Last New Visitor Belgium Visited January 4, 2011 |  |
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
11-01-04 Welcome Belgium - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Bélgica - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎比利时- 最后的新游客
Monday, January 3, 2011
Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) in the Los Angeles Superior Court and Sturgeon v LA County (D056266) in the California Court of Appeals, 4th District - Opined as elaborate Fraud on the Courts // Elaboración de Fraude en las Cortes de California // 详细阐述了加州法院欺诈
Charles McCoy_ _ _ _
Presiding Judge_ _ _
Surgeon v LA County (BC351286) in the Los Angeles Superior Court - Opined as Fraud on the Court
Los Angeles, January 3 - a recent decision in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County et al (D056266) by the California Court of Appeals, 4th District, [1] affirming a judgment in the case in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, has been opined by Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO) as part of elaborate Fraud on the Courts.
Surgeon v Los Angeles County et al (BC351286) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles originated as a request for injunction against the County of Los Angeles' payments to the Los Angeles County Judges. The secret payments of about $45,000 per judge per year, have been going on for over a decade. The judges never listed the payments in their outside income disclosures, and never informed parties in cases where Los Angeles County was a party of the payments. Neither did the judges recuse. In parallel, it was shown that it became practically impossible to win a case against Los Angeles County in the Los Angeles County courts.
The payments (labeled by media "bribes"), necessitated the passage of a law by California legislature, which was signed by then California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger at the behest of the California Judicial Council, according the judges "retroactive immunities" (labeled by media "pardons"). Retroactive laws are prohibited by the California Constitution. The California Attorney General Jerry Brown (today California Governor) refused to intervene in the matter.
Therefore, the case is of the highest public policy significance. It reflects the conduct in concert of the California Government of all branches in a manner that undermines the prospect of honest court services in Los Angeles County, California, for years to come.
Some of the reasons listed by Dr Zernik for the opinion of Fraud on the Court in Sturgeon v Los Angeles County are: [2]
1) The Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles acts in the case as the Court, the Clerk, the Judge, and a Party (Intervenor).
2) Justice James A Richman (California Court of Appeals, 1st District) appeared in the case for a couple of years as a Presiding Judge with no Assignment Order. In court papers, Judge Richman routinely referred to himself as "Sitting as Judge by Assignment". In contrast, the Los Angeles Superior Court routinely referred to him as sitting "by Reference, not by Assignment", and Judicial Watch referred to him as sitting by "Designation".
No record was found among the court records in the case of an Assignment/Referral/Designation Order.
Requests, which were filed with the chambers of James A Richman, with Presiding Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk John A Clarke of the Superior Court, and with Judicial Watch, to explain the legal basis for the language they employed in referring to Justice James A Richman's appearances in the case remain unanswered.
3) All Minutes issued in the case were void - including an invalid legal signature box, with no name appearing below the signature line (where the name and authority of a Deputy Clerk should have been typed) and only an illegible scribble above the signature line.
4) The Superior Court of California continues to deny access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights.
5) The purported Judgments in the case were posted online with invalid authentication: The Proof of Service attached to the records was from different record, dated prior to the dates of the Judgments.
6) The purported Judgments in the case were never entered in the Judgments Archive of the Superior Court, which the court claims is today the "equivalent" of Judgment Book, which the Court must maintain pursuant to the California Government Code �69844.7. Entry of Judgments in the Judgment Book is required by the California Code of Civil Procedure � 664.5 to make a Judgment "effectual for any purpose".
7) The California Court of Appeal has jurisdiction only in reviewing entered judgments, and therefore the conduct of the California Court of Appeal was with no authority as well.
Human Rights Alert also questioned the conduct of Judicial Watch in the matter:
1) Requests were filed with Attorney Sterling Norris of Southern California Judicial Watch and the Judicial Watch Washington DC counsel, Mr Orfanedes, who appeared in the case, for explanation for their conduct in the case. No answer has been received.
2) Judicial Watch of Southern California runs like no bone fide public interest, non-profit organization: It is practically a one man operation of Sterling Norris, a former Los Angeles County prosecutor. It should be recalled that the Rampart Scandal report listed the DA office together with the LA court as two entities that "must" be investigated "regarding integrity of the system". [3]
Human Rights Alert's April 2010 submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council was incorporated in official staff report, as part of the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California.
