Monday, May 24, 2010

10-005-25 Richard Fine on CNN –Correction of Errors in CNN Reporting // Richard Fine en la CNN-Corrección de errores en la presentación de informes de CNN // Richard Fine auf CNN-Korrektur von Fehlern bei CNN Reporting


Washington DC, May 24 - the CNN report provide erroneous information regarding the core facts in the case of Richard Fine: "Superior Court Judge David Yaffe found Fine in contempt after he refused to turn over financial documents and answer questions when ordered to pay an opposing party's attorney's fees, according to court documents."
There are no honest, valid, and effectual court documents in the case of Richard Fine.  That is the hallmark of the corruption in his case and in the cases of thousands of others who are falsely held in Los Angeles County, California.
As documented in a UTube clip, Motion to Intervene was filed in the case of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court, Washington DC. [1]  The Motion to Intervene did not address the various arguments brought up by Richard Fine himself in the application to US Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg.  Instead, it argued that Richard Fine must be immediately released for the simple reason that there were no records, conforming with the fundamentals of the law, to provide the legal basis for his confinement. 
Therefore, the filing provided detailed evidence of the alleged fraud in respective records of the various agencies of the justice system:
(a) The Los Angeles Superior Court -  refuses to this date to allow access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case, in disregard of First Amendment rights;
(b) The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department - insists to this date on fraudulently claiming that Richard Fine was arrested and booked at an by the authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro";
(c) The US District Court, Los Angeles - purported to conduct a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but served minutes, orders, judgment, and mandate with no valid authentication at all;
(d) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - likewise served orders,  judgments, and a mandate unsigned, and with no authentication at all.
The US Supreme Court handled such filing the same way the other courts did - the papers simply vanished.  A declaration [2] posted at Scribd detailed what took place:  The exhibits to the declaration provided the conformed copies that were received from the US Supreme Court as evidence of the filing.  It also recorded the phone call with the US Supreme Court  the next day: Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell initially tried to deny that the papers were filed and were held in his possession.  Later he stated that he had not yet made the decision whether the papers would or would not appear in the Supreme Court docket of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827). When asked whether he was the Clerk of the Court or whether he was authorized as Deputy Clerk, he admitted he was neither. 
Regardless, Mr Bickell stated that he would made the decision... And indeed he apparently did - the papers simply vanished with no Due Process at all...
No discrepancy notice or any other notation ever appeared in the docket to document the filing...  Forget about the First Amendment right to to "petition the Government for a redress of grievances..." The US Supreme Court disregarded it, just like the lower courts...
The reason that the US Supreme Court refused to hear the case as presented by Fine is likely to be of the same nature - there was no judgment or mandate in the case to take the application of Richard Fine from, and therefore, the US Supreme Court had no jurisdiction in the matters that Richard Fine brought before that court.
For such reasons, the case and the filings of Richard Fine, futile as they may be, are of historic significance.  Richard Fine, in his filings, documented in great detail the alleged fraud in the US justice system from top to bottom. [3] 
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION -  FREE RICHARD FINE
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
LINKS:
[1] UTube clip - filing at the US Supreme Court in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRKUbhmoCpU
[2] 10-04-22 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court Dr Zernik’s Declaration RE Court Counsel Danny Bickell and Filing at US Supreme Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31430464/
[3]  Human Rights Alert submission to the United Nations:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31632549/
10-05-19 Human Rights Alert: PowerPoint presentation, as forwarded to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder, as part of the 2010 UPR
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
10-04-19 Press Release: Human Rights Alert (NGO) Filed UPR Report with the United Nations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
10-04-18 Human Rights Alert: Final submission to the United Nations for the 2010 Universal Periodic Review of the US 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert: Final Appendix for Submission to the United Nations for the 2010 UPR of the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31136665/
10-05-10 Human Rights Alert: Human Rights in the Digital Era – A Call for Publicly Accountable Validation of the justice system case management and online public access systems

Comments - sort by newest to oldest

  • This article smells of the conspiratorial ravings of the same sort that got this guy in the pickle he's in. He's in willful defiance of the court and continues to be. These claims about missing documents or issues related to whether they're conformed or not is scarcely credible and there is no contention at all that the guy is NOT in continuing defiance of the court.

