09-12-13- Draft claims for complaint against US Government in Interamerican Human Rights Court - Costa Rica

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:57:25 -0800
To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Draft claims for complaint against US Government to Interamerican Human Rights Court, Costa Rica

Requesting comments, advise from all people of good will, good faith.

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:21:28 -0800
To: "list judicial reform"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Draft complaint to Interamerican Human Rights Court, Costa Rica

Hi K:
Thanks, enjoy, and I would appreciate any information that you may be willing to share, and also - comments, advise regarding the write-up below.

Draft

Claims for Complaint against the US Government in Interamerican Human Rights Court

Sheriff Lee Baca_ _ _ _ _ Attorney Richard Fine

1) US government permitted the ongoing false, arbitrary imprisonment of Richard Fine in Los Angeles, California - with no warrant, no conviction, and no sentencing. Attorney Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former US prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, was held in solitary confinement, under false hospitalization, since March 4, 2009, less than two weeks after February 20, 2009 signing by the California Governor of pardons for all judges for the wrongful conduct exposed by Richard Fine.

US Secret Service _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FBI

2) US government permitted the false, arbitrary imprisonment of many thousands in Los Angeles, California - the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), almost exclusively blacks and latinos, a full decade after the widespread corruption that led to the false convictions and false sentencing were documented in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000). Incontrovertible evidence was provided in both media reports -e.g. PSS Frontline - false imprisonments - and in official government reports - e.g. Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006).

3) US Government deprived the 10 millions who resided in Los Angeles County of Equal Protection, and permitted widespread corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, which was best evidence in the alleged operation of the Equity/Enterprise Track in the court:
The LA Superior Court routinely mixed together real True Court Track cases, and sham cases, and to cover it up, the court concealed the dockets and denied access to court records. The Richard Fine case was from the sham track - the Equity/Enterprise Track:
a) "Equity" refers to the evidence from a couple of cases - that the judges considered themselves presiding in an "Equity Court", not subject to California or US law (hence the futility of efforts for disqualification)!
b) "Enterprise" - designation for such conduct, is in reference to RICO enterprises..
The best evidence for the existence of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles came from the following:
a) The fees collected from Equity/Enterprise Track cases were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke, and the Presiding Judge of the Court - Charles McCoy, refused to answer what the final designation of such "Journal Entry" funds was.
b) No valid and effectual orders or judgments were ever issued in Equity/Enterprise Track cases, only "false on their faces" orders and judgments. That was the alleged reason why there was no warrant for the arrest and no booking papers for Richard Fine, and why all orders and judgments in his case were "false on their faces". [1] Such orders and Judgments were of they type designated Kozinski Fraud.
c) None of the judges presiding in Equity/Enterprise Track ever held a valid Assignment Order, and even after motions before the Presiding Judge, he refused to issue such Assignment Orders.
d) Although the specialty of the Equity/Enterprise Track was claimed to be in real estate and financial institution fraud, [2] the outcome was invariably - fraud in conveyance of title. [3] The court never issued valid, effectual, honest Grant Deeds, because no Writ of Executions were issued either.
The operation of the double track - True Court Track vs Equity/Enterprise Track was the only plausible explanation for the denial of access to the dockets (California - Registers of Actions) in LA County, California.

4) US Government discriminated against the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, for the past 3 decades, starting with shipments of illicit drugs and their distribution under the patronage of CIA in the 1980s and 1990s, and continuing with the deprivation of the 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County of the rights for:
a) Fair and impartial hearing,
b) Public trial in criminal prosecutions, and
c) National tribunals to protect human rights and rights pursuant to the US Constitution and the Amendments to it.

5) US Government deprived residents of Los Angeles County, California of the right to own property, and also residents of San Bernardino County, California, and many other counties, by permitting the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, and many other state courts, to engage in real estate fraud, including collusion in financial institutions fraud with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.

6) US Government deprived US residents, and many others throughout the world of property, through enormous losses in the current economic/integrity crisis, and also continued to subject workers and investors world-wide to unreasonable risks, by refusing to enforce the law on major financial institutions, such as Bank of America Corporation.

