Beverly Hills Police Dept, La Verne Police Dept, Cal AG, SEC, FBI, U.S. Judge Richard Leon, 9th Justicee Alex Kozinski, and the Culture of Deceit

We are still on the letter "C" for Corruption, but below, what appears to be a stream of consciousness is in fact a disciplined attempt to move to "D" for Deception... As in FBI deceiving U.S. Congress and the people of the U.S.... As in judges deceiving from the bench... Financial institutions and their attorneys engaging in deception in court... The culture of deception...

_____________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer #1: I am not an attorney, not even by a long shot, and therefore, what I write must not be readas legal analysis

Disclaimer #2: The older I get the more I realize how clueless I am.

_____________________________________________________________________________

The FBI stated numerous times its official policy regarding judicial corruption: They are definitely against it... Most of the times...

It all depends... Sometimes they actually protect and defend it... and nurture it... Below is a statement released in conjunction with the indictment of a former New York State Supreme Court Justice, in December 2008:

.

. The felony indictment alleges that Thomas J. Spargo, 65, of East Berne, pressured an Ulster County

. attorney who had cases before him to give Spargo $10,000. The money, solicited in 2003, was

. intended to help defray Spargo's legal bills in connection with a state judicial panel's years-long

. effort to have him removed from the bench, records show.

.

. The indictment further charges that Spargo solicited the money by causing the attorney to fear that

. Spargo would use his official acts and influence to harm the attorney if he was not paid and,

. conversely, to help the attorney if he was paid," states an FBI release announcing the indictment.

..

. This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations

. of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are

. among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the

. fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of

. the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

. . . . .. . . . .December 11, 2008, BRENDAN J. LYONS, TimesUnion.com

In February, 2009, FBI indicted 2 Pennsylvania Judges for false imprisonment of juveniles. We had it on a much larger scale in Los Angeles, California as well. It was called the Rampart -scandal (1998-2000). But here, not a single judge was indicted... It was claimed that the police were corrupt, and the judges were "duped". In fact, hardly any of the victims were freed, even after a 2-year, 200 investigator probe, that determined that practices that resulted in false convictions and false sentencing were commonplace. The number of the victims was estimated between 8,000 on the low side and 30,000 on the high side. My reading was that the total released today, was fewer than 200.

.

But how do you know that there were any juveniles invovled? I can't see it written anywhere?

Well, that's really a good question. Because all involved simply forgot to write a report at the end of that massive investigation. And I would agree that the issue of juveniles was hardly even mentioned. However, it was a surprise to me as well, when I realized that the Consent Decree of 2001, which governed the LAPD until a couple of months ago, was in fact founded only on the abuse of juveniles and applicable only to juveniles. You could never get it from reading the reports, but the section of the code that was the basis for the whole agreement was only the section for abuse of rights of minors, not of adults!

But I still can't see how you got to the conclusion that the FBI and US DOJ, or anybody else defended and protected widespread corruption of judges in LA?

Well that direct conclusion was based on what happened a year ago. I tried for a while to gain protection from various law enforcement agencies. Because I knew that a group of judges, in collusion with a convicted felon who was also a "Loan Originator: for Countrywide, and people at Countrywide, were in the middle of running a major fraud scheme on me. It was not only the FBI... Let's start close to home...

.

Beverly Hills Police... Tel: 310 550 4951. Detective Steve Seeger, Chief David Snowdon.

They would not accept a citizen's incident report from me during the whole of 2007. They claimed it was a "Business Dispute". I had documented and provided evidence of numrous types of forgery and adulterations of records, wire/fax fraud, forged prequalification letter, where NIVIE SAMAAN forged the loan broker signature...

So the Detective at Beverly Hills police said- And what if a guy writes a check in the garage from his wife's checkbook and signs in her name?

.

Well, the broker was not her husband, and the forgery was meant to harm.

Later they refused to take an incident report claiming that my harm was not yet materialized... So basically, for a full year of 2007 I was a sitting duck, and no Local, State, or Federal agency would provide protection...

.

And then, in 2008, after the harm was materialized, and I had expert opinion letter that Att DAVID PASTERNAK engaged in real estate fraud...Beverly Hill Police, would still not accept an incident report...

Why? The response was by Lt STEVE SEEGER - Head of the Detective Unit, but it was on behalf of DAVID SNOWDON, the Chief of Police. The only reason they stated then was : We have not changed our position from last year....

.

I then appeared about a year ago before City Council, and asked that they direct the police to provide equal protection... I have the video.. I am not a movie star, for sure.. It took a couple of months, and finally the counsel for the city wrote some letter that gave no reason at all.

.

About 2 weeks ago, I communicated with Lt STEVE SEEGER again:

What is the state of the matter? Finally Lt Steve Seeger, from the Detective Unit wrote: "The case is closed"

I was surprised, because I never knew that it was opened, so never knew it could be closed.

And why? Well he wrote that he did not have the time to repeat it all... but no crime took place in Beverly Hills... I made a fatal error in jurisdiction... The crimes took place in Santa Monica...

- Well, the property is in Beverly Hills, Att DAVID PASTERNAK engaged in forced entry and false possession in Beverly Hills, NIVIE SAMAAN, DAVID PASSTERNAK and MARA ESCROW engaged in transactions in Beverly Hills...

NO - it all happened in Santa Monica...

.

Jerry Brown... 916 324 5437; The California Attorney General, and his right hand Tom Green:

At the end they had hundreds of pages of evidence. So they told me that Jerry Brown appointed his political right hand.. Att TOM GREEN to review the matter... and he even interviewed me by phone, for maybe an hour... And in the middle of it, it was clear to me that he was friendly with some of the judges that I claimed were racketeering. So I demanded that he provide a statement on the record of conflicts of intrest, if any, or else - that he recuse himself. He never made a sstatment on the record, and he refused to recuse himself, and he wrote a report that the whole thing was jsut a private matter, and that Jerry Brown should not get invovled in anything like that... He must still be his right hand...in the election campaign for governor..

