Should Judge Jacqueline Connor be deemed a Flimflam artist? Or maybe a racketeer?
RE: JULY 9, 2007 - Fictitious Proceeding - alleged falsification of court records, as part of
alleged sanctions fraud in collusion with Sheppard Mullin
Jacqueline Connor
Alleged Racketeer
July 9, 2007 was a minor episode - Judge Jacqueline Connor entered on that day a fictitious, false and deliberately misleading Minute Order. Just the daily routine - production of false trial court litigation records, assuming that the parties would never even get to see these records.
The main reasons I bring it in here are:
1) Conduct of an enterprise in a pattern of racketeering activity...
Because it was part of a sanctions scheme (alleged fraud to be precise) by Judge Connor in collusion with Mohammad Keshavarzi (Sheppard Mullin). The Presiding Judge of the court, Charles McCoy, was noticed, as usual, hoping that he would ask his colleagues in Sheppard Mullin to stop the alleged racketeering in the courtroom with Judge Connor. But I guess it was irresistible.
It was almost identical to the sanctions scheme that ended up with the false imprisonment of Atty Richard Fine. I am posting it here for public education, and I will refer law enforcement to the web page, in noticing them that Richard Fine is falsely imprisoned by Judge Yaffe and others.
It is the repetitive pattern of these alleged crimes that is the best evidence of the racketeering at the LA Superior Court.
2) Public access to court records in the only way to safeguard minimal integrity in the courts
Because some people pretend that they do not understand what is wrong with hidden records. That is what is wrong - non stop falsifications.
3) Flim Flam at the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District
Because eventually you must stop and think: Why do they bother?
Racketeering in Los Angeles Courts and the California Court of Appeal, 2nd DistrictAnd then you realize that there must be readers for the false records, otherwise, they would not bother. Finally you realize the self-evident - that the LA Superior Court forwards the Registers of Actions to review courts without notice to parties... That of course creates a uniquely, I hope, Los Angeles style of justice: People go to the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, and they make arguments based on records that they never even got to see. But the Justices of the Court of Appeals base their decisions on such records that they secretly get from the LA Superior Court, behind the backs of the parties... routinely...Simply through terminals installedat the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District for Sustain - the "privileged" case management system.In short - anybody who pays an attorney to go to appeal must be either uninformed or inclined to subscribe to abusive style of justice...
Basically - we live in Los Angeles in the digital-medieval era... The court managed to use digital technology to take us back into the deep past...
July 9, 2007 Minute Order for a fictitious proceedings that never took place in reality.
The Court reporter that is listed denied that she had any such proceeding on file. I never talked with Judge Connor “telephonically” in my life. And the party line company can check that I never had an account and I could not conduct such phone hearing. This fictitious minute order was part of an elaborate sanctions fraud, in collusion with Mohammad Keshavarzi, Sheppard Mullin, very similar to the Flim Flam that Judge Yaffe was running with Atty Joshua Rosen on Atty Richard Fine. However, Judge Yaffe went all the way with it to false imprisonment…
Well, I am sure that Jacqueline Connor can claim a few thousands false imprisonmetns, so one by David Yaffe really does not count…
Linked Records:
1) July 9, 2007 Minute Order from electronic court file (no comparable minute order was found in paper court file)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-samaan-v-zernik-court-filing_07-07-09-fictitious-minute-order-by-judge-connor-in-sanctions-fraud-s.pdfShould Judge Jacqueline Connor be deemed FLIM FLAM ARTIST? Or maybe a RACKETEER?
RE: JULY 9, 2007 - Fictitious Proceeding - alleged falsification of court records, as part of
alleged sanctions fraud in collusion with Sheppard Mullin
Please vote in the Comments below_________________________________
"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial
corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most
serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society,"
said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared
statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment