10-01-17 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - Requests for responses on requests in re: dockets integrity.

 
US District Court, Los Angeles

Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:59:57 -0800
To: Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the US District Court, Central District of California
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)  Request for responses on requests dated January 4, 2010 in re dockets integrity.
Cc: Dawn Bullock, Records Supervisor

January 16, 2010

Terry Nafisi
Clerk of the US Court
Central District of California

RE: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)  Requests for responses on requests dated January 4, 2010 in re dockets integrity.

Dear Clerk Nafisi:

Please accept this notice as a reminder of requests for information from your office, made in person to Records Supervisor Dawn Bullock on December 29, 2009, and also in writing, in letters dates January 4, 2010.[1] [2]

In a December 29, 2009 visit to the US District Court, LA, requests were made to access court records, to inspect and to copy. Most requests were denied, but access was allowed to several NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) . Such NEFs cemented concerns regarding honesty, validity, and effect of the PACER docket under such caption.

The US District Court would not certify its dockets. Moreover, no statements appear in the dockets in the name of the Clerk or any Clerk Deputy, as such.  Therefore requests were made, and requests are made herein, for statements by the Clerk of the US District Court, LA - Terry Nafisi, whether the dockets in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were honest, valid, and effectual dockets, in compliance with US law.  Please accept this request also as Custodian of Records of the US District Court, LA, pursuant to California Law, as a request for custodian of records declaration regarding the PACER dockets of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914).

As a follow up to the December 29, 2009, visit to the United States District Court, Los Angeles, where access to almost all records requested was denied, request was made for written explanations of the legal foundation for such denials, and related questions regarding the legal foundation for the rules of operation of PACER & CM/ECF at the US District Court.

Ms Bullock indicated that some of my questions would require research.  However, it should be possible to provide without any further delay at least responses to two of the simpler questions:

a) Are the PACER docket in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) honest, valid, and effectual dockets, in compliance with US law?

b) Was Donna Thomas, Courtroom Assistant of Magistrate Carla Woehrle, who conducted various transactions in the dockets of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)  and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) a Deputy Clerk at that time, who was authorized to engage in such transactions, pursuant to your authority as Clerk of the US Court, Central District of California?

I look forward to your expedient responses on at least these two questions.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

Linked Records:
[1] http://www.scribd.com/doc/24772496/10-01-04-Requesting-US-District-Court-LA-Clerk-Terry-Nafisi-s-statements-re-docket-of-Zernik-v-Connor-et-al-is-it-honest-valid-and-effectual-in

[2] http://www.scribd.com/doc/24776792/10-01-04-Request-Clarifications-by-US-District-Court-LA-Clerk-Terry-Nafisi-in-re-PACER-CM-ECF-and-denial-of-access-to-records-s

10-01-16 Comunicación a Alta Comisionada de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos y el Comité de Basilea

Sábado, 16 de enero 2010

   

Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:12:32 -0800

A: "Comité de Basilea en los Acuerdos de Banca Internacional y las Naciones Unidas del Alto Comisionado de Derechos Humanos"
De: Jose Zernik
Asunto: Departamento de Los Angeles County Sheriff's: datos interno de la encuesta - VINE vs Internos Centro de Información de volver a José Martínez, José Rodríguez,
 Estimados del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas y el Comité de Basilea (incluidos Kevin Bailey - EE.UU. Sub Contralor de la Moneda, y el representante de EE.UU. para el comité): 

El informe a continuación forma parte de una serie de documentación de la corrupción generalizada del sistema de justicia en el Condado de Los Angeles, California, que pretendía ser una desgracia de Derechos Humanos de proporciones históricas. Esta corrupción está plenamente documentado en los informes del gobierno y los registros del gobierno, por lo menos dos décadas. En un principio puede aparecer como ajenos a la banca y la regulación bancaria. Sin embargo, fue el mismo juez, Jacqueline Connor, que estaba en el centro del escándalo de corrupción de Rampart (1998-2000), que fue inexplicablemente el mejor amigo de algunos de los más corruptos de la policía, que condujo a la detención ilegal de miles de Rampart -FIP (secuestrada personas), que también fue la figura clave en la instigación en 2005, el litigio malicioso y fraudulento, opinó por decoradas informe veterano agente del FBI, en connivencia con Countrywide - ahora Bank of America Corporation.

La evidencia demuestra la corrupción generalizada de los tribunales en connivencia con las instituciones financieras más grandes, como Bank of America Corporation, que afectan a abusos de derechos humanos en múltiples frentes. Se dudó de que alguien que vive fuera de los EE.UU. tiene la capacidad para medir la dimensión de la corrupción. Por lo tanto, recomendó hace ya un año, que algunos observadores internacionales se desea, si no por otra razón - para reducir el riesgo de quiebra financiera catastrófica.

