09-11-26 http://w2.eff.org/congress/#phonefax

Contacting Congress (& Other US Policymakers):

Making Your Voice Heard by US Federal Legislators, the White House, State Legislators and Governors

Version 4.0, Mar. 31, 2002

Contents

Finding Your Legislators

Identifying Them

Getting Phone and Fax Numbers

Why to Not Send Postal Letters Anymore

Where to Send Postal Letters If You Must

Getting Policymaker E-Mail Addresses

How to Visit in Person

Contacting Your Legislators with Your Message

Why Contacting Policymakers Is Vital

Your Message's Perceived Priority

Important Notes

Dos and Don'ts

Background Information on Activism & the Legislative Process

09-11-26- Requests for advise/help from Medical & Legal professionals Re: approaching International Human Rights Courts

Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:07:55 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Have you looked at CJA's website? -- RE: Is this news to you? RE: "New Lawsuits Try to Pierce Shield of Judicial Immunity" comments deleted from blog
Cc:

Hi [redacted ]:

Thanks for the response. Again - since I am no lawyer, I hope to hear specific responses on the issue itself.

All options within the U.S. legal system were already exhausted, except for request for investigation by the U.S. DOJ I.G. which is still pending. Access to the courts was denied. All litigations by Richard Fine were in fact corrupted, and none was deemed valid and effectual by the courts themselves. I was party in interest in the petition to the 9th circuit court of appeals. The denial was an unsigned order, served with no NEF or any certificate of mailing by clerk that would be deemed a valid attestation. Therefore, like all orders of the U.S. District Court - none were deemed valid and effectual by the courts themselves. For the same reason, the representation of an appeal now purportedly running, was a hoax, just as well. You could not run a valid appeal from an invalid judgment of the District Court.

There was a big difference between what I was talking about and the attempts to initiate complaints against President Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. The latter attempts were for claims of War Crimes, as far as I could tell, and the issue was related to the justification of a war, that was initiated after resolution of he U.N., albeit - based on false data presented to the U.N. I agree that such claims were a tall order.

In contrast, in the former, I was talking prosaic stuff - abuse of Human Rights. Just read the Universal Declaration:

1) Surely, the holding of Richard Fine in a hospital for 7 months in solitary confinement with no warrant, and no sentencing/Judgments, was a direct replica of methods that were denounced when used by the former Soviet Union. In terms of Human Rights language - it would be claimed as "Arbitrary Arrest" and Denial of "Liberty". These were much simpler and technically easier claims to prove than "War Crimes".

2) Surely the issuance of false orders and judgments by the U.S. District Court, LA, and the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit should be claimed as failure to establish and maintain "National Tribunals for protection of Human Rights and Rights pursuant to the Constitution of this Country and its Amendments".

3) In LA County, both criminal and civil litigations are conducted without notice and service of minute orders and with no access to Dockets (Registers of Actions). I have a series of letters from the Counsel for the Court, trying to provide lame excuses why the acccess was and is denied to the Docket of the litigation of the arrest of Richard Fine.


And so forth... Such claims were not nearly as complex as the claims of War Crimes. And the evidence involved no "he said she said" - it would be based exclusively on court records that were false and deliberately misleading. Otherwise - media reports would be use to document the chronology of events, not the interpretations. E.g. the fact that Richard Fine was no longer a free man since March 4,2009, regardless of the legal background. No records issued by Atty Richard Fine would be required either.

For example - the records issued by the Sheriff for the arrest and booking, and posted online , compared to media report of the arrest, would be sufficient to show that the government records were false and deliberately misleading. The sheriff claimed that the arrest and booking took place in Municipal Dept 86 in San Pedro:
a) No such department existed - there were no municipal courts in LA for years.
b) Media reported that it took place in Dept 86 of the Superior Court, downtown LA, Judge Yaffe's courtroom.
c) Even after the Sheriff was notified of the false data - it was never corrected.
d) The false data was used to obscure the lack of records - the Sheriff's office claimed that the papers were held at the place of the arrest and booking - which did not exist at all - Municipal Dept 86, San Pedro.[5]

I made the request for access to arrest and booking papers following consultations with a California Civil Rights organization that provided me with the exact code section and subsection to quote in the request. Moreover, the Legal Director of that organization informed me that other counties in California routinely comply with California law in this matter. In fact - you can access such records from other counties online.

This was one area where a declaration by [redacted] would be helpful. [Redacted] I assumed that [redacted] got a warrant. If he were willing to produced a declaration that documented what was a standard California procedure for arrest and booking in LA county, that would be critically helpful. Similar declaration by a criminal defense attorney who practiced in LA County, would be great. However, I doubt that any criminal defense attorney would dare provide such declaration, based on the experience so far, unless anonymity could be somehow guaranteed, which I doubt was the case.

Similarly, declaration by [redacted], or anybody else, about their attempts to access their own docket (Register of Actions) in LA county, would be great help. I am copying this letter to some candidates as well.

This is only one simple example, but it gets to the essence of the case. It is not at all in the same league as "War Crimes" claims against Bush and Rumsfeld. In addition - in Iraq - a number of countries and governments were involved - the "Coalition". Here - we are talking about the Justice Department of California, and the Justice Department of the U.S. It is a much narrower field.

Finally - the current situation is direct extension of the Rampart Scandal.. It was carefully documented in official and media reports, and we have some 10,000 documented victims, who were still falsely imprisoned a decade after their innocence was proven.