Truly,


J Zernik

I. Footnotes
[1] Detailed analysis of a series of eight (8) false on their faces orders and judgments in the case of Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List of eight (8) consecutive rulings, or...
[2] Similar finding - routine real estate financial institution/real estate frauds by the court were also found in the neighboring San Bernardino County, California, where the former Presiding Judge of the Court was reported to have been involved in numerous such cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[3] Equity/Enterprise Track: Example of fraud in conveyance of title by the LA Superior Court, as opined by highly decorated FBI veteran. The fraud in this case was in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf
II. Previous communications in this string

At 13:09 13/12/2009, you wrote:

The Organization of American States. It is the only international court which has any semblance of jurisdiction.

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.
• Chinese Ambassador to the US - since the Chinese people are likely to sustain the largest losses - robbed of savings earned through decades of hard work - as a result of US government recklessness in regulation of financial institutions.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-12-13 Alleged widespread corruption in administration of state courts- LA County as an example

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:36:57 -0800
To: "judicial reform list"
From: joseph zernik

December 12, 2009

Hi G and judicial reform list:

Thank you for the response, I appreciate it, you helped me in improving the questionnaire. Your response, copied below, appeared to describe your local variation of the so called Kozinski Fraud. Finally - we are focused back on the cause - denial of access to court records - and variations on the Kozinski Fraud - alleged widespread fraud in the administration of state courts across the US - underlying the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case.

In this email we leave behind the Federal Courts, and the alleged large scale fraud on the American people in the operation of dual docketing systems of PACER & CM/ECF, installed by the Administrative Office of the US Courts with no authority at all, and in alleged violation of the Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC 2071 - 2077.

state courts alone are the subject of this email:

1) Requesting help in surveying integrity, or lack thereof in state courts
Could you please add Yes/No for (a) through (f) below? [1] Use more space as necessary and links to records, but please provide short overall description in the response itself. This questionnaire is about state courts only, and I am asking for the name of the state and the county as well. Thanks again, this would be great help! Please also provide additional information regarding conduct of the courts relative to verification of orders and judgments by judges (signatures and dates) or lack thereof, and attestations by clerks, or lack thereof (see comments at bottom of this email note). These two areas appear to be most common theme in the alleged widespread frauds in the administration of both federal and state courts in the US today - the so called Kozinski Fraud.

2) Refusal of US Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law
I would be grateful for responses from other states and counties... I am seeking the data for arguing before International Human Rights courts the failure and refusal of US Gov to provide Equal Protection in LA County in general, and in the case of Richard Fine in particular. Such refusal persisted even after inquiries by the Honorable Diane Watson - Congresswoman and the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator in August 2008 on FBI and US Dept of Justice.

3) Conditions in LA County, California as a detailed example for the background for the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case
I will scan and post my correspondence with the California Superior Court. County of Los Angeles, regarding the denial of access to dockets... It is a serious violation of human rights, I believe. There is no possible explanation why an honest court would deny such access. The only plausible explanation, was in what was stated before regarding the Richard Fine case - that the LA Superior Court routinely mixed up real True Court Track cases, and sham cases, and to cover it up, the court concealed the dockets and denied access to court records. The Richard Fine case [2][3] was from the sham track - the Equity/Enterprise Track:
a) "Equity" refers to the evidence from a couple of cases - that the judges considered themselves presiding in an "Equity Court", not subject to California or US law (hence the futility of efforts for disqualification)!
b) "Enterprise" - designation for such conduct, is in reference to RICO enterprises...

4) Evidence for operation of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the LA Superior Court
The best evidence for the existence of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles came from the following:
a) The fees collected from Equity/Enterprise Track cases were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke, and the Presiding Judge of the Court - Charles McCoy, refused to answer what the final designation of such "Journal Entry" funds was.
b) No valid and effectual orders or judgments were ever issued in Equity/Enterprise Track cases, only "false on their faces" orders and judgments. That was the alleged reason why there was no warrant for the arrest and no booking papers for Richard Fine, and why all orders and judgments in his case were "false on their faces". [4] Such orders and Judgments were of they type designated Kozinski Fraud.
c) None of the judges presiding in Equity/Enterprise Track ever held a valid Assignment Order, and even after motions before the Presiding Judge, he refused to issue such Assignment Orders.
d) Although the specialty of the Equity/Enterprise Track was claimed to be in real estate and financial institution fraud, [5] the outcome was invariably - fraud in conveyance of title. [6] The court never issued valid, effectual, honest Grant Deeds, because no Writ of Executions were issued either.

