Whoever
thought that judges can address their peers’ corruption, must be delusional…
From online discussion
group, original title – No judge in the US holds a lawful Oath of Office…
Corrupt
California Judge (Ret) Jacqueline Connor – one of the leaders of the LA-JR (Los
Angeles Judiciary Racket) - and former LAPD undercover narcotic officer Rafael
Perez - key figures in the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000).
VIEW THE COMPLETE DISCUSSION AS PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/134648903/
On Monday, April 8, 2013 2:06:47 AM UTC+3, Joseph Zernik, Human Rights Alert
(NGO) wrote:
1) THE
BIG PICTURE
To
make the story more complete, let me add the following:
Corrupt
California Judge Jacqueline Connor was one of the leaders of
the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). Her position as such was
established in the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000):
Before
the scandal erupted, she had already been known as a Rampart Judge, for her
close relationship with the undercover narcotic unit of the LAPD Rampart
station. She was also known for her close friendship with Rafael Perez -
later the key figure in the scandal (with Connor).
When
the scandal erupted, it was misrepresented as an LAPD corruption scandal.
In fact, as pointed out by Erwin Chemerinky (then at USC) and
by David Burcham (then Dean of Loyola Law School), the LA Superior
Court judges were the crux of the corruption.
*
“…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did
not commit." Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police
states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are
convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Irvine Law School (2000)
Once
the scandal erupted, Connor appeared as the trial judge in the First Rampart
Trial (2001). As such, she did her best to undermine the prosecution of 4
LAPD undercover narcotic officers, probably to save her own skin. When that did
not work, and 3 were convicted by the jury, she overturned the jury conviction
in her infamous ruling from home, on Friday night, just before Christmas.
The reason - she claimed that she tainted the jury through her erroneous
jury instructions - a brilliant fraud on the court!
Another
key figure in the scandal was then US Attorney for the Central District of
California – Alejandro Majorkas (he too served on the board of
Bet Tzedek – the Los Angeles “House of Justice” – a prominent Jewish
charity and an affiliate of the Los Angeles Jewish Federation...). At
the time he was considered a brilliant young legal talent... Majorkas permitted
the LAPD the LA District Attorney, and the LA Superior Court to investigate,
prosecute and adjudicate their own corruption... Last I checked Majorkas was
Director of Citizenship Services...
In
the 1990s the main line of business of the LA-JR (LA Judiciary Racket) was in
controlling the wholesale drug markets in Los Angeles. [1,2] I
believe that such conduct started at least as early as the early 1980s, with
CIA’s wholesale cocaine trafficking to Los Angeles under Iran-Contra during
the Reagan administration.
Effectively,
under Reagan, through Iran-Contra, Los Angeles was established as an
extra-constitutional zone. [3]
At
least by the late 1990s, the LA-JR branched into the more lucrative field of
real estate and banking fraud through simulated litigation of such cases.
The earliest such case that I could document started in 1998 – Galdjie
v Darwish. [4]
By
the early 2000s, FBI reports distinguished LA County as "the epicenter of
a real estate and mortgage fraud". I believe that it was the synergy
between the LA Superior Court and LA County-based Countrywide that led
to such distinction. I believe that it was also the reason for the
exceptionally fast growth of Countrywide...
Today,
the practice is widespread in the state and US courts from coast to coast - key
element, often overlooked in the current financial crisis. That is also
the true reason that, as Eric Holder pointed out, banks cannot
be criminally prosecuted in the US today.
The
case I documented in most details of simulated litigation in the current
financial crisis is in SEC v Bank of America Corporation in
the US District Court, Southern District of NY, under corrupt US Judge Jed
Rakoff. [4]
LINKS:
[1] 12-06-08
Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current
financial crisis
[2]
10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles
Judiciary Racket) s
[3]
10-10-13 Extra Constitutional Zones - Excerpts From Discussion on the OAK Board
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39302595/
[4] Galdjie v Darwish - racketeering by judges and attorneys in Los
Angeles County, California
[5]
12-09-04 Zernik, J., "Design and Operation of the Electronic Record
Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation", Data
Analytics 1:83-93 (2012)
2)
MORE ON SIMULATED LITIGATION - WHEN SUING JUDGES FOR
CORRUPTION
I guess I still have not
answered the question:
What happens when you try to sue a judge that ran on you
simulated litigation?
Well, Richard
Fine never did that, but I had done it, even before Richard Fine was arrested.
So here it
goes:
In 2008 I
filed complaint in the US District Court, Central District of California, under Zernik
v Connor et al. Jacqueline Connor, first named defendant was a
judge of the LA Superior Court, and one of the leading figures of the LA-JR
(Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). Some 10 judges of the LA Superior Court,
as well as the Clerk of the Court were named defendants under Deprivation of
Rights under the Color of Law.
The conduct
I was detailing amounted to racketeering, but after reading on the subject, I
decided that filing a RICO complaint was above my head, and settled for the
above cause of action.
1) No
attorney would file such complaint
The reason I
had to do it pro se was that no attorney in Los Angeles
agreed to help me, not even anonymously. Some of them had strange
explanation, why it should not be done. Others simply explained that it was too
dangerous for them...
2) Summonses
The case
started with the corrupt office of the Clerk of the US District Court, Central
District of California Terry Nafisi refusing to issue me
summonses.