So why is it the FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice

For a long time I was reading and searching for the answer for the evident disparity in enforcement between Los Angeles and most other parts of the country. In Los Angeles, where the evidence for widespread corruption of the judiciary is abundant, there was no evidence of enforcement in reports of the Public Integrity Section of U.S. Dept of Justice in the past 25 years!

In July-September 2008, the Honorable Diane Watson - Congresswoman, and the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator, issued Congressional Inquiries on FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice - Why they would not respond at all to complaints by Dr Joseph Zernik.

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . Hon Dianne Feinstein . . Hon Diane Watson

The responses were provided by two senior U.S. officers, and these responses should be ruled upon review by a competent court as fraud by FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice on U.S. Congress. There is no way to explain the writing of KENNETH KAISER - Assistant Director of FBI, and KENNETH MELSON - Director of U.S. Department of Justice, other than patronizing the alleged organized corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County.

.

How can I make such scandalous statements?

I don't think they are scandalous, I believe that any reasonable person who would be reasonably informed,would reach the same conclusions.

.

Do I believe that they violated their oath of office of loyalty to the U.S. Constitution?

I think it is a no-brainer.

.

Wait a minute - they must then be hold-over from the previous administration... How come they have not been replaced yet?

Well - that is a good question, and I have to speculate here - I would say that although we have a new president and a new Attorney General, the Obama Administration has so far failed to gain control of the Dept of Justice and FBI. They may have had a success at CIA, through the brilliant appointment of Leon Panetta, but they have to find his twin for FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice.

. . . . . . . , . . . . .
. . . KENNETH KAISER . . . . . . . KENNETH MELSON US DOJ

. . . . FBI. . . . . . . . . US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
. . Assistant Director, Director . . . `. . Director

. . . . Criminal Investigations

Fraud on U.S. Congress, and patronizing of alleged racketeering.

To test such heavy duty allegations, I indeed filed, on May 1, 2009 a complaint at the U.S. Court in Washington DC. In Zernik v Melson et al (1:2009cv00805 ) the causes of action included "to compel U.S. Officer to Perform His Duties", "False Claims Act", and "Civil RICO". The two senior U.S. Officers, above, were named Defendants. Other Defendant included also SEC and Samuel Bezek - for failure to enforce the law on Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation. During most of the period covered in the complaint, Linda Thompson was Head of Enforcement. more recently it was Robert Khuzami. I did not think that the change of person would chance the policy.

.

1) SEC was named Defendant - for refusing to enforce the law at Countrywide and BAC.

February 2009: Discussion of SEC Enforcement with Prof Joseph Grundfest, former Commissioner OF sec

In February 2009 I discussed it with Prof Joseph Grundfest from Stanford Law School, former Commissioner of the SEC. He looked at some of my papers, and told me that he forwarded them directly to Linda Thompson. However, he gave me the disclaimer - that he had no authority with SEC at this time. I told him that my analysis of the situation was that BAC was offered and accepted as part of the merger with CFC the status of "Indemnity for Future Criminalities:". He dismissed it on the grounds that it would be outright illegal. However,the months that passed proved my claim a good fit with reality.

.

Last December when BAC was involved in open court in Securities Fraud litigation, some financial commentators were shocked, that BAC allowed itself to get to such situation. Today, I lost the count of Securities Fraud that BAC is involved in... Nobody would take such risks unless they have assurances of "Indemnity for Future Criminalities"

.

I never challenged the scholarship of Prof Grundfest, but the illegality of such future indemnities, never prevented their use - at least not in the circles that I end up having to watch...

.

1) In February 2009, the California legislature passed a bill Bx2-11 that was illegal on its face on several counts, among them: it provided ex post facto pardons to all LA Superior Court judges, for alleged criminality in their past conduct - in taking payments that were ruled "not permitted". It also offered them "indemnity for future criminality" - by continuing to take payments that were "not permitted".

.

2) On December 7, 2008, I was present in court, against my will, when Att DAVID PASTERNAK asked, and purportedly received from Judge Patricia Collins court approval for an Indemnity Agreement for Future Criminalities for MARA ESCROW, a subsidiary of the giant corporation OLD REPUBLIC TITLE INSURANCE. The title was explicitly - Indemnity Agreement, and it was set to cover future conduct by the escrow company. DAVID PASTERNAK was seeking their collusion in real-estate fraud, but the senior escrow officer, LIZ COHEN, refused to cooperate with him, after I discussed the matter with her. And MARA ESCROW was represented in this court appearance which was illegal on almost each item brought by Att PASTERNAK for court approval. The GRANT DEED - was later opined by decorated FBI veteran JAMES WEDICK as fraud, and the two gag orders, were obviously illegal, I simply ignored them.

.

Most people in their right mind, and even attorneys, or legal scholars, or Law Professors would think that it would be illegal for Judge PATRICIA COLLINS to pronounce from the bench that she approved such Indemnity Agreement, and then on top of it to sign and date a written paper order to the same effect. Some people would even be misguided to call it criminality of the judiciary, or corruption of the courts. But in fact - it was none of it:

- I can guarantee that if the matter would be reviewed by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District - pursuant to California Law - prohibition on future indemnities for criminalities- it would be found just fine.

- If the issue would be pursued, for example, at the U.S. District Court, LA - as "deprivation of civil rights under color of law" there would be some wimps who would recuse - but eventually it would fall in the lap of Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - and Judge PATRICIA COLLINS would do just fine...

- Moreover, if we still felt that it absolutely wrong, and went further - to the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and our luck was that a brilliant jurist, by all accounts - ALEX KOZINSKI - was on the review panel for the petition - I can guarantee that he would rule it was the right thing for Judge PATRICIA COLLINS to do.

How could I engage in such speculations?