The operation of the double track - True Court Track vs Equity/Enterprise Track was the only plausible explanation for the denial of access to the dockets (California - Registers of Actions) in LA County, California.

Truly,

Joe Zernik

I. Footnotes
[1] Questionnaire: Access and authenticity of state court records
Questions: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Answers for < > County, state of < >
a) Are you allowed to see your docket?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Y/N
b) Are you served by mail you minute orders?_ _ _ _ _ Y/N
c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts?_ _ Y/N
d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases?_ _ __ _ Y/N
e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments?_ _ _ _ __ Y/N
f) What type of payments are involved, if any. use more space as necessary
g) What is the typical manner in which orders/judgment are verified (signed) by judges? Please provide short description of problems in this area, if any.
h) What is the typical manner of attestation by clerks (Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry, Proof of Service, etc)? Please provide short description of problems, if any.
[2] Marina v LA County (BS109420) - Los Angeles Superior Court denied multiple requests to access the docket (Register of Actions) in this case, and Habeas Corpus petition to the US District Court, Los Angeles, and emergency petition to the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, were reviewed in the absence of such record, quintessential for providing the foundation for any other litigation records.

[3] The Richard Fine case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[4] Detailed analysis of a series of eight (8) false on their faces orders and judgments in the case of Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List of eight (8) consecutive rulings, or...
[5] Similar finding - routine real estate financial institution/real estate frauds by the court were also found in the neighboring San Bernardino County, California, where the former Presiding Judge of the Court was reported to have been involved in numerous such cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[6] Equity/Enterprise Track: Example of fraud in conveyance of title by the LA Superior Court, as opined by highly decorated FBI veteran. The fraud in this case was in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf

II. Previous communications in this string
____________________________________
This is g's writing (condensed)
At 18:00 12/12/2009, G wrote:

I feel pretty lucky ....our dockets are posted for free, you can go to the courts and review the docket,
but we are not allowed to have signed orders from real judges.
All of arts or rubber stamp facsimiles from the court clerk and the orders are seldom in the file signed afterwards.

___________________________________
This is jz's writing:
Hi G:
This is important information. What you are describing is your local variation of the Kozinski Fraud. My questions are:
1) Is this all in reference to state court?
2) What is the typical form of authentication of orders and judgments in your state court?
a) Notice of service and entry of Order/Judgment by clerk?
b) Proof of Service by party?
c) Digital signatures of some sort?
Thanks for any responses on the matter.
Joe Zernik

This is jz's writing:

--- On Sat, 12/12/09, joseph zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Getting to the heart of the matter - access to court records in the digital era.

To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"

Date: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 3:28 PM

Let's get to the heart of the matter, what unites us in this discussion. I am curious regarding the Common Law right to access court records, to inspect and to copy - Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978).

If you have a civil case in the Superior Court in your state and county:

Questions: Answers for LA County, California

a) Are you allowed to see your docket? NO

b) Are you served by mail you minute orders? NO

c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts? NO

d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases? NO

e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments? NO

f) What type of payments are involved, if any. [1]

[1] In some situations, where one would be allowed to view the docket in Los Angeles County (Register of Actions) each view may cost $25-75, depending on the size of the document, at $0.50 per page.

I am trying to figure out how usual or unusual conditions in LA County are for the USA 2009. I would be grateful if responders name the state and county, and answer each of the 5 questions, as in a questionnaire.

Joe Zernik

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-12-12 Zeitgeist - is this blog a subplot of the movie?

Steven claims that this blog was merely a subplot of the YouTube / Google videos movie Zeitgeist. The movie is not a short one, exceeding 2 hours in length, yet it logged millions of viewers.

You judge for yourself:

On Youtube: Movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kHhc67GopM&feature=related

On Google: Movie

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197&ei=5VskS6HUNIGwqAOzisTFAQ&q=zeitgeist&hl=en&view=3#

On Google: Addendum

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912&ei=5VskS6HUNIGwqAOzisTFAQ&q=zeitgeist&hl=en&view=3#

09-12-11 Judge David Yaffe was right in refusing to disqualify...

Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:50:11 -0800
To: LIST HOUSE JUD FAX
From: joseph zernik
Subject: US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee hearing re: recusal, and the case of Richard Fine.