In short - the conditions of the justice system in Los Angeles County are not only the case of one person - Richard Fine, but a Human Righst disgrace of global and historic proportions.[1][2][3][4]

It is not a temporary failure of the U.S. Government either. In 2000, the following was written by credible national level legal scholars, abotu the justice system in LA:

judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit. How could so many participants in the criminal justice system have failed either to recognize or to instigate any meaningful scrutiny of such appalling and repeated perversions of justice?
we felt a particular obligation to ensure that no aspect of the Los Angeles criminal justice system, including the lawyers and judges, escaped scrutiny.
Prof David W. Burcham, then Dean, and Prof Catherine L. Fisk, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, Rapart symposium, 2000

Any analysis of the Rampart scandal must begin with an appreciation of the heinous nature of what the officers did. This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states.
and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.
Erwin Chemerinsky, today Dean of Irvine Law School, University of California, 57 Guild Prac. 121 2000

These were no fringe radicals, these writers were the establishment itself. And yet - for a decade, not corrective actions were taken, as documented in reference, below. [2]

In short - I am talking about taking concrete, practical measures, relying on evidence that is official reports, commissioned by government itself, court records, and media reports. Some scholarly legal publications to provide the context. Hardly any declarations or witnesses would be required.

I do not expect necessarily any final rulings, or judgments either, just issuance of the comparable of summons, or warrants. That's enough. I believe that what I am talking about is not such a major project, but then again - I am no lawyer... I would be grateful for comments on the matter. I am trying to accomplish in a time-frame of 30-60 days, a tangible outcome, possibly sufficient to secure the release of Richard Fine.

This is again, a request for help or advise from medical professional in LA County and elsewhere in the U.S.- how to address the holding of Richard Fine, coerced confinement in a hospital room.

Any help, or suggestions from people of good will would be gratefully accepted.


Joseph Zernik

Linked Records
[1] Best short review of the Rampart scandal massive probe (1998-2000, 200 investigators), on how the Rampart-FIPs where falsely convicted and falsely sentenced - by renowned constitutional scholar, Founding Dean of Univ of Cal Irvine Law School, Prof Erwin Chemerinsky - paper from Guild Practitioner
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-reports-00-09-01-chemerinsky-57_guild_prac_121_2000.pdf
[2] Best reference on why the Rampart-FIPs are still imprisoned - by an official panel of experts, commissioned by the LAPD itself, led by civil rights activist, Att Connie Rice - LAPD Blue Ribbon Report (2006)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-blue-ribbon-review-panel-2006-report.pdf
[3] One reference for our low, conservative estimate of 10,000, compared to an estimate of 8,000 by the LA District Attorney office, 15,000 by criminal defense attorneys, and 30,000 by others - PBS Frontline (2001, updated 2005)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-first-trial-01-05-01-pbs-frontline_rampart-false-imprisonments-s.pdf
[4] A Symposium held at the Loyola Law school 2000, reviewed various ascpects of the scandal.
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-rampart-loyola-sypmposium-2000-burcham-fisk-s.pdf
[5] Data from the sheriff's inmate information center. The sheriff refused to allow access to arrest and booking records, in contradiction with california public records act.
http://inproperinla.com/09-04-21-richard-fine-inmate-information-center-%20booking-details.pdf

At 10:33 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:

I dare say, my cup runneth over and my plate is full.

You have a tall order in front of you. Not that I do not think you are well intended in your goals, holding each of these people accountable in the way you are planning to may be a bit tough.

I think there was a similar movement against Rumsfeld and even Bush.

I do not want to discourage you, but I would like you to consider other options and so forth.

Perhaps someone else on this list might have another idea.

[redacted]




On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:46 PM, joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net> wrote:

Hi [Redacted]:

As you know I am no lawyer, in contrast with many in this group. However, I tend to see the the situation more along legal lines - as violations of ratified International Law. Current corruption prevalent among the U.S. judiciary (by that I mean the class, including both state and federal judges) is something of medieval proportions - and with that severe abuse of the Human Rights of the American People by it own government. The same government would like to rescue the rest of the world from abusers of Human Rights.

FIRST - you have to realize how many of the Human Rights in the Universal Declaration pertain to establishment and maintenance of a fair and honest tribunals [1]

SECOND - you have to realize that the Universal Declaration, passed at the efforts of Elenor Roosevelt and others in 1948, is today Ratified International Law.

THIRD - You have to realize that certain courts in various countries hold that any court has jurisdiction on Human Rights anywhere.

Even if a result could be an issuance of international warrant on any of these individuals, limiting their ability to travel internationally, it would be a major step towards release of Richard Fine.

FOURTH - Please notice that RIchard Fine is held in the jail hospital all of this time - since he is not on the Count List of the jail, since he was never booked, since none of the papers is held valid by the justice system itself. It is exactly the equivalent of the Soviet Union holding dissidents in mental hospitals.

In short -

1) I am seeking like minded persons to join me in calling upon medical assocations to raise their voice and power. To hold him in the Jail hospital some unknown doctor had to sign papers - illegally.

2) I am seeking like minded persons to join me in a trip abroad this winter. Not next summer, etc. THIS WINTER.

In short: I believe that we must go abroad and sue the U.S. Government, David Yaffe, Carla Woehrle, John Walter, Alex Kozinski, Richard Tallman, Richard Paez, Eric Holder, Glenn Fine, Webster, Kenneth Melson, Kenneth Kaiser, Eric Holder, Barack Obama, for violations of Human Rights on the issue of false jailing of Richard Fine.

The evidence is all there [2] [3]. I am ready/able/willing to go tomorrow, but I am seeking like minded persons, ideally with legal background, who speak several languages, to join me in a group.

Consider it a winter vacation... :)

Linked Records

[1] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-law-international-ratified-48-12-10-the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights.pdf

[2] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-disuea_lasda_09-10-13-appeal-to-sheriff-lee-baca-s.pdf

[3] http://inproperinla.com/09-11-21-complaint-to-fbi-on-kozinski-s.pdf

At 05:11 PM 11/25/2009, [redacted] wrote:

I get the sense that there is some sort of synergy between all of us since we all tend to contribute a little here and there to these "Group" discussions. I also get the sense that other than a few others that are not on this list, we are the main resistors/reformers out there. There must/needs perhaps ought to be a way for us to better work with each other.

