Tuesday, May 21, 2013

13-05-21 Ongoing war on the American People: Dissent = Terrorism

How America's National Security Apparatus -- in Partnership With Big Corporations -- Cracked Down on Dissent

A new report is an eye-opening look into how the U.S. counter-terror apparatus was used to track the Occupy movement.
Occupy protests in New York on November 15, 2011, after the eviction of the protest encampment at Zucotti Park.


13-05-22 Robbing the American People - how it works in practice.

There is no way to describe it other than warr on the People. jz

SOURCE: http://www.alternet.org/police-tase-foreclosed-upon-homeowners-protesting-criminal-bankers-criminal-bankers-continue-facing?akid=10464.1117888.ODMjYC&rd=1&src=newsletter843638&t=15

Police Tase Foreclosed Upon Homeowners Protesting Criminal Bankers, Criminal Bankers Continue Facing No Repercussions

Why shoot peaceful protesters full of electricity in order to get them to fall to the ground in excruciating pain, dazed and compliant?
Taser International's X2 two-shot Taser for law enforcement is displayed in January. The US Supreme Court refused to review the use of Taser stun guns by police on two women, including one who was seven months pregnant at the time.

13-05-21 Hello World!

21/5 @ 19:18 : Beijing, CN
21/5 @ 18:36 : Arroyo Grande, California, US
21/5 @ 17:59 : Redmond, Washington, US
21/5 @ 17:27 : San Francisco, California, US
21/5 @ 16:58 : Chicago, Illinois, US
21/5 @ 16:11 : Israel, IL
21/5 @ 14:46 : Modi'in, IL
21/5 @ 13:03 : Mountain View, California, US
21/5 @ 12:36 : Clifton, New Jersey, US
21/5 @ 10:17 : Azur, IL

13-05-21 The Israeli Supreme Court is having difficulties issuing a valid decision record...

13-05-16 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) in the Israeli Supreme Court – Additional copy of April 18, 2013 Decision by Justice Esther Hayut, as received by the Petitioner

a.  b. 

a. The April 18, 2013 Decision by Justice Esther Hayut, as originally served; b. Additional copy of the April 18, 2013 Decision as received by mail, following request for a certified copy.

Following a request for a certified copy of the decision, “True Copy of the Original”, the decision paper was sent again to the Petitioner, signed, with the disclaimer “subject to editing and phrasing changes” removed, but with neither authentication letter by the Clerk of the Court, nor certification “True Copy of the Original”. The Supreme Court is having difficulties issuing a valid decision record...
The Petition itself addresses widespread corruption of the Israeli courts over the past decade, enabled by new, fraudulent electronic record systems in the courts.
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated into the Human Right Council Report on Human Rights in Israel (2013) with a note, referring to "Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel".

Additional Links:[1] 13-04-15 Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the Courts Spitzer (2689/13) – Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew with English translation))
[2] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
[3] 13-05-12 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) Request for Certification of Israeli Supreme Court Justice Esther Hayut April 18, 2013 Decision