Hi George:
I appreciate your good will, however, it is no fun repeating myself:
Judge Yaffe was correct in refusing to disqualify, since the case - Marina v LA County, was not a case of the Superior Court in the first place, and it was not litigated pursuant to the law of California or the US. It was fraud to start out - a major real estate case, with Real Parties in Interest who were two large developers, privately held, and LA County - the payer of "not permitted" payments - as Defendant. It would have been bad business practice to run it under the True Court Track. It was diverted from the start to the Equity/Enterprise Track, just like the case of Barbara Darwish.
Why don't we trade places:
Please show me the evidence to support the notions implied in your message, which I explicitly stated below, and which I hold were false and misleading:
________________________________________________
1) The caption of Marina v LA County (BS109420) - in ancillary proceedings of which Richard Fine was taken away on March 4, 2009 by the Sheriff's Warrant Squad - was a matter litigated under the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, pursuant to the law of the State of California.
2) Judge Yaffe was presiding in the caption of Marina v LA County (BS109420) as a Judge of the Superior Court of California, duly assigned to the case pursuant to the law of the State of California.
________________________________________________
Seems elementary to me... Any record you want! Proving me wrong on one of the two would be enough for me... Not trying to be stickler for perfection - half is enough :)... 50% would be considered passing grade...
Until your prove me wrong - and I would be happy to be challenged - I claim that you distributed false and misleading information, which you should retract!
Joe Zernik
___________
The offending statement is marked in red. At minimum you should have stated: "involved in the purported Richard Fine proceedings..."
___________
At 18:38 11/12/2009, you wrote:

After yesterday attending the hearings on judicial recusal, I suggest all parties involved in judicial reform take time to view the complete video on the House Judiciary website.

Maybe I was wrong, the testimony heard, both from the committee members themselves and the panel of guests invited, would indicate that the judges in California, involved in the Richard Fine proceedings should have recused themselves because they were being paid off by the county.

--- On Fri, 12/11/09, joseph zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Request that US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee initiate corrective actions in re: case of Ms Barbara Darwish

09-12-10 I guess I should be jubilant - the House passed another bill against financial institution fraud...

JOSEPH --
This afternoon, the House passed a bill 223-to-202 tightening financial regulations and ensuring we put Main Street first.
...
Best wishes,

Jon Vogel
DCCC Executive Director
-----------------------
JON --
You must be kidding...
The hyperactivity of the Democrats-controlled US Congress in passing more and more bills fighting financial institution fraud appears as the manifestation of desperate lack of any impact, nothing more. Congress could use its time much more effectively in tightening oversight over the executive and judicial branches, law enforcement, banking regulators, and the courts...
The first step in that direction would be enforcing the Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC 2071-2077 on PACER & CM/ECF (the dual docketing systems of the US Courts) - allegedly the largest Flimflam - Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

• Show me the regulator who would enforce the law on Bank of America Corporation...
• Show me the US court where I am permitted to exercise my right to file a complaint and sue Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth Lewis, and Sandor Samuels, for fraud and deceit, false claims, racketeering, and more... together with Kenneth Melson (US Dept of Justice) and Kenneth Kaiser (FBI) for collusion.

Check out the conduct of US Court in Washington, spitting distance from capitol, in Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) and the corrupt conduct of US Judge Richard J Leon in the case - Kozinski Fraud galore...

You really expect people to reward you with contributions for this futility? You must be deluded. You somehow remind me of Sandor Samuels fund raising for Bet Tzedek while perpetrating the heist of sub-prime lending...
Best wishes,

Joseph Zernik
Voter

Sandor Samuels -Associate General Counsel
Bank of America Corporation
Countrywide - Chief Legal Officer
Alleged organized crime figure
Key culprit in the current economic/integrity crisis.

Ken Lewis - CEO
Bank of America Corporation
Continues the fraud initiated by Countrywide, while signing "no fraud" in certifications pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002).

Richard J Leon - US Judge
Colluded in alleged Bank of America fraud and deceit - by perpetrating Kozinski Fraud galore.