Two
emergency petitions, filed with the corrupt 9th Circuit, to compel the office
of the US District Court to issue the summonses, were summarily denied with no
explanation at all.
3) First
amendment right to file papers in court
In parallel,
the office of the clerk of the US District Court, Central District of
California, denied me the right to file any papers, which included evidence of
the corruption of the LA Superior Court. That included, for example, an opinion
letter by probably the best fraud expert in the US - retired FBI agent James
Wedick, who amazingly agreed to issue an opinion letter on the subject.
Wedick had been decorated by US Attorney General, by FBI Director, and by US
Congress for his achievements in law enforcement - he was key figure in
Abscam... [1] Wedick’s letter specifically referred to conduct of David
Pasternak, former President of the LA Bar Association, and former
President of Bet Tzedek. The clerk of the US District Court issued on
all such papers perverted "Discrepancy Notices." [2]
Moreover,
the clerk explained to me that he was doing so at the explicit instruction of
corrupt US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. She was the same one who
later perverted Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition.
Later, I
tried it again in the US District Court, Washington DC, with a little different
approach. In Zernik v Melson et al I sued Fast and
Furious Kenneth Melson (US DOJ) and Kenneth Kaiser (FBI
Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations) in a petition to Compel a US
Officer to Perform His Duties. I asked for Equal Protection of the 10
million people of LA County against the LA-JR.
Corrupt US
Judge Richard Leon took the same approach as Woehrle, with a
slightly different bent: All my papers that included evidence of judicial
corruption were returned with the hand inscription "Leave to File
Denied" on their faces, signed by Richard Leon.
Bill
Windsor's experience with Judge Richard Leon was exactly the same. [3]
3) Appearance of unauthorized attorneys with "no
communication with client" clause
Another key
element of simulated litigation in cases of this kind, and also in cases
involving banksters, is the appearance on behalf of the defendants of attorneys
with no authorization by the clients and with "no communication with
client" clause.
This part of
the routine was best described by US Bankruptcy Court, Texas, Jeff
Boehm in early 2008, in a case involving Countrywide, where Sandor
Samuels (President of Bet Tzedek) was Chief Legal Officer at
the time. [4] It is a standard procedure in many or most foreclosure and
similar litigation cases involving the banks. You would not find in such
cases any paper that is signed by the client (e.g. no declaration or affidavit
by an officer of the bank), or even any paper that was derived from the client.
The attorneys for the banks would work strictly from records he or she
obtained from public databases.
In cases
involving judges, it is even simpler... The attorney is not even hired by the
defendants. Instead the attorney is hired by the California Judicial
Council. The perversion of the process here is in issuing
deliberately false authorization letter to the respective attorney. I
best documented it in the case of Richard Fine. The case was Fine
v Sheriff of Los Angeles County. But in response to requests to the
California Judicial Council, they insisted in calling the case Fine v
Sheriff of the Court... [5]
4) Issuing
of unauthenticated orders and judgments in the US District Courts
As is the
case in the LA Superior Court, key element of simulated litigation in the US
courts is the issuance of unauthenticated orders and judgments. However,
due to the differences between the electronic record systems of the LA Superior
Court (Sustain) and the systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF), the
records look differently. In the US District Courts, issuing
unauthenticated orders and judgments comes as orders and judgments, accompanied
by NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing), which is missing the "Electronic
Document Stamp", which is the fraudulent way that electronic signatures
were implemented in these systems.
In such
cases, papers, which were electronically filed by parties to the case may be
authenticated by an NEF bearing the "electronic document stamp", but
none of the minutes, orders, or judgments would bear that stamp. [6]
Summary
The above is
only a short summary of the highlights of simulated litigation practices.
Anyone, who is seriously interested in the subject, should review the
more detailed Motion to Intervene in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) in the Supreme
Court [6]
Because of
the extensive documentation, I consider the case of Richard Fine a historic
landmark case. It documented the operation in concert of the following
fraudulent electronic record systems:
1) LA
Superior Court - SUSTAIN
2) Sheriff
of Los Angeles - INMATE INFORMATION CENTER
3) US
District Courts - PACER & CM/ECF I
4) US Courts
of Appeals - PACER & CM/ECF II
5) US
Supreme Court - UNNAMED
LINKS:
[1] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik
(SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly
Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
08-08-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email letter by
highly decorated FBI veteran, James Wedick, regarding refusal to Investigate
FBI to provide Dr Zernik protection against real estate fraud - corruption in
Los Angeles County courts
[2] 09-04-09
Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central
District of California, Dkt #105: Compiled Records of Perverted Discrepancy
Notices
[3] 11-05-30
PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC – master of the “Leave
to file denied”
[4] 08-03-05
Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's
Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's
false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of
Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
[5]
10-03-19b Richard Fine: Dr Zernik - Mr Carrizosa's Correspondence on behalf of
the California Judicial Council in re: Case Caption in engagement of Attorney
McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
[6] 10-01-01
Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik v
Connor, based on copies provided by Clerk on December 29, 2009
[7] 10-04-20
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik, with
stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court
Records s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene 5 Amended Appendices s
10-04-18
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendix IX b: Zernik's Declaration in re:
April 16, 2010 search for records in the Courts microfilm judgments archive s
10-04-22
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court - Dr Zernik's Declaration RE:
Court Counsel Danny Bickell and Filing at US Supreme Court