Well it was not so much speculation as much as educated guess. Because in fact FALSELY IMPRISONED ATT RICHARD FINE tested all of the options above, in a case that was much worse than approving false Indemnity Agreement.

Did ALEX KOZINSKI really review and approve the false imprisonment of Att RICHARD FINE?

Yes he did! Well... not really...

It's not that he wrote that Judge DAVID YAFFE was your poster=boy of honesty and decorum. He wrote that the case did not amount to such that would require the application of the extreme measure, which was intervention by the writ of mandate...

Is that really what ALEX KOZINSKI, the brilliant jurist, the civil rights champion, really write about the false imprisonment of Att RICHARD FINE, now going past half a year?

Yes he did! Well... not really....

.

.Robert Khuzami, Head

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEC Enforcement

2) Bryan Cave, LLP - a major law firm was and is allegedly engaged in racketeering- to this date

Other Defendants, who were most directly perpetrating the alleged racketeering were from the giant international law firm of BRYAN CAVE, LLP, such as DON LENTS - Chair of the firm, and PETER VAN CLEVE - St Louis Office Manger.

`

DON LENTS, CHAIR

JENNA MOLDAWSKY . . . . . . JEFFREY MODISETT .JOHN AMBERG

The ones who actually perpetrated the alleged racketeering were attorneys from the Los Angeles office of Bryan Cave, LLP, JOHN AMBERG and JENNA MOLDAWSKY. JOHN AMBERG was the former Chair, LA County Bar Professional Responsibility and Ethics Committee and JENNA MOLDAWSKY engaged in the alleged racketeering almost fresh from law school at UCLA... I can certify, based on my own personal knowledge, that the expertise did not originate with either of these two.

So where did the expertise come from?

The office manager was JEFF MODISETT, former Indiana Attorney General, who was considered an expert on white collar crime defense. I do not doubt the expertise! I found from him the following quote:

• "Financial crimes often seem to languish for a host of reasons, said Jeff Modisett, a former Indiana attorney general who specializes in white collar defense and investigations for St. Louis-based law firm Bryan Cave LLP. The evidence often doesn't immediately rise to the surface, as with violent crimes. Instead, lengthy, detailed investigations are usually needed, and those can be delayed by jurisdiction dispute, manpower shortages or other Modisett said. "Unless you have a squeaky wheel, it's not unusual for these types of crimes to take a long period to be fully investigated," he said.

In fact, BRYAN CAVE, LLP were retained in June 2007 to engage in obstruction/perversion/collusion of justice, and they have been active at it to this very date. However, in fact, I don't think the source of the expertise was Jeff Modisett at all, either. I believe that anybody who reviews the whole matter would conclude that it was SANDOR SAMUELS, former Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide, and today Associate Counsel at Bank of America Corporation. What they were and are doing is basically standard procedures of Countrywide across the U.S. In my opinion SANDOR SAMUELS is the central organized crime figure in the whole group from Countrywide, and the fact that he was allowed to move to BAC is in my analysis directly tied to the fact that BAC was vested with the Indemnity for Future Criminalities, and that now they did not hesitate to get into numerous securities fraud situations.

.

The report from Texas showed the Countrywide typically used large, national law-firms for these jobs. If there was any expertise on the side of BRYAN CAVE, LLP, and JEFF MODISETT, I would say, it was in risk assessment. However, I assume that for anybody who practiced law in LA County for sometime, it was clear what the rules of the game are. The only attorney whom I retained who was not trained, got set straight within a week by Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR in a 10-15 minutes appearance. He came out of it transformed... clearly deeply scared. I later read her profile in the LA Times, written in relationship to her presiding in the First Rampart Trial. When you read these reports today, it is obvious that the reporters were reporting on corruption, although they were not explicit. The profile stated that attorneys who were grown men lean forward to hear her eviscerate them with her mumble... I later also received an anonymous letter from a criminal defense attorney, describing to me how she intimidated defense counsel if they try to stand for their clients rights. Then I found another anonymous report online, of exactly the same thing, but a different case, where the person describes how as a judge she was continuously trying to intimidate him by trying to get him to perjure himself, and scaring him all the time about it. In short - on the risk side, I would say there was none. If anything, it was a practice builder to collude with allegedly racketeering Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR, since she seemed to be a central figure to the whole operation - the MADRONE. Therefore, was expertise was required was in pricing - to charge Countrywide high enough a fee for such specialized services.

.

They were retained in June 2007, to prevent me from ever getting to the point of obtaining from Countrywide or Bank of America Corporation a response on allegation of fraud, deceit, perversion of justice, and other offenses that amount in fact to racketeering. And given that they had full support of the judges of the LA Superior Court, on the one hand, and given the fact that no law enforcement agency is willing to provide equal protection, they were rather successful as well.

.

The novelty in it all is probably the fact that now it is perpetrated for over a year under the name of Bank of America Corporation. In that - there is some novelty. I could actually track the process. I called a number of times from July to December 2008 the office of General Counsel of BAC. I talked with senior staff there. They all without hesitations, within seconds told me the same: Bryan Cave, LLP was not authorized to appear in court on behalf of Bank of America Corporation. The only one authorized, and the one I should communicate with was Todd Boock, In house counsel of Countrywide, now- BAC. It was simple, they asked me for my last name, they checked it up on their system, and they read to me the answer. Some also promised to send it to me in writing, but eventually none of them did. And during that period, from July 2007 to January 2009 Bryan Cave continued to appear in court on behalf of BAC, file false claims against me, etc. ask for judgment of contempt, etc.

.

Then, when I called after January 2009, it was clear that some change took place. The same people would not give any straight answer anymore, and some even gave now deceptive responses. Later I figured out that the General Counsel Tim Mayopoulos was summarily dismissed in January 2009, in the middle of a negotiation meeting with Merrill Lynch, on the merger. He was escorted by security out of the building. Since then the Legal Deparment of BAC has slowly converted to closer and closer copy of the Legal Department in Countrywide, which I definitely believe would be found racketeering upon review.

