2014-08-13 Human Right Alert: United States DRAFT UPR Submission (2014)
Large-scale
fraud in IT systems of the US courts - unannounced regime change?
Wide
segments of the people of the United States today hold that the US
government has undergone a transformation over the past couple of
decades, and the US Constitution is no longer in force and effect.
Instant submission documents that the US Constitution was indeed
voided, and that the implementation of invalid, fraudulent IT systems
in the US courts was a key event in this regard, which enables
widespread judicial corruption and disregard of the law of the United
States and the US Constitution.
Allegations:
1.
The IT systems of the US courts enable the routine conduct of
simulated (sham/fake) litigation and the publication of simulated
judicial records; 2. Under such circumstances, the rule of law and
the US Constitution are effectively suspended, access to the courts
is effectively denied; 3, Such conditions should be considered
unannounced regime change; 4. Such conditions amount to violation of
any article of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights,
where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a
prerequisite.
Evidence:
IT
system analysis documents: a) Servers of
unverified identity; b) Invalid implementation of electronic
signatures (including invisible electronic signatures - “The
Emperor's New Cloths”); c) Invalid implementation of
authentication, certification, and service procedures; d)
Establishing of “double books” systems, where the public and
pro-se parties (those, who are represented by attorneys) cannot see
true and complete court records; e) Invalid implementation of
authorities and permissions, so that unauthorized persons can access
the courts' data base and make entries in dockets; f) Discrimination
in access to the courts, where attorneys are permitted access to
CM/ECF, but not pro-se parties, and attorneys are permitted to enter
papers in the US district court dockets with no prior review by the
clerk of the court; g) Universal failure to docket summonses; h)
Adulteration and deletion of court records.
Case
studies document the outcome of conduct of simulated litigation in
matters involving deprivation of liberty and property, as well as
fundamental constitutional matters.
Conclusions:
1.
Through the implementation and operation of invalid, fraudulent IT
systems, the US courts today routinely conduct simulated (fake/sham)
litigation, unlawfully deprive the liberty and property of
individuals, and place the banks above the law. 2. Such conduct
amounts to serious violation of fundamental Human Rights of the
people of the United States. 3. Such
conduct is also central to
the current socio-economic crisis, failing banking regulation, and
the “Foreclosure Crisis”, which resulted in vast increase in
poverty and homelessness. 4. The validity of any legal and
judicial records, originating in the United States, and the
validity of any litigation in the US courts should be considered
dubious. 5. The international community should reassess the nature
of the current regime in the United States, and any claims that its
foreign policy is driven by Human Rights interests. 6. Efforts
to address conditions, which have been established in the United
States, and to restore the force and effect of the US Constitution
and US law, are likely be protracted and meet stark resistance by
powerful US security, legal, and financial groups and their
interests.
Recommendations:
Emerging
from the current conditions would require a fundamental corrective
process in the United States, where as a result of current
conditions, the political process is undermined: 1.
The large-scale fraud in the US courts, which in fact implicates
each and every US sitting judge, would likely require an approach
such as a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2. Due to the central
role of the Administrative Office of the US Courts in implementing
the fraudulent IT systems of the US courts, the Office should be
restructured or closed. 3. Measures, similar to those taken a
century ago under similar circumstances through the Salary Act
(1919), which placed the clerks of the US courts under the direct
authority of the Attorney General, should be considered. 4. US legal
and computing experts should be employed in an initiative to restore
the integrity of the IT systems of the US courts, under
accountability to the US Congress, with the goal of making such
system as transparent to the public at large as possible. 5. In
nations, where the separation of branches is established by law, the
courts must not be permitted to develop and implement the courts' IT
systems. 6. Human
Rights and internet activists must keep a watchful eye on the
validity and integrity of IT systems of the courts and prisons.
Online
Appendix:
To
be completed
===2014-08-13 UN Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States (2014) - Human Rights Alert (NGO) draft submission===
Filed today with US State Department for corrections, comments.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/236702601/
Filed today with US State Department for corrections, comments.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/236702601/
No comments:
Post a Comment