_____
LINKS:
[1] 10-12-28 Sturgeon v Los Angeles County et al (D056266) in the California Court of Appeal, 4th District, decision affirming judgment in Surgeon v Los Angeeles County et al (BC351286) in the Los Angeles Superior Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46227783/
[2] For the records, and detailed explanation regarding the Fraud opined in Surgeon v LA County (BC351286) see:
1) http://www.scribd.com/doc/28049418/10-03-08-Sturgeon-v-LA-County-BC351286-and-alleged-fraud-in-the-online-servers-of-the-LA-Superior-Court
2) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34403872/09-07-28-to-30-Sturgeon-v-LA-County-BC351286-Correspondence-Re-Denial-of-Access-to-Court-Records-s
3) http://www.scribd.com/doc/26576447/10-02-08-Sturgeon-v-LA-County-BC351286-and-Prospects-of-Future-Honest-Court-Services-in-Los-Angeles-County-California-s
4) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34402043/09-10-16-Sturgeon-v-Los-Angeles-County-BC351286-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-Request-for-Presiding-Judge-McCoy-to-Access-Court-Records-to-inspect-a
5) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34389177/10-07-15-Sturgeon-v-LA-County-BC351286-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-Online-Case-Summary-Not-a-Formal-Court-Record-s
6) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34405754/09-08-13-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-at-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-6-Dr-Zernik-s-Motions-Vol-II-Part3-p199-243
7) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34406023/09-08-13-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-at-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-7-Dr-Zernik-s-Motions-Vol-II-Part4-p295-306
8) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34407292/09-08-13-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-at-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-12-Dr-Zernik-s-Motions-Vol-II-Part6b-p442-491
9) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34406493/09-08-13-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-at-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-9-Dr-Zernik-s-Motions-Vol-II-Part4-p319-343
10) http://www.scribd.com/doc/30929197/09-07-28-to-09-07-30-Sturgeon-v-LA-County-BC351286-Correspondence-w-Deputy-Clerk-Drapac-Counsel-Bennett-re-denial-of-access-to-court-records-s
11) http://www.scribd.com/doc/31467632/10-05-16-Marina-v-La-County-BS109420-and-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-Non-cases-Of-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-s
12) http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305372/10-04-16-Samaan-v-Zernik-SC087400-Marina-v-La-County-BS109420-Galdjie-v-Darwish-SC052737-Sturgeon-v-La-County-BC351286-Los-Angeles-Superi
13) http://www.scribd.com/doc/34408770/10-07-15-Complaint-filed-with-US-Attorney-Office-Central-District-of-California-against-Justice-James-A-Richman-Presiding-Judge-Charles-McCoy-Clerk
14) http://www.scribd.com/doc/30018079/09-07-28-to-09-07-30-Correspondence-w-Bennett-Court-Counsel-Denial-of-Access
15) http://www.scribd.com/doc/30115846/10-04-16-Zernik-s-Visit-to-Archive-of-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-Failure-to-find-entered-March-4-2009-Jugment-for-Contempt-RE-Richard-Fine-s
16) http://www.scribd.com/doc/30119483/09-10-16-Letters-to-reliably-inform-Presiding-Judge-McCoy-of-Alleged-Criminality-in-Court-operations-request-Rules-of-Court-re-Entry-of-Judgments-s
17) http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-5-Amended-Appendix-IX-b-Zernik-s-Declaration-in-re-April-16-2010-search-for-records-in-the-Courts-microfilm-judgm
[3] 06-07-15 Rampart Reconsidered: LAPD's Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006):
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[4] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
Sunday, January 2, 2011
URGENT INTERNATIONAL CALL FOR PAPERS: JUDICIAL CORRUPTION; 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011; DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS - JANUARY 24, 2011. // Internacional Convocatoria de Presentación de Comunicaciones - la Corrupción Judicial // 国际征集论文- 司法腐败
In case you are not interested, please forward this message to potentially interested parties. jz
_____
Human Rights Alert (NGO) Seeks Worldwide Submissions on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION for the 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011.
