Last New Visitor Switzerland  Visited 31 minutes ago |  |
Saturday, March 31, 2012
12-03-31 Social protests resume in Israel...
Social Protests: hundreds demonstrated and blocked streets in Tel Aviv
המחאה החברתית: מאות הפגינו וחסמו כבישים בת"א
המפגינים, שצעדו מכיכר הבימה לאזור רחבת מוזיאון ת"א, הניפו לפידים וקראו להתפטרות רה"מ
READ MORE: http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/1.1676240
Thursday, March 29, 2012
12-03-29 Corruption of the Israeli Justice System
Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel is asked to comment on the nature of her appointment, certification procedures of the Court.
Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been most likely left in 'deliberations' for years. Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, are alleged as serious Human Rights violations of all, who reside in the State of Israel. Effectively, such conditions amount to the establishment of a simulated justice system, a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States years earlier. Human Rights Alert concludes that nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel.![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1365ea92cd443275&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1)
![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1365ea92cd443275&attid=0.2&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1)
![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1365ea92cd443275&attid=0.3&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1)
![[]](https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS-kk-JHaqsuqI2XUyhbzrL_yGqEVKfF1RW0PE0YLET2vIHmzL3ow)
Supreme Court; Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen, Sarah Lifschitz; State of Israel
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 29 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), has forwarded a request to Sarah Lifschitz, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, for explanations regarding the nature of her appointment and the certification procedures of the Court. [1]
The request follows the denial by the office of Administration of Courts of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, pertaining to the appointment records of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court. [2-4] The denial letter claims that all such records are exempt from the FOIA under a clause, pertaining to "records of internal deliberations".
"The most plausible explanation for the denial of the FOIA request is by accepting the response of the Administration of Courts at face value," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been left in 'deliberations' for years."
The FOIA request also asked for records pertaining to the Apostille certification of records of the Supreme Court, pursuant to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961). The denial of the request for legal public records regarding the Apostille certifications, implies that the Apostille certification arrangements, which are published on the web site of the Judicial Authority, [5] should be deemed a simulated, or illegal public record. [6]
Today’s request, addressed to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz, notes that such conditions are alleged as serious violations of the Human Rights of all, who reside in the State of Israel, and therefore solicits her comments, as a key figure under the circumstances.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, the integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel was seriously compromised.”
Today:
Human Rights Alert (NGO) recommendations include the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
Conditions, which were established in the State of Israel a decade ago, appear as a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States a decade or two earlier, with the implementation of fraudulent electronic record systems (PACER, CM/ECF) in the US courts. The current financial crisis and civil unrest in the United States are tightly linked to corruption of the justice system. [8]
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) report concludes, "...nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel." [7] Human Rights Alert’s report on this matter is perhaps the first ever Human Rights report on any nation, which in primarily based on data mining and analysis of the integrity, or lack thereof, in electronic record systems of the courts.
______LINKS:
[1] 12-03-29 Request for comments by Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court Sarah Lifschitz on denial of FOIA Re: Appointment records of the Chief Clerk, certification procedures in the Supreme Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 12-03-06 FOIA Response by Administration of Courts (P29-2012) Re: March 2, 2012 Request for the appointment letters of the Chief Clerks and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (Heb)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 12-02-19 PRESS RELEASE: Invalid, Simulated Apostille Certification Procedure Published Online by the Judicial Authority of the State of Israel (English)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[6] "Simulated litigation" [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated decisions" [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to felonies, defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[7] 12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." ______________________________
OccuParty Jerusalem-AlQuds!