    Hand over the financial documents, stop defying the court.
    Posted 2 hours ago by "dorbie" (R)
    Quote | 
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 
  • Quoted comment by dorbie: This article smells of the conspiratorial ravings of the same sort that got this guy in the pickle he's in. He's in willful defiance of the court and continues to be. These claims about missing documents or issues related to whether they're conformed or not is scarcely credible and there is no contention at all that the guy is NOT in continuing defiance of the court.

    Hand over the financial documents, stop defying the court.

    And your response smells of the arrogant condescension of the same sort that armchair legal scholars use to justify their apathy toward the oppression of fellow human beings.

    Gosh, it's fun being a know-it-all, ain't it?
    Posted 1 hour ago by "CaptainAntarctica" (R) United States
    Quote | 
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 
  • Quoted comment by dorbie: This article smells of the conspiratorial ravings of the same sort that got this guy in the pickle he's in. He's in willful defiance of the court and continues to be. These claims about missing documents or issues related to whether they're conformed or not is scarcely credible and there is no contention at all that the guy is NOT in continuing defiance of the court.

    Hand over the financial documents, stop defying the court.

    "dorbie" failes to explain why the Sheriff of Los Angeles, even in response to Supervisor of Los Angeles County, Michael Antonovich, refused to provide copy of the warrant and booking records of Richard Fine - public records by California Public Records Act, and insisted on fraudulently claiming that Richard Fine was arrested at and by the authority of the non existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro".
    LINKS:
    [1] 10-01-08 Supervisor Antonovich, Los Angeles County, repeat mailing of January 8, 2010, response from Sheriff Lee Baca in re: Richard Fine papers including the fraudulent attachments:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/25555341/ 
    Posted 24 mins ago by "jz12345" (R) United States
    Quote | 
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 
  • PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION: FREE RICHARD FINE
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine  
    Posted 22 mins ago by "jz12345" (R) United States

Posted by at No comments:

10-05-24 Richard Fine on CNN - report and a comment // Richard Fine en la CNN - Informar y Comentar // Richard Fine auf CNN - Bericht und Kommentar

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/24/jailed.lawyer.richard.fine/index.html?hpt=C1
Former Beverly Hills lawyer Richard Fine is led back to his cell at L.A.'s Men's Central Jail.

COMMENT LEFT BY JOSEPH ZERNIK


PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION -  FREE RICHARD FINE
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