I am of the mind that judiciail corruption is a symptom of bad representation. I am in the process of fighing cases trying to increase representation. My website californiacommonwealth.com is sorely in need of better content and more relevant updates. I need to expand what I am doing on another page I own "projectcommonwealth" I am having a hard time balancing myself and my own life as well as getting my cases drafted/finished and so forth. I try an d go on as many radio shows as I can to get the message on what I am working on out.

One group has recently considered adopting my strategy and has invited me on NFOJA. Other than that, I read up on what is going on with most others on this list. I keep up with Barbara Johnson, even helped on her Cert Petition to the US Supreme Court some years ago. I talk with [redacted] regularly, I use Constitution.org for lots of my research. I have been on Sassowers webage a few times over the years. I have been n knowyourcourts as well. I even contributed a bit to it (one piece needs to be rewritten).

We need to be able to organize and perhaps stop some of the duplication. Goodness knows, it seems like with a snap of a finger, the other side (whoever they are individually or collectively) can dump comments we have made on stories or en troth, eliminate any and all education to the greater body of people (The Public) who may benefit from our experience.

Not sure what else to say or add.

[Redacted]

09-11-25 - Requesting Atty D Bronner full refund of any moneys paid for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:01:27 -0800
To: "Atty D Bronner"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Request for full refund of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

Atty Deborah Bronner
By email
By Fax:

RE: Request for full refund of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

Dear Debbie:

In reviewing Samaan v Zernik, I must come to the conclusion that you were shown sufficient evidence all along, and were informed repeatedly of my concerns that the entire litigation was fraud, and that none of the records were valid and effectual. However, you led me to believe that there was no substance to my concerns, and surely you never warned me that my concerns were true and valid.

I therefore request that you review your books, and send me within 10 days, a full refund for any funds that were paid for legal services related to samaan v zernik. My mailing address: PO Box 526, La Verne, Ca 91750.

After reviewing the matter with a number of Los Angeles attorneys, and with fraud experts. I would also like to know if you would be willing to provide an affidavit regarding his experience in this case. The matter was of the highest public policy significance today, with the ongoing false imprisonment of Atty Richard Fine, since March 4, 2009, in solitary confinement, using the same fraud methods in Marina v LA County (BS109420) that were used in Samaan v Zernik, Similarly, ongoing litigation in Sturgeon v LA County, (BC351286), where the prospect of any integrity in the justice system in LA County was on the line, showed use of the same fraud methods as well.

Conduct of such fraud litigations in the LA County Justice system was deemed a direct extension of the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000), with Jacqueline Connor - the central figure in corruption of both civil and criminal courts. It was also likely to be deemed as severe violation of the Human Rights, pursuant to ratified International Law, of all 10 million residents of LA County, upon review by competent International Human Rights Courts of Jurisdiction..

Dated November 25, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se

09-11-25 - Requesting Sullivan Workman & Dee full refund of any moneys paid for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

- - -- - ---- -- - - - - -- - -- - -

Charles D. Cummings, Partner

Gary A. Kovacic, Partner

Karyn A. McCreary, Partner

D. Daniel Pranata, Partner

Roger M. Sullivan, Of Counsel

Henry K. Workman, Of Counsel

Thomas E. O'Sullivan, Of Counsel

SULLIVAN, WORKMAN, & DEE, LLP

Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:51:11 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Request for full refund within 10 days of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)

Charles D. Cummings Partner
Gary A. Kovacic Partner
Karyn A. McCreary Partner
D. Daniel Pranata Partner
Roger M. Sullivan Of Counsel
Henry K. Workman Of Counsel
Thomas E. O'Sullivan Of Counsel

Sullivan, Workman, and Dee, LLP
By email
By Fax: (213) 627-7128

RE: Request for full refund of any moneys paid to you for legal services in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) within 10 days.

Dear Attys Cummings, Kovacic, Parnata, Sullivan, Workman, O'Sullivan, and Sullivan, Workman, and Dee, LLP:

In reviewing Samaan v Zernik, I must come to the conclusion that Atty Cummings, was aware all along that the whole litigation was fraud and none of the records were valid and effectual. However, even after I raised such concerns with him, in December 2006, he led me to believe that there was no substance to my concerns. Surely, he never warned me that my concerns were true and valid, and never filed cross complaints for Fraud and Deceit.

In December 2006 - January 2007 I also raised my concerns with Mr Workman and others in your law-firm.

I therefore request that you review your books, and send me within 10 days, a full refund for any funds that were paid for legal services related to samaan v zernik. My mailing address: PO Box 526, La Verne, Ca 91750.

After reviewing the matter with a number of Los Angeles attorneys, and with fraud experts. I would also like to know if Mr Cummings would be willing to provide an affidavit regarding his experience in this case. The matter was of the highest public policy significance today, with the ongoing false imprisonment of Atty Richard Fine, since March 4, 2009, in solitary confinement, using the same fraud methods in Marina v LA County (BS109420) that were used in Samaan v Zernik, Similarly, ongoing litigation in Sturgeon v LA County, (BC351286), where the prospect of any integrity in the justice system in LA County was on the line, showed use of the same fraud methods as well.

Conduct of such fraud litigations in the LA County Justice system was deemed a direct extension of the Rampart Scandal (1998-2000), with Jacqueline Connor - the central figure in corruption of both civil and criminal courts. It was also likely to be deemed as severe violation of the Human Rights, pursuant to ratified International Law, of all 10 million residents of LA County, upon review by competent International Human Rights Courts of Jurisdiction..

Dated November 25, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se

09-11-25 - Holding Richard Fine in a hospital jail, in solitary confinement for seven month - identical to methods used in soviet Russia ....

Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:04:38 -0800

To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: 09-11-25 - Holding Richard Fine in a hospital jail, in solitary confinement for seven month - identiacl to methods used in soviet Russia ....

09-11-25 - Holding Richard Fine in a hospital jail, in solitary confinement for seven month - identical to methods used in soviet Russia ....