I. CC:

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

III. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-12-11 Requesting reasonable explanations by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District in re: Darwish

_ _ _ _ _

Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:32:04 -0800

To: "US House of Representatives -Judiciary Committee"
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Request that US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee initiate corrective actions in re: case of Ms Barbara Darwish

The favor of a response within 10 days was requested

TO MEMBERS OF THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE:

Copied below is my request for explanation by Joseph Lane, Clerk of the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, regarding the case of Ms Barbara Darwish. Like the case of Attorney Richard Fine, it was a real estate matter. The case of Attorney Fine was best noted for the abduction and false imprisonment of Attorney Fine as part of the purported ancillary proceedings. The case of Ms Barbara Darwish was best noted as an example of alleged real estate fraud by the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, in collusion with the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District.

It was claimed that this type of conduct propelled Los Angeles County to be listed by the FBI as: "The epicenter of real estate and mortgage fraud". It was further alleged that conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court in collusion with Countrywide and later - Bank of America, was also tightly tied to alleged criminality underlying the current economic/integrity crisis.

The case demonstrated the underlying deficiency - failure to establish process and procedures for publicly accountable validation/logic verification of large computer systems in government, in financial institutions, and in public corporations. It is the same deficiency - in large systems in the courts and in large financial institutions - operating in perfect harmony to defraud the American people - that underlies the current Economic/Integrity Crisis.

Allowing such conditions to stand amounted to serious deprivation of Human Rights of the people. In addition, such conditions inherently generate intolerable risks to financial markets in the US and beyond.

FBI and US Department of Justice refused to investigate complaints in this regard in the past three years, in disregard of overwhelming evidence of widespread corruption at the Los Angeles Courts and criminality at Countrywide and Bank of America.

Please initiate corrective actions pursuant to your duties and authority to restore the rights of Ms Barbara Darwish and all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County.

Dated December 11, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik

By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__[*]
_ _ JOSEPH H ZERNIK
_ _ PO Box 526, La Verne,CA 91750
_ _ Fax: 801 998 0917
_ _ Email

[*] A digitally signed copy of this notice, with evidence of electronic fax transmission, can be viewed at:
http://inproperinla.com/09-12-11-req-us-judiciary-committee-corrective-actions-re-darwish-s.pdf

I. Addressed to:

• Congressman Howard Berman - fax <1202-225-3196@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Rick Boucher - fax <1202-225-0442@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Jerrold Nadler - fax <1202-225-6923@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Bobby Scott - fax <1202-225-8354@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Mel Watt - fax <1202-225-1512@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren - fax <1202-225-3336@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee - fax <1202-225-3317@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Maxine Waters - fax <1202-225-7854@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Bill Delahunt - fax<1202-225-5658@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Robert Wexler - fax <1202-225-5974@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Steve Cohen - fax <1202-225-5663@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Hank Johnson - fax <1202-226-0691@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Pedro Pierluisi - fax <1202-225-2154@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Mike Quigley - fax <1202-225-5603@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Judy Chu - fax <1202-225-5467@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Luis Gutierrez - fax <1202-225-7810@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin <>
• Congressman Charles Gonzalez
• Congressman Anthony Weiner - declined to provide fax number@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Adam Schiff - fax <1202-225-5828@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Linda T. Sanchez - fax <1202-226-1012@efaxsend.com>
• Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz - fax <1202-226-2052@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Dan Maffei - fax <1202-225-4042@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Lamar Smith - fax <1202-225-8628@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner - fax <1202-225-3190@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Howard Coble - fax <1202-225-8611@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Elton Gallegly - fax <1202-225-1100@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Bob Goodlatte - fax <1202-225-9681@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Daniel Lungren - fax <1202-226-1298@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Darrell Issa fax <1202-225-3303@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman J. Randy Forbes - fax <1202-226-1170@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Steve King - fax <1202-225-3193@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Trent Franks - fax <1202-225-6328@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Louie Gohmert - faxed to <1202-226-1230@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Jim Jordan - faxed to <1202-226-0577@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Ted Poe - faxed to <1202-225-5547@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Jason Chaffetz - faxed to <1202-225-5629@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Tom Rooney - faxed to <1202-225-3132@efaxsend.com>
• Congressman Gregg Harper - faxed to <1202-225>

II. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

III. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:38:56 -0800
To: "California Court of Appeal, 2nd District" <12138972430@efaxsend.com>
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Attention: Clerk Joseph Lane, Cal Crt of Appeal, 2nd District, in re: Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737)

The favor of a response within 10 days was requested

TO CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS, 2ND DISTRICT, CLERK OF THE COURT JOSEPH LANE.