Please notice on UTBUE clip documenting the filing of Motion to Intervene in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court, Washington DC. [1]
The Motion to Intervene did not address the various arguments brought up by Richard Fine himself in the application to US Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg.  Instead, it argued that Richard Fine must be immediately released for the simple reason that there were no records, conforming with the fundamentals of the law, to provide the legal basis for his confinement.   Therefore, the filing provided detailed evidence of the alleged fraud in respective records of the various agencies of the justice system:
(a) The Los Angeles Superior Court - which refuses to this date to allow access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case;
(b) The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department - which insists to this date on fraudulently claiming that Richard Fine was arrested and booked at an by the authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro";
(c) The US District Court, Los Angeles - which purported to conduct a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but served minutes, orders, judgment, and mandate with no valid authentication at all;
(d) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - which likewise served orders,  judgments, and a mandate unsigned, and with no authentication at all.
The US Supreme Court handled such filing the same way the other courts did - the papers simply vanished.
A declaration posted at SCRIBD detailed what took place:  The exhibits to the declaration provided the conformed copies that were received from the US Supreme Court as evidence of the filing.  It also recorded the phone call with the US Supreme Court  the next day: Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell initially tried to deny that the papers were filed and were held in his possession.  Later he stated that he had not yet made the decision whether the papers would or would not appear in the Supreme Court docket of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827). When asked whether he was the Clerk of the Court or whether he was authorized as Deputy Clerk, he admitted he was neither.  Regardless, he stated he would made the decision... And indeed apparently he did - the papers simply vanished with no Due Process at all...
No discrepancy notice or any other notation ever appeared in the docket to document the filing...
Forget about the First Amendment right to to "petition the Government for a redress of grievances..." The US Supreme Court disregarded it, just like the lower courts...
The reason that the US Supreme Court refused to hear the case as presented by Fine is likely to be of the same nature - there was no judgment or mandate in the case to take the application of Richard Fine from, and therefore, the US Supreme Court had no jurisdiction in the matters that Richard Fine brought before that court.
For such reasons, the case and the filings of Richard Fine, futile as they may be, are of historic significance.  Richard Fine, in his filings, documented in great detail the alleged fraud in the US justice system from top to bottom. [2]
LINKS:
[1] UTube clip - filing at the US Supreme Court in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRKUbhmoCpU
[2]  Human Rights Alert submission to the United Nations:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31632549/
10-05-19 Human Rights Alert: PowerPoint presentation, as forwarded to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder, as part of the 2010 UPR
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
10-04-19 Press Release: Human Rights Alert (NGO) Filed UPR Report with the United Nations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
10-04-18 Human Rights Alert: Final submission to the United Nations for the 2010 Universal Periodic Review of the US  
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert: Final Appendix for Submission to the United Nations for the 2010 UPR of the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31136665/
10-05-10 Human Rights Alert: Human Rights in the Digital Era – A Call for Publicly Accountable Validation of the justice system case management and online public access systems

CNN REPORT

Ex-lawyer jailed 14 months, but not charged with a crime

By Abbie Boudreau, Emily Probst and Dana Rosenblatt, CNN Special Investigations Unit
May 24, 2010 -- Updated 1417 GMT (2217 HKT)
Former Beverly Hills lawyer Richard Fine is led back to his cell at L.A.'s Men's Central Jail.
Former Beverly Hills lawyer Richard Fine is led back to his cell at L.A.'s Men's Central Jail.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Former Beverly Hills lawyer has been in solitary confinement for 14 months
  • Richard Fine, 70, is not charged with a crime; he's being held in contempt
  • Supreme Court decides Monday it won't hear the case
Los Angeles, California (CNN) -- Once a dapper Beverly Hills attorney known for his bow tie, Richard Fine has been held in solitary confinement at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail for 14 months, even though he's never been charged with a crime.
Fine, a 70-year- old taxpayer's advocate who once worked for the Department of Justice, is being held for contempt of court.
Superior Court Judge David Yaffe found Fine in contempt after he refused to turn over financial documents and answer questions when ordered to pay an opposing party's attorney's fees, according to court documents.
Fine says his contempt order masks the real reason why he's in jail. He claims he's a political prisoner.
"I ended up here because I did the one thing no other lawyer in California is willing to do. I took on the corruption of the courts," Fine said in a jailhouse interview with CNN.
For the last decade, Fine has filed appeal after appeal against Los Angeles County's Superior Court judges. He says the judges each accept what he calls yearly "bribes" from the county worth $57,000. That's on top of a $178,789 annual salary, paid by the state. The county calls the extra payments "supplemental benefits" -- a way to attract and retain quality judges in a high-cost city.
While the practice of paying supplemental benefits is common in California, most high-cost cities elsewhere don't hand out these kinds of benefits. Judges in Miami, Chicago and Boston receive no extra county dollars.
Video: In jail but not charged with a crime
Video: L.A. attorney in solitary confinement
Video: Attorney was 'shut up and locked away'
RELATED TOPICS
Judges in Los Angeles County not only have the highest state salaries in the nation, they also get tens of thousands of dollars in county benefits. These payments, Fine says, mean judges are unlikely to rule against the county when it is involved in a lawsuit.
In the last two fiscal years, Los Angeles County won all but one of the nine trials that went before a judge, according to Steven Estabrook, the county's litigation cost manager.
"The reason I'm here is the retaliation of the judges," Fine says. "They figured they're going to throw me in jail and that way they feel that they can stop me."
Fine's decade-long crusade against the judges eventually led to his disbarment last year. Joe Carlucci was the lead prosecutor for the California State Bar. Carlucci says whenever Fine lost a case, he would appeal and argue the judges were corrupt.
"What he ultimately did was to delay proceedings, to level false accusations against judges," Carlucci says. "All of those lawsuits were found to have been frivolous and meritless."
Judge Yaffe and county officials refused to comment on Fine's case while it's still pending.
"Fine holds the key to his jail cell," Kevin McCormick, one of the court's attorneys, pointed out in a court filing. In other words, Fine will go free once he hands over the documents the court seeks and answers the judge's questions.
The technical term is "coercive confinement" -- jail-time until a person follows a judge's order.
"He's probably done more time than most burglars, robbers and dope dealers," says Sterling Norris of the public-interest group Judicial Watch.
Norris says Fine's confinement has gone on too long.
Norris won a case in 2008 that found county payments to judges unconstitutional. The California Legislature swiftly passed a bill that enabled counties to continue paying the extra benefits.
"I think it's a lack of judicial integrity to say enough is enough," Norris says. "We've got a man, 70-year-old attorney, in jail for over a year on coercive confinement and that is way beyond the pale. No matter what else he may have done, that is improper."
Steve Whitmore, a spokesman for Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, calls the length of Fine's contempt confinement an "anomaly."
Fine's jail cell could be used for a more violent offender, Whitmore added. In fact, Los Angeles County's jails have in recent months released hundreds of inmates before their terms were up due to budget constraints.
Fine took his pencil-and-paper fight from solitary confinement to the U.S Supreme Court, which ruled Monday it would not hear the case. The court offered no explanation.
Meanwhile, Fine's family stands behind him -- even in the face of home foreclosure.
"My husband has always been the straightest arrow, hardworking, very successful attorney, and for this to happen to him is unbelievable," says Maryellen Fine, his wife of 27 years.
"I'll look back with tears with all the time I might have missed with the family," Fine says tearfully just before he is handcuffed and walked back to his cell.
"We don't know what is going to be next," says Fine's daughter, Victoria. "Every day is just one more day where I think maybe I'm going to get a phone call that says dad's coming home."


