Recent publications claim large-scale fraud in the 2015 general election, which was perpetrated through IT systems of the Central Election Committee. Freedom of Information request on the Knesset, filed today, tries to clarify, whether such systems were lawfully implemented, who is charged with their operation and security... Numerous fraud cases have been documented in IT systems of the Israeli courts, and the Administration of Courts refuses to answer on similar requests. Likewise - the Debtors' Courts - whose fraudulent IT systems are notorious. The Israeli regime today can be viewed as operating through a series of "black boxes", which are fraudulent IT systems, representing Deep State control...
Read in blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2016/08/2016-08-25-election-computer-fraud.html
OccupyTLV, Auguest 25 - Freedom of Information request has been filed today on the Knesset, pertaining to IT systems of the Central Election Committee.
The request was filed following a recent series of publications, which pointed out internal inconsistencies in data, which were published by the Central Election Committee, and unusual deviations, relative to previous elections. Such publications claimed large-scale fraud in the 2015 general election, the scope of whcih was estimated at 8 (out of 120) mandates in favor of Netanyahu's Likud party. [1]
Such publications raise the obvious questions:
a. Were IT systems of the Central Election Committee developed and implemented in compliance with the law? Was their integrity duly examined?
b. Who holds the ultimate administrative authority for such systems?
c. Who is charged with security of such systems?
In a meeting today in Tel-Aviv of protest activists with Chairwoman of the Knesset Oversight Committee, MK Elharar, she was asked about such election fraud claims. Her response: "Everything is possible".
It should be noted that unauthorized source claims that the Shin-Bet is not charged with security of the systems of the Central Election Committee...
Following is the Freedom of Information filed today with the Knesset:
Fraud in IT systems of the Court
A. IT systems of the Central Election CommitteeThe requested information pertains to IT systems, which are used by the Central Election Committee for monitoring conduct of the election in the various polling stations, for collection and maintenance of voting data from the polling stations, for processing of the data for calculation of election outcome, and for publication of the data in the Central Election Committee web-sites.1. Compliance of development and implementation of the systems with Treasury Accounting Office Standards, and October 28, 1991 Cabinet Decision 103/eco, pertaining to development and maintenance of IT systems:a. Documentation of existence of specifications in conjunction with the signing of contrasts for system development by a State employee, including but not limited to his name, title, documentation of his lawful appointment pursuant to the State Service Regulations.b. Documentation of core management of IT systems development by a State employee, including but not limited to his name, title, documentation of his lawful appointment pursuant to the State Service Regulations.c. Documentation of independent examination and validation of IT systems prior to implementation by a State employee, including but not limited to his name, title, documentation of his lawful appointment pursuant to the State Service Regulations.2. Who holds the ultimate administrative authority for such IT systems?3. Which State authorities hold the responsibility for securing such systems?4. Who were authorized to publish data, pertaining to the 20th Knesset election outcome, in the Central Election Committee website? (e.g., portal: http://votes20.gov.il/ballotresults)
The State Ombudsman Report 60b (2010) documented the development and implementation of IT systems of the courts in the previous decade:
a. Contrast were signed with no legal tender.
b. Contracts were signed with no written specifications.
c. Systems were developed with no core supervision by State employees.
d. No independent examination, validation were performed by State employees prior to implementation.
e. Severs of the systems were removed from custody of the offices of the clerks of the courts to the custody of corporations.
f. Unknown number of people were issued double "smart-ID" cards.
Numerous cases of computer fraud in the courts have been documented in subsequent years, the most notorious - the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" scandal.
Yet, the Administration of Courts refuses to duly answer on Freedom of Information requests:
a. Who is charged with operation of the systems in the various courts?
b. Who is charged with security of the systems.
In this case, in response to inquiry, the Shin-Bet responded that it was not charged with security of IT systems of the courts...
Fraud IT systems of the Debtors' Courts
Fraud in IT systems of the Debtors' Courts is infamous...
In parallel, the Enforcement and Collection Authority - administrative unit of the Ministry of Justice - refuses to duly answer on FOIA requests:
a. Were IT systems of the Debtors' Courts developed and implemented in compliance with the law? Were their validity and integrity duly checked?
b. Who holds the ultimate administrative authority for such systems?
c. Who is charged with security of such systems?
Fraudulent government IT systems - "Deep State" control tools
Some see in the State of Israel a nation governed by authorities provided by State law.
Alternatively, the State of Israel today can be viewed as controlled through a series of "Black Boxes", which are fraudulent government IT Systems, which represent "Deep State" control ...
In parallel, Israeli media have recently reported that Netayahu completed asserting his control over all critical State IT systems. [2]
LINKS:
[1]2016-06-14 ISRAEL: Computer fraud in the Central Election Commission? Where is the Shin-Bet?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ISRAEL-Computer-fraud-in-by-Joseph-Zernik-Election-Fraud_Israel_Netanyahu_Shin-Bet-160614-259.html
2016-06-07 הונאת הבחירות (2015)- תוספת בוחרי הליכוד לא תואמת את אחוז המצביעים שפורסם ע"י וועדת הבחירות
2016-06-11 "דודי" הפרשיה החדשה של נתניהו- האם השמשעומדת לזרוח שוב, בשבוע הקרוב, על מדינת ישראל?
http://cafe.themarker.com/topic/3318492/
[2] ברשות עצמו
נתניהו העביר את אבטחת המידע של הגופים הרגישים במדינה לידי רשות הסייבר שבאחריותו
http://www.yediot.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4837497,00.html
[2] ברשות עצמו
נתניהו העביר את אבטחת המידע של הגופים הרגישים במדינה לידי רשות הסייבר שבאחריותו
http://www.yediot.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4837497,00.html
No comments:
Post a Comment