3) FBI and US Dept of Justice were also named Defendants

What happened next i

s taken by me as a sign that someone felt very threatened...

Anonymous letter on Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR by a criminal defense attorney

Online report by witness on Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR

Complaint of Zernik v Melson et al

News report from New York, including the policy statement on judicial corruption:

Copies of the original reports of the Public Integrity Section can be viewed at:

Table compiling enforcement statistics demonstrates geographic biases in enforcement:

STURGEON V LA COUNTY (BC351286) - ALLEGATION OF CRIMINALITY IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COURTS

Los Angeles Views #1

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer:
I am not a lawyer, not even by a long shot, and therefore, this writing must not be construed as legal analysi________________________________________________________________________________________

Downtown skyline
.

INTENT IN PROVIDING THESE RECORDS:
.

1) Hoping that the story as a whole will be filmed, or published... our salvation is in the movies...
.
2) To solicit help - I am trying to find an agency that would accept citizen's complaint regarding various alleged criminalities in the justice system in Los Angeles County, California. No LOCAL, STATE or FEDERAL agency that I know of agrees to take any complaints, therefore, allowing alleged judicial criminality to thrive in Southern California.
.
3) To establish public records outside of my files - and therefore reduce my security risks.
.4) To establish the public record - the evidence that: LITIGATION IN STURGEON v LA COUNTY (BC351286) WAS AND IS INVALID LITIGATION ON ITS FACE, no matter how many years the show goes on...
.
5) To establish evidence relative to the state of the justice system in Los Angeles today, in conjunction with efforts to release Att RICHARD FINE. from false jailing.
California.
.
6) To provide additional foundation for claims that the current financial crisis is in fact a Financial /Judicial Crisis - or in other words -Integrity Crisis. The claims were made by others before, and I believe that there were also hearings in Congress on the issue of the courts being the engine driving the financial crisis. The evidence is abundant, from the few courts that stood up to financial corporations.
.
7) To provide essential evidence for any observers inside or outside the U.S. who try to assess the success of any claims that the U.S. Government has taken steps to reassert the rule of law, which is the prerequisite foundation for an effective regulatory system of financial institutions. As will be evidenced in other reports, the alleged criminality documented here in the LA County courts, is tied directly to alleged criminality at Countrywide (CFC) and Bank of America Corporation. (BAC).

.

.

Records:
Almost all of my records are publicly posted at:http://inproperinla.com/
The records pertaining to STURGEON start at:
Location #1:
00-00-00-cal-ct-app-4tg______________________________________CAL_CT_APP_4TH_(STURGEON-V-LA-COUNTY)
Location #2:
00-00-00-la-sup-ct-stu_________________________________LA_SUP_CT__STURGEON-v-LA-COUNTY-(BC351286)

Dated: October 8, 2009 _______/s/_Joseph H Zernik_____________
Los Angeles County, California JOSEPH H ZERNIK
_____________________________________________________________________________________

The complete Los Angeles View #1 - Criminality in Litigation of Sturgeon v LA County:

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-disuc_lvpd-09-10-02-citizen-s-crime-complait_sturgeon-v-la-county(bc351286)-criminality-in-court.pdf

We own the "C" in Corruption.

Oct 7, 2009

Dear Mr Witham:

A, PLEASE - GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE:
I had to respond, because you hurt my local patriotism... Texas possibly featured big in the S&L crisis, but that was history , and small change too. SO PLEASE DO NOT CARRY OVER stories of the epidemic of the S&L crisis in Texas.... Just get over it...

In the current crisis, FBI defined none other than LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AS "THE EPICENTER OF THE EPIDEMIC", which makes your claims of being an EPIDEMIC only (without the EPICENTER) marginal at best.
http://inproperinla.com/08-03-27_fbi-la-epicenter-fraud-epidemic-o-s.pdf


B. LA COUNTY IS UNIQUE IN ITS REGIONAL PRODUCTS - RECOGNIZED WORLD-WIDE - WE CREATED THE ORIGINAL REGIONAL BLEND - FINANCIAL INSTITUTION - COURT CORRUPTION COCKTAIL

Let me add my contribution to the story, in a separate email note... I claim:

a) IN January 2007 I FILED WITH FBI LA a 100 page complaint claiming that Countrywide was in the midst of a major fraud against the u.S. government , and in March 2007, I provided an initial estimate of hundreds of billions. Special Agent Vallese who was assigned to my case , then instructed me NOT TO FILE ANY PAPERS ANYMORE.

b) i now add the senior partner that propelled Countrywide and LA COUNTY to the regional distinction of AN EPICENTER OF AN EPIDEMIC;;; none other than the LA SUPERIOR COURT.
\
And in a similar predicament, the former PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA was tied a couple of weeks ago to numerous real estate fraud as well.; I believe that San Bernardino County is a close contender to the title of LA County... but we try to put them down, by calling them RURAL... the worst possible derogatory in the lexicon of corruption...
http://inproperinla.com/09-09-11-former-san-bernardino-county-superior-court-presiding-judge-sustpect-of-real-estate-frauds-san-bernardino-county-sentinel.pdf ,


C. WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME, THIS CRISIS MAY EVENTUALLY BE RECOGNIZED AS A FINANCIAL/JUDICIAL CRISIS, NOT ONLY FINANCIAL - AND IT REFLECTS A COORDINATED CAMPAIGN OF THE COURTS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - USHERING BACK THE ROBBER BARON ERA IN A BIG SWING...

