12-04-08 Welcome India!

Last New Visitor

India 
Visited 18 minutes ago

12-04-08 Arrest and conviction Wanted: SANDOR SAMUELS

First Post With A Reward of $250, $500, $750 and $1,000 - Wins a 1 OZ SILVER COIN ($35)!! See more

ArrestWanted.com

SID - 245557415
ARREST WANTED

REWARD $0 for Arrest Leading to Felony Conviction See Details

Sandor  Samuels "At Large"

FOR FRAUD

Suspect Details

Name

Legal: Nick:

Sandor  Samuels Sandy

Characteristics

Gender: Height: Hair Color: Ethnicity:	Male       Caucasian	Age (yrs.): Weight (lbs.): Eye Color: Citizenship:	U.S.A.
Features:	Obese

Felony Allegation(s)

CID - 50
Reward:	$0	CONTRIBUTE to REWARD!
Crime:	Fraud
Charge:	Racketeering, extorsion
Jurisdiction:	U.S.A., Federal Court
Description:	As former Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide, Samuels was key figure in the design and execution of the subprime crisis. With it, he is central to one of the largest frauds in the history of mankind. His particular expertise is in corruption of regulators, law enforcement, state and US judges.

12-04-07 Arrest and conviction wanted: DAVID PASTERNAK

First Post With A Reward of $250, $500, $750 and $1,000 - Wins a 1 OZ SILVER COIN ($35)!! See more ArrestWanted.com

SID - 967726910
ARREST WANTED

REWARD $0 for Arrest Leading to Felony Conviction See Details

David J. Pasternak "At Large"

FOR FRAUD

Suspect Details

Name

Legal:

David J Pasternak

Characteristics

Gender: Height: Hair Color: Ethnicity:	Male       Caucasian	Age (yrs.): Weight (lbs.): Eye Color: Citizenship:	U.S.A.
Features:

Felony Allegation(s)

CID - 51
Reward:	$0	CONTRIBUTE to REWARD!
Crime:	Fraud
Charge:	Racketeering, extorsion
Jurisdiction:	U.S.A., Federal Court
Description:	As former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, and former President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice"), Pasternak has been a key figure in racketeering of judges, attorneys, and others in the Los Angeles, California Courts. His specialty is in simulated appearance as "Receiver", with no foundation in the law, under which he extorts others under the color of law. [1]10-08-13 RE: Karimi v Mithawaila (BD518503) - Complaint against Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK and the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for public corruption and racketeering in pretense receiverships at the Court. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/ [2]10-07-18 Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) Complaint for Public Corruption against JOHN SEGAL – Judge, JOHN A CLARKE – Clerk, Attorney DAVID PATERNAK and others at the Los Angeles Superior Court, RE: Conduct of pretense litigation – alleged real estate fraud by the Court. http://www.scribd.com/doc/34504304/

12-04-07 Arrest and conviction wanted: BRIAN MOYNIHAN

First Post With A Reward of $250, $500, $750 and $1,000 - Wins a 1 OZ SILVER COIN ($35)!! See more ArrestWanted.com http://arrestwanted.com/?target=awad&sid=322315206 SID - 322315206
ARREST WANTED

REWARD $0 for Arrest Leading to Felony Conviction See Details

Brian T. Moynihan "At Large"

FOR FRAUD

Suspect Details

Name

Legal:

Brian T Moynihan

Characteristics

Gender: Height: Hair Color: Ethnicity:	Male     Brown  Caucasian	Age (yrs.): Weight (lbs.): Eye Color: Citizenship:	Brown  U.S.A.
Features:

Felony Allegation(s)

CID - 47
Reward:	$0	CONTRIBUTE to REWARD!
Crime:	Fraud
Charge:	Racketeering, extorsion
Jurisdiction:	U.S.A., Federal Court
Description:	Large-scale fraud and extortion on homeowners, shareholders, US treasury, corruption of the state and US courts.