Hi Med Professionals:

I am sending you this notice, hoping that you be of help in generating action by medical societies to initiate investigation into the illegal holding of Richard Fine in solitary confinement in a jail hospital for seven months. My understanding is that some medical professional had to sign on some papers to allow this to happen.

As you know I am no lawyer, in contrast with many in the groups involved. However, I tend to see the situation more along legal lines - as violations of ratified International Law. Current corruption prevalent among the U.S. judiciary (by that I mean the class, including both state and federal judges) is something of medieval proportions - and with that severe abuse of the Human Rights of the American People by it own government. The same government would like to rescue the rest of the world from abusers of Human Rights.

FIRST - you have to realize how many of the Human Rights in the Universal Declaration pertain to establishment and maintenance of a fair and honest tribunals [1]
SECOND - you have to realize that the Universal Declaration, passed at the efforts of Elenor Roosevelt and others in 1948, is today Ratified International Law.
THIRD - You have to realize that certain courts in various countries hold that any court has jurisdiction on Human Rights anywhere.
Even if a result could be an issuance of international warrant on any of these individuals, limiting their ability to travel internationally, it would be a major step towards release of Richard Fine.
FOURTH - Please notice that Richard Fine is held in the jail hospital all of this time - since he is not on the Count List of the jail, since he was never booked, since none of the papers is held valid by the justice system itself. It is exactly the equivalent of the Soviet Union holding dissidents in mental hospitals.

In short -
1) I am seeking like minded persons to join me in calling upon medical associations to raise their voice and power. To hold him in the Jail hospital some unknown doctor had to sign papers - illegally.
2) I am seeking like minded persons to join me in a trip abroad this winter. Not next summer, etc. THIS WINTER.

In short: I believe that we must go abroad and sue the U.S. Government, David Yaffe, Carla Woehrle, John Walter, Alex Kozinski, Richard Tallman, Richard Paez, Eric Holder, Glenn Fine, Webster, Kenneth Melson, Kenneth Kaiser, Eric Holder, Barack Obama, for violations of Human Rights on the issue of false jailing of Richard Fine.

The evidence is all there [2] [3]. I am ready/able/willing to go tomorrow, but I am seeking like minded persons, ideally with legal background, who speak several languages, to join me in a group.

Consider it a winter vacation... :)

Joseph Zernik

Linked Records

[1] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-law-international-ratified-48-12-10-the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights.pdf
[2] http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-us-disuea_lasda_09-10-13-appeal-to-sheriff-lee-baca-s.pdf
[3] http://inproperinla.com/09-11-21-complaint-to-fbi-on-kozinski-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11025 Thanksgiving special- retired judge Gregory O'Brien and judge Jacqueline Connor- grandma and grandpa racketeering

A heart warming Thanksgiving Story!

Grandma and grandpa racketeering... Jackqueline Connor - LA Superior Court - and Gregory O'Brien -ADR -and the young generation - Atty Mohammad Keshavarzi - Sheppard Mulling - fully integrated in the biz and the tradition...

Pics are a bit old...

.- - - - - -

Jacqueline Connor- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Gregory O'Brien- - - - - - - -Mohammad Keshavarzi

Racketeering in perfect harmony!

On August 30, 2007 judge Jacquelin Connor was presiding in a Case Conference... or maybe it was a Motion Hearing? Although it was listed as a Case Conference, she was routinely referring to it as a Motion. As I already knew her routine deceptions, I routinely interrupted her anytime that she said "Motion". The transcript was edited, so only some of these remained on the transcript.

Jacqueline Connor was pretending to assign an Escrow Referree to execute an invalid, ineffectual August 9, 2007 Judgment. Since I was by then familiar with her routine deceptions, I can be found on the transcript, stating:

"Your Honor, please be diligent and issue an Order in compliance with the law". To which the reponded on the record: "I have no intention of doing so". I then added, that I provided her with an ADR form, all that she needed to do, was check some boxes. However, Jacqueline Connor was set in her way, she was determined to engage in willful criminality.

The August 30, 2007, invalid, ineffectual minute order, that atty Mohammad Keshavaarzi and retired judge Gregory O'Brien tried to use to coerce my participation read as follows:

Status Conference Regarding Referee Appointment

Matter is called for a hearing.

The Court appoint Honorable Greg O'Brien, Retired Judge

as Referee. The Court will prepare the Order to appointing

Discovery Referee.

...

Notice is waived.

On October 11, 2007 I received a fax indicating that Retired Judge O’Brien, who was pretending to be a Referee in Samaan v Zernik SC087400, resigned. Until that day, he and Mohammad Keshavarzi attempted to coerce me to meet them, in what later, on October 11, 2007, on the record, Mohammad Keshavarzi described as "execution of an entered oral judgment".

That letter states:
“..certain circumstances have arisen that make it imprudent for me to remain as the referee” and “Please also consider this letter to be on behalf of ADR Services, Inc., which shall decline any further reference as to this case.”

ADR and retired judge Gregory O'Brien decided that it was imprudent to continue racketeering... not so judge Jacqueline Connor and Mohammad Keshavarzi... no way that these two would stop...

Judge Jacqueline Connor, retired judge Gregory O'Brien, and ADR were among defendants in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550). at the U.S. District Court, LA. That litigation was corrupted by Magistrate Carla Woehrle, best remembered for doing the same job on the Habeas Corpus petition of Atty Richard Fine.

Linked Records:

1) August 30, 2007 Transcript

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-transcripts-07-08-30-status-conference-and-purported-appointment-of-obrien-referee-s.pdf

2) August 30, 2007 invalid Minute Order

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-08-30-mo-from%20paper=court0file-escrow-referee.pdf

3) September 7, 2007 Fax from ADR and Gregory O'Brien, showing the papers that formed the foundation for his conduct, which were stated to have been received from Mohammad Keshavarzi (in one of the documented ex parte communication)

http://inproperinla.com/07-09-07-obrien-s-papers-s.pdf

4) A copy of the October 11, 2007 letter can be viewed at:

http://home.earthlink.net/~jz12345/COUNTRYWIDE/07-10-11_obrien&adr_resign.pdf

5) October 11, 2007 Transcript.