Otherwise, I claim that the current crisis is a financial/legal/judicial crisis. The claims were made by others before, and there were I believe also hearings in Congress on the issue of rthe courts being the engine driving the financial crisis. The evidence is abundant, from the few courts that stood up to financial corporations:

In Houston, Texas (yes, I give credit when credit is due) the Honorable JEFF BOHM, issued in March 2008 a 72-page rebuke of the practices of Countrywide Legal Department.
http://inproperinla.com/08-03-05-countrywide-hon-jeff-bohm-us-judge-decision-rebuke--s.pdf

And likewise, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in December 2007, Countrywide was caught in court filing "Recreated Letters" as evidence.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-27-countrywide-three-recreated-letters-filed-in-pittsburgh-pa-court.pdf

In contrast, in Los Angeles, California, Countrywide - now Bank of America Corporation continues with the same donduct even today - with full blessing of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

D. FOCUSING ATTENTION ON SWISS BANKERS (MY FAVORITE - UBS AG) IS FULLY JUSTIFIED, THE SWISS GOT TO DO SOME INTROSPECTION

Otherwise put, the U.S. in its hay day, had the late Kennedy bill (if I recall correctly) which prohibited U.S. Corporations from corrupting governments abroad. I believe that the time is right to recognize the new realities, and negotiate with the Swiss the reverse....

However, I would focus my sights on the southern Florida (competitor of Los Angeles County in several ways) U.S. Court, where UBS AG is on trial - OR IS IT A SHOW TRIAL? Just like the spectacle from NYC under the caption of SEC v BAC, you can never tell anymore.

Joe Zernik
Los Angeles County, in Sunny California
We own the "C" in Corruption!

09-10-05 If you have the need to blow up some money, please consider the cause of: THE COD PROJECT by Dr Z

DISCLAIMER #1: I am not an attorney, not even by a long shot....
DISCLAIMER #2: The older I get the more I realize how clueless I am.

HI Richard:

Please do yourself a favor...

Please! Dont spend more than $1,000 on the appeal process before you are positive that you read the court document and that you understand it.

If you cannot scan the whole thing, please just fax me the first 2-4 pages. That 's it.

Fax Number: 801 998 0917

I will get back to you in 24h or less.

Last time you contacted me on the same subject, and you told me that you were too busy shelling you money on an attorney in preparation for trial, so that you had no time to read the documents. I said - you were clueless and a fool, and your attorney was clueless and a crook, unless you carefully read court documents and figured out each and every word in it.

...

...

On the other hand, if you have the need to blow up some money, I can help you with that too. I stopped working in my office a few weeks ago, and I am focusing on this biz 100%. I going to register a tax ID for a not for profit: THE COD PROJECT by Dr Z... So if you feel the need to spend money, please consider this cause.

Thanks,

Joe.

THE COD PROJECT by Dr Z (not for profit tax ID application in progress)

CALLING UPON PRESIDENT OBAMA - FREE THE 10,000 RAMPART-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), FREE ATTORNEY RICHARD I FINE http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/restore-justice-in-l-a
References
1) Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf
2) Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf
3) One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000 by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-first-trial-01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf
4) Full Disclosure Network video of a phone call request for assistance by Att Richard I Fine from jail http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Joseph Zernik, DMD PhD , Fax: (801) 998-0917

09-10-03 E-Mail requesting that Commissioner Murray Gross identify the source of his authority in Marina v LA County.

Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:32:51 -0700

To: mgross@lasuperiorcourt.org

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Timely response kindly requested by Tue, October 6, 2009 - Identifying of the Court Record

Appointing Commissioner Gross as Debtor Examiner in Marina v County (BS109420)

Request to Identify the Record of Valid, Effectual Appointment of

Commissioner Murray Gross as "Debtor Examiner" in Marina v

County (BS109420)

TO THE HONORABLE MURRAY GROSS, COMMISSIONER, Listed as

"Debtor Examiner" in Marina v County (BS109420):

.

The requester is of the people of Los Angeles County, California. The

online "Case Summary" [1] of the above referenced caption lists

Commissioner Gross as "Debtor Examiner". However, there is nowhere to

be found in the same record an Appointment Order for Commissioner

Gross in the respective caption. Moreover, the LA Superior Court denies

access to the Register of Action, a public record by law, which would have

provided the answer instantaneously.

.

Therefore, Att Gross is requested, under such circumstances, and for the

cause of furthering justice - as a judicial officer - to identify by date and

title of the record, if any, among the list of records posted online in this

caption, which provides the legal foundation for his appointment, as

required by law.

.

For convenience, copied below are the records in Marina v County, as

they are listed online, by date and title. All that is requested is to identify in

such list the record that holds the Appointment Order of Commissioner

Gross as "Debtor Examiner" in the caption. In case it is not among the

records listed online, reference is requested by date and title, which would

allow to retrieve such record from the clerk's office.

.

Timely response by Tuesday, October 6, 2009, is kindly requested.

.

Respectfully submitted,

.

Dated: Saturday, October 3, 2009 ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik_____

Los Angeles County, California JOSEPH H ZERNIK

Party in Interest

[1] The online "Case Summary" records are published online by the LA

Superior Court, while access is denied to the true Registers of Actions -

public records by law. Concomitantly with denying access to any record of

the sort except for the Case Summary, the LA Superior Court publishes

Disclaimers, warning the public not to rely on the Case Summary records,

and justly so.

____________________

A COPY OF THE NOTE WITH THE COMPLETE LIST OF RECORDS CAN BE VIEWED:

http://inproperinla.com/09-10-03-email-to-commissiner-murray-gross-s.pdf

A Citizen’s Crime Complaints was filed in La Verne on crimes committed in Beverly Hills -- and the COD project is born...

It took between 10 and 15 minutes and Officer Quinn #350 accepted my complaint as Incident Report #2009-3329, for further review and forwarding to Beverly Hills and other relevant police Departments.

From the Transmittal Note of the complaint:

09-10-02 Transmittal Note for – 09-10-02 CITIZEN’S CRIME COMPLAINT1

TO: Dispatch, La Verne Police Department

By Hand Delivery

Sir/Madam:

Please accept the attached papers as a Citizen’s Crime Complaint, filed with the LVPD, as part of

a request for that the LVPD issue a courtesy crime report.

