Sunday, July 18, 2010

2010-07-18 Discussion on the OAK Discussion Board // Debate sobre el tablero de la discusión OAK

Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Lynette: As for the solution - the evidence from Los Angeles County, and beyond, in the past couple of decades shows that we cannot expect it to come from the United States government. The highest level officers of the US Department of Justice are fully informed on corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, they refuse to take action, even when prodded by US Congress. It has therefore been Human Rights Alert's policy for sometime to focus its efforts on increasing international awareness of the level of abuse that US citizens are subjected to by their own government. Hundreds of thousands of reads and downloads from Human Rights Alert were registered from over 85 nations around the globe. Between now and November 2010, our efforts should be focused on lobbying nations who sit on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations - to affect an honest and effectual report by the United Nations in its first ever review of Humane Rights in the United States. [1] We must define specific areas of abuse, such as false imprisonments - the focus of Human Rights Alert's report, the intimidation of Human Rights counsel - the focus of OAK's report, or the retaliation against whistle-blowers - the focus of ITHACA's report. With it, we must propose specific goals and effective corrective actions, which should be easily monitored, which the report would request the United States to undertake between 2010 and the next review - in 2014. It is not that such report is the end all in the matter. However, such report is very likely to get publicity, which is much wider than anything that we may be able to generate on our own. jz LINKS [1] 10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nations shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/
Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Dr Jackson: . The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment. . As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago: 1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000. 2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” 3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct. , In view of the above, I would be grateful if you could please likewise provide the references to the "general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records." . As far as I could tell, you were making baseless statements by the seat of your pants, in a matter that is, based on solid evidence, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
c. lynnette thomasComment by c. lynnette thomas 59 minutes ago
so, with all this blogging and boggling, exposing the issues, where is the chattering about viable solutions? I very much support the idea that comments here should be kept under the 250 word limit rule, as comments and blogs are a might different. anything more that needs said in a comment, a link can be provided to the corresponding blog. that way, we'll be able to sort through all the info with much more ease and, together, devise strategies to begin to resolve the many issues. I would love to aid in that endeavor, but get rather lost in the exhausting comments here. just some thoughts on how to streamline things here and make it more productively functional for all our purposes! :)
Dr. A. D. JacksonComment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 5 hours ago
I only stated a general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records. I did not imply Richard Fine's papers were in order as I have extreme misgivings concerning his being locked up. Andrew

10-07-18 Government or Private Sector? // Gobierno o del sector privado?

Friday, July 16, 2010

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

10-07-13 Contact list in re: 2010 UPR review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations // UPR revisión de los Derechos Humanos en los Estados Unidos por las Naciones Unidas


What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?*        
"Innocent people remain in prison"
*         "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
*        
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
*   
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
      Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]

[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

Dear Cheryl:

Ms D'aniello herself is probably not the best address to forward messages to, since she is in the Petition Unit.

Better addresses are:
1) "U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights" niu@ohchr.org
2) gmagazzeni@ohchr.org
3) "Network of the NHRIs of the Americas ,Ms. Gabriela del Mar Ram�rez P�rez" secretariared@defensoria.gob.ve
4) "Will Davis - DC Public Information Office" wdavis@unicwash.org
5) UPRStates@ohchr.org
6) UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org
7) civilsocietyunit@ohchr.org
8) Lidiya Grigoreva LGrigoreva@ohchr.org
9) Bernadette Arditi BArditi@ohchr.org
10) Jessica Neuwirth neuwirth@un.org


Please make sure to copy also the US State Department on your messages to the United Nations:
1) upr_info@state.gov

Please also the US Congress Judiciary Committees:
1) �Dianne Feinstein� <1-202-228-3954@metrofax.com>
2) �Russ Feingold� <1-202-224-2725@metrofax.com>
3) �Orrin G Hatch�   <1-202-224-6331@metrofax.com>
4) �Chuck Grassley�  <1-202-224-6020@metrofax.com>
5) �Chuck Schumer� <1-202-228-3027@metrofax.com>
6) �Jon Kyl �  <1-202-224-2207@metrofax.com>
7) �Dick Durbin� <1-202-228-0400@metrofax.com>
8) �Benjamin L Cardin� <1-202-224-1651@metrofax.com>
9) �John Cornyn�  <1-202-228-2856@metrofax.com>
10) �Sheldon Whitehouse�  <1-202-228-6362@metrofax.com>
11) �Tom Coburn�   <1-202-224-6008@metrofax.com>
12) �Amy Klobuchar�  <1-202-228-2186@metrofax.com>
13) �Ted Kaufman� <1-202-228-3075@metrofax.com>
14) �Arlen Specter�  <1-202-228-1229@metrofax.com>
15) "Senator Byron Dorgan" senator@dorgan.senate.gov
16) "Senator Dorgan Staffer Rich Swayze" rich_swayze@commerce.senate.gov
17) "Senator Claire McCaskill" melissa_mann@mckaskill.senate.gov
18) "Senator Levin Subcommittee on Investigations" kata_sabenga@levin.senate.gov
19) "Senator Charles Grassley" brian_downey@finance-rep.senate.gov
20) "Senator Daniel Akaka" lisa_powell@hsgac.senate.gov
21) "Senator Johnny Isakson" Senator_Isakson@isakson.senate.gov
22) "Senator Saxby Chambliss" camilia_knowles@chambliss.senate.gov
23) "Congressman Lynn Westmoreland" chip.lake@mail.house.gov
24) "Congressman Lynn Westmoreland" jean.studdard@mail.house.gov
25) "Senator Charles Grassley" casework@grassley.senate.gov
26) "Senator Patrick Leahy" senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
27) "Senator Leahy Staffer Lydia Griggsby" lydia_griggsby@judiciary-dem.senate.gov
28) "Congressman George Miller" George.Miller@mail.house.gov


The Metrofax service is very convenient in this regard, since it is integrated with your email, and allows you to email up to 1000 pages per month for about $10.00.

Please also feel free to copy the quotations and URLs, above, of expert opinions, supporting our claims of widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, which the United States is refusing to address for over a decade.

According the UPR protocol, the US State Department was supposed to discuss with stakeholders, who filed reports with the United Nations as part of the 2010 UPR of the United States, the claims of Human Rights violations by the US government, prior to the August 2010 deadline for a response on the reports by the US State Department.  However, the US State Department refuses to even acknowledge receipt of the reports.

Please also include in your messages any possible evidence that US authorities - in particular US law enforcement were fully aware of the complaints, and refused to take action. For example, you may copy the US Marshal Service, FBI, US Dept of Justice, and others. However, there is no significance at all to any conduct of state law enforcement agencies in this matter - unless they are the subject of alleged corruption.
1) "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" Darcy.Smith@usdoj.gov,
2) "Shell, Thomas\(USMS\)" Thomas.Shell@usdoj.gov
3) US DOJ Barbara.B.Salazar@usdoj.gov
4) US DOJ Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
5) US DOJ Roger.M.Williams@usdoj.gov
6) US DOJ dojfitzgerald ck.j.fitzgerald@doj.gov
7) US DOJ EmilyLanglie emily.langlie@usdoj.gov
8) US DOJ-IG 12026169898@metrofax.com
9) US DOJ-IG Glenn.A.Fine@usdoj.gov
10) US DOJ-IG inspector.general@usdoj.gov
11) US DOJ-IG oig.hotline@usdoj.gov
12) US Holder Eric eric.holder@usdoj.gov
13) npftf@usdoj.gov
14) H.Jarrett@usdoj.gov
15) "Civil Rights Devision" 1-202-514-0293@metrofax.com
16) "Civil Rights Devision" 1-202-514-0212@metrofax.com
17) "Division, Criminal" Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
 

From this date to November 2010, we believe that efforts should be focused on lobbying certain nations, listed in the "Road Ahead",
[2] linked below, to affect a UPR report calling upon the US to abide by ratified international law - the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 

Any help that you could provide in advising how to lobby those nations, or generate more international signatures on the petition to free Richard Fine,
[3] linked below, would be gratefully accepted.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
Locations of visitors to this page

LINKS:
[1] April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/
[2] The Road Ahead. 
10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nationss
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/
[3] Free Richard Fine:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

At 02:45 PM 7/13/2010, you wrote:

Thanks for that Joseph!  Since I submitted a request, I am going to write
Ms. D'aniello, too!

Cheryl Kennedy

10-07-13 Real estate and court scam in New York // Bienes inmuebles y estafa corte en New York

http://parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7786

Friday, July 2, 2010
Sunny Shue Dies Two Months After Asking For Protection From Judge Joseph Golia
New Court Court Corruption

Sunny Shue died Saturday June 26, 2010. The police reports say that he was found outside of his apartment with severe head trauma. He died several hours later in the hospital. I met Sunny several times because he and I are both interested in reforming the judiciary in New York State. We want the judges in New York State to remember who they are in service to, and what the Rule of Law really means.

On June 23, 2010 he and two others went to the judicial ethics committee with documents that Sunny says proved his allegations about Judge Golia. He said over and over again, "I got him! I got Golia!" according to one of the two people who were there with him.

Video that Sunny did on April 9 2010, asking for protection from Judge Joseph Golia.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Queens Homeowner Fights To Hold Onto Home Stolen In Deed Theft Scheme; May Lose House Anyway Despite Successful Forgery Prosecution Against Scammers
LINK

In Queens County, New York, The Black Star News reports (see below - Editor) on the story of Sun-Ming Sheu, a local resident and immigrant from Taiwan who had his home ripped off from out from under by scammers in 2001 in a straw buyer scam which utilized a forged power of attorney to complete a fraudulent transfer of the title to the house. The scammers then obtained a mortgage against the home, failed to make the mortage payments, and Sheu has been fighting off a foreclosure ever since.

To add insult to injury, the scammers were actually busted by the New York City police, and they ultimately copped pleas to forgery. However, the mortgage lender that was duped into financing the fraudulent sale and the title insurer that issued the lender's title insurance policy have ignored the successful criminal prosecution and all the evidence produced demonstrating that the signatures on the documents in the fraudulent sale were forged, and have continued to move forward on the foreclosure of Sheu's home, acting as if the fraudulent closing was authentic. A reportedly accomodating judge, Queens Supreme Court Justice Joseph Golia, has allowed the foreclosure to proceed.

Most recently, Sheu reportedly met twice with a criminal investigator at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan in June, 2009 for a total of about four hours and discussed his case and submitted documentation. “We cannot confirm or deny that we are investigating this case,” the investigator told The Black Star News, when contacted by phone.

Alleges: "Junk Justice" System And Mortgage Fraud
by Milton Allimadi, Black Star News
LINK

The man has been fighting a foreclosure for nearly 10 years.

Sun-Ming Sheu was eating Chinese noodle soup one day nine years ago when he heard a knock on the door of his Queens house.

When Sheu stepped out, he found an agent from Tower Insurance who told him that he was there to inspect the house for its new owner. "I almost choked on my soup," Sheu recalled in an interview with The Black Star News.

Sheu says he had never sold his house.

Earlier, he had worked with Manhattan-based mortgage brokers to refinance the house, which was under the name of his brother, Ming Chien Hsu. It turns out that the mortgage broker, Yek-Yun Chiu (a.k.a. Roman Chiu) and other accomplices, had forged his brother Hsu's signature on a power of attorney and applied for a mortgage loan with Centex Home Equity.

The forged power of attorney was signed and dated February 11, 2000; Sheu's brother, Hsu, was later able to prove that he was actually in Taiwan on that date and could not have signed the document.

Sheu immediately reported the fraud to the police and obtained a complaint report #7167, on June 19, 2000, from the 109 precinct, in Queens. Sheu also reported the matter to the Queens County District Attorney's office and to the Manhattan D.A., since the fraudsters worked in Manhattan.

On June 19, 2000, Sheu faxed a copy of the police complaint he had filed, to Ed Folland, a Centex official, and B. Osterman, director of collection, at Centex, alerting them to the fraud. Sheu also spoke with both officials by phone. “Folland said he would investigate,” Sheu said.

Sheu also faxed a copy of the police complaint on the same date to Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, which provided title insurance for the May 23, 2000 closing. He also reported the fraudulent mortgage loan to Midwest Finance, which was the agent for Chase Bank of Texas, the original mortgage lender to his brother, Hsu.

Sheu said he warned Centex to recover its money, since the mortgage had been fraudulently obtained. He said he was confident things would soon be resolved once Old Republic issued him with a claim #43391, after he had written a letter to the New York Department of Insurance, complaining about the fraudulent conveyance.

The letter from Old Republic with the claim number, reviewed by The Black Star, is dated October 5, 2004, and was signed by Felice K. Shapiro, then Vice President, New York State Counsel. The claim was assigned to Timothy McLeron, then the New York State Claims counsel for Old Republic.

Rather than deal with his claim, Sheu says, Centex and Old Republic decided to pretend as if the May 23, 2000 closing was not fraudulent, even though he provided both companies with documentation.

Instead, Centex later filed a lawsuit to foreclose on the property, Sheu says. “It was like a thief suing the victim. They conspired to steal my property," Sheu claims.