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-transcripts-07-10-11-jude-segal-kesharzi-on-entered-oral-judgment-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-24 David Pasternak's monetary transactions with Clerk John Clarke, as evidence of racketeering activity.

- - - -

David Pasternak

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:03:44 -0800
To: LIST FBI, LIST USDOJ

From: joseph zernik
Subject: Monetary transactions as evidence for conduct of a racketeering enterprise in the LA Justice System.

Bcc:

To FBI and Att Glenn Fine, Inspector General, U.S. Dept of Justice
Please accept the email notice below as additional evidence of an Enterprise of Racketeering in the LA Justice System.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated November 24, 2009

La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se
____________________________
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:57:41 -0800
To: "David Pasternak" , "John A Clarke" <12136217952@efaxsend.com>, "Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge " <12136177176@efaxsend.com>
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kindly request: Please no money laundering transactions as part of the operations of LA Superior Court

Att David Pasternak


John A Clarke - Clerk of the Court
<12136217952@efaxsend.com>

Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge
<12136177176@efaxsend.com>

RE: Kindly request: Please no money laundering transactions as part of the operations of LA Superior Court

I received via USPS on November 22, 2009, at my box in the La Verne Post Office a letter dated November 16, 2009, from Atty David Pasternak, post stamped November 16, 2009. [1] Such letter contained evidence of transaction of $6,000.00 in check written by David Pasternak to the Clerk of the Court, Check No 4323, 1st Century Bank, Los Angeles. Account details were written by hand, and the check appeared to be signed by Lisa Kalaydjian, who was previously listed as Suspect for colluding with Atty Pasternak in issuance of fraudulent grand deeds on property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, California, as indicated in California Crime Report CA01938800.

The November 9, 2007 Appointment Order purported by Atty David Pasternak as the foundation of his authority was fraud on its face. Its authentication was dated earlier than the Order itself - in what was dubbed the "Fingerprints of the LA-JR". [2] Similar false and deliberately misleading court orders were found in all four cases that were listed as key evidence for the complaint regarding the LA-JR [3] Neither the Clerk, nor the Presiding Judge of the Court were ever willing to certify such Order, regardless of numerous requests by me, or by legal services hired by me, which provided a declaration to that effect.

There is no registration of the "Receivership" of David Pasternak in any valid and effectual record of the LA Superior Court either, since the court claimed to keep no Book of Judgments, contrary to the requirement of California Codes.

All court fees in the purported case of "Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)" were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Court refused to answer questions regarding the ultimate designation of such funds. [4]

The evidence as a whole demonstrated that Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) was never a case of the Superior Court. The Clerk of the Court and Presiding Judge refused to state so either. However, the court denied access to a true Index of All Cases, and therefore the public was left susceptible to fraud as seen here.

The transaction evidenced in this letter was likely to be deemed upon review by competent court of jurisdiction as:
1) Mail fraud
2) Money Laundering.
3) Part of a pattern of racketeering activity by an enterprise operating in the LA Justice System.

I kindly request:
1) That Atty David Pasternak cease and desist conduct that was likely to be deemed racketeering.
2) That the LA Superior Court not collude in such conduct, and that the LA Superior Court not deposit this check.
3) In case the Court did deposit the check, that the account designation into which it was deposited be disclosed, and the coding of the transaction, and case number used relative to the origin of such funds.

This message is copied to various FBI field offices, and also to Atty Glenn Fine, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice, as additional evidence for conduct of an organized crime enterprise in the LA Justice System.

Respectfully submitted,
Dated November 24, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se
Linked Records:
[1] November 16, 2009 Letter by David Pasternak, received in Post Office of La Verne, California.
http://inproperinla.com/09-11-16-pasternak-check-$6000-to-clerk-s.pdf
[2] Request for Corrective Actions in re: False Appointment Order of David Pasternak
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-00-00_09-10-16-request-mccoy-corrective-action-re-criminality-in-records-fine-judgment-pasternak-appointment-s.pdf
[3] Table summarizing four cases of the LA-JR
http://inproperinla.com/09-11-22-parallels-in-cases-of-the-la-jr-s.pdf
[4] Register of Actions, listing "Journal Entry" for all fees in purported case of Samaan v Zernik
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-register-of-actions-case-history-s-v-z-sustain-07-12-31_us-dist-ct-la_doc-39-08-04-17-req-for-judicial-notice-osc-contempt-s.pdf

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-24 Request to add correspondence with Police Chief Pickwith to complaint on LA-JR

Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:32:50 -0800
To: "Scott Pickwith"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.
Bcc:

November 24, 2009

Dear Chief Pickwith:

Thank you very much for your response. Your note below still failed to answer the question in my email notice of November 17, 2009:
Was the record, which was provided to me by the La Verne Police Department, as Crime Report CA01938800, an honest, valid, and effectual Crime Report of the La Verne Police Department?
This email is copied to Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, and to FBI Field Office in Los Angeles. It is requested that it be added as evidence to complaint about conduct of an enterprise of organized crime in Southern California Justice System.

Sincerely,

Joseph Zernik

CC:
Councilmember Nasmyth, City of La Verne
Councilmember Johnson , City of La Verne
Martin Lomeli - City Manager, City of La Verne
Bob Russi - Assistant City Manager, City of La Verne
Ruth Mahlow - Record Supervisor, La verne Police Department
Various FBI Field Offices.
Atty Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, U.S. DOJ

At 11:26 AM 11/23/2009, you wrote:

Dear Mr. Zernik,

Although I disagree with your characterization of the report, I have to respond to you that the courtesy report is in fact a courtesy report. As you have been told, the signatures are typed rather than hand-affixed, however, they are nevertheless the signatures of myself and Detective Newman. The number of pages was not stated, because, in an endeavor to provide you with as much information as possible, materials which are not strictly part of the police report, such as your statement and the fraud expert report, were supplied to you.