August 17 - ?, 2012
Love, Peace, Justice![[]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhzcVTotgIQTLI2BhngmVD_gtWwr9J08xa0Kye0RvmiG1DDX3f7sivI7zG0iTKEfdBSeUPnh7Zz9MWGc9yC4LTqH25yOiQnTvPus5g0NBeMj5ReAXipUr0LWmF-VETn6uu5M2a9djGh6J9/s1600/josephs+dream+2010+logo+small.gif)
Empowering the People through
dance/music/art/study/pray
Facebook Eventhttp://www.facebook.com/
Youtube: Occuparty kills my luv life...
http://youtu.be/UX2cdaWtxa4
Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been most likely left in 'deliberations' for years. Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, are alleged as serious Human Rights violations of all, who reside in the State of Israel. Effectively, such conditions amount to the establishment of a simulated justice system, a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States years earlier. Human Rights Alert concludes that nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel.
Supreme Court; Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen, Sarah Lifschitz; State of Israel
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 29 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), has forwarded a request to Sarah Lifschitz, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court, for explanations regarding the nature of her appointment and the certification procedures of the Court. [1]
The request follows the denial by the office of Administration of Courts of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, pertaining to the appointment records of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court. [2-4] The denial letter claims that all such records are exempt from the FOIA under a clause, pertaining to "records of internal deliberations".
"The most plausible explanation for the denial of the FOIA request is by accepting the response of the Administration of Courts at face value," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Both the appointment of Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz and the certification procedures of electronic records of the Supreme Court have been left in 'deliberations' for years."
The FOIA request also asked for records pertaining to the Apostille certification of records of the Supreme Court, pursuant to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961). The denial of the request for legal public records regarding the Apostille certifications, implies that the Apostille certification arrangements, which are published on the web site of the Judicial Authority, [5] should be deemed a simulated, or illegal public record. [6]
Today’s request, addressed to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz, notes that such conditions are alleged as serious violations of the Human Rights of all, who reside in the State of Israel, and therefore solicits her comments, as a key figure under the circumstances.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, the integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel was seriously compromised.”
Today:
- The identity of the Supreme Court's servers is uncertified;
- All electronic records are published online unsigned and uncertified, ‘subject to editing and phrasing changes’;
- Certifications by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen appear on judicial records, which were purportedly issued years after his death;
- The office of current Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz refuses to certify the decisions and other records of the Supreme Court;
- The Director of Administration of Courts, Judge Moshe Gal, denied Freedom of Information request for the appointment records of the current Chief Clerk and current certification procedures, claiming that with both in office/operation for a decade, both are also exempt as “internal deliberation”;
- The Supreme Court routinely publishes simulated decisions and conducts simulated review;
- “Sealing” is imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner;
- A fraudulent Apostille certification arrangement was jointly entered by the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Authority, which circumvented the refusal of the Chief Clerks to certify the Courts’ records; the arrangement is published, unsigned and undated on the Judicial Authority’s web site, while invoking the authority of an unnamed Minister of Justice. The Administration of Courts and Ministry of Justice hold pending Freedom of Information Act requests, re: the identity of the author and the individual, who authorized the online publication of the arrangement.
Human Rights Alert (NGO) recommendations include the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
Conditions, which were established in the State of Israel a decade ago, appear as a mirror copy of conditions, which had been established in the United States a decade or two earlier, with the implementation of fraudulent electronic record systems (PACER, CM/ECF) in the US courts. The current financial crisis and civil unrest in the United States are tightly linked to corruption of the justice system. [8]
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) report concludes, "...nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should re-assess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel." [7] Human Rights Alert’s report on this matter is perhaps the first ever Human Rights report on any nation, which in primarily based on data mining and analysis of the integrity, or lack thereof, in electronic record systems of the courts.
______LINKS:
[1] 12-03-29 Request for comments by Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court Sarah Lifschitz on denial of FOIA Re: Appointment records of the Chief Clerk, certification procedures in the Supreme Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 12-03-06 FOIA Response by Administration of Courts (P29-2012) Re: March 2, 2012 Request for the appointment letters of the Chief Clerks and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (Heb)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 12-02-19 PRESS RELEASE: Invalid, Simulated Apostille Certification Procedure Published Online by the Judicial Authority of the State of Israel (English)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[6] "Simulated litigation" [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated decisions" [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to felonies, defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[7] 12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." ______________________________
OccuParty Jerusalem-AlQuds!
