10-12-18 UCLA HILLEL'S RABBI CHAIM SEIDLER-FELLER ENDORSED THE CALL: STOP THE EXECUTION OF KEVIN COOPER; END THE DEATH PENALTY IN CALIFORNIA! // El rabino en Los Angeles Apoya Acabar con la Pena de Muerte! // 在洛杉矶结束拉比支持死刑!

UCLA HILLEL'S RABBI CHAIM SEIDER-FELLER ENDORSED THE CALL: STOP THE EXECUTION OF KEVIN COOPER; END THE DEATH PENALTY IN CALIFORNIA!
---
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AT:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/
---
Los Angeles, December 18 - UCLA Hillel's Rabbi Chaim Seidler-Feller endorsed  the call upon California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California. In message received December 17, 2010, Rabbi Seidler-Feller also stated: I just signed. I support [these] important efforts.

The petition was also endorsed by Tikkun's Rabbi Michael Lerner.

As noted in the petition itself, reasonable doubts remained regarding the guilt of Kevin Cooper, which led five federal judges to take issue with their colleagues' decision to put a stop to Cooper's appeals. 


Moreover, corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California was well-documented for over a decade in official, scholarly and media reports. 

Thousand of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - victims of court corruption of the courts in Los Angeles County, which was uncovered in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) remain imprisoned to this date, and judges of the Los Angeles Court were documented as objecting to their release, since it would lead to "collapse of the justice system".

"Corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California was also noted in a recent report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, which called upon the US to abolish the death penalty.

Therefore, the petition called upon California Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger to stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and to impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.

The Jewish community is vastly over-represented among judges and attorneys in California, and the Jewish community historically held itself committed to Human and Civil Rights in the United States. Therefore, Human Rights Alert repeatedly asserted that the Jewish community must deem itself accountable for the conditions of the justice system in California and the United States.

Asking leading rabbis of the day to voice their opinions on current issues has been a Jewish tradition for some 1,500 years.
---
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AT:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/
---


Target: California Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger:

We, the undersigned call upon Governor Schwarzenegger to stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California:

1. Reasonable doubts remain regarding the guilt of Kevin Cooper
The legal effort to prevent the execution of Kevin Cooper has run its course. Unless the governor of California intervenes, Cooper is likely to be put to death next year for the brutal 1983 murders of a Chino Hills couple, their 10-year-old daughter and an 11-year-old houseguest.
Just one eyewitness survived the horrific scene, a 9-year-old boy whose throat had been sliced. His initial account of the attack is one of many disturbing contradictions that led five federal judges to take issue with their colleagues' decision to put a stop to Cooper's appeals.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/12/EDG81GP0I7.DTL#ixzz18BGZmaQA

2. Corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California was well-documented for over a decade.
Official, scholarly, and media reports have documented the corruption of the justice system in California for over a decade. 
Reports of the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000) established that thousands of innocent persons were falsely imprisonment for long terms through framing of evidence, extraction of confessions under torture, and perjury of police.  The victims - the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly blacks and Latinos, were estimated by various groups at 10,000-30,000.  Regardless, judges of the Los Angeles Court have refuses to free the Rampart-FIPs, and the US Department of Justice refuses to take action either.

Read more: Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review; Rampart-FIPs - Rampart First Trial PBS Frontline: Rampart False Imprisonments; 06-07-15 Rampart Reconsidered: LAPD's Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006);

2. "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California was noted in a recent report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, which called upon the US to abolish the death penalty.
As part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, official report noted %u201Ccorruption of the courts and the legal profession%u201D in California.
The United Nations Human Rights Council also called upon the United States to abolish the death penalty.

