There is no plausible explanation for the dramatic events of the past 3 days, where Gantz, the narrow majority leader, purportedly committed to fight Netanyahu's corruption, yielded and joined Netanyahu to form a new government.
Tel-Aviv, March 28 - the past 3 days have left all in Israel stunned. Today, Saturday, we are informed that the new emerging coalition, again headed by Netanyahu, and joined by opposition leader Benny Gantz (Blue and White party), is considering a bill to allow criminally indicted persons to be appointed government ministers.
[i] Such bill is intended to personally serve Netanyahu, who was indicted in three separate matters on bribes, deceit, and breach of trust. The central theme in Gantz's election campaign was fighting the corrupt Netanyahu government...
On Wednesday, Israel appeared on the brink of total chaos, and concerns of eruption of violence were mounting , after Interim Knesset Chair Yuli Edelstein (of Netanyahu's Likud party), defying Supreme Court decision, refused to convene the Knesset and allow the election of a new permanent Chair to replace him. Edelstein resigned instead, intending to leave the Knesset in limbo for at least a few days.
[ii]
2020-03-25, 1:33 pm - renowned journalist Attila Somfalvi : "People, aren't you afraid of the eruption of a civil war? Aren't you concerned of the eruption of violence? What the hell is going on?
https://twitter.com/attilus/status/1242776741220941824?s=20
The main concern remains of violence by the settlers, who are effectively organized as armed militias, and who would not hesitate to act violently, if so ordered by their rabbis (who are on state payroll!). The settlers, encouraged by US Ambassador David Friedman, are expecting immediate annexation of major parts of Palestine, following the late January announcement of Trump's "Deal of the Century". Trump's announcement (unworthy and far-fetched as it was) also amounts to a blatant intervention in favor of Netanyahu in the early March general election in Israel. However, the settlers' expectations were dashed following the outcome of the early March general election and Netanyahu's apparent loss of power. A Gantz led government could have agreed to concessions to the Palestinians in the West Bank.
2020-03-25 3:38 PM B'tselem, human rights NGO reports serious overnight vandalism by settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank, 'expressing "the promise", which was written on a wall in Kafr Yasuf [Palestinian village south of Nablus-jz]: "Judea and Samaria means war"'. “Judea and Samaria” are the Israeli right-wing names for the West Bank Palestinian territories.
The calming response to Somfalvi came only 12 hours later, after midnight (early Thursday), from Netanyahu's cabinet minister and settlers' leader Bezalel Smotrich.
2020-03-26, 1:20 am - settlers' leader, Minister Bezalel Smotrich re-tweets Somfalvi and responds: "There shall be no civil war!"
By that time, however, the tables had turned through a sequence of events that makes no sense at all. Netanyahu was again in position to head the new government – his 5th.
On Wednesday, immediately following Edelstein's resignation, petition were filed in the Supreme Court, claiming contempt of the Court by Edelstein and seeking remedies. Indeed, after midnight (early Thursday) the Supreme Court rendered a decision, which in itself was unprecedented. The Supreme Court avoided imposing any sanctions on Edelstein for defying its previous decision, but denounced Edelstein's conduct 'an unprecedented violation of the rule of law'. At the same time, the Supreme Court decision appointed a new Interim Knesset Chair (a member of the newly elected narrow majority, headed by Gantz) and ordered him to convene the Knesset on the very same day, Thursday, to elect its new permanent Chair. Such decision was not only of dubious foundation in the law, it also amounted to a major breach of the separation of powers, where the Supreme Court effectively took over the management of the legislature. Moreover, according to Israeli law, the resignation of Interim Chair Edelstein took effect only 48 hours after its submission, and therefore, the Supreme Court's decision effectively generated a situation, where two Interim Knesset Chairs held office at the same time. [
iii]
The Supreme Court decision appeared as a victory for Gantz's narrow majority, and its expected outcome was the election on Thursday of a new Knesset Chair by the new narrow majority. However, by mid morning Thursday it turned out that the outcome was the exact opposite. It turned out that the night hours, gained by Edelstein's maneuver, obviously coordinated with Netanyahu, were sufficient to somehow convince Gantz, head of Blue and White party, to cut a deal with Netanyahu to join a new coalition, headed by Netanyahu, and break down his own party Blue and White in the process. Once the Knesset was convened on Thursday, as ordered by the Supreme Court, Gantz, who even today (Saturday) still holds the mandate to form the new government, was elected the new Knesset Chair through the support of Netanyahu's Likud party and its partners. I.e., the lawfully designated head of the executive branch was elected the new head of the legislature.