Nine years later, Sheu has been foreclosed on his property by Old Republic, which substituted for Centex as plaintiff, in 2008.

Separately, officials at both Centex and Old Republic did not return phone calls and e-mail messages from The Black Star seeking comment.

A lawyer for Old Republic, Matthew Dollinger, did not respond to an e-mail message with detailed questions. A spokesman for the New York State Department of Insurance did not return a phone message and e-mail message by publication time. Similarly, a spokesman for the New York State Attorney General did not respond by publication time.

At the fraudulent closing, on May 23, 2000, two associates of the broker, Yek-Yun Chiu, participated in the scam, Sheu says. Amy Cheng, whose real name is Jin Rong Wang, acted as the “buyer” of the property. She carried multiple identifications, and used the fake one, "Amy Cheng" for the closing. Her boyfriend Jing Gao, acted as the “seller.”

The pair was later busted by police and pleaded guilty on forgery charges.

Jin Rong Wang, the supposed buyer, did not even make the required $30,000 down payment on the property, Sheu says. Yet the deal was okayed by Centex’s lawyer, Brooklyn-based attorney Jakov J. Bohensky, Sheu says.

Bohensky’s name appears on the federally-required HUD-1 document certifying that the $30,000 downpayment was made; although his signature is not on the form.

The Black Star News has also reviewed photocopies of what purports to be checks made out by Bohensky in connection with the transaction. One check, purportedly made out to Ming Chien Hsu, Sheu’s brother, is for $4,112.60; Sheu says it was also a fake check since his brother was not selling the property, and, in any case, was not even in the country and never received the check.

Another check, purportedly for $1,000 was to Jeffrey Ruan, who was supposed to have been Jing Gao’s, the “seller’s” lawyer.

A copy of what purports to be a money order for $1,000, one of several payments towards the purchase of the house, made out to Sheu’s brother, Hsu, by Amy Cheng, is drawn from Abacus Federal Savings Bank, in Chinatown. Canal Street is mispelled “Cannal Street.”

In an interview Ruan told The Black Star News that when Sheu later told him about the forgery, he wrote to Old Republic urging that the company not transfer the title pending resolution of the alleged forgery.

"What I cannot understand is how Centex's lawyer at the closing went along with this scam," Sheu says, in the interview. “He must have known it was fraudulent as the detectives said.”

Bohensky did not return a phone message from The Black Star News seeking comment.

The Black Star News spoke with one of the New York Police detectives who looked into Sheu's allegations in 2000. He said he was able to confirm that it was a forged power of attorney and that Sheu's brother, Hsu, was not in the country and could not have signed it in front of the notary public. He said bank records also showed that some purported deposits were actually never made.

Sheu also blames Midwest Finance, the agent for Chase Bank of Texas, his brother's mortgage holder, for not returning the money to Centex after he notified the company of the 2000 forgery. Contacted by The Black Star News, a Midwest official confirmed that Sheu's mortgage had been paid off; he wouldn't provide additional information.

Even after the May 23, 2000 fraudulent “closing” Sheu says, he wasn't too worried initially because he believed once he had reported the fraud to police and the DA, things would eventually be sorted out.

"It was the court system that later betrayed me," says the immigrant from Taiwan." Is this the American way?"

Acting as if the May 23, 2000 closing had been authentic, on January 10, 2001, Centex’s title insurer, Old Republic, recorded the property's deed and mortgage with the New York City Register, in Queens County. Old Republic listed Sheu’s brother, Ming Chien Hsu, as the first “party” and Jing Gao, the phony "seller" at the May 23, 2000 "closing" as the second “party.”

"This was knowingly criminal," Sheu claims.

Then on December 12, 2001, Centex filed a lawsuit against Sheu and his brother Hsu in State Supreme Court, in Queens County, seeking a default judgment on the property, arguing that Amy Cheng was not making payment on the mortgage, even though Cheng was the fictitious name of the buyer at the fraudulent May 23, 2000 closing.

So, in addition to Sheu and Hsu, Centex listed as co-defendants, the very individuals that had victimized the brothers: Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a. Amy Cheng); her boyfriend Jing Gao; and the broker who presided over the fraudulent May 23, 2000 "closing," Yek-Yun Chiu. Non of the fraudsters ever appeared in court.

The case was assigned to Justice Joseph Golia in State Supreme Court in Queens.

Judge Joseph Golia

"My nightmare was just beginning," Sheu now recalls. “It was like the thief suing the victim of the crime.”