Thank you for your courtesy.

Scott Pickwith
Chief of Police

---

From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 4:55 PM
To: Scott Pickwith
Cc: Donna Nasmyth; Steve Johnson
Subject: October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.

November 17, 2009

Scott Pickwith, Chief
LVPD

October 2, 2009 DR#2009-3329 & Crime Report CA01938800. Kindly requesting your statement whether report I received today was a valid and effectual report of the La Verne Police. Timely response requested by November 24, 2009.

Chief Pickwith:

Supervisor Mahlow told me by phone yesterday that the report was ready. Therefore I went to the station today. Ruth Mahlow, Record Supervisor presented me with a sealed envelope. I opened it in her presence. There were in it some 10-20 pages, all of them certified, with her signature, but none of them relevant as part of the Crime Report.

When I pointed out to Supervisor Mahlow that it was not the crime report, she took back the papers, and asked me to wait.

Since the wait became prolonged, I went over to city hall, and met briefly with Mr Lomli, city manager. A couple of weeks ago he promised me that the matter would be taken care of, and asked that I let him know if it was not. I asked if he could call and make sure that I get an honest, valid, and effectual report. He promised "Your concerns would be taken care of".

When I came back to the station, I was presented by the Duty Officer with a package of entirely different papers than I was presented earlier. This time they were indeed pages of a police report:

1) The first page, still included the false and misleading information, with no foundation at all.

2) The two supplemental pages, with your name typed, included correct information, but were missing your hand signature,

3) A supplemental page by Detective Newman was likewise unsigned.

4) The fraud expert report, was included in the loose pages,

5) My typed statement was included in the loose package.

6) The number of pages in the report was never stated.

I pointed the missing signatures to Duty officer- she tried hard to convince me that the certification as sufficient on a record that was unsigned. I pointed out the missing signatures also to the Captain, but the Captain indicated that the missing signatures would not be provided.

I am writing to kindly ask that you state whether a crime report, made of loose pages, where the number of pages was never stated, where he first page -- including false and misleading information -- was signed and dated, and where the other supplemental pages by police -- including correct information -- were unsigned, was indeed an honest, valid, and effectual crime report of the La Verne Police Department..

Sincerely,

Joseph Zernik

CC:
Councilmember Nasmyth
Councilmember Johnson

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-23 Requests filed with Insepector General U.S. DOJ- Glenn A Fine.

Glenn Fine

Inspector General

U.S. DOJ

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:33:22 -0800
To: Chinese Embassy
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attention: His Excellency Ambassador of the People's Republic of China
Matter pertains to failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties in re; Banking Regulation and reckless conduct relative to failure to safeguard the stability of financial markets.
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph Zernik
_____________________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:02:08 -0800
To: joseph zernik
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions
Bcc: LIST Law Faculty

____________________________________
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:46:35 -0800
To: "Attention J van Cornewal-Harlaar", "Attention Mr Stefan Walter and Standards implementation-Mr Jos Mara Roldn, Validation Subgroup-Mr Maarten Gelderman, The Operational Risk Subgroup-Mr Kevin Bailey, Deputy Comptroller, Accounting Task Force-Ms Sylvie Mathrat"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions
Attention: Basel Committee
Matter pertains to failure of U.S. Government to perform its duties as a good faith signer of the Accords.
Joseph Zernik
__________________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:51:09 -0800
To: "U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Fwd: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attention: High Commissioner for Human Rights
Matter pertains to failure of U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law.
Joseph Zernik

______________________________
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:36:49 -0800
To: Prof Richard Posner, Univ of Chicago Law School
From: joseph zernik
Subject: FYI: Copy of letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine to reliably inform you of the issues.
November 23, 2009
Dear Prof Posner:
Attached and within is a copy of letter to IG-DOJ regarding judicial corruption, to reliably inform you in this matter.
Thanks,
Joseph Zernik
______________________________

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:44:17 -0800
To: Office of Inspector General US Dept of Justice
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Letter to IG-DOJ Atty Glenn Fine and request for urgent actions

Attached is a digitally signed copy.jz
_____________________________________________________________________

Dr Z
Joseph H Zernik, DMD, PhD
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 801.998.0917; E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

09-11-23 Request for urgent actions by IG-DOJ Glenn A Fine.

ATTY GLENN A FINE
Inspector General
Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530
By Certified Mail
By Email:
<List U.S. iG-DOJ>
By fax:

In the second request your immediate actions are requested. Response regarding your intent to take any actions regarding any of the requests below is kindly requested by December 4, 2009.

Dear Atty Fine:

I, Dr Joseph Zernik, write to request your actions regarding my case and the conduct of the U.S. Department of Justice in this regard. I was forced to leave my residence, my property, which was taken for private use with no compensation at all, in conjunction with fraud by the court, as opined by a decorated, veteran FBI agent. [i],[ii] It also involved fraud, as opined by yet another fraud expert by Countrywide Financial Corporation,[iii] and in the past year and a half - Bank of America Corporation. I was trapped in this scheme since 2004. Local FBI and USAO for the past three years, have denied my Human Rights for Equal Protection and to Own Property.[iv] Senior officers of FBI and US Department of Justice provided false and deliberately misleading responses to U.S. Congress in my case last year.[v]

I write to you to request that you free Atty Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, who was held in solitary confinement in LA for over 7 months, with no warrant, with no sentencing/judgment, from litigation at the LA Superior Court - with no Register of Actions (California docket). His Human Right for Liberty was denied.[vi], [vii] The pattern of false court records in all these cases was similar, and was considered the Finger Prints of the LA-JR (alleged LA-Judiciary Racket).

I also write to you regarding the Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons). Over 10,000 of them, mostly blacks and latinos, who are still falsely imprisoned a decade after their innocence was documented. It was the principle evidence for the conduct of the LA-JR already a decade ago.[viii], [ix], [x] Their Human Rights for Liberty were denied.

