Stay tuned, it may become the first criminal investigation (at least publicized) in the 65 years of the State of Israel against a judge for his conduct from the bench!!!
Magistrate/Pro Tem District Judge Hagai Brenner - subject of criminal complaint with Israel Police
US:
I have filed with FBI numerous criminal complaints against corrupt judges in the LA. Obviously, I could never even get "Received" stamped copies, and none was ever investigated. However, it appeared that the complaints might have had some impact:
* The corrupt Terry Friedman, key perp from the LA Superior Court, abruptly resigned soon after, and people were sending me emails, asking me about it, and
* Jacquelin Connor, key figure in the LA-JR - LA Judiciary Racket retired soon after.
When I filed a complaint in the US District Court in LA (Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law), no attorney in LA dared to advice me, even incognito.
Ssshhh - it is not "immunity", it is not "de facto immunity", in plain English is it called "corruption" and "fear".
Israel:
Today I filed with Israel Police a criminal complaint against an Israeli judge, Israel Police accepted the complaint and I got my copy stamped and signed "Received". I was NOT intimidated in by police either.
In parallel, I started a petition, demanding that the Israeli Attorney General insruct police to conduct the investigation.
Within the last 48 hours I got:
* 61 signatures on the petition, including 5 by attorneys!!!
* Volunteer PR professional to handle the case, and
* Volunteer Civil Rights Attorney to appear before media on the issue.
The law is not much different in the two nations, both originating from the English common law. It's only that the people of the State of Israel are not yet reduced to total serfdom...
Obviously, people in Israel warn me that I may suffer consequences. However, the level of fear here is not even close to that in LA.
The nature of underlying judicial conduct?
The usual - simulated proceedings and issuance of simulated* court records - the most common form of judicial corruption for centuries. Accordingly, others named in the criminal complaint - the current and former chief clerks of the Tel Aviv District Court.
* Simulated proceedings, simulated process, simulated records are defined here as used in the Texas Code:
Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
Legal Research Home > Texas Laws > Penal Code > Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
§ 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits
an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to
another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment,
or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the
document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any
action in response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with
the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a
sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
(c) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section
that the simulating document:
(1) states that it is not legal process; or
(2) purports to have been issued or authorized by a
person or entity who did not have lawful authority to issue or
authorize the document.
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
section that the simulating document was filed with, presented to,
or delivered to a clerk of a court or an employee of a clerk of a
court created or established under the constitution or laws of this
state, there is a rebuttable presumption that the document was
delivered with the intent described by Subsection (a).
(e) Except as provided by Subsection (f), an offense under
this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
(f) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
section that the defendant has previously been convicted of a
violation of this section, the offense is a state jail felony.