En verdad,

Jose Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Fotos Patriótica de Beyonce Knowles, Sharon Stone, y Charlize Theron.
Pronto la música deep house!

10-01-16 Departamento de Los Angeles County Sheriff's: datos interno de la encuesta - VINE vs Internos Centro de Información de volver a José Martínez, José Rodríguez

             
Imágenes de José Rodríguez, de búsqueda de imágenes de Google - que no son prisioneros. Sin embargo, probablemente se debe aconsejar a permanecer fuera del Condado de Los Angeles, California.


El interés inicial en el sistema de gestión de casos del Departamento del Sheriff del Condado de Los Angeles apareció, tras el encarcelamiento y la hospitalización de dos abogados de alto nivel que habían presentado denuncias relativas a denuncias de corrupción de los jueces de la Corte Superior de Los Ángeles. Uno de ellos, Richard Fine, se ha limitado en virtud de la hospitalización forzada de más de 10 meses. En paralelo - Sheriff de Los Angeles, Lee Baca, se negó a permitir el acceso a los Registros Públicos de California, que son la detención y los documentos de reserva de los dos abogados. En lugar de datos, su oficina en varias ocasiones se hace referencia falsa y deliberadamente engañosa publicada en la línea de Internos Centro de Información.

Anterior datos de las encuestas demuestran que alrededor del 30% de las entradas en el Departamento del Sheriff del Condado de Los Angeles de Internos del Centro de información no tenían número de reservas disponibles. Asimismo, mostró que cerca del 50% de las entradas habían tribunal ficticio y / o número de caso como la autoridad legal para su encarcelamiento.Encuestas de datos de los nombres latinos comunes tales como "José Martínez", "José Rodríguez", frente común "anglosajón" de nombres como John Smith o John Williams, también sugirió que el nombre latino reclusos tenían más probabilidades de que falta un número de reserva o venta con otros datos falsos.

Aquí, estos datos fueron analizados mediante el acceso a más de revistas de Los Angeles Departamento del Sheriff de los reclusos a partir de dos fuentes alternativas: el sistema de vid, y el Centro de Información del Recluso, y comparando los resultados de las mismas consultas de los dos sistemas.

Las diferencias eran de una magnitud sorprendente: El nativo de Internos Centro de Información encontrado 141 hits para una consulta sobre "José Martínez", mientras que el sistema VINE identificado sólo 28 hits en la misma consulta. Además, de los internos que se encuentran a través de vid, el 7% (2 de 28) no detectable en el Condado de Los Angeles Reclusos Centro de Información sobre todo, a pesar de vid que figuran el Departamento del Sheriff del Condado de Los Ángeles como la fuente de datos. Entre los presos que aparecen en vid, algunos tenían un número de reservas que eran de la serie "bajo" previamente identificados, que no son continuos con los números de reserva y otras en relación a Fechas de la reserva, y por tanto sospechoso.

La comparación se repitió por una consulta de ambos sistemas o "José Rodríguez", la obtención de 133 muestras en el formato nativo de Internos Centro de Información, pero sólo 26 reclusos en la vid para el mismo nombre.
Resultados de dicho análisis se pretendía demostrar que tras la investigación que era muy probable que se encuentre que las grandes detenciones ilegales y encarcelamiento falso prevalecían en Condado de Los Angeles, California. La evidencia demostró que tales prácticas eran frecuentados por los tribunales. La evidencia adicional demostró la corrupción generalizada de la Corte Superior de California, condado de Los Ángeles - en relación a la propiedad inmobiliaria y el fraude institución financiera. Del FBI y el Departamento de Justicia de EE.UU. se negó a investigar las denuncias y pruebas contundentes de la corrupción generalizada del sistema de justicia del Condado de Los Angeles. Por lo tanto, propuso que observadores internacionales deben tratar de acceder a los registros públicos en Condado de Los Angeles, California, y explorar más a fondo lo que parecía ser falso encarcelamiento a gran escala - extensión directa del escándalo de Rampart (1998-2000). Condiciones del sistema de justicia en el Condado de Los Angeles, California, también pueden requerir acceso inmediato a los tribunales internacionales de derechos humanos.


16 de enero de 2010.

En verdad,

Jose Zernik

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs

Fotos Patriótica de Beyonce Knowles, Sharon Stone, y Charlize Theron,
Pronto la música deep house!