Read more: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ ;http://www.scribd.com/doc/42218232/

3.  Therefore, the Governor of California should stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.
Under conditions that today prevail in the justice system in Los Angeles County and California, it is inconceivable to continue with executions.  California Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger should stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.
---
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AT:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/
---

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?*     "Innocent people remain in prison"*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

10-12-17 SEC's Freedom of Information Response in re: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) // Falso Registros Bancarios Reglamento // 假银行监管记录

  

Judge Jed Rakoff_ _ _ _ _ _  _ __ __ _ _ _BAC Pres Brian Moynihan_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _SEC Chair Mary Schapiro


SEC's Freedom of Information Response in re: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)

Pretense Litigation under SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States

Los Angeles, December 17 - Human Rights Alert and Joseph Zernik, PhD, released Freedom of Information Act responses [1] provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission, pertaining to litigation under SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829), including unsigned Summons as issued by clerk.

The PACER docket of the case failed to include the summons as issued by clerk in apparent violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  Moreover, the office of the Clerk of the Court refused to provide a copy of the Summons, and claimed that the custom at the US District Court, Southern District of New York, was not to docket the summons.

The PACER docket also failed to include any reference to execution of service of the Summons, or waiver of the execution of the service of the Summons and the Complaint.

As documented in the FOIA-responses released today, SEC failed to provide any evidence of an Assignment Order for Judge Jed Rakoff and Minutes of the proceedings in the case, all of which were missing from the PACER (the online Public Access system of the US courts) docket as well.

SEC also refused refused to provide copies of the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) - the attestation/authentication for judicial records, including, but not limited to the NEF pertaining to the purported February 24, 2010 Final Consent Judgment.

The office of the Clerk of the Court also refused to provide copies of the NEFs in the case, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights.

Absent attestation/authentication by the Clerk of the Court, the February 24, 2010 Final Consent Judgment cannot be deemed a valid and effectual judicial record.

For the reasons, including but not limited to the above listed ones, the case as a whole was opined in a scholarly report, filed for international peer-review, as pretense litigation and Fraud on the Court. [2]

The report also reviewed the extensive coverage of the case by both US and international media.  The case was widely perceived as the highlight of enforcement of corporate and banking regulation under the current financial crisis.  In contrast, the report opined that the case was the hallmark of pretense Banking Regulation in the United States, and direct evidence of the tight link between corruption of the US courts and corruption of banking regulation. 

The report also served as the basis for requests, which were filed with the US Congress judiciary and banking committees to initiate investigation, and if appropriate - impeachment proceedings - against US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk of the US Court Ruby Krajick. [3, 4]

Human Rights Alert also called upon US Congress to initiate corrective actions:

1) Restoring provisions of the Salary Act of 1919, which placed the clerks of the US courts under the direct authority of the US Attorney General.
Such provisions were key to restoration of integrity of the US courts and ending the Robber Baron Era a century ago.

2) Enacting federal rules or electronic court records.
Such rules would restore accountability of the clerks for the PACER records, and restore public access to the attestation/authentication records of the US courts, now universally excluded from Public Access in apparent violation of First Amendment rights, following implementation of PACER and CM/ECF (the elelctronic case management system of the US courts) by the Administrative Office of the US Courts.  Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF was claimed as key to undermining the authority of the clerks and integrity of the US courts.

Such actions by US Congress were asserted as essential not only for restoring the integrity of the US courts, but also for restoring the integrity of banking regulation and ending the current economic Depression.


Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  

LINKS:
[1] 10-12-17 RE: SEC Freedom of Information Response re: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45502385/
[2] Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States - pending
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[3] 10-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for Investigation, Impeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44669382/
[4] 10-12-08 Press Release - Request for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk US District Court, Southern District of New York-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44910959/

10-12-17 Welcome India - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido India - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎印度- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor India Visited December 17, 2010

10-12-17 Welcome Bhutan - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Bhután - Pais Mas Reciente ! // 欢迎不丹-最后一个新的国家！

        

Newest Country Bhutan Last Visited December 16, 2010

10-12-17 Welcome Taiwan - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Taiwán - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎台湾 - 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor

Taiwan
Visited December 17, 2010