[iv]
Thursday's news left Gantz's party leaders and their voters stunned and furious. Gantz was denounced as a traitor by those who had been his closest associates just 24 hours earlier.
2020-03-26 5:44 PM - Yair Golan, Blue and White party MK, retired IDF Deputy Chief of Staff: "Benny Gantz has displayed despicable leadership, second to none. Our voters despise his, and justly so. Anybody who joins him in serving the government to a corrupt leader on a silver platter would be blamed for eternity."
https://twitter.com/YairGolan1/status/1243202081084801024?s=20
Nevertheless, Gantz was congratulated for his election as Knesset Chair by none other than Edelstein - the Interim Knesset Chair, still lawfully in office...
2020-03-26 6:34 PM - Interim Knesset Chair Yuli Edelstein: "I congratulate Benny Gantz, the new Knesset Chair. Benny, I wish you joy in your new position, but only for a short time..."
https://twitter.com/YuliEdelstein/status/1243214715192578048?s=20
Edelstein's strange congratulation apparently referred to the underlying scheme: Gantz would remain in his office of Knesset Chair only for a short time. Eventually, Gantz would be appointed Deputy Prime Minister in a new Netanyahu government, would resign from his position as Knesset Chair, and Edelstein would be re-elected Knesset Chair. Therefore, Gantz was intended only as a place holder for a couple of weeks. Needless to day, the re-election of Edelstein as Knesset Chair, with Gantz’s support, following Edelstein’s conduct this past week, would amount to another blatant blow to the rule of law.
Gantz's two major partners, Bogie Yaalon and Yair Lapid were apparently left out of Gantz's overnight dealings with Netanyahu, and refused to join him as turncoats. Therefore, Blue and White party was split and its power base in the Knesset vanished.
2020-03-26 8:44 PM IDF Radio: "MK Bogie Yaalon in a joint declaration with MK Yair Lapid: Gantz's agreement to join a Netanyahu government is inexplicable and disappointing. It tramples any norm."
https://twitter.com/GLZRadio/status/1243247467426086914?s=20
Regardless, Gantz managed to sway with him over 10 members of the Blue and White party, enough to secure a Knesset majority for Netanyahu. It appears that as part of such deal, each and every one of the defectors would be appointed minister (some perhaps “minister without portfolio”) in a bloated government with 30 ministers...
2020-03-26 9:12 PM - Yariv Oppenheimer, prominent left-wing figure, former "Peace Now" CEO: "Shell-shocked nation"
https://twitter.com/yarivop/status/1243254588892942338?s=20
On Friday, Haaretz columnist Chemi Shalev wrote: "there is no doubt that over the past few weeks Gantz committed one of the greatest fraud in Israeli politics."
[v]
And yet, even today, Saturday, newly elected Knesset Chair Gantz has not returned his mandate as Prime Minister designate to the President.
It appears that one key problem remains: Netanyahu's indictment on charges of bribes, deceit and breach of trust, pertaining to his conduct as Prime Minister during his previous terms as prime minister"
The issue, whether the President may offer the mandate of prime minister designate to a person, who is criminally indicted on such charges, was the subject of petitions to the Supreme Court a few weeks ago as well. However, at that time the Supreme Court refused to rule on the matter, reasoning that it was "theoretical".
Early next week, remaining factions of Blue and White party plan on attempting to pass a bill that would explicitly prohibit the President from giving the mandate of prime minister designate to a criminally indicted person. Gantz had repeatedly announced such intention over the past several weeks, in his previous role as Blue and White leader. Blue and White, still headed by Gantz, still planned on voting on such bill last Wednesday. That plan was apparently a key reason for Edelstein's maneuver.
[vi]
However, in a bizarre turn of events, today, Saturday afternoon, journalists claim that Netanyahu and Gantz are planning an opposing bill, which absurdly would explicitly permit the appointment of criminally indicted ministers.