Sheu says had Judge Golia granted him due process, including disclosure, he would have quickly exposed the fraud perpetrated against him and had the case would have been thrown out.

Instead, Judge Golia granted summary judgment in favor of Centex and foreclosed on the property on July 21, 2004, records show.

Sheu continued to complain to Centex. A September 23, 2004 letter to Sheu's brother, Hsu, by Gerry King, a customer relations officer at the company acknowledges receiving “numerous faxed letters and copies of various documents” from Sheu but adds that “it was the decision of the court that insufficient evidence to prove fraud was provided and the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a judgment of foreclosure...”

“There was no deposition; no discovery; so how could I present evidence to show fraud?” Sheu says, in the interview with The Black Star.

Sheu says even though Centex knew its May 23, 2000 originated mortgage was fraudulent, it was now using the Court system to legitimize the transaction.

The foreclosure sale was on January 28, 2005. “Centex bought the property for $1,000 from Amy Cheng, the fraudster,” Sheu says. “That was not even her real name. How can you buy property from someone who does not exist?”

A week after Centex “bought” the property, on February 2, 2005, both Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a. Amy Cheng) and Jing Gao, who had never appeared in court on the Centex case, were arrested based on the criminal forgery complaint filed by Sheu in 2000.
Sheu sent a fax to Centex’s Gerry King about the development and also informed Judge Golia. Sheu says he was appalled so he also wrote a letter to New York State Chief Administrative Judge, Jonathan Lippman, complaining about how his brother's property had been "stolen." He accused Golia of “bias” and “discrimination.”

Sheu says on February 3, 2005, Jason Garlick, an Assistant District Attorney at the Queens County DA’s office, who had prosecuted Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a Amy Cheng) and Jing Gao, called him and asked him not to contact media about his case. “Judge Golia must have called the DA’s office because I told him I was going to media,” Sheu says.

Judge Golia ordered a hearing for April, which was later moved to May 18 and 19, 2005

The order was signed by Judge Golia on March 17, 2005 and stamped with the Queens county clerk’s seal on March 23, 2005. Sheu says when he’d last checked court records on March 24, 2005, there was no such entry or copy of such an order.

In fact, Sheu says, the only order he found in the records at the time, signed by Judge Golia on March 17, 2005, and stamped with the Queens county clerk’s seal on March 23, 2005, was a denial of Sheu’s and his brother, Hsu’s motion for Judge Golia to
recuse himself.

After the May hearing, it was not until nearly a year later, on April 12, 2006, that Judge Golia returned with a ruling on the case.
Judge Golia again denied the defendants’ motion that he recuse himself; the judge cancelled the fraudulent deed of May 23, 2000 between Ming Chien Hsu and Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a Amy Cheng); he cancelled the foreclosure order filed on July 21, 2004; and, he cancelled and vacated the foreclosure sale of January 28, 2005.

Judge Golia, however, did not restore Ming Chien Hsu’s (Sheu’s brother) original 15-years $226,500 mortgage with SMI Mortgage (SMI had later assigned the mortgage to Chase Bank of Texas).

"This violated my right as a crime victim to be restored to original status," Sheu says, reading from papers he had pulled from research.

That wasn’t all.

Judge Golia awarded Summary Judgment in favor of Centex to foreclose an equitable mortgage, under the doctrine of Equitable Subrogation against the premises: he ruled that Centex had paid off the original mortgage.

"How can equitable subrogation apply to stolen property?” Sheu asks. "This means if I have a lot of money, like Centex, I can pay off anybody's mortgage anywhere without their permission and then take possession of their home and kick them out," Sheu noted, sarcastically.

Judge Golia did not return phone calls seeking comment and also didn’t respond to an e-mail message. In a phone interview, Mitchell Kaufman, Judge Golia’s law secretary claimed Sheu’s information about the fraud would not have made a difference in the case “if Centex did not know at the time” of the May 23, 2000 closing that it was based on the forged power of attorney. “Apparently Mr. Sheu is either unwilling or unable to accept the judgment of equitable subrogation.”

Sheu retorts: “Centex knew it was a fraudulent transaction. It was represented by an attorney—Bohensky and the fraudulent transaction was endorsed by Joseph Bigman, Old Republic's title agent. In any case Old Republic issued me a claim number and they still did nothing except to foreclose.”

Asked what if Centex did know, or came to know that the May 23, 2000 closing was fraudulent Kaufman said, of Sheu: “He may have a tort claim against Centex.”

Judge Golia appointed Martin Evans as referee charged with computing the amount owed to Centex by Sheu. Evans entered a judgment amount of $465,433.29 in favor of Centex.