August 17 - ?, 2012
Love, Peace, Justice
Empowering the People through
dance/music/art/study/pray
Facebook Eventhttp://www.facebook.com/
Youtube: Occuparty kills my luv life...
http://youtu.be/UX2cdaWtxa4
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
12-03-29 Miami Heat in Hoodies
Miami Heat Tweets Team Pic of Hoodies To Support Trayvon Martin
LeBron James tweeted the picture Friday morning.
12-03-28 On March 7, 2002, Israel was set up for a “push button” regime change
On March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a “push button” regime change
In between, the Supreme Court considers all its records uncertified, and “subject to editing and phrasing changes”
Supreme Court, State of Israel, Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen (שמריהו כהן), Sarah Lifschitz
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 28 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), released further details, pertaining to data mining of records in the weeks before and after March 7, 2002.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a ‘push-button’ regime change.”
The findings have wide-range implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional and world violence.
Human Rights Alert’s Draft Submission is remarkable, in being narrowly focused on data mining and analysis of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel. [1]
The Recommendations include:- Resolution of the crisis would have to draw upon civil society agents within the legal profession, and also most likely computing experts and religious leaders. - Thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the March 7, 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen is warranted. - Truth and reconciliation commission may also be required to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
LINKS:12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...____________________Appendix 06a: Table Summary - Changes in the certification patterns of the Supreme around March 7, 2002 As further analysis of discontinuities in certification patters of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, ELYON1 was searched for decisions issued on each day, around March 7, 2002 (between February 22 and March 20, 2002). Date data should be deemed unreliable, until the systems are examined.
This period is characterized by increased irregularity in certification practices, and the joint appearance of various certification forms outside their normal sequence, at times several certification patterns on the same date. [,]
These irregularities appear on the background of the steady underlying trends, which started long before March 7, 2002, and ended around January 2003:
a) Elimination of the mention of the authority of the “Chief Clerk”;
b) Elimination of the mention of the name of the accountable individual;
c) Elimination of the certification statement, “True Copy of the Original”;
d) Addition of the disclaimer, “Subject to phrasing and editing changes”;
e) Increased dominance of an “Information Center”, “operated in the Supreme Court”;
f) Transition of the database to “COURT.DOT”, and “.doc” files.
Combined, the analysis of these longer-term trends [] and the certification patterns around March 7, 2002, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that a thorough, public investigation of the circumstances of the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen z”l, is fully warranted.
Otherwise: On or about March 7, 2002, a system was set, which may permit a “push button” regime change in the State of Israel.
Three senior Israel computing/cryptology experts independently reviewed the data previously generated by Dr Zernik. All three expressed alarm and concern. One of the three issued a formal request on a nationally decorated rabbinical authority, who is versed in math and physics, for a Halachic ruling:
Is the Supreme Court of the State of Israel engaged in Gneivat Ha-Da’at? [Widespread Public Deception jz]
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
In between, the Supreme Court considers all its records uncertified, and “subject to editing and phrasing changes”
Supreme Court, State of Israel, Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen (שמריהו כהן), Sarah Lifschitz
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Jerusalem, March 28 - as part of preparation of evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, Human Rights Alert (NGO), released further details, pertaining to data mining of records in the weeks before and after March 7, 2002.
“With the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, immediately after offering a toast in an office party,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, “in the afternoon of March 7, 2002, through collusion of judges, IBM and EDS, Israel was set up for a ‘push-button’ regime change.”
The findings have wide-range implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional and world violence.
Human Rights Alert’s Draft Submission is remarkable, in being narrowly focused on data mining and analysis of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel. [1]
The Recommendations include:- Resolution of the crisis would have to draw upon civil society agents within the legal profession, and also most likely computing experts and religious leaders. - Thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the March 7, 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen is warranted. - Truth and reconciliation commission may also be required to resolve the disposition of the large number of missing and falsified court records from the past decade, and to investigate, whether judges/justices and/or senior officers of the Ministry of Justice have been involved in wholesale violations of their oaths of office.