12-04-07 Judge Moshe Gal, Judge (Ret) Boaz Okon - alleged key figures in corruption of the electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel

Both are asked to comment on Human Rights Alert draft report, claiming that as Directors of the Administration of Court, they were/are key figures in corruption of the justice system of the State of Israel.
  
 Judge Moshe Gal, Judge (Ret) Boaz Okon

View as PDF:

Jerusalem, April 7 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) has asked Judge Moshe Gal, departing Director of Administration of Courts, and retired Judge Boaz Okon, former Magistrate Judge of the Supreme Court and former Director of Administration of Court for comments/corrections to draft report, which named them as key figures in corruption of the electronic records of the courts of the State of Israel. [1]
The draft report is primarily based on data mining of decisions of the Supreme Court, and it shows that until March 2002, all decisions of the Supreme Court were certified by the late Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen.  Since his sudden death and to this date, none of the decisions of the Supreme are certified.  Today, all decisions are published unsigned, with a disclaimer, stating that the records are subject to "editing and phrasing changes." [2]

Moreover, the report shows that numerous decisions of the Supreme Court have been falsified, including:

•  Records that show false certifications by Shmaryahu Cohen, at times years after his death, [3] and
•  Records that were recently produced, and show false certification by the current Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz. [4]

The development of new electronic record systems of the courts was reviewed by State Ombudsman, who describes the "flag project" of the Administration of Courts as one that was conducted in violation of various regulations of the State of Israel - with no bidding (to US based corporations IBM, EDS), with no specifications, with no core supervision by State employees, and with no independent examination prior to acceptance by the State client. [5]

The Human Rights Alert report also shows that following the implementation of the new electronic record systems:

•  The Supreme Court engages in the conduct of simulated reviews and the publication of simulated decisions; [6,7]
•  A new apostille certification arrangement was published online, which is opined as fraud on nations, which are party to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961). [8]

"A court, which refuses to certify its own records, is certified corrupt," concludes Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert.

Three Israeli computing/cryptology experts, who reviewed the evidence, expressed concern and alarm.  One of them forwarded a request for a Halachic (Jewish law) ruling by a leading Israeli rabbi, "is the Supreme Court engaged in Gneivat Da'at Ha-Tzibur (large-scale public deception)?
The draft report alleges:

Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic record systems of the national courts of the State of Israel, are in violations of any article of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite. Conditions, which have been established over the past decade should be deemed a simulated justice system, reflecting corruption of the courts, the Ministry of Justice, and the legal profession.

The draft report concludes:

•  The validity of any legal public records, originating in the State of Israel, and employed in the UPR process, should be re-assessed;
•  Nations, including but not limited to those, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), should re-assess any faith and credit, given to legal public records, originating in the State of Israel.
•  The findings carry far-reaching implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional violence.
•  Attempts by the State of Israel to address the crisis would likely be compounded by conflicts of rivaling security, legal, and computing groups.

The draft report recommends:  

•  Recruitment of all possible civil society agents in effort to resolve a constitutional crisis, in a nation with no constitution.
•  Institution of a thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen in 2002.
•  Establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Conditions, which have been established in the courts of the State of Israel over the past decade, closely mimic conditions, which had been established in the US courts a decade or two earlier.[9] Corruption of the US courts is tightly linked to the current financial crisis and civil unrest in the United States, and therefore, the State of Israel should be considered at increased risk of the same.

Human Rights Alert report is prepared for the 2012 Universal Periodic Review of human rights in Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.

The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert, for the UPR of human rights in the United States, was reviewed and incorporated into the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”[10]###
Joseph Zernik, PhD [11]Human Rights Alert (NGO)____
LINKS:
[1] 12-04-05 Responses by National Authorities/Experts - Appendix 10: Request for Comments by current and former Directors of Administration of Courts, Judges Moshe Gal and Boaz Okon s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88178976/
[2] 12-04-05 Draft Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82927700/[3] 12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 06 Invalid on Their Faces Decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180892/[4] 12-04-05 False and Deliberately Misleading Certifications, Recently Executed by the Chief Clerk on Decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88096768/
[5] 12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel - Appendix 00: Excerpts from the Ombudsman Report 60b s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180111/[6] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to conduct defined as felonies in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. [7] 11-12-19 Zernik, J: Simulated Records, Simulated Litigation Enabled by the Electronic Record Systems of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (English) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/73239491/[8] 12-02-19 PRESS RELEASE: Invalid, Simulated Apostille Certification Procedure Published Online by the Judicial Authority of the State of Israel (English)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82064304/ [9] 12-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and proposed corrective measures submitted to the US House of Representatives
http://www.scribd.com/doc/85481555/[10] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination  by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/[11] 12-03-20 Biographical Sketch  Joseph Zernik, PhD s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180312/_______________
Human Rights Alert (NGO)  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”Human Rights Alert (NGO) online  Flag Counter: 135http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 774,060+116,012 Followers: 1,390http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 22,066http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 664,803
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
_____________________________

12-04-06 Harassment/retaliation against Bradley Manning supporters

Business as usual...

Bradley Manning Supporter Sues Government Officials

Dave Rice, April 6, 2012

Bradley Manning Support Network co-founder David House has been cleared by a federal judge to continue with a lawsuit he’s filed against former San Diego schools superintendent and current Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Alan Bersin, along with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton.

At issue is a claim by House of surveillance and routine harassment by federal officials since he helped form a legal defense fund for Manning, the soldier suspected of dumping 700,000 confidential military files through the whistleblower site WikiLeaks. Though arrested in May of 2010, Manning has yet to stand trial.

House’s specific charges include allegations that he has been detained every time he’s crossed the U.S. border since September 2010, and has been “grilled about his political beliefs and work for the Bradley Manning Support Network,” according to a report by Courthouse News Service.

http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/news-ticker/2012/apr/06/bradley-manning-supporter-sues-government-official/

12-04-06 US prosecutes torture whistleblower, not the torturers

The Truth About Espionage Act Prosecution Against Whistleblower John Kiriakou

By Jesselyn Radack

Well-played, Justice Department. Indict former CIA officer John Kiriakou on Tuesday evening, but don't unseal the indictment until 4:59pm on Thursday, right before the holiday weekend, in order to avoid press coverage of the Obama administration's 6th Espionage Act prosecution of a whistleblower.

Before I start deconstructing the Indictment, here's a key to reading the tea leaves:

Officer A = undercover
Officer B = former CIA career & targeting analyst Deuce Martinez (never undercover)
Journalist A = Matthew Cole
Journalist B = Scott Shane
Journalist C = mentioned in original charges, but dropped from Indictment

Facts Not in the Indictment/Kiriakou's Whistleblowing Disclosures:
* Refused to be trained in torture tactics
* First CIA officer to call waterboarding "torture" (2007/ABC News)
* Helped expose CIA's torture program as policy rather than playtime (2009/The Reluctant Spy: My Secret Life in the CIA's War on Terror)

It's outrageous that John Kiriakou, a whistleblower, is the   ONLY INDIVIDUAL TO BE PROSECUTED IN RELATION TO THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S TORTURE PROGRAM . 

The interrogators who tortured prisoners, the officials who gave the orders, the attorneys who authored the torture memos, and the CIA agents who destroyed the interrogation tapes have not been held professionally accountable, much less charged with crimes. But John Kiriakou is facing decades in prison for helping expose torture.

The fact that national security and intelligence officials have become the exception to the Obama administration's mantra of "looking forward, not backward" and Bush-era lawbreaking sets a dangerous precedent: if you torture a prisoner, you will not be held criminally liable, but if you blow the whistle on torture, you risk criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act. 

READ MORE:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Truth-About-Espionage-by-Jesselyn-Radack-120406-402.html

12-04-06 Welcome Belgium!

Last New Visitor Belgium  Visited 55 minutes ago

12-04-06 Welcome Brazil!

Last New Visitor Brazil  Visited 8 minutes ago

12-04-05 Welcome Malasia!

Last New Visitor Malaysia  Visited 12 minutes ago

12-04-05 Fraud in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel

False and deliberately misleading certifications, recently executed by the Chief Clerk on decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
The certification statement, used by the Chief Clerk, is not the one authorized by the Regulations of the Courts, and the purported certifications are executed  on unsigned copies of the purported decisions, "subject to editing and phrasing changes". No certified electronic signatures, pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act (2001), have been established in the Supreme Court.  Since early 2003, all the electronic decisions of the Supreme Court been  published online unsigned and uncertified.  A fraudulent, unsigned, undated, apostille certification arrangement has been published online by the "Judicial Authority".  Nations, including but not limited to those, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), should re-assess any faith and credit, given to legal public records originating in the courts of the State of Israel.

        Supreme Court; Chief Clerks: the late Shmaryahu Cohen, Sarah Lifschitz; State of Israel

View as PDF:
Jerusalem, April 5 - following repeated requests,  Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has received for the first time purported certifications by Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz on three judicial records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel.  All three records originated in challenges by Dr Zernik to the integrity of the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court. [1,2] All three records are claimed to be simulated decisions of the Supreme Court. [3,4]
All three certifications are deemed false and deliberately misleading as well, for the following reasons:

•  If valid original judicial records had existed for any of the three decisions, they would have been the records signed by the respective justices/judges.  However, the Chief Clerk's certifications are executed on unsigned copies of the respective records, which bear the disclaimer, "subject to editing and phrasing changes".
•  The certification statement used by the Chief Clerk is invalid:
  • The Regulations of the Courts - Office of the Clerk (2004), Regulation 6a explicitly states, that the certification statement, which the Chief Clerk is permitted to execute is “Copy Corresponds to the Original” (He’eteq Mat’im la-Maqor). [5]
  •  The March 29, 2012 cover letter of the records, signed  by Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz, also purports the same: that the attached records bear the certification statement, “Copy Corresponds to the Original”.
  •  In contrast, the attached records are stamped “Copying Corresponds to the Original” (Ha’ataqah Mat’imah la-Maqor).

____________________________________________________________   ____________________________________________________________  Excerpt from one of the three records, recently provided by Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz, Supreme Court of the State of Israel.  The excerpt says: "Issued today, September 21, 2011", then shows spaces for the signatures of three justices.  The footnote says, "copy subject to editing and phrasing changes", then shows the Seal of the Court, and the invalid, false certification stamp, "Copying Corresponds to the Original," with the hand signature of the Chief Clerk. ____________________________________________________________

Consequently, request has been forwarded to the  Chief Clerk, asking for new certification of the three records, correcting the deficiencies found in the records at hand. [6]
The findings, pertaining to the records at hand, are not unique:

•  Since January 2003, all decisions of the Supreme Court have been published online unsigned, uncertified, and with the disclaimer - "subject to editing and phrasing changes." 
•  Although the Supreme Court relies on electronic records, no visible certified electronic signatures, pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act(2001), have been established in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court to this date.
•  Numerous decisions of the Supreme Court have been falsified, particularly in 2002, following the sudden death of Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen.  Decisions, issued years after his death, bear his purported certifications. [7]
•  The evidence indicates that Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz is not in control of the electronic records systems of the Supreme Court. And given that a valid certification by her on any judicial record of the Supreme Court is yet to be discovered, the nature of her appointment remains unclear.  The Administration of Courts has denied a Freedom of Information request for her appointment record, claiming that it was exempt as a "record of internal deliberations". [8]
•  The "Judicial Authority" has also published online an undated, unsigned, false and deliberately misleading certification arrangement, relative to theHague Apostille Convention(1961).  The arrangement delegates the apostille certification authority, which is vested in the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court (or other Deputy Clerks) to outside notaries. The arrangement is alleged as fraud on the courts of other nations, which are party to the Convention.[9]   The Administration of Courts refused to disclose, who authored the arrangement, who authorized its publication on the web, who the Justice Minister was, whose authority was invoked in the arrangement, and what the legal foundation for the apostille certification arrangement was. [9]

Combined, the evidence shows that the Supreme Court refuses to certify its own judicial records, and when pressed, resorts to false and deliberately misleading certification procedures.