Posted by at No comments:

10-05-24 10-05-24 Dennis C Blair Resigned as Director of National Intelligence – warned Senate of Assassination of US citizens // Dennis Blair renunció al cargo de Director de Inteligencia Nacional - Advirtió Senado de asesinato de ciudadanos de los EE.UU. // Dennis Blair trat als Direktor der National Intelligence - warnt Senat der Ermordung des amerikanischen Bürger



Testimony on use of assassination on United States citizens

On 3 February 2010 as Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair testified before Congress, "We take direct action against terrorists in the Intelligence Community. If... we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."
Los testimonios sobre los Estados Unidos utilizan el asesinato de los ciudadanos
El 3 de febrero de 2010 que como Director de Inteligencia Nacional, declaró ante el Congreso, Dennis Blair, "Nos tomamos la acción directa contra los terroristas en la comunidad de inteligencia. ... Si pensamos que la acción directa a la muerte de un estadounidense, obtendremos su autorización específica para hacerlo. "
Zeugnis über die Verwendung von Attentat auf US-Bürger
Am 3. Februar 2010 als Director of National Intelligence vor dem Kongress Dennis Blair, "Wir nehmen direkten Aktion gegen die Terroristen in der Intelligence Community. ... Wenn wir denken, dass Will direkte Tötung eines amerikanischen Aktion, bekommen wir ausdrückliche Erlaubnis das zu tun. "
  1. ^ http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_house_hearings&docid=f:55551.wais
  2. ^ http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/license-kill-intelligence-chief-us-american-terrorist/story?id=9740491&page=1
  3. ^ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/04/dennis-blair-us-can-kill_n_449170.html
  4. ^ http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126001
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)