…

Most of the specific crimes covered by such complaints were centered at Beverly Hills, California,

and resulted in real estate fraud against me, pertaining to my property at 320 South Peck Drive,

Beverly Hills, CA 90212. However, some of the interim crimes took place at other locations, in

Santa Monica, in Los Angeles, in Calabasas, and in Norwalk, California – in the County of Los

Angeles, California.

…

I have previously filed a number of complaints with the Beverly Hills Police Department (BHPD),

starting in early 2007, before the crimes were even consummated. BHPD initially placed

obstacles and consistently refused to accept such complaints. Later – once a complaint was filed

- it refused to issue crime reports and investigate such crimes, under the claims that they

constituted only “business disputes”. After the crimes were consummated – as documented in

opinion letter of decorated FBI veteran James Wedick, BHPD still refused to investigate the

crimes - with no explicable reason at all.

…

I am grateful for the help provided by LVPD in this matter. There is no doubt in my mind that

through my insistence on Equal Protection in this matter, I am providing help to many others in

Los Angeles County and elsewhere in the U.S., since the wrongdoing by the Legal Department

of Countrywide Financial Corporation in courtrooms across the U.S. is well documented.

Complaints are filed with the LVPD on paper, due to requirements of the LVPD. However, all

such complaints were imprinted with digital signatures, and are derived from digital files that are

digitally signed.

Dated: October 2, 2009 ____/s/Joseph H Zernik_______

La Verne, California Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhD

1 NOTICE: The filer is not an attorney, and has no background in law enforcement. Therefore, no attempt was

made to assign penal code sections to the crimes. Similarly, it is requested that verbal definition of the crimes

under “claim” be ignored if found in error. Instead, the facts and the crimes should be reviewed, and law-enforcement

professionals should designate the correct violations of the law.

The complete Citizen's Crime Complaint can be viewed at:

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-disuc_lvpd-09-10-02-citizen-s-crime-complait-in-re_07-12-07-fraud-grant-deed-by-pasternak-s.pdf

09-09-28-Request for guidance from the Federal Reserve Board.

Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:15:44 -0700

To: donna.m.harrison@frb.gov
From: joseph zernik

.

Subject: Request for guidance from FRB in getting help from Federal Agencies in alleged financial institutions fraud, in view of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009.

.

Bcc:

September 28, 2009


Donna M Harrison
Federal Reserve Board
By Email

Ms Harrison:

I hope that you could help. Please inform me: Which of the multiple federal agencies involved in banking regulation could assist me in this matter. I already filed a complaint with the regulating body in this case - CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - an exercise in futility. They informed me in advance that their procedure involved no actions on their part. It just provided an opportunity for the consumer and the financial institution to state their positions.

My position was that USC CREDIT UNION was key to the perpetration by Att DAVID PASTERNAK of real estate fraud against me- as opined by decorated FBI agent JAMES WEDICK. Damages to me exceed $2.0 millions. I believe that such crimes, as opined by Mr WEDICK, deserve attention of federal agencies, given that State of California and local agencies entirely refused to address the issue.

The alleged frauds here were by a small financial institution, but it engaged in such conduct repetitively, with impunity. I believe that the reason was that COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION were tied to the same fraud, and it was obvious that no action was taken against them. Since January 2007, I have submitted numerous complaints against COUNTRYWIDE, ANGELO MOZILO, and SANDOR SAMUELS, for what I believe would be deemed by court as willful criminal conduct, with a pattern that continued now for over 2 years.

I have detailed documentation how such complaints were deliberately ignored, or even undermined, by FBI, SEC, THRIFT SUPERVISION, and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, as well as other agencies.

In January 2007, the issue was not of much interest. However, today, the question of non-functional banking regulation in the U.S. is the focus of interest world-wide, and the loss of confidence in U.S. regulation of its financial institutions causes real harm to the U.S. economy.
In recognition of the importance of the issue, the U.S. Congress even passed the:

. Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009
. An Act to improve enforcement of mortgage fraud, securities and commodities
. fraud, financial institution fraud, and other frauds related to Federal assistance
. and relief programs, for the recovery of funds lost to these frauds, and for other
. purposes.

In sum: PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHICH AGENCY I SHOULD APPROACH, AND WHICH PROCEDURE I SHOULD INVOKE TO INITIATE REVIEW OF MY CLAIMS, WHICH ARE CREDIBLY DOCUMENTED, INCLUDING FRAUD EXPERT OPINION LETTERS.

Expedient response would be appreciated.



_____/s/ Joseph H Zernik_________
Joseph Zernik, DMD, PhD


cc:
U.S Congress
Basel Committee
Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Washington DC.



At 12:35 PM 9/28/2009, you wrote:

Return Receipt

Your . Integrity of records produced by USC Credit Union as the
document: . legal foundation for actions in Dr Zernik's accounts with
. . . no authorization and with no notice, which caused
. . . devastating harms, and Integrity of Operations at USC CU.

was . . donna.m.harrison@frb.gov
received
by:

at: . . . 09/28/2009 03:35:15 PM

09-06-27 Notice of disability – resulting from alleged severe deprivation of rights

September 27, 2009

.

DENTAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA

2005 Evergreen Street, Suite 1550

Sacramento CA 95815

T (916) 263-2300 F (916) 263-2140

.

In RE: Notice of Disability in license #40328

.

Sir/Madam:

I spoke earlier this week with your office. Your staff informed me that the Board

recognized only medical disability, certified by a physician.

.

I am disabled as a result of alleged severe deprivation of rights, stemming from alleged

corruption of the California justice system and the Los Angeles Superior Court, and

denial of the basic right for equal protection under the law.

.

A brief review is enclosed.

.

There is no doubt in my mind that the events that I am witnessing and recording are of

historic proportions – the looting of the American people by large banks, the courts, and

the legal profession. Furthermore, given the false reporting of events that is

commonplace, I believe that the meticulous documentation of what is taking place here

and now is of unique significance.

.

