12-03-30 Welcome Brazil!

Last New Visitor Brazil  Visited 24 minutes ago

12-03-29 Welcome Chile!

Last New Visitor Chile  Visited 31 minutes ago

12-03-29 Welcome the Netherlands!

Last New Visitor Netherlands  Visited 1 hour ago

12-03-29 Corruption of the Israeli Justice System

Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel is asked to comment on the nature of her appointment, certification procedures of the Court.
Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been most likely left in 'deliberations' for years. Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, are alleged as serious Human Rights violations of all, who reside in the State of Israel.  Effectively, such conditions amount to the establishment of a simulated justice system, a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States years earlier.  Human Rights Alert concludes that nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel.     
Supreme Court; Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen, Sarah Lifschitz; State of Israel

View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/87191557/
Jerusalem, March 29 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), has forwarded a request to Sarah Lifschitz, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, for explanations regarding the nature of her appointment and the certification procedures of the Court. [1]
The request follows the denial by the office of Administration of Courts of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, pertaining to the appointment records of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court. [2-4]  The denial letter claims that all such records are exempt from the FOIA under a clause, pertaining to "records of internal deliberations".

"The most plausible explanation for the denial of the FOIA request is by accepting the response of the Administration of Courts at face value," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been left in 'deliberations' for years." 

The FOIA request also asked for records pertaining to the Apostille certification of records of the Supreme Court, pursuant to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961).  The denial of the request for legal public records regarding the Apostille certifications, implies that the Apostille certification arrangements, which are published on the web site of the Judicial Authority, [5] should be deemed a simulated, or illegal public record. [6]

Today’s request, addressed to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz, notes that such conditions are alleged as serious violations of the Human Rights of all, who reside in the State of Israel, and therefore solicits her comments, as a key figure under the circumstances.

“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, the integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel was seriously compromised.”

Today:

•  The identity of the Supreme Court's servers is uncertified;
•  All electronic records are published online unsigned and uncertified, ‘subject to editing and phrasing changes’;
•  Certifications by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen appear on judicial records, which were purportedly issued years after his death;
•  The office of current Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz refuses to certify the decisions and other records of the Supreme Court;
•  The Director of Administration of Courts, Judge Moshe Gal, denied Freedom of Information request for the appointment records of the current Chief Clerk and current certification procedures, claiming that with both in office/operation for a decade, both are also exempt as “internal deliberation”;
•  The Supreme Court routinely publishes simulated decisions and conducts simulated review; 
•  “Sealing” is imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner; 
•  A fraudulent Apostille certification arrangement was jointly entered by the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Authority, which circumvented the refusal of the Chief Clerks to certify the Courts’ records; the arrangement is published, unsigned and undated on the Judicial Authority’s web site, while invoking the authority of an unnamed Minister of Justice.  The Administration of Courts and Ministry of Justice hold pending Freedom of Information Act requests, re: the identity of the author and the individual, who authorized the online publication of the arrangement.

The findings have wide-range implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional violence.

Human Rights Alert (NGO) recommendations include the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.

Conditions, which were established in the State of Israel a decade ago, appear as a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States a decade or two earlier, with the implementation of fraudulent electronic record systems (PACER, CM/ECF) in the US courts.  The current financial crisis and civil unrest in the United States are tightly linked to corruption of the justice system. [8]
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) report concludes, "...nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel." [7] Human Rights Alert’s report on this matter is perhaps the first ever Human Rights report on any nation, which in primarily based on data mining and analysis of the integrity, or lack thereof, in electronic record systems of the courts.
______LINKS:
[1] 12-03-29 Request for comments by Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court Sarah Lifschitz on denial of FOIA Re: Appointment records of the Chief Clerk, certification procedures in the Supreme Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/87175250/[2] 12-03-02 FOIA Request Re: Appointment Letters of the Chief Clerks and Certification of Judicial Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel R s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/83584055/ 
[3] 12-03-06 FOIA Response by Administration of Courts (P29-2012) Re: March 2, 2012 Request for the appointment letters of the Chief Clerks and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (Heb)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86345296/[4] 12-03-28 Revised Freedom of Information Act Request (P29-2012), in re: Appointment records of the Chief Clerk and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel. s (Eng)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/87055920 
[5] 12-02-19 PRESS RELEASE: Invalid, Simulated Apostille Certification Procedure Published Online by the Judicial Authority of the State of Israel (English)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82064304/
[6] "Simulated litigation" [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated decisions" [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to felonies, defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[7] 12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82927700/[8] 12-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and proposed corrective measures submitted to the US House of Representatives
http://www.scribd.com/doc/85481555/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."  _________________________________________~ If it ain't a Party, it ain't my occupation ~

OccuParty Jerusalem-AlQuds!
August 17 - ?, 2012
Love, Peace, Justice 
Empowering the People through
dance/music/art/study/pray
Facebook Eventhttp://www.facebook.com/events/210316185725129/
Youtube: Occuparty kills my luv life...
http://youtu.be/UX2cdaWtxa4

12-03-29 Welcome Egypt!

Last New Visitor Egypt  Visited 3 hours ago

12-03-29 Welcome Lithuania!

Last New Visitor Ukraine  Visited 50 minutes ago