2020-03-28 3:41 PM columnist Gur Megiddo: 'Resilience for Israel [Gantz's faction following the break down of Blue and White – jz] is negotiating possible support for enactment of a Base Law that would permit the appointment of criminally indicted ministers. Response: "We don't comment on details of the negotiations".
Needless to say, enactment of such law with Gantz's support would not only be an absurd, it would also transform the Israeli regime into a criminal parody.
The new Netanyahu-Gantz bill, if enacted, would surely be the subject of new petitions to the Supreme Court. However, that is likely to lead to a new "constitutional crisis".
Over its 72 year history, the State of Israel has failed to write a formal constitution through a process similar to constitutional convention, although its 1948 Declaration of Independence stated that a constitution would be written within half a year. Over the past 30 years, the Supreme Court has claimed that it holds the authority to declare laws, which are enacted by the Knesset "unconstitutional". However, Netanyahu's camp does not accept that notion"
In short, the crisis isn't over yet.
The most likely scenario is that the justice system, now crippled, would simply eliminate the indictments against Netanyahu and his partners. Following Gantz’s defection, on Thursday Haaretz editor Aluf Ben wrote: "Soon the indictments would probably be thrown to the garbage..."
[vii]
In the meanwhile, an unprecedented attack by settlers on IDF took place on Thursday evening.
2020-03-26 11:04 PM - military affairs reporter Or Heller: "Very serious incident this evening in Yitzhar settlement in Samaria: Masked settlers through 4-5 fire bombs on IDF vehicle" The vehicle caught fire, but the fire was extinguished" "
https://twitter.com/OrHeller/status/1243282716344438785?s=20
As usual, the Shin-Bet, which is very effective in preventing such terrorist acts by Palestinians, is unlikely to find the perpetrators.
The Shin-Bet, which has recently been openly authorized by Netanyahu to spy on all resident of Israel under emergency Corona- related regulations (bypassing lawful Knesset approval), also maintains a dubious role in a series of events over the past year, particularly related to alleged cyber criminality, which allegedly undermined the integrity of the 3 general elections.
Since Gantz's total change of heart in the night between Wednesday and Thursday remains entirely inexplicable, rumors have in the meanwhile spread that he is the victim of extortion by Netanyahu, perhaps related to hacking of his personal cell phone. The hacking was attributed to the Iranians, but rumored to be the handiwork of Israelis.
[viii]
Claims of criminal cyber activity by Netanyahu's camp over the 3 election campaigns of the past 12 months have been repeatedly raised. The latest case involved specific allegations of cyber spying on Gantz, orchestrated by a person, who operated out of Netanyahu's personal counsel's office and who employed a "Cyber front company". [
ix] None of it has been apparently investigated by law enforcement. The authority to investigate such matters is vested in the Shin-Bet. Then again, the Shin-Bet is under Netanyahu's direct control.
It appears that Ed Snowden's promise is fulfilled - that the notorious Israeli specialty of criminal cyber activity, under state patronage, would come home to roost. [
x]
iGantz
to Push Law Allowing Netanyahu to Serve in Government Despite Trial
ii[Videos]
Collapse of the Israeli regime - dancing in Jerusalem
iiiHigh
Court Appoints Temporary Knesset Speaker to Elect Replacement on
Thursday
ivElected
Knesset speaker by right wing, Gantz heads for government with
Netanyahu
vExactly
when Netanyahu’s end appeared close, Gantz offered him the
ventilator
viBenny
Gantz promises legislation to ban PM from serving under indictment
viiNetanyahu
laughs last: Gantz transformed from an alternative government into
Erdogan's deputy
viiiGantz,
Netanyahu’s Challenger, Faces Lurid Questions After Iran Hacked
His Phone
ixNetanyahu
Associate Hired Intel Firm to Dig Up Dirt on Gantz
'Cyber'
Front Company Used to Foot Bill for Spying on Netanyahu Rival Gantz
Israel:
Proof Netanyahu knew his lawyer hired intel firm to spy on Gantz
xIsraeli
tech helped Saudis kill journalist, Snowden tells Tel Aviv confab
Snowden tells Tel Aviv conference Israel cyber
firm linked to Khashoggi killing
2020-03-28 Netanyahu: "I thank US President Donald Trump, who called me to congratulate me on formation of a government headed by me..."