Therefore, I finally had to realize that I was not able to perform in protecting my basic

Human Rights, and operating my office under the current duress. It ended up in two

options – leaving the U.S. immediately, or quitting my practice and committing myself full

time to fighting for my rights and the rights of others.

.

I chose the latter, and it came with major losses, and also with considerable risks – I

already received several death threats in the past two years.

______/s/ Joseph Zernik_______________

Joseph Zernik, DMD, PhD

Attached:

1) Application to inactivate license

2) Alleged Racketeering by Countrywide, Bank

of America Corporation, and judges.

Copy of the complete communication with the attachments can be viewed at:

http://inproperinla.com/09-09-27-inactivate-report+form-s.pdf

09-09-25 Request for help from pro se filers

REQUEST FOR HELP BY PRO SE FILERS

.

I assume that like all of us, you filed your complaint in pro se. Such is the

way it typically ends up, since no attorney would agree to represent

plaintiffs on such cases. I am writing to ask for your help.

.

Please do me a favor, and share a few of your records:

.

A. List the captions and numbers of all of your U.S court cases, and

the district court they were heard in.

.

B. For each case, please email to me the following 3 records.

.

1) One minute order of your choice (the shortest preferred).

.

2) One order on dispositive motion ( e,g, Order on Motion to Dismiss, or

Summary Judgment, or Entry of Judgment, etc). I am looking for a "written

order" in contrast with the Minute Orders that were typically generated

from the case management system directly. Again, the shortest is

preferred.

.

3) One paper from opposing counsel (the shortest).

I assume that you received them all by USPS First Class mail. I hope that

by chance you have the envelopes and everything that was included.

.

C. Please indicate in a cover email, addressed to me:

1) That I stated that I was a fellow Pro Se filer, and that I was interested in

your Pro SE experience, and that you were emailing the documents to me

at my request. The simplest is to reply to instant email, so that my writing

is incorporated in your email.

.

2) If true and correct: Please state that the source of all the records that

you are sending to me is service by USPS.

If served in any other way, please indicate for each specific record, which way it was served. In case a

record was served in more than one way, I am interested primarily in the USPS service, whenever

possible.

.

3) If true and correct: Please state that the records are the full and

complete true and correct copies of the specific records, as received by

you via USPS.

.

In case you know that you lost a cover page, or something that was included in the mailing, please

indicate so for each individual record.

If you kept the envelopes, that is super, but not essential.

.

4) Please list and identify the records that you are sending to me under

each given caption by:

.

a) Date filed, b) Dkt #, c) Originating Party/Court, and d) Title.

.

5) Please sign as shown below.

.

I am grateful for your help, and I should be able to email you back within

24 hours from the time I receive the records. I am likely to have

information about your case, that you were not aware of.

.

DISCLAIMER #1: I am not an attorney, not even by a long shot.

DISCLAIMER #2: The older I get the more I realize how clueless I am.

.

Dated: September 25, 2009 ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____

Joseph H Zernik

CALLING UPON PRESIDENT OBAMA - FREE THE 10,000 RAMPART-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), FREE ATTORNEY

RICHARD I FINE http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/restore-justice-in-l-a

References

1) Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely

convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin

Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf

2) Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by

civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-

2006-report.pdf

3) One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000

by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-firsttrial-

01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf

4) Full Disclosure Network video of a phone call request for assistance by Att Richard I Fine from jail http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/

Joseph Zernik, DMD PhD , Fax: (801) 998-0917

09-09-21 RE: SEC v BAC (09-CV-06829-JSR) - Request filed to disambiguate the nature of the proceedings, and alleging racketeering by CFC and BAC

Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:27:10 -0700
To: jz12345@earthlink.net
From: joseph zernik
Subject: SEC v BAC (09-CV-06829-JSR) Request filed to disambiguate the nature of the proceedings, alleging racketeering by CFC and BAC
Cc: jz12345@earthlink.net
Bcc:

Concomitantly served and mailed for filing at the Court on September 21, 2009.
A. Paper filed as Pro Se Filer:
(1) Ex Parte Request for Leave to File as Party in Interest [1]
Pro Se Filer Joseph H Zernik, resident of Los Angeles County, California, files instant Request
following his notice to parties of intent to intervene....to allow him, and also the public at large,
clear and unambiguous perspective of the nature of proceedings in SEC v BAC (09-CV-06829-
JSR).
Instant litigation should be of interest to the public at home and abroad, in the midst of the
ongoing financial crisis, as integral part of U.S. regulatory system of financial institutions,
where doubts cast shadows relative to intentions of regulators and efficacy of the system as
a whole. Such shadows, in and of themselves counter the mission of regulation. Likewise,
any ambiguity, unintended and unnecessary as it may be, in the nature of instant
proceedings as viewed by the public at large, is likely to be harmful. Conversely
allowing Joseph H Zernik to file the attached paper as Party in Interest, as requested,
should help the Court in its cause of furtherance of justice.
...
Instant litigation should be of interest to the public at home and abroad, in the midst of the
ongoing financial crisis, as integral part of U.S. regulatory system of financial institutions,
where doubts cast shadows relative to intentions of regulators and efficacy of the system as
a whole. Such shadows, in and of themselves counter the mission of regulation. Likewise,
any ambiguity, unintended and unnecessary as it may be, in the nature of instant
proceedings as viewed by the public at large, is likely to be harmful.

B. Papers filed as [Proposed] Party in Interest:
(1) Request for Disambiguation - as an essential of Due Process of the Law [2]
Party in Interest Joseph H Zernik, resident of Los Angeles County, California, files instant
Request for disambiguation individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated...
Pro Se Filer Joseph Zernik requests herein that the Court take actions as it deems fit to allow Party
in Interest, and the public at large, transparency into the nature of instant proceedings.
Summons was not docketed, and staff at the Clerks office informed Party in Interest that
such was the custom at the Court...
Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFs) deemed equivalent to Certificates of Service and/or
Attestations by Clerk, were inaccessible in PACER, as part of general configuration of PACER and
CM/ECF, that is herein alleged as questionable and requiring careful review by the courts...
The latest Memorandum Order (Dkt #22) by the Court, appeared in PACER with no stamp of the
Clerk on its face, no PACER blue security header imprint, and its NEF, if any, was inaccessible...
From public perspective, such docket and such online records leave the nature of proceedings in SEC
v BAC (09-CV-06829-JSR) vague and ambiguous.