I write on behalf of Ms Barbara Darwish, who was subjected over an 8 year period (1998-2006) to a real estate scheme by the courts that was the prototype of the scheme perpetrated on me. In May 2002 she appeared for trial at the LA Superior Court, but was deceived to proceed to the Municipal Court in Culver City, where a bench trial was conducted on her by an anonymous - listed only as Muni Judge in the records to take her 6-unit Santa Monica rental property. [xi], [xii], [xiii] Her Human Rights to Own Property and for a Fair and Impartial Hearing were denied.

I write to you to today on behalf of all 10 million residents of the County of Los Angeles, California, whose prospects for any honest court services in the future were on the line in false court action underway, where you could not even tell who was a judge, and who was a referee. [xiv] Their Human Rights were denied - for Fair and Impartial Hearings.

I write to you today to request that you investigate, prosecute and take corrective actions regarding the failure of the U.S. Justice Department in the past decade to protect the Human Rights of the residents of Los Angeles County. In particular - the disintegration of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, documented in this letter, which was considered a direct extension of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000).

I request that you investigate the conduct of FBI and USAO during the past decade, which amounted to cover up of the scandal. I also request that you investigate the conduct of senior officers of the U.S. Department of Justice, surrounding false and deliberate responses, which they gave to the U.S. congress last year, after Congressional Inquiries on my behalf.[xv]

Conditions prevailing in Los Angeles County, California, were likely to be deemed serious failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law. Our Human Rights were denied for Liberty, to Own Property, for Public Access to Court Records, for Fair and Impartial Hearings, for National Tribunals to Protect our Human Rights, and for Equal Protection.[xvi]

Conditions described in this letter were also likely to be deemed serous failure of the U.S. Government to perform its duties pursuant to International Banking Accords that it claimed to be good faith party to.[xvii]

In short I am asking that you investigate the conduct of the U.S. Department of Justice:

1) Relative to the LA-JR alleged LAJudiciary Racket. The evidence is incontrovertible, and neither the local FBI, nor local USAO, nor the senior officers of U.S. Department of Justice ever denied my assertion of conduct of such enterprise in the Los Angeles County courts.

2) Relative to cover up and deception on the American People by the U.S. Department of Justice - of the criminality that underlies the sub-prime crisis, and with it the refusal to investigate my complaints on the matter since January 2007, and denial of my rights to access the courts in Qui Tam False Claims Act complaints, both at the U.S. District Court, LA and the U.S. District court Washington DC.[xviii]

In the second request your immediate actions are requested. Response regarding your intent to take any actions regarding any of the requests below is kindly requested by December 4, 2009.

Specific requests are kindly submitted to you: [Redacted]

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-23 Atty David Pasternak's notice that a "hearing" that was never "on calendar" is now "off caldendar".

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:10 -0800
To: "David J. Pasternak"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.

November 23, 2009
Mr Pasternak:
Thank you for your response. Calling it a "hearing" is additional evidence of wire fraud by you. There is nothing of a valid, effectual court actions in your conduct. It was fraud from A to Z, and I warned you of that in advance.
Joseph Zernik

At 02:55 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:

The hearing scheduled for Nov. 25 is off calendar.

From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:48 PM
To: Charles McCoy -Presiding Judge ; John A Clarke; Greg Drapac -Senior Administrator; David J. Pasternak
Subject: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.


Atty David Pasternak


Charles McCoy
Presiding Judge
12136177176@efaxsend.com

John Clarke
Clerk of the Court
12136217952@efaxsend.com

Greg Drapac
Senior Administrator
12136258536@efaxsend.com

RE: Kindly request to Atty David Pasternak, Judge Terry Friedman, and the Presiding Judge and Clerk of the Court: Please make sure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.

Dear Atty David Pasternak, Presiding Judge McCoy, Clerk Clarke, and Senior Administrator Drapac:

Please accept this notice as a kindly request to ensure that no racketeering activity takes place on the grounds of the court during business hours.
Please remove from the online Case Summary the listing of any Future Proceeding on Wednesday, November 25, 2009, or any other "Proceeding" in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400). It never was and never will be a true litigation of the Superior Court of California. None of you was willing to state that much either, except for David Pasternak, and complaint is filed with FBI for mail and wire fraud for that reason.

Dated: November 22, 2009

Los Angeles County, California ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: (323) 515-4583
Fax:(801) 998-0917

CC: FBI Los Angeles


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4628 (20091122)

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4628 (20091122)

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-11-23 Letter to Prof Richard Posner, Univ of Chicago Law School

Prof Richard Posner

November 22, 2009

Dear Prof Posner:

RE: Kindly request to FBI - Complaint against Chief Judge, 9th Circuit, Alex Kozinski

I hoped that you would find at least some academic merit in this note, given your clerkship with the late Justice Brennan, who wrote:

"The basic principle of the Great Writ of habeas corpus is that, in a civilized society... if the imprisonment cannot be shown to conform with the fundamental requirements of law, the individual is entitled to his immediate release" . Fay v Noia 372 US 391 (1963) p399

Attorney Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former U.S. Prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, is held in solitary confinement in LA for over 7 months, with no warrant, with no sentencing/judgment, from litigation at the LA Superior Court - with no Register of Actions (California docket).
- -
In response to Ricahrd Fine's petition, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski served on Richard Fine and on me (as Party in Interest) a sham, false and deliberately misleading, unsigned court order denying the petition.

Under the watch of the 9th Circuit, we also have over 10,000 Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), almost exclusively Black and Latinos, documented a decade ago as falsely convicted and falsely sentenced to long prison terms - still never freed. It is a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions.

The case of Judge Kozinski, was in fact deemed as mail fraud, perversion of justice, and collusion with the LA-JR (alleged LA-Judiciary Racket). It was also a computer and internet fraud.