LINKS:12-03-26 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT to Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
###Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...____________________Appendix 06a: Table Summary - Changes in the certification patterns of the Supreme around March 7, 2002 As further analysis of discontinuities in certification patters of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, ELYON1 was searched for decisions issued on each day, around March 7, 2002 (between February 22 and March 20, 2002). Date data should be deemed unreliable, until the systems are examined.
This period is characterized by increased irregularity in certification practices, and the joint appearance of various certification forms outside their normal sequence, at times several certification patterns on the same date. [,]
These irregularities appear on the background of the steady underlying trends, which started long before March 7, 2002, and ended around January 2003:
a) Elimination of the mention of the authority of the “Chief Clerk”;
b) Elimination of the mention of the name of the accountable individual;
c) Elimination of the certification statement, “True Copy of the Original”;
d) Addition of the disclaimer, “Subject to phrasing and editing changes”;
e) Increased dominance of an “Information Center”, “operated in the Supreme Court”;
f) Transition of the database to “COURT.DOT”, and “.doc” files.
Combined, the analysis of these longer-term trends [] and the certification patterns around March 7, 2002, would lead a reasonable person to conclude that a thorough, public investigation of the circumstances of the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen z”l, is fully warranted.
Otherwise: On or about March 7, 2002, a system was set, which may permit a “push button” regime change in the State of Israel.
Three senior Israel computing/cryptology experts independently reviewed the data previously generated by Dr Zernik. All three expressed alarm and concern. One of the three issued a formal request on a nationally decorated rabbinical authority, who is versed in math and physics, for a Halachic ruling:
Is the Supreme Court of the State of Israel engaged in Gneivat Ha-Da’at? [Widespread Public Deception jz]
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
12-03-28 Revised Draft Report: Integrity of the electronic record system of the Israeli courts.
Supreme Court of Israel, Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz
Jerusalem, March 27 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) has published a new draft submission for the 2012 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations:
Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, SHORT REPORT (REVISED)
Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission:
Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts
The Human Rights Alert submission is narrowly focused on Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the: Supreme Court, District Courts, Detainees’ Courts.
Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic records of the national courts of the State of Israel, are alleged as violations of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite.
The underlying research was inspired by data mining and zero knowledge proofs. Serious deficiencies were identified in all systems, which were inspected. Three senior Israeli computing/cryptology experts expressed their concern/alarm.
In the Supreme Court, on or about March 7, 2002, integrity of the electronic records was compromised. Two large US data processing corporations were involved: IBM, EDS, jointly with the Administration of Courts in this “flag project”.
Today:
- The identity of the Supreme Court's servers is uncertified;
- All electronic records are published online unsigned and uncertified, ‘subject to editing and phrasing changes’;
- Certifications by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen appear on judicial records, which were purportedly issued years after his death;
- The office of current Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz refuses to certify the decisions and other records of the Supreme Court;
- The Supreme Court routinely publishes simulated decisions and conducts simulated review; [[i]]
- “Sealing” is imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner;
- A fraudulent Apostille certification arrangement was jointly entered by the Ministry of Justice and the Courts to circumvent the refusal of the Chief Clerks to certify the courts’ records; the arrangement is published, unsigned and undated on the Judicial Authority’s web site, while invoking the authority of an unnamed Minister of Justice.
The findings are compounded by various conflicts of interests of legal and computing experts.
Such findings should require re-assessment of the validity of any other legal public records, provided by the State of Israel, and employed in the UPR process. Member nations, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), and others, should reassess any faith and credit, which are given to legal public records originating in the State of Israel.
Recommendation include, but are not limited to, the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
[i] "Simulated litigation" [Halich le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated decisions" [Ketav Bei Din le-Mar’it Ayin - jz], "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to felonies, defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)