(2) Request for Lenience as Pro Se Filer [3]
[Proposed] Party in Interest Joseph H Zernik, resident of Los Angeles County, California,
herein requests lenience - for his "inartful pleading" (Erickson v Pardus, 2007), such as
accorded by U.S. law to pro se filers. In particular, I am not qualified in assessing the
validity of legal theories. I ask the court to ignore any irrelevant or erroneous legal theory I
claim, and do take into consideration the facts themselves, as well as the claims, if they can
support some other valid theory (Haddoc 1985).
For such reasons routinely use was made of violations of the law without spelling
out the specific section. Similarly, Criminalities or Violations of the Penal Code, or
Predicated Acts were used - without spelling out the specific section of the code. Use of
Obstruction/Perversion/Corruption of Justice was in reference to any of the multiple ways
that judges, clerks, and large corporations can subvert the courts to generate the opposite of
furtherance of justice. Hardly any refer was made to specific violations of Civil Rights per
the Amendments, instead, such violations are considered as overlapping references made
to violations of Common Law rights to access court records to inspect and to copy, and
to violations of Human Rights per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - ratified
International Law.

(3) Request for Incorporation by Reference [4]
...Such papers provide much of the evidence of alleged criminalities by
Countrywide Financial Corporation (CFC), and/or Bank of America Corporation (BAC), which
upon review should be deemed racketeering. Such papers describe the emergence of CFC as an
alleged corrupt organization on the background on lawlessness in LA County, California,
patronized by FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice for at least two decades...
The lawlessness tolerated by U.S. government in LA Country, was and is also associated with
Human Rights abuses of historic proportions the ongoing false holding of the Rampart-FIPs...
The two main cases that detailed the alleged criminal conduct of CFC and BAC against Party
in Interest Joseph H Zernik were (a) Zernik v Connor et al and (b) Zernik v Melson et al, albeit,
considerable part of the evidence filed also under (c) Borrower Parsley for reasons explained
below. Additional cases, demonstrated that Dr Zerniks allegations were nothing new. Conduct
that should be deemed racketeering by CFC in Courts across the U.S. was well documented in
cases such as (a) Borrower Hill. (b) Borrower Parsley, and (c) in a U.S. Trustee report, embedded
in case of Borrower Parsley, based on a full-year study of the conduct of CFC in courts across the
U.S.
Such papers stand in contrast with FBIs investigation of the sub-prime crisis, which led to no
indictments of senior management at CFC so far, and likewise to SECs refusal to enforce the
law at CFC and BAC, regardless of numerous complaints based on credible evidence of alleged
criminal conduct.
Furthermore, such papers demonstrated the approach of U.S. Courts so far,
regarding attempts to address wrongdoing by CFC and/or BAC. The dockets of cases such as
(a) Zernik v Connor et al, at the U.S. District Court, LA, as well as (b) Zernik v Melson et al, at
the U.S. District Court, Washington DC, were alleged as prime examples of fraud in operation
of PACER vs CM/ECF. To this date the Clerks of the respective courts deny access to inspect
and to copy the NEFs of the records it was assumed that no valid NEFs existed for any such
records, since no NEFs were ever served with papers by parties or by court.
The cases of (a) Fine v Sheriff Department of LA County, and (b) Fine v Bar Association
document the extreme extent to which alleged fraud in operation of PACER and CM/ECF was
advanced in LA County: Deprivation of property in the case of Party in Interest, Dr Zernik, and
deprivation of liberty in the case of Att Richard Fine, 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, in solitary
confinement since March 4, 2009, based on purported judgment of LA Superior Court judge,
which is alleged as fraud on the face of the record.

(4) Notice of Affidavit of Joseph H Zernik [5]
[Proposed] Party in Interest Joseph H Zernik, resident of Los Angeles County, California,
herein files notice of Affidavit of Joseph H Zernik in re: Then Proposed Settlement, previously
submitted to the Court (Exhibit 1).
The Affidavit detailed much of the essential justification for the Request of Leave to
File, and the Request for Disambiguation, concomitantly filed with instant Notice.

Dated: September 21, 2009 Joseph H Zernik

By: ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik__________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
Pro Se Filer
PO Box 286
Fax: 801 998 0917
E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

The complete papers can be viewed at:
[1] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-09-21-as-mailed-for-filing-a-1-req%20leave%20to%20file-s.pdf
[2] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-09-21-as-mailed-for-filing-b-1-req-disambiguation-s.pdf
[3] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-09-21-as-mailed-for-filing-b-2-req-lenience-s.pdf
[4] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-09-21-as-mailed-for-filing-b-3-req-incorporation-s.pdf
[5] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-dist-ct-ny-sec-v-bac-09-09-21-as-mailed-for-filing-b-4-notice-of-affidavit-s.pdf


CC:
BAC - Audit Committee
BAC - Executive Committee
BAC - Holders of Reporting Duties
BAC - Independent Auditor
BAC - Analysts
Basel Committee - Switzerland
Chinese Embassy, Washington DC
Harvard Law Faculty
Stanford Law Faculty
U.S. Congress

CALLING UPON PRESIDENT OBAMA - FREE THE 10,000 RAMPART-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), FREE ATTORNEY RICHARD I FINE http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/restore-justice-in-l-a
References
1) Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf
2) Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf
3) One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000 by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-first-trial-01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf
4) Full Disclosure Network video of a phone call request for assistance by Att Richard I Fine from jail http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Joseph Zernik, DMD PhD , Fax: (801) 998-0917;