Golia also ruled that Centex could move for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, with costs, disbursements and any additional allowance as allowed by law.

Separately, Dollinger, Gonski & Grossman, the law firm representing Centex (now representing Old Republic, since it substituted as the plaintiff), managed to get a satisfaction of mortgage document from Chase Bank of Texas, even though the mortgage was in the name of Mr. Sheu’s brother, Hsu.

Sheu said when he called Midwest, Craig K. Olson, a Vice President, told him that a lawyer from Dollinger had informed Midwest that the firm represented Sheu and his brother, Hsu.

Judge Golia issued a judgment of foreclosure sale on April 7, 2009. The foreclosure sale occurred on May 15, 2009.
On May 27, Sheu appeared before Judge Golia with Stephen Katz, an attorney, and Judge Golia denied Sheu’s motion to vacate the order for foreclosure and sale.

In his motion, Sheu said Old Republic was foreclosing on a loan “obtained by fraud and by forgery of a power of attorney,” to which Judge Golia wrote: “This assertion is intentionally misleading and disingenuous at best.”
"It is the truth," Sheu says. "It is nothing but the whole truth."

In the almost decade he's been fighting for the property, Sheu has learned a few things about the law. He pulls out information he’s researched and reads, "Part 100 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts Governing Judicial conduct. Section 100.3. Disqualification. A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or the judge has personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding."

In June 2009, Sheu met twice with a criminal investigator at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District for a total of about four hours and discussed his case and submitted documentation. “We cannot confirm or deny that we are investigating this case,” the investigator told The Black Star News, when contacted by phone.

"These seem to be issues for the Appellate Division as I am not in position, nor am I qualified, to say whether or not a Judge's decision was 'proper' or not nor am in a position to say what rule of law should have been used to decide a particular case," David Bookstaver, Communications Director for the New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration told The Black Star News.

Desperate, on June 23, 2009, Sheu again filed an order to show cause for a temporary restraining order to halt any further action even though the sale had already occurred.

He demanded that detectives Keith Ng and Kin Lee, now both retired, who both had investigated the fraudulent May 23, 2000 closing, be permitted to testify.

Judge Bernice D. Siegal, stayed any additional proceedings with respect to sale of the property, with a return hearing date of July 8, 2009.

At the July 8, hearing, Judge Golia set another hearing date for July 15, 2009, at which time Sheu was to produce cancelled checks for all payments he had made over the last nine years on the property, for taxes; insurance payments; and, utilities.

This reporter attended the July 15, 2009, hearing and observed the clearly acrimonious relationship between Judge Golia and Sheu. The Judge Golia kept shouting at Sheu, who was unable to produce receipts; Sheu on the other hand kept shouting at the judge about the May 23, 2000 fraudulent conveyance he insisted was at the root of his predicament.

“This is junk justice,” Sheu said, as he walked out of the court. "Nobody is above the law, except Judge Golia."

Note: Readers if you believe you’ve been the victim of a mortgage scam and have documentation please contact Milton@blackstarnews.com or call (212) 481-7745

Please post your comments directly online or submit them to Milton@blackstarnews.com

Monday, July 12, 2010

10-07-13 Judicial corruption in the US and beyond // La corrupción judicial en los EE.UU. y más allá

On 7/13/2010, Joseph Zernik wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:44:23 +0300To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Judicial Corruption Continues To Plague the World, Report Says - 2007 report
All I can contribute is that I have contacted Transparency International on a number of occasions, and provided them with evidence and official reports regarding rampant judicial corruption in the United States.  Like other US based Human Rights organizations, they had no interest at all.  Transparency International explained to me that their activity in the United States is limited to fund raising, in order to document judicial corruption in other countries...

In short - such biased reports help propagate the myth of honest justice system in the United States, when in fact, the level of corruption in unprecedented relative to other "western democracies".
Joseph Zernik


At 12:06 AM 7/13/2010, Joe wrote:

This report is 3 years old  ask "what has happened to correct the problem" answer--absolutely nothing not a damn thing. your thoughts are appreciated Joe
06 June 2007