Here
White House official announcement of the phone call makes no mention of such congratulations, and congratulations on putative future government are not the common protocol... However, it is obvious that US President supports the formation of a right-wing authoritarian regime in Israel (and elsewhere), and that Netanyahu is using such support as part of his campaign.
Comment
2020-03-29 8:20 PM - columnist Shemuel Meir: "It turns out that one of the dispute issues, which delays agreement on the formation of a new Netanyahu-Gantz government, is Netanyahu's insistence on including annexation of the West Bank as part of the new government agenda..."
Here
ישנן שאלות בסיסיות שלא ראיתי שנידונו כלל בפס"ד בנק מזרח או בשיח האקדמי אודותיו. הסיבה שהארכתי להלן בתיאור הרקע ביחס למערכת המשפט בארה"ב היא שיש בעניין תובנות ביחס למצב בישראל היום: 
מהלך עניינים חוקתי דומה התרחש בארה"ב במחצית השנייה של המאה ה-19. לאחר מלחמת האזרחים (1861-1865) חלו שינויים מובהקים בחוקה האמריקאית, לרבות התיקון ה-14 משנת 1868, שהבטיח ל"כל אדם" הליך ראוי גם בכל ההליכים בבתי המשפט של המדינות השונות. בהמשך, נחקקו חוקים שהפכו את הפרת זכות זאת לעבירה פדרלית - הן פלילית והן אזרחית - "שלילת זכויות תחת מראית עין של החוק" [Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law]. 
התיקון ה-14 והחוקים הנ"ל היו חלק מ"תקופת השיקום" [Reconstruction Period], ותכליתם הייתה להגן על העבדים המשוחררים מפני שחיתות בבתי המשפט במדינות הדרום - מצב בו המשיכו את דיכויים של העבדים המשוחררים באמצעות שחיתות במערכת החוק והמשפט.
עוד באותה שנה ממש, בה כונן התיקון ה-14, שנת 1868, ניתנה החלטה של בית המשפט העליון של ארה"ב בפרשת Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co, שהכריזה על כך שתאגידים הם אנשים [persons] ולפיכך זכאים לכל זכויות האזרח בחוקה של ארה"ב, ובפרט להגנה על פי התיקון ה-14. 
יש לציין שפסק דין זה של בית המשפט העליון שלארה"ב נחשב ע"י רבים כ"מפוברק" - שכן ההכרזה הנ"ל אינה חלק מפסק הדין עצמו, אלא הערה בשולי המסמך, שהוספה ע"י הרושם [court reporter]. הערת שוליים זאת אומרת, שבפתח הדיון הכריז נשיא בית המשפט שהדיון כולו יתנהל מתוך ההכרה בכך שתאגידים הם אנשים, ועניין זה לא יידון בתיק זה כלל. בתמונה לעיל נוסח ההערה שהוספה בכתב יד ע"י הרושם [court reporter] בשולי הפרוטוקול וההחלטה של בית המשפט העליון בפרשת סנטה קלרה.
צריך גם לזכור, שהתקופה שלאחר מלחמת האזרחים ועד לשפל הגדול נחשבת לתקופה של שחיתות שלטונית יוצאת דופן של כל שלוש זרועות המשטר בארה"ב. תקופה זאת נקראת בפי היסטוריונים מאסכולת Howard Zinn "עידן הברונים השודדים" [Robber Baron Era]. הברונים כללו את רוקפלר, קרנגי, מורגן, וכו' (הדמיון למשטר הטייקונים שלנו אינו מקרי). היסטוריונים שמרניים קוראים לאותה תקופה "העידן המוזהב" [Gilded Age]. והשחיתות היתה קשורה ישירות לכוחם הבלתי מרוסן של התאגידים, בחסות בתי המשפט...
כבר בתחילת המאה ה-20 (~1910-1920), לואיס ברנדייס, מי שהיה קודם עו"ד של זכויות האדם ואח"כ שופט דגול בבית המשפט העליון, ערך מחקר ומצא, שבעקבות ההחלטה הנ"ל בעניין סנטה קלרה, מי שהפכו לנהנים הגדולים ביותר מפסיקות של בתי המשפט בעניינים הנובעים מזכויות האזרח היו דווקא התאגידים, ולא אנשים כגון העבדים המשוחררים במדינות הדרום.