Dear Clerk Lane:

I spoke today by phone with Chief Deputy Danny Potter in re: Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737). The purported case of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was reviewed twice by your court. The caption was represented by the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, as a true court case. However, review of the Registers of Actions [1] and other evidence revealed facts that were difficult to comprehend:
a) Multiple judges presided in the case, none with an assignment order.
b) All fees in this case were listed as "Journal Entry" whereas in true court cases such fees are listed as "Filing Fees", "Motion Fees", "Stipulation Fees", etc. John Clarke- Clerk, and Charles McCoy- Presiding Judge, of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, refused to answer any questions regarding the "Journal Entry" designation of funds in this case.
c) In critical court actions the Register of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, concealed the names of the judges involved, in one case listing only "Retired Judge", and in another listing only "Muni Judge".
d) I received a declaration under penally of perjury from Defendant Barbara Darwish, stating the the "Muni Judge" in this case was indeed Municipal Court Judge John Segal - in a civil unlimited real property case of the Superior Court of California. In May 2002 Ms Darwish appeared for trial at the California Superior Court, but was instructed to proceed to the Municipal Court, where John Segal purported to conduct a "bench trial" to take her 6-unit Santa Monica rental property.
e) John A Clarke, Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court denied requests to certify the case caption, the judgments, or the judges in this case as due case captions, judgments, or judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
e) The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District took three (3) appeals in this case, from two (2) purported Judgments. [2] The first two appeals were denied, and the third was voluntarily dismissed. The first appeal in this case resulted in a published opinion.

In discussing the matter with your Chief Deputy, Danny Potter, today by phone, his only explanation was that the California Court of Appeals liberally construed the law. I would therefore be grateful if you could look into the matter and provide a reasonable explanation for the conduct of the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, in this case.

Dated December 11, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik [3]
By: __/s/Joseph H Zernik__
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne,CA 91750
Fax: 801 998 0917
Email

[1] Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, purported Registers of Actions:

a) Derwish v Darwish (SC060217)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-galdjie-v-darwish_register-of-actions-case-history-d-v-d-sustain-ocr.pdf

b) Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737)
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-galdjie-v-darwish_register-of-actions-case-history-g-v-d-sustain-ocr.pdf

[2] California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, online dataCaption

a) B163970
LA Superior Court:	Galdjie v Darwish et al (SC052737)	Trial Court Judge: Segal, John	Trial Court Judgment Date: 09/05/2002; *	Date of Entry of Judgment: None;
Cal Crt App, 2nd:	Galdjie v. Darwish et al. B163970	Notice of Appeal: 12/19/2002	Disposition: Affirmed in full, Published.
	California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, Judges involved: (1) Curry, Daniel A; (2) Vogel, Charles S; (3) Hastings, J Gary.
b) B179667
LA Superior Court:	Galdjie v Darwish et al (SC052737)	Trial Court Judge: Segal, John;	Trial Court Judgment Date: None;	Date of Entry of Judgment - None;
Cal Crt App, 2nd:	Galdjie v. Darwish et al. B179667	Notice of Appeal: 11/24/04	Disposition: Affirmed in full, Unpublished.
	California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, Judges involved: (1) Curry, Daniel A; (2) Epstein, Norman L; (3) Hastings, J. Gary.
c) B191327
	Galdjie v. Darwish et al. (SC052737)	Trial Court Judge: Segal, John;	Trial Court Judgment Date: 04/26/2006	Date of Entry of Judgment - None;
	Galdjie v. Darwish et al. B191327	Notice of appeal: 05/18/2006	Disposition: Voluntary Dismissal
	California Court of Appeals Judges involved: None.

* California Court of Appeals, 2nd District online listed the date as : 09/05/2002, in fact it was 05/09/2002 -- both inexplicable relative to time frames for appeals, if construed as date of entry of judgment.

[3] A digitally signed copy of this notice, with evidence of electronic fax transmission can be viewed at:
http://inproperinla.com/09-12-11-clerk-joseph-lane-cal-crt-app-2nd-dist-re-galdjie-v-darwish-s.pdf