Appendix 10: The Haifa Court is Unable to Collect False Punitive Charges in TE 11650-06-24
Appeal to Prof. Uri Sivan, President of the Technion, and Prof. Daniel Chamovitz, Chair of VERA, in re: Review of Rachel Ben-Ari's competence as Legal Counsel
In browser: https://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2026/07/appendix-10-haifa-court-is-unable-to.html
Zernik filed notice with the Court that his false listing as Plaintiff in published records was perceived by him slanderous. All his friends and acquaintances had known his opinion regarding the Family Courts for years. Therefore, official notice listing him as a person that initiated action in a Family Court of the State of Israel was slanderous.
.
B. Inability to generate charges for collection through the Government Collection Center
1) No Event #, May 25, 2025 Notice by Deputy Clerk Hagit Lasri Ben Hamo
Of note, the Office of the Clerk treated the charges as "Fines", which was legally false. Had Judge Gurevitz imposed charges as "Fines" she would have been compelled to use a different more complex procedure. The charges were strictly imposed as 'expenses,' i.e., reimbursement. Obviously it was a false designation, since the charges were of punitive nature.
Translation
Notice by the Clerk
Re: Creation of Fine Obligation
In this case, a technical glitch occurred, and it was not possible to update the fines imposed within its framework on Mr. Zernik. (Documentation of Meital’s handling can be viewed in the case notes). Following discussions with the Management representative and the IT representative, we were requested to apply to the Judge and request that a decision be issued ordering the unified collection of the fines and confirming that they are in effect as of this date.
Issued on date 27 Iyar 5785, May 25, 2025.
Hagit Lasri Ben-Hamo, Department Manager
.
2) No Event #, May 25, 2025 Notice by Judge Hila Gurevitz
Translation
25/05/2025 | 27 Iyar 5785 Decision
Case 11650-06-24
Judge Hila Gurevitz Ovadia
The Clerk of the Court announced that due to a technical error, the obligation was not updated upon implementation of the decisions, and the charge was not transferred to the Center for Fine Collection. It was reported that there is a need to give a decision regarding the validity of the previous obligations that were ruled. Accordingly, and per the Secretariat’s request, it is clarified that the charge imposed on Defendant 1 – Mr. Yosef Zernik, in expenses as detailed below, is in force:
Decision dated 20/01/2025 in the amount of 700 NIS; Motion 52
Decision dated 13/03/2025 in the amount of 5,000 NIS; Motion 61
Decision dated 03/04/2025 in the amount of 5,000 NIS; Motions 62, 63.
The Clerk of the Court shall implement and update the charge row accordingly and serve the decision to the parties and the estate administrators.
*** Digitally Signed ***
Note
The inscription at the lower left corner of the yellow "Post-it" Decision reads, "***Digitally signed***".
The automatic green seal, "True Copy", and below it, the light blue shield with the inscription, "This record is digitally signed."
There is no "Digital Signature" defined in the Israeli Electronic Signature Law, 2001. Therefore, the inscriptions may refer to some other forms of signature.
3) June 4, 2025, Payment Voucher issued by the Office of the Clerk
Translation
Haifa Family Court
Estate File 11650-06-24 June 4, 2025
Notice of Charges of Expenses to benefit the State Treasury
Your payment is demanded:
Type Activity Total demanded
Expenses to benefit Formation of a NIS 10,700.00
the State Treasury Fine with no beneficiary
... last date for payment June 24, 2025. A payment that is not paid on time is transferred for collection by the Collection Center.
.
C. Further charges imposed on Respondent 1, Joseph Zernik
The two purported decisions—one dated June 25, 2024, and the second from the hearing on October 9, 2024—deviate from the required form for recording decisions due to the absence of a signed written document (even if not strictly required under the Regulations of Civil Procedure 2018, reasoning and service/delivery are required).
Furthermore, they are contrary to the laws of the State of Israel, Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), and Article 16 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).
The request also noted that such actions were perpetrated by the courts in the Southern States after the Civil War, as a method to re-enslave the freed slaves. In response, the U.S. Congress enacted between 1865-1870 acts such as "Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law" and "Conspiracy against Rights". Such acts were aimed at law and justice officers, and the maximum penalty was Capital Punishment!
Would Judge Hila Gurevitz clarify whether she considers these two acts valid decisions of the Court?
Event #70, July 6, 2025 - Judge Hila Gurevitz's Decision
Gurevitz imposed a "Blocking Decree" on filing in court by Respondent 1, a charge of NIS 6,000 in "expenses to benefit the State Treasury", and NIS 25,000 Deposit for future expenses.
.
Event #72, July 23, 2025 -- Request for Instruction by "Estate Administrators"
The request was entered under Respondent 2, Dror Zernik, since there are no "Estate Administrators" defined in the court file. The request asked permission to pay certain expenses from the Estate funds, and to be exempt from filing further requests for instructions.
Event #72, July 28, 2025 -- Response by Respondent 1, Joseph Zernik
Joseph Zernik's response: The request failed to include an affidavit by the "Estate Administrators" as prescribed by law. Therefore, the request should be summarily dismissed.
Event #72, July 29, 2025, AM -- Decision by Judge Hila Gurevitz
Gurevitz decided that the requested payments were permitted. NIS 1,500 in "expenses to benefit the State Treasury" were imposed on Respondent 1, Joseph Zernik, since his conduct demonstrated lack of trust in the attorneys.
Event #72, July 29, 2025, ~15:00 -- all papers under Event #72 disappeared.
See further details under Appendix 12: The history of Event #72.
.
D. Conclusions
Judge Hila Gurevitz is allegedly engaged in an extensive plot of Fraud Upon the Court, where Attorney Rachel Ben-Ari is a central figure.
As part of this allegedly criminal plot, there is a need to silence Respondent 1, Joseph Zernik. Imposing still charges was one of the ways that Judge Hila Gurevitz tried to silence him.
As of July 2026, Judge Hila Gurevitz was unable to generate charges from EF 11650-06-24 and transfer them for collection in the government's collection center.
From day one, Respondent 1, Joseph Zernik, claimed that this court action amounts to a simulation, or a fictitious litigation. One of the ways to administer such fictitious action may involve the use of inherently fictitious electronic files in Net HaMishpat. The designation of "Fictitious Files" in Net HaMishpat first appeared in a publication by the Research Department of the Administration of Court in 2011. The reference there was to court files of type TLA [תל"א] and TLP [תל"פ].[1] This issue deserves a separate investigation, since it is an entire level of specifications of court files, which may be critical to the conduct of the process, which is hidden from the public. Yet another reason whey the system must be independently examined by State employees under the appropriate authorizations.
A separate issue that deserves attention is the designation of funds, which are collected by the courts. Judge Hila Gurevitz designated the charges as "expenses to benefit the State Treasury". However, the vouchers that were produced by the Office of the Clerk converted the charges into "fines with no beneficiary." "Expenses" are reimbursement, a clearly non-punitive payment. "Fines" on the other hand are clearly of punitive nature. And with "no beneficiary" it is anybody's guess, where the money ends up.
No comments:
Post a Comment