10-01-16 Notice to UN Hight Commissioner for Human Rights and the Basel Committee

    

Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:12:32 -0800
To: "Basel Committee on International Banking Accords & UN High Commissioner on Human Rights"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department: inmate data survey - VINE vs Inmate Information Center re Jose Martinez, Jose Rodriguez
Bcc: 

Dear UN High Commissioner and Basel Committee (including Kevin Bailey - US Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, and US rep for the committee):

The report below is one in a series documenting the widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, which is claimed to be a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. Such corruption was fully documented in government reports and government records, for at least two decades. It may initially appear as unrelated to banking and banking regulation. However, it was the same judge, Jacqueline Connor, who was at the center of the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000), who was inexplicably best friends with some of the most corrupt police, which led to the false imprisonment of thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), who was also the key figure in instigating in 2005 the malicious and fraudulent litigation, as opined by decorated veteran FBI agent report, in collusion with Countrywide - now Bank of America Corporation.

The evidence demonstrates widespread corruption of the courts in collusion with the largest financial institutions, such as Bank of America Corporation, affecting Human Rights abuse on multiple fronts. It was doubted that anyone living outside the US has any ability to gauge the dimension of the corruption. It was therefore recommended already a year ago, that some international observers were desired, if for no other reason - to reduce the risk of catastrophic financial failure.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Patriotic pics of  Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron, 

Coming soon- deep house music!

CC:

Brian T Moynihan, President & CEO (also - former General Counsel), Bank of America Corporation.

10-01-16 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department: inmate data survey - VINE vs Inmate Information Center re Jose Martinez, Jose Rodriguez

             
Images for Jose Rodriguez from Google image search - they are not jail inmates. However, they probably should be advised to stay out of Los Angeles County, California.

Initial interest in the case management system of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department arose following the jailing and hospitalization of two senior attorneys, who had filed complaints pertaining to allegations of corruption of judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. One of them, Richard Fine, has been confined under coerced hospitalization for over 10 months. In parallel – Los Angeles Sheriff, Lee Baca, refused to allow access to California Public Records, which were the arrest and booking papers of the two attorneys. Instead, his office repeatedly referenced false and deliberately misleading data published on the online Inmate Information Center.

Previous data surveys demonstrated that about 30% of the entries in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Inmate information Center had no booking number available. It further showed that about 50% of the entries had fictitious court and/or case number listed as the legal authority for their jailing. Data surveys for common latino names such as “Jose Martinez”, “Jose Rodriguez”, versus common “anglo” names such as John Smith or John Williams, also suggested that latino named inmates were more likely to be missing a booking number or listed with other false data.

Here, such data were further analyzed by accessing the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department listing of inmates from two alternative sources: The VINE system, and the Inmate Information Center, and by comparing the results of the same queries from the two systems.

The differences were of surprisingly large magnitude: The native Inmate Information Center found 141 hits for a query for “Jose Martinez”, while the VINE system identified only 28 hits for the same query. Moreover, of the inmates that were found through VINE, 7% (2 out of 28) were not traceable in the Los Angeles County Inmate Information Center at all, although VINE listed the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department as the data source. Among inmates listed on VINE, some had Booking Numbers that were from the “low series” previously identified, which were non-continuous with other booking numbers in respect to Booking Dates, and therefore suspect.

The comparison was repeated by a query of both systems or “Jose Rodriguez”, yielding 133 hits in the native Inmate Information Center, but only 26 inmates in VINE for the same name.
Results of such analysis was claimed to demonstrate that upon investigation it was very likely to be found that large-scale false arrests and false jailing were prevalent in Los Angeles County, California. The evidence demonstrated that such practices were patronized by the courts. Additional evidence demonstrated widespread corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – relative to real estate and financial institution fraud. FBI and the US Department of Justice refused to investigate allegations and overwhelming evidence of widespread corruption of the Los Angeles County justice system. It was therefore proposed that international observers should attempt to access public records in Los Angeles County, California, and further explore what appeared as large scale false jailing – direct extension of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000). Conditions of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, may also require immediate approach to International Human Rights courts.

Dated January 16, 2010.
Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron, 

Coming soon- deep house music!

Linked Records:
1) The full report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25315610/10-01-16-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-inmate-data-survey-VINE-vs-Inmate-Information-Center-re-Jose-Martinez-Jose-Rodriguez-s

10-01-15 Proposing a simple review standard to US Office of Comptroller of the Currency.

  

Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:05:46 -0800
To: "US Office of Comptroller of Currency"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: Case #00971981 - Complaint against Bank of America Corporation, for conduct that was alleged as amounting to racketeering in the courts in Los Angeles County, California - review procedures.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

RE: Case #00971981 - complaint against Bank of America Corporation, for conduct that was alleged as amounting to racketeering in the courts in Los Angeles County, California - review procedures.