Los Angeles, January 3 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, Released an international "Urgent Call for Papers" for a new section in the 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011 on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION; with a DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS - JANUARY 24, 2011. This year's meeting central theme is: GLOBAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRISIS AND CRIME CONTROL POLICIES.
Human Rights Alert's call is for scholarly papers for presentation in a dedicated section on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. The draft session outline (copied below) sought submissions from contributors worldwide, addressing the impact of Judicial Corruption on civil society and economic development, monitoring, crime detection, crime prevention, law enforcement, and proposed corrective actions: technological solutions, legislative actions, Truth and Reconciliation.
Of special interest are reports exploring the area of Judicial Corruption and its potential relationship to the collapse of large financial institutions, mortgage lenders, real estate foreclosures, failure of banking regulation, and the dynamics of the current economic/financial/integrity crisis.
New case management and online public access systems, which have been installed in recent decades in the banks, prisons, and courts worldwide will be explored, both as potential enabling tools for high-level fraud, Judicial Corruption, and dysfunctional regulation, and also as an area for new research opportunities, based on data mining methodologies. based on data mining methodologies. [iv,v]
Solutions will be explored, including legislative actions clarifying the unique role of various forms of certifications and publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of digital systems in areas that are crucial for the maintenance of a civil, law abiding society and international financial stability, peace and welfare.
CONTACT: Joseph Zernik, PhD: jz12345@earthlink.net
_____
URGENT CALL FOR PAPERS: JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011; DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS - JANUARY 24, 2011.
1. Deadline for submission to Human Rights Alert: JANUARY 24, 2011.
Contact: Dr Joseph Zernik: jz12345@earthlink.net
2. Meeting Information and Deadlines:
Submission Deadline: Monday January 31, 2011 5pm Japan time. Submissions after that time are absolutely not accepted.
Registration Deadline: Saturday, April 30, 2011 5pm Japan time.
Meeting web site: http://hansha.daishodai.ac.jp/wcon2011/index_en.html
Submission instructions: http://wcon2011.com/
3. Proposed Session Abstract: Judicial Corruption
Judicial Corruption is well-documented as both individual and organizational crime in both developing and developed nations. [i,ii,iii] The session solicits scholarly submissions from contributors worldwide, addressing the impact of Judicial Corruption on Civil Society and Economic Development - monitoring, crime detection, crime prevention, law enforcement, and proposed corrective actions: technological solutions, legislative actions, Truth and Reconciliation.
Of special interest are reports exploring the area of Judicial Corruption and its potential relationship to the collapse of large financial institutions, mortgage lenders, real estate foreclosures, failure of banking regulation, and the progress of the current economic/financial/integrity crisis.
New case management and online public access systems, which have been installed in recent decades in the banks, prisons, and courts worldwide will be explored, both as potential enabling tools for high-level fraud, Judicial Corruption, and dysfunctional regulation, and also as an area for new research opportunities, based on data mining methodologies. [iv,v]
Solutions will be explored, including legislative actions clarifying the unique role of various forms of certifications and publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of digital systems in areas that are crucial for the maintenance of a civil, law abiding society and international financial stability, peace and welfare.
In the United States: A well-known constitutional scholar and law school dean compared already a decade ago - after conducting his own independent investigation - the conduct of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, to "the most repressive dictators and police states...", [vi] another law school dean opined that "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit"; [vii] an official government report recommended in 2006 that the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles "must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system"; [viii] a well-known constitutional scholar and law school professor, acting in his capacity as Senior Counsel for the US Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, recently chided the Chief Justices of the several states that they may "become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations", [ix] and the highly-respected, long-term Chair of the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary called already a couple of years ago for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission". [x]
References/Footnotes:
i. Fighting Judicial Corruption Tops Agenda- China Daily: http://www.scribd.com/doc/46157506/
ii. Judicial Corruption, Recommendation 1896, Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe: http://www.scribd.com/doc/46157398/
iii. The Human Rights Alert (NG0) Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States was incorporated into the UPR Staff Report with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
iv. Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty - Online Public Prisoners' Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010): http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
v. Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010): http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
vi. "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School in: Chemerinsky, Erwin (2000) The Rampart Scandal and the Criminal Justice System in Los Angeles County. Guild Practicioner, 57 . pp. 121-133. http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
vii. "Innocent people remain in prison... ...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." Los Angeles Police Department Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
viii. Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles in: Burcham, DW and Fisk, CL: Policing the Justice System, in: Symposium, The Rampart Scandal: Policing the Criminal Justice System, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review34:537 (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
ix. "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations." Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute: http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
x. Transcript of the Senator Patrick Leahy February 9, 2009 speech calling for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____
Human Rights Alert (NGO) Seeks Worldwide Submissions on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION for the 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011.