מפולת הבורסה של 1929 ותחילת השפל הגדול הובילו את הנשיא רוזוולט להניע את ה"ניו דיל". אולם בית המשפט העליון של ארה"ב חסם את היזמה באמצעות פסיקות, שפסלו את חוקי ה"ניו דיל" כבלתי חוקתיים. כתוצאה מכך החל עימות ישיר בין הנשיא לבין בית המשפט העליון, שבמרכזו עמד עניין סמכות הביקורת השיפוטית של בית המשפט העליון על החקיקה בקונגרס. מצב עניינים זה הוביל למאבק ישיר וכוחני של הנשיא רוזוולט נגד בית המשפט העליון [court-packing plan] בשיא השפל הגדול בשנות ה-30.
בסופו של דבר, הנשיא רוזוולט ניצח במאבק זה, וחוקי הניו דיל נחקקו, לרבות כמה מהחוקים החשובים להגבלת כוחם של התאגידים, בפרט הבנקים וחברות הביטוח, והפיקוח הפדרלי עליהם ועל הבורסה. בנוסף - חוקים שהיו הבסיס ליצירת המעמד הבינוני החזק בארה"ב בהמשך המאה ה-20, כגון הערבות הפדרלית למשכנתאות לרכישת בית מגורים. בקיצור - חוקי הניו דיל יצרו סדר חברתי-כלכלי חדש בארה"ב (וקרוב לוודאי שתקופת השיקום לאחר הקורונה בישראל תצריך חקיקה שתקבע סדר חברתי-כלכלי חדש גם אצלנו). במקביל, החל התיקון של מערכת המשפט בארה"ב. את התיקון, שראשיתו בשנים 1932-1937 הובילו 3 שופטים דגולים - שלושת המוסקטרים - לואיס ברנדייס, בנימין קרדוזו והרלן פיסק [Justices Louis Brandeis, Benjamin N. Cardozo, and Harlan Fiske].
התקופה בה אנו נמצאים היום, נחשבת שוב לתקופה של שיא בשחיתות מערכת המשפט והמשטר בארה"ב. הפסיקה שאולי מסמלת מצב זה יותר מכל היא הפסיקה בפרשת Citizens United בשנת 2010. אז פסל בית המשפט העליון של ארה"ב את רוב ההגבלות על תרומות של תאגידים למועמדים בבחירות (כולל בחירת שופטים!) תחת התואנה, שההגבלה של תרומות התאגידים היא הפרה של חופש הביטוי (התיקון הראשון לחוקה של ארה"ב). כביכול - תרומות כספיות הן חלק מהותי באופן הביטוי של התאגיד. בעקבות פסק הדין של בית המשפט העליון בפרשה זו, כתבו משפטנים בכירים שבית המשפט העליון של ארה"ב הכשיר שוחד על פי דין. והנשיא לשעבר קרטר הכריז שוב ושוב, שארה"ב אינה עוד דמוקרטיה, אלא הפכה לאוליגרכיה. בתגובה לפסה"ד בפרשת Citizens United גם נפתח מסע בניסיון להעביר תיקון לחוקה שיתגבר על פסה"ד של בית המשפט העליון. אולם כידוע, תיקונים לחוקה של ארה"ב הם עניין קשה, מסובך וממושך...
ובחזרה לענייננו: ברור ששופטי בית המשפט העליון של מדינת ישראל, שישבו בדין בפרשת בנק המזרחי, היו משפטנים מלומדים, והכירו יפה את ההיסטוריה החוקתית של ארה"ב ואומות אחרות. למדנותם זאת משתקפת היטב בפסק הדין עצמו. אולם בפסק הדין בפרשת בנק המזרחי לא מצאתי כל התייחסות לכך שבמדינת ישראל תאגיד, כגון בנק המזרחי, הוא "אדם" במובן שאליו התכוון חוק יסוד כבוד האדם וחירותו, הזכאי להגנה על פי חוק יסוד יסוד כבוד האדם וחירותו, או כל התייחסות ישירה או עקיפה לתורת "האנשת התאגידים" והשלכותיה על זכויות האדם של האנשים הטבעיים.