The case is not unique. The practice is structured in the implementation of PACER & CM/ECF - the dual systems of the U.S. courts, which replaced, with no authorization at all the traditional system of Proofs of Service, with automated response from the court's computer - the NEFs (notices of electronic filing). In principle, it could be a good idea, but the way it was implemented:
a) The NEFs were omitted from PACER - so that any person, who was not authorized for the particular court on CM/ECF, was denied access to critical court records that determined the validity and effect of court orders and judgments in any case. Two classes of persons were established in fact: (i)Those who were permitted to know which records were valid, and which ones were not, and (ii) Those who were deemed by the court unworthy of such knowledge.
b) It was never spelled out in FRCP or Criminal Procedures, neither in Rules of Court, it appeared in the various U.S. District Courts either in Manuals - with no legal effect, or in Standing Orders, themselves of dubious effect - you cannot view their NEFs either.
c) Judges and Clerks routinely posted in Pacer such orders and judgments, which were not deemed valid and effectual by the court itself. The posting of such records misled those who used Pacer to obtain such records.

Even an experienced attorney, like Richard Fine, in jail, did not catch the deceit:The only thing that at the end makes any court order valid, is the RSA string, that appears to most lay persons as nonsense, on the cover sheet of the order (NEF). The judges, on their part, feel that if they sent an invalid order (with no RSA string on the cover) then it could be anything they wanted. The recipient, on the other hand, believes that it is a real court order, and is left puzzled how the judges could make such gross error on the law...
In short - it is seen as a very large scale shell-game fraud.

Any response would be appreciated.

Respectfully,

Joe Zernik
P.S..
1) RE: YOUR NYT PIECE IN JUNE 2009 IN RE: BANKING REGULATION,
As seen here, it is not only banking regulators. The current crisis should be considered an "INTEGRITY CRISIS" - investors lost faith in the integrity of U.S. financial markets, U.S. regulators, and U.S. courts. The regulators can be seen as only following the example set by the conduct of U.S. Courts.

* The January 8, 2008 collapse of Countrywide (not by chance - LA based) was the outcome of publication in NYT of the "recreated letters" filed as evidence in Pittsburgh PA court, case of Borrower Hill (01-22574). It was not any news related to financial performance that undermined investor confidence.

* In March 5, 2008, Judge Jeff Bohm, case of Borrower Parsley (4-05-bk-90374), in Houston Texas, issued a 72 page Memorandum Opinion, describing fraud on the court in employment of outside counsel, who appeared while not counsel of record, with "no communications with client" clause in its engagement by Countrywide.

* In the same record also U.S. Trustee report is cited - of litigation practices of Countrywide across the country.
* In May 09 the visit of U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Beijing, as has become an annual ceremony in recent years - was aimed to obtain Chinese agreement to devalue the dollar. It was described as "difficult". Media reported that the Chinese were concerned regarding integrity of U.S. banking regulation...

* August 2009 The litigation of SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829) is yet another point in case. Throughout the litigation, which was supposed to demonstrate effective enforcement by SEC, the summons were never posted in Pacer. When I inquired with the clerk of the NYC U.S District court, he explained to me that their custom is not to post the summons. I pointed out that it was in direct opposition to FRCP and asked both the Clerk and counsel in the case to view the summons. Request was denied. To the best of my understanding (you cannot see any of the NEFs in Pacer, of course), none of the orders of Judge Jed Rakoff in this case was with a valid NEF.

* November 09 The litigation in US v UBS AG (09-Cr-60033) in Southern District of Florida is yet another case of this sort. Pretending to appear as enforcement by IRS on the Swiss banking institution, the records appears anything but that.

* November 09 in Los Angeles,California, Bank of America subsidiary Countrywide continues to this date the same practices in the Superior Court in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400).
- With support of the judges it has been employing Bryan Cave, LLP - not counsel of record - who has been appearing for 2.5 years, falsely designating Bank of America "Non Party". The court itself uses shifting designations by the date - "Defendant", "Plaintiff", "Cross-Defendant", "Intervenor", "Real Party in Interest", etc.
- Countrywide'Bank of America filed false banking records . http://inproperinla.com/09-04-17-list-of-six-key-records-for-bac-audit-committee-review-s.pdf
- Bank of America has refused to answer in any way, includign complaints to the Audit Committee, pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002)
* When protection of civil rights was sought at the U.S. district court - Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
- A false case number was issued, linking the case to an unrelated criminal litigation, and
- The court falsely refused to issue summons.
* When petition was filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cicuit, in re: Denial of Access to the Courts by refusal to issue summons - Zernik v US Dist Ct, LA (08-72714)
- The response was exactly the same as in the case of Richard Fine, verbatim, and
- The response was delivered in an unsigned order as well.,

* To this date, FBI could never find any reason to indict anybody in Countrywide,
* Countrywide legal department, headed by Sandor Samuels, was incorporated intact into Bank of America, with predictable results.

2) OTHER CRITIQUE OF THE DUAL SYSTEMS (PACER AND CM/ECF),
Can be found in my blog:http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
The manner in which the system is operated today, is considered the largest shell game fraud in the history of mankind:

Joe Zernik
_____________________________________________
Complaint filed November 21, 2009 with FBI LA against Chief Judge, 9th Circuit Alex Kozinski

Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:20:54 -0800
To:
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Kindly request to FBI - Complaint against Alex Kozinski
Cc:
____________________________________________
To: FBI Field Office, Los Angeles, California
Kindly Request: Please accept this notice as a complaint against Chief Judge Alex Kozinski for serving on falsely imprisoned Richard Fine and on me an unsigned July 30, 2009 Order in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) (Dkt #4), with no NEF - an invalid, ineffectual, false and deliberately misleading court record. He did so in disregard of my protest of such habits by judges (Dkt #2) in the very same docket.
Such mailing allegedly amounted to:

• Perversion of Justice
• Mail Fraud
• Willful Misconduct

Dated: November 21, 2009
Los Angeles County, California ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750
Tel: (323) 515-4583
Fax:(801) 998-0917

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.