] 13-01-17 PRESS RELEASE: Fraud in the US Consulate, Jerusalem, denying the right to renounce US citizenship
http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2013/01/13-01-17-press-release-fraud-in-us.html

[ix] Washington DC attorney opinion:

Available upon request.

[x] Banks and WikiLeaks - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/26/opinion/26sun3.html?_r=0

[xi] Aaron Schwartz

[xii] Grace, Francie Thirteen Arrests Ordered by Germany CBS News, 31 January 2007

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/31/world/main2415627.shtml?source=RSSattr=World_2415627

[xiii] Grace, Francie Thirteen Arrests Ordered by Germany CBS News, 31 January 2007

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/31/world/main2415627.shtml?source=RSSattr=World_2415627

[xiv] Right-wing Israeli group admits using PIs to spy on leftist NGOs
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/right-wing-israeli-group-admits-using-pis-to-spy-on-leftist-ngos.premium-1.494734