Los Angeles, January 3 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, Released an international "Urgent Call for Papers" for a new section in the 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011 on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION; with a DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS - JANUARY 24, 2011. This year's meeting central theme is: GLOBAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRISIS AND CRIME CONTROL POLICIES.
Human Rights Alert's call is for scholarly papers for presentation in a dedicated section on JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. The draft session outline (copied below) sought submissions from contributors worldwide, addressing the impact of Judicial Corruption on civil society and economic development, monitoring, crime detection, crime prevention, law enforcement, and proposed corrective actions: technological solutions, legislative actions, Truth and Reconciliation.
Of special interest are reports exploring the area of Judicial Corruption and its potential relationship to the collapse of large financial institutions, mortgage lenders, real estate foreclosures, failure of banking regulation, and the dynamics of the current economic/financial/integrity crisis.
New case management and online public access systems, which have been installed in recent decades in the banks, prisons, and courts worldwide will be explored, both as potential enabling tools for high-level fraud, Judicial Corruption, and dysfunctional regulation, and also as an area for new research opportunities, based on data mining methodologies. based on data mining methodologies. [iv,v]
Solutions will be explored, including legislative actions clarifying the unique role of various forms of certifications and publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of digital systems in areas that are crucial for the maintenance of a civil, law abiding society and international financial stability, peace and welfare.
CONTACT: Joseph Zernik, PhD: jz12345@earthlink.net
_____
URGENT CALL FOR PAPERS: JUDICIAL CORRUPTION, 16th World Congress of the International Society for Criminology, KOBE, JAPAN, AUGUST 5-9, 2011; DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS - JANUARY 24, 2011.
1. Deadline for submission to Human Rights Alert: JANUARY 24, 2011.
Contact: Dr Joseph Zernik: jz12345@earthlink.net
2. Meeting Information and Deadlines:
Submission Deadline:
Registration Deadline:
Meeting web site:
Submission instructions:
3. Proposed Session Abstract: Judicial Corruption
Judicial Corruption is well-documented as both individual and organizational crime in both developing and developed nations. [i,ii,iii] The session solicits scholarly submissions from contributors worldwide, addressing the impact of Judicial Corruption on Civil Society and Economic Development - monitoring, crime detection, crime prevention, law enforcement, and proposed corrective actions: technological solutions, legislative actions, Truth and Reconciliation.
Of special interest are reports exploring the area of Judicial Corruption and its potential relationship to the collapse of large financial institutions, mortgage lenders, real estate foreclosures, failure of banking regulation, and the progress of the current economic/financial/integrity crisis.
New case management and online public access systems, which have been installed in recent decades in the banks, prisons, and courts worldwide will be explored, both as potential enabling tools for high-level fraud, Judicial Corruption, and dysfunctional regulation, and also as an area for new research opportunities, based on data mining methodologies. [iv,v]
Solutions will be explored, including legislative actions clarifying the unique role of various forms of certifications and publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of digital systems in areas that are crucial for the maintenance of a civil, law abiding society and international financial stability, peace and welfare.