"A court, which refuses to certify its own records, is certified corrupt," concludes Dr Zernik.

The requests for certification of the three decisions at hand, were filed by Dr Zernik, as part of preparation of submission for the 2012 Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of human rights in the State of Israel by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations. The submission is narrowly focused on "integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel."[10]
The draft submission alleges:

Conditions, now prevailing in the electronic record systems of the national courts of the State of Israel, are in violations of any article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where integrity of the courts and the justice system is a prerequisite. Conditions, which have been established over the past decade should be deemed a simulated justice system, reflecting corruption of the courts, the Ministry of Justice, and the legal profession.

The submission concludes:

•  The validity of any legal public records, originating in the State of Israel, and employed in the UPR process, should be re-assessed;
•  

Nations, including but not limited to those, who are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention (1961), should re-assess any faith and credit, given to legal public records, originating in the State of Israel.

 The findings carry far-reaching implications in analysis of socioeconomic trends, stability of local financial markets, and regional violence.

 Attempts by the State of Israel to address the crisis would likely be compounded by conflicts of rivaling security, legal, and computing groups. The submission recommends:  

•  Recruitment of all possible civil society agents in effort to resolve a constitutional crisis, in a nation with no constitution.
•  Institution of a thorough, public investigation of events surrounding the death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen in 2002.
•  Establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Conditions, which have been established in the courts of the State of Israel over the past decade, closely mimic conditions, which had been established in the US courts a decade or two earlier.[11] Corruption of the US courts is tightly linked to the current financial crisis and civil unrest in the United States, and therefore, the State of Israel should be considered at increased risk of the same. The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert, for the UPR of human rights in the United States, was reviewed and incorporated into the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.” [12]###
Joseph Zernik, PhD [13]Human Rights Alert (NGO)____
LINKS:
[1] 12-03-12 Request forwarded to Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court Sarah Lifschitz for Certification of Supreme Court decisions s (Eng)http://www.scribd.com/doc/85992928/ 
[2] 12-03-25 Request for Certification by the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel of the December 4, 2011 Decision in Dr Joseph Zernik v Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court (8835/11) shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/86655977/ 
[3] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service", "simulated justice system" here refer to conduct defined as felonies in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. [4] 11-12-19 Zernik, J: Simulated Records, Simulated Litigation Enabled by the Electronic Record Systems of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (English) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/73239491/[5] 04-11-25 Takanot Batey Hamishpat - Mazkirut (2004) // Regulations of the Courts - Offices of the Clerks (2004) (Heb + Eng)http://www.scribd.com/doc/48770720/ 
[6] 12-04-04 Request forwarded to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz for correct certification of copies of decisions of the Supreme Court.http://www.scribd.com/doc/87995925/ 
[7] 12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 06 Invalid on Their Faces Decisions of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180892/[8] 12-03-06 Freedom of Information Response by the Administration of Courts (P29-2012), Re: March 2, 2012 Request for the appointment records of the Chief Clerks and certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (Heb+Eng) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86345296/[9] 12-02-19 PRESS RELEASE: Invalid, Simulated Apostille Certification Procedure Published Online by the Judicial Authority of the State of Israel (English)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82064304/
[10] 12-04-02 Draft Human Right Alert's 2012 State of Israel UPR Submission: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic records of the courts (REVISED)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82927700/[11] 12-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and proposed corrective measures submitted to the US House of Representatives
http://www.scribd.com/doc/85481555/[12] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination  by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/[13] 12-03-20 Biographical Sketch  Joseph Zernik, PhD s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86180312/_______________
Human Rights Alert (NGO) online
Flag Counter: 135http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 774,060+116,012 Followers: 1,390http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 22,066http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 664,803
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
_____________________________