Judicial Corruption Continues To Plague the World, Report Says
Social order, economic growth suffer when justice fails
By Jaroslaw Anders
Staff Writer
Washington -- Systemic corruption of judicial systems not only denies citizens their basic human rights, but hinders economic development and sometimes pushes aggrieved populations to violence, according to a recent report.
Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems says that despite international efforts, different forms of judicial corruption continue to afflict many parts of the world. The report was issued in late May by Transparency International, an international anti-corruption nongovernmental organization.
“We are talking not just about outright bribery, but political bias or interference, the influence of money, which can have a profound impact on all of us, undermining our trust in public institutions and their capacity to deliver fair and impartial outcomes,” said Nancy Boswell, the president of Transparency International-USA. She spoke June 6 at an event at the Brookings Institution, a private research organization in Washington.
According to the report, there is a clear connection between high levels of judicial corruption and low levels of economic growth. This comes as no surprise, the report says, since “the expectation that contracts will be honored and disputes resolved fairly is vital to investors, and underpins sound business development and growth.”
Speaking at the same event, Aryeh Neier said widespread mistrust of the institutions of justice also is one of the factors that push citizens to resolve their grievances through the use of force, leading to social disorder and violence. Neier is the president of the Open Society Institute, a private group that promotes democratic governance, human rights, and economic, legal, and social reform.
According to Transparency International, a majority of people in seven of the eight African countries it polled said their legal systems are corrupt and one among five of those who had dealt with courts admit to paying bribes. Another aspect of judicial corruption -- political influence over the judiciary -- is especially serious in Niger, Nigeria, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the organization says. In addition, it cites Kenya and Lesotho as countries with high level of social tolerance for corrupt practices.
In Latin America, 80 percent or more of respondents in Bolivia, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru perceive their judiciary systems as corrupt.
Governments in many low-income countries in Asia -- including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam -- are not providing adequate support for their courts and court officials, “inviting corruption and undermining the rule of law,” the report says.
In Europe and Central Asia, the report cites what it considers undue influence of the executive branch on judicial appointments in countries such as Azerbaijan, Croatia and Turkey. The report also concludes that Russia and Georgia have been backsliding on international standards of judicial independence.
The report also looks critically at the United States, citing a 2004 poll that showed that more than 70 percent of U.S. respondents believe contributions to U.S. judicial campaigns influence judicial decisions in the states in which judges are chosen through elections.
The report points out that judicial and political corruption tend to reinforce each other. A corrupt judicial system is unlikely to sanction people who bribe and threaten politicians. As a result, “honest and unfettered candidates” often are prevented from entering politics or succeeding in public life.
But Susan Rose-Ackerman, a law professor at Yale University and one of the authors of the report, cautioned that judiciary independence is not enough to guarantee impartial justice. “You can certainly have independent judges who are acting with impunity, who are lazy, corrupt, but are completely independent: they can do what they want because nobody can control them,” she said. 
The report calls for a delicate balance between judicial independence and accountability. On the one hand, constitutional and legal mechanisms must protect judges from political pressure; on the other, judicial officials should not be permitted to “shelter behind outdated immunity provisions, draconian contempt laws, or notions of collegiality,” the document states.
The
full text of the report is available on the Transparency International Web site.
For more information, see
Bribery and Corruption.

Social order, economic growth suffer when justice fails
By Jaroslaw Anders
Staff Writer
Washington -- Systemic corruption of judicial systems not only denies citizens their basic human rights, but hinders economic development and sometimes pushes aggrieved populations to violence, according to a recent report.
Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems says that despite international efforts, different forms of judicial corruption continue to afflict many parts of the world. The report was issued in late May by Transparency International, an international anti-corruption nongovernmental organization.
“We are talking not just about outright bribery, but political bias or interference, the influence of money, which can have a profound impact on all of us, undermining our trust in public institutions and their capacity to deliver fair and impartial outcomes,” said Nancy Boswell, the president of Transparency International-USA. She spoke June 6 at an event at the Brookings Institution, a private research organization in Washington.
According to the report, there is a clear connection between high levels of judicial corruption and low levels of economic growth. This comes as no surprise, the report says, since “the expectation that contracts will be honored and disputes resolved fairly is vital to investors, and underpins sound business development and growth.”
Speaking at the same event, Aryeh Neier said widespread mistrust of the institutions of justice also is one of the factors that push citizens to resolve their grievances through the use of force, leading to social disorder and violence. Neier is the president of the Open Society Institute, a private group that promotes democratic governance, human rights, and economic, legal, and social reform.
According to Transparency International, a majority of people in seven of the eight African countries it polled said their legal systems are corrupt and one among five of those who had dealt with courts admit to paying bribes. Another aspect of judicial corruption -- political influence over the judiciary -- is especially serious in Niger, Nigeria, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the organization says. In addition, it cites Kenya and Lesotho as countries with high level of social tolerance for corrupt practices.
In Latin America, 80 percent or more of respondents in Bolivia, Mexico, Paraguay and Peru perceive their judiciary systems as corrupt.
Governments in many low-income countries in Asia -- including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam -- are not providing adequate support for their courts and court officials, “inviting corruption and undermining the rule of law,” the report says.
In Europe and Central Asia, the report cites what it considers undue influence of the executive branch on judicial appointments in countries such as Azerbaijan, Croatia and Turkey. The report also concludes that Russia and Georgia have been backsliding on international standards of judicial independence.
The report also looks critically at the United States, citing a 2004 poll that showed that more than 70 percent of U.S. respondents believe contributions to U.S. judicial campaigns influence judicial decisions in the states in which judges are chosen through elections.
The report points out that judicial and political corruption tend to reinforce each other. A corrupt judicial system is unlikely to sanction people who bribe and threaten politicians. As a result, “honest and unfettered candidates” often are prevented from entering politics or succeeding in public life.
But Susan Rose-Ackerman, a law professor at Yale University and one of the authors of the report, cautioned that judiciary independence is not enough to guarantee impartial justice. “You can certainly have independent judges who are acting with impunity, who are lazy, corrupt, but are completely independent: they can do what they want because nobody can control them,” she said. 
The report calls for a delicate balance between judicial independence and accountability. On the one hand, constitutional and legal mechanisms must protect judges from political pressure; on the other, judicial officials should not be permitted to “shelter behind outdated immunity provisions, draconian contempt laws, or notions of collegiality,” the document states.
The
full text of the report is available on the Transparency International Web site.
For more information, see
Bribery and Corruption.

10-07-12 Welcome Nicaragua, newest flag! // Bienvenido Nicaragua, la nueva bandera!

         


Newest Country

Nicaragua
Last Visited July 12, 2010

10-07-12 Discussion on the OAK web site

OAK AdministrationOAK

Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA 2 minutes ago
Delete CommentDear Mr Strickland: . Thanks for your offer of help: . 1) About my individual case: There is no need for your investigation of the title. A fraud expert of the highest reputation provided an opinion letter, based on the grant deeds issued by the court in this case, that the case was real estate fraud. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/ James Wedick is an FBI veteran, who was decorated by US Congress, by US Attorney General, and by FBI Director. Of note, of his own volition, Mr Wedick provided a letter that documented that FBI contacted him regarding my case (they refused to ever contact me), and that FBI agent assigned to the case agreed with Mr Wedick that it was real estate fraud. http://www.scribd.com/doc/29713733/ On the very same day that FBI contacted Mr Wedick, FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Affairs - Kenneth Kaiser, issued a letter responding to a Congressional Inquiry by Senator Dianne Feinstein, refusing to investigate the case, denying my claims of racketeering by judges in Los Angeles County, and claiming that I was complaining about "foreclosure procedure". I was never part of any foreclosure, bankruptcy or default of any kind. In fact, I overpaid my mortgage by some $14,000. I subsequently filed complaint with US DOJ IG - alleging fraud by Kenneth Kaiser on US Congress. US DOJ IG is refusing to answer on the complaint, even after Congressional Inquiry by Senator Dianne Feinstein on US DOJ IG. . 2) Real estate fraud by the courts is common in Los Angeles County. My case is only unique since I documented the fraud by the courts starting with a complaint I filed with FBI in January 2007, a full year before the fraud was consummated. Regardless, FBI refused to provide me equal protection. Instead I was and am subject to intense campaign of retaliation, harassment and intimidation ever since. I have also filed complaint with US Attorney Office, based on a simple search at the Los Angeles County Registrar Office, where within a couple of hours I found dozens of cases of real estate fraud by the court. However, in most cases the victims never realize that the court was part of the fraud. Their counsel hide the facts from them. It should be noted that starting 2004, FBI discerned Los Angeles County as "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud". The essence of the fraud in the courts is in conducting pretense real estate litigations, which the courts themselves do not consider valid court actions at all - none of the court papers are authenticated, an no judgments are ever entered. . In this respect it should also be noted that the Michael Welch, former Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, and even today a member of the California Judicial Council, was also tied to numerous cases of real estate fraud by the courts: http://inproperinla.com/09-09-11-former-san-bernardino-county-superior-court-presiding-judge-sustpect-of-real-estate-frauds-san-bernardino-county-sentinel.pdf . 3) False Imprisonments in