In the United States: A well-known constitutional scholar and law school dean compared already a decade ago - after conducting his own independent investigation - the conduct of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, to "the most repressive dictators and police states...", [vi] another law school dean opined that "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit"; [vii] an official government report recommended in 2006 that the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles "must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system"; [viii] a well-known constitutional scholar and law school professor, acting in his capacity as Senior Counsel for the US Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, recently chided the Chief Justices of the several states that they may "become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations", [ix] and the highly-respected, long-term Chair of the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary called already a couple of years ago for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission". [x]
References/Footnotes:
i. Fighting Judicial Corruption Tops Agenda- China Daily: http://www.scribd.com/doc/46157506/
ii. Judicial Corruption, Recommendation 1896, Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe: http://www.scribd.com/doc/46157398/
iii. The Human Rights Alert (NG0) Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States was incorporated into the UPR Staff Report with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
iv. Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty - Online Public Prisoners' Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010): http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
v. Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010): http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
vi. "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School in: Chemerinsky, Erwin (2000) The Rampart Scandal and the Criminal Justice System in Los Angeles County. Guild Practicioner, 57 . pp. 121-133. http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
vii. "Innocent people remain in prison... ...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." Los Angeles Police Department Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
viii. Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles in: Burcham, DW and Fisk, CL: Policing the Justice System, in: Symposium, The Rampart Scandal: Policing the Criminal Justice System, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review34:537 (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
ix. "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations." Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute: http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
x. Transcript of the Senator Patrick Leahy February 9, 2009 speech calling for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
10-01-02 Welcome Taiwan - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Taiwan - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎台湾- 最后的新访问者！
| Last New Visitor Taiwan Visited January 2, 2011 |  |
11-01-02 Federal Judge A Howard Matz and Mob Affiliates Named as Co-Defendants in a RICO Lawsuit // Las cifras de California EE.UU. Juez de Distrito y la mafia fueron nombrados como acusados en una demanda // 美国加州地方法院法官，并命名为黑手党的数字是被告人在诉讼
RICO is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations law, enacted for the prosecution of organized crime operations.
A Howard Matz, US Judge
US District Court
Central District of California
READ THE FULL STORY:
[1] http://www.free-press-release.com/news-federal-judge-a-howard-matz-and-mob-affiliates-named-as-co-defendants-in-a-rico-lawsuit-1252740843.html
A Howard Matz, US Judge
US District Court
Central District of California
FEDERAL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ AND MOB AFFILIATES
NAMED AS CO-DEFENDANTS IN A RICO LAWSUIT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) September 12, 2009 --
September 11, 2009 – Hollywood Producer/Director BJ Davis named Central District of California federal Judge A. Howard Matz as a co-Defendant with known mob affiliates, for aiding and abetting them in committing serious copyright fraud and other RICO violations (Case No. CV 09-1771-PHX-JAT).
After numerous attempts of extortion against Davis, known affiliates of the Bonanno crime family arranged a takeover of his company and an award-winning film.
(Free-Press-Release.com) September 12, 2009 --
September 11, 2009 – Hollywood Producer/Director BJ Davis named Central District of California federal Judge A. Howard Matz as a co-Defendant with known mob affiliates, for aiding and abetting them in committing serious copyright fraud and other RICO violations (Case No. CV 09-1771-PHX-JAT).
After numerous attempts of extortion against Davis, known affiliates of the Bonanno crime family arranged a takeover of his company and an award-winning film.
READ THE FULL STORY:
[1] http://www.free-press-release.com/news-federal-judge-a-howard-matz-and-mob-affiliates-named-as-co-defendants-in-a-rico-lawsuit-1252740843.html
Saturday, January 1, 2011
11-01-02 Threat by US Marshals Following Request for Correction of False Docket at the US District Court in California Reported to Harvard Law School Blog // Amenazas de Alguaciles de EE.UU. se informa de que la Escuela de Leyes de Harvard blog // 美国法警威胁报告哈佛法学院博客
United States Marshal
Los Angeles, January 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed report with the Harvard "Citizen Media Law Project" of threat by US Marshals against Dr Zernik.
The threat against Dr Zernik followed requests, which were filed with the Clerk of the Court Terry Nafisi and the Chief Judge Audrey Collins, US District Judge, Central District of California, and were also published online, to correct false PACER dockets, pursuant to Code of Conduct of US Judges.