Dear Office of Comptroller of the Currency:

In a phone call today with Sonya, a phone representative at OCC, I was glad to hear that after two "escalations" Bank of America finally filed two letters with OCC, dated January 8, 2010, as a response to the complaint referenced above, dated September 29, 2010.  However, I was also informed, that following OCC's standard procedures, while the bank was allowed to view my complaint, I would not be allowed to view the response.

I therefore filed today a Freedom of Information Act request for the records.  Regardless, based on past experience, it was unlikely that I would get any of the records prior to OCC's determination in this matter.

Past experience in the same and related matters included, but was not limited to:

a) A complaint to Office of Thrift Supervision CASE #0507312007 against Countrywide Bank, in 2007, on the same matter.
Thrift Supervision practiced the same review standards as described above.  When I later obtained records through a Freedom of Information Act request, it became apparent that Countrywide provided Office of Thrift Supervision false and deliberately misleading responses, unsubstantiated, and inherently illogical.  Regardless, such responses were accepted and quoted verbatim as the determination by that office.

b) A complaint to OCC, # 00974775 against Union Bank, filed in 2009, currently under appeal, on a related matter.
Union Bank's has refused in the past 2.5 years  to allow me any any access to my own banking records in this matter.  The  response to OCC was likewise - a narrative with no documentary substantiation at all. Such response was nevertheless accepted by OCC, and the complaint was closed.

Therefore, since I would be able neither to see Bank of America's response on my complaint, nor to reply prior to OCC's determination,  I am writing to propose a review standard that I suggest would amount to fundamental integrity in banking regulation:

In my complaint I provided links to records to substantiate each and every one of my claims.   I request that OCC would not accept any response from Bank of America on my complaint, unless it provided documentation to substantiate the narrative of the response. 

I hope that you share my concerns regarding integrity of banking regulation under the current crisis, and would therefore accept this simple suggestion.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Patriotic pics of Sharon Stone, Beyonce' Knowles, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

CC:
1) Kevin Bailey - Deputy Comptroller
2) Basel Accords Committee
3) Mary Schapiro - SEC
4) David Kotz - SEC-IG
5) Eric Thorson - Treasury-IG 

10-01-15 Government or private sector?

10-01-15 Notice to members of the Basel Accords Committee, copied to Brian Moynihan, President of Bank of America Corporation

 

Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:24:05 -0800
To: "Members of the Basel Accords Committe, including Kevin Bailey"
From: joseph zernik

Subject: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829), and US v UBS-AG (09-CR-60033)Concerns regarding integrity of US Courts and US banking regulation
Cc: "Moynihan, Brian T" 

To members of the Basel Accords Committee, including Kevin Bailey - Deputy Comptroller of the Currency, and US representative to the Committee.

RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829), and US v UBS-AG (09-CR-60033) - integrity of US Courts and US banking regulation, or lack thereof.

Dear members of the Basel Accords Committee:

Please take notice of the motion copied below, filed by mail on January 14, 2010 with the US District Court, Vermont. The motion may initially appear as unrelated to banking regulation. The two cases the were discussed in it pertained to deprivation of Liberty and deprivation of First Amendment Right of Free Speech.  However, the thrust of the motion was in claims of very large scale shell-game fraud (Flimflam) in the dual docketing systems of the US Courts - PACER & CM/ECF. Installation of such systems was recently concluded following a decade-long project.  However, the systems were materially deficient in  lacking publicly-accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification).  Moreover, the data presented in the motion demonstrated incontrovertibly that such systems, combined with denial of the common law right to access court records, were routinely used to pervert justice.  The core of the fraud and deceit in the system was opined to be in the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) and their RSA-encrypted digital signatures.

Not mentioned in the motions were the following cases related to banking regulation:

a) SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1-09-cv-06829): My requests for the NEFs in this case in the past half year were repeatedly denied. Therefore, such litigation, which was routinely reported by US media as the hallmark of US banking regulation in the past year, is at least of unknown validity.  However, additional circumstantial evidence, e.g. - failure to docket summons in this case, in contradiction with the law, and refusal to provide copies of the summons in this case upon requests, indicated that the case most likely was an invalid litigation - a show trial with no consequences at all, conducted through collusion of attorneys for Bank of America Corporation, SEC, and the court.

b) US v UBS-AG (09-CR-60033): Similar concerns were raised regarding this high visibility case, and request for the NEFs in that case is underway.

It is inconceivable that a banking regulation of any integrity could be instituted in the US on the foundation of national justice system that was thoroughly lacking in integrity.  The fundamental deficiency is seen in failure to institute by law mechanisms for publicly-accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of case management systems, in the courts, in prisons, in financial institutions, and at regulatory agencies.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
Patriotic pics of Sharon Stone, Beyonce' Knowles, and Charlize Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!

CC: Brian T Moynihan, President, Bank of America Corporation.