===2014-06-26 US: Judicial corruption is a central cause of the banking fraud crisis===
The new article, linked below, presents only a small part of the evidence for the central role of judicial corruption in the banking crisis in the US.
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the UN Human Rights Council was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Report on the US (2010) with the note "corruption of the courts and the legal profession... in California". Evidence of fraud and corruption in the California courts in cases involving the banks, particularly Countrywide and Bank of America, and refusal of the US federal agencies to take action in view of credible evidence of judicial corruption, was a key part in the report.
=LINKS=
[1] 10-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the UPR of the United States, as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights Council site
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights%20alert1.pdf
[2] Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisis
http://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/
jz
___
Backing Banks Over Borrowers, California Judges Often Big Stakeholders in Same Banks
Darwin BondGraham, Truthout: Why do individual borrowers so rarely win in cases against banks in spite of the evidence of massive frauds systematically perpetrated by banks? Is there a case for systemic judicial bias?
Read the Article
http://org2.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ukXTtevikD73AK%2BYxm5orGT0Qiayrqq%2F
The new article, linked below, presents only a small part of the evidence for the central role of judicial corruption in the banking crisis in the US.
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the UN Human Rights Council was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Report on the US (2010) with the note "corruption of the courts and the legal profession... in California". Evidence of fraud and corruption in the California courts in cases involving the banks, particularly Countrywide and Bank of America, and refusal of the US federal agencies to take action in view of credible evidence of judicial corruption, was a key part in the report.
=LINKS=
[1] 10-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the UPR of the United States, as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights Council site
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights%20alert1.pdf
[2] Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisis
http://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/
jz
___
Backing Banks Over Borrowers, California Judges Often Big Stakeholders in Same Banks
Darwin BondGraham, Truthout: Why do individual borrowers so rarely win in cases against banks in spite of the evidence of massive frauds systematically perpetrated by banks? Is there a case for systemic judicial bias?
Read the Article
http://org2.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ukXTtevikD73AK%2BYxm5orGT0Qiayrqq%2F
No comments:
Post a Comment