The requests for correction of the PACER dockets pertained to litigations in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-1550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), both of which originated from claims of widespread corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
In the former case, US Judge Virginia Phillips appeared as presiding judge, and in the latter - US Judge John Walter. In both cases US Magistrate Carla Woehrle appeared as well. The evidence showed that neither the judges, nor the magistrate, appeared with a valid Assignment/Referral Order. Absent valid Assignment/Referral Order, judges or magistrates lack authority to adjudicate in a case.
In both cases, judgments were published as "entered" in the online PACER dockets, but later it was found that the judgments were issued with invalid certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk of the Court. Absent valid authentication/attestation by the clerk, a judgment is void. However, the online PACER dockets would mislead a reasonable person to conclude that the judgments were valid and effectual.
In both cases, the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify the PACER dockets.
In both cases, no corrective actions have been taken to this date regarding the false and deliberately misleading online PACER dockets.
"Citizen Media Law Project" previously reported a threat by the US Marshals in the California Central District against a blog publisher, who used crude language in protesting the conduct of litigation by US Judge Howard Matz.
The common theme in both threats was the employment of the US Marshals to suppress claims of judicial corruption, and issuance of the threat by US Deputy Darcy Smith on behalf of the US District Court.
__________________
Harvard Law School Web Site
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/marshals-v-ahowardmatzcom#description
I. US MARSHALS THREAT AGAINST BLOG PUBLISHER, REPORTED BY HARVARD LAW SCHOOL:
Marshals v. ahowardmatz.comNOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute. Posted November 18th, 2010 by Guest |
Human Rights Alert Site
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
II. US MARSHALS THREAT AGAINST DR JOSEPH ZERNIK
A. Background - invalid litigation of cases in the US District Court, Central District of California, and publication of void judgments in the PACER dockets:
Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-1550) - litigation under cause of action of Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law - where US Judge Virginia Phillips appeared as presiding judge, and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - petition for a writ of habeas corpus - where US Judge John Warner appeared as presiding judge, both in the US District Court, Central District of California, are claimed as Fraud on the Court.
In both cases judges appeared with no Assignment Orders, magistrates appeared with no Referral Orders and false and deliberately misleading minutes, orders, and judgments were published as "entered" in the online PACER dockets by unnamed and unauthorized court personnel, with invalid certificates of authentication/attestation by the clerk (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing).
The claims and the documentary evidence related to Zernik v Connor et al and Fine v Sheriff are now provided in the Motion to Intervene in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634 and 10-56813) in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. [2]
The Motion to Intervene claims that Judge Virginia Phillips engaged in the same conduct also in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al.
In Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al two opposing judgments were published in the online PACER docket:
The first judgment was issued in 2006 by Judge George Schiavello, who appeared with no Assignment Order. His judgment was listed as "entered" and also listed in the Judgment Index of the court. The judgment was never reversed.
The second judgment was issued In 2010 by Judge Virginia Phillips, who also appeared with no Assignment Order, and her judgment was NOT listed in the Judgment Index of the US District Court.
In Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al the Clerk of the US District Court Court continues to deny access to the NEFs, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights - to access court records to inspect and to copy.
In all three cases of the US District Court, Central District of California, the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify the PACER dockets and the judgments.
Regardless, the uncertified October 2010 Judge Virginia Phillips judgment and is now the foundation for the two appeals in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
B. Threats and retaliation following the filing of requests for corrective actions
1) In Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-1550) and Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), access to the NEFs was denied for months.
2) In late December 2009, following repeated appearances in the office of the clerk with written requests to access the records, the certificates of authentication/ attestation by the clerk (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing) in the two cases were finally discovered. Upon examination, the NEFs in both cases were found uniformly invalid. [3]
3) In January 2010, notices and requests for investigation and correction of the PACER dockets were filed with Clerk of the Court Terry Nafisi.
4) In late February 2010 a letter was received by Dr Zernik from Lydia Yurtchuk, US Court Staff Attorney, of a purported investigation. [4]
5) In response to Staff Attorney Yurtchuk, clarification to the letter itself was requested, since it was addressed to an unknown person, unrelated to the matters, instead of being addressed to Dr Joseph Zernik, and with no mention of Counsel Yurchuk's authority in issuing the letter.
6) No clarification has been received from Staff Attorney Yurtchuk to this date.
7) In late March 2010 Dr Zernik therefore filed request with Chamber staff, to the attention of Chief Judge Audrey Collins, to reliably inform her of "unprofessional conduct" in the litigation of the two cases, and to request the initiation of investigation and corrective actions, pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges.[5]
8) In early April 2010 a phone call was received from US Deputy Marshal Darcy Smith asking Dr Joseph Zernik to meet her, referring specifically to the notice filed with Chief Judge Audrey Collins as the subject matter of the meeting.
9) Dr Zernik requested a written request by Deputy Marshal Darcy Smith.
10) On April 7, 2010 a request was then received by email from Deputy Marshal Darcy Smith - for an "interview". The request was signed by Deputy Darcy Smith on behalf of the "District Threat Unit". [6]
11) Dr Zernik responded by email, explaining that he believed that the US Marshals had no legal authority to conduct "interviews". Dr Zernik asked for explicit explanation of the legal foundation for the invitation. [6]
11) No response was received.
12) On or about April 24, 2010, Dr Zernik was informed by his neighbor that the previous night unidentified armed federal agents appeared at Dr Zernik's residence and tried to apprehend Dr Zernik. According to the neighbor, the agents also knocked on his door and asked the neighbor about Dr Zernik's whereabouts. The neighbor also explained to Dr Zernik his concern that shooting was going to take place if the agents appeared again.
13) Dr Zernik immediately abandoned his residence and never returned ever since.
14) No known corrective actions have been taken to this date regarding the false and deliberately misleading PACER dockets in Zernik v Connor et al or in Fine v Sheriff.
LINKS:
[1] http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/marshals-v-ahowardmatzcom#description
[2] http://www.scribd.com/doc/45945087/
[3] http://www.scribd.com/doc/24681508/
[4] http://www.scribd.com/doc/30764101/
[5] http://www.scribd.com/doc/28938859/
[6] http://www.scribd.com/doc/29570298/
___
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
DECEMBER 3, 2011: COMMENTS FROM THE LIVELEAK SITE:
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
- So, why not just put it into simple, plain language? What exactly was the threat?
Posted 6 hours ago by "Punch_The_Monkey" (R)(1)
- ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ fell asleep by the 3 paragraph, who the fuck writes like this and expects anyone to want to read it? I am guessing some fuckwit with his head in his ass filing papers all day and reading technical manuals on break.Posted 5 hours ago by "Zardoz003" (R)
- Quoted comment: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ fell asleep by the 3 paragraph, who the fuck writes like this and expects anyone to want to read it? I am guessing some fuckwit with his head in his ass filing papers all day and reading technical manuals on break.
LOL...i still dont know what he said.Posted 4 hours ago by "heavyrocker" (R) - GOODNESS, I ALWAYS HAVE TO TRANSLATE IT FOR ALL THOSE WHO DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH:
Dr Joseph Zernik caught the judges and the clerk of the US District Court in California in alleged Fraud on the Court, Adulteration of Court Records, and Perversion of Justice.
All these nice things did not happen in your run-of-the-mill jay-walking prosecution, but in a case where Dr Zernik claimed that judges of the Superior Court of California and top executives of Bank of America were racketeering in the courts in California.
Most politely Dr Zernik just asked the Clerk, and then the Chief Judge of the US District Court to please correct the fraudulent docket, in compliance with the law.
In response Dr Zernik got an invitation for an "Interview" with the US Marshals.
Dr Zernik is no attorney, but he was under the impression that for each false statement you make in such "interview" you can land 5 years in Federal Prison.
Therefore, Dr Zernik turned down the invitation for an "interview", and with it his chance for 15-minutes of fame.
Instead, Dr Zernik asked the US Marshals to clarify the legal basis for their on-the-job journalistic activities.
No response was received from the US Marshals.
A few days later, Dr Zernik was told by a neighbor that armed agents converged on his home, and that it looked like they were on a hunting expedition, and shooting was going to happen.
COMPRENDE?Posted very recently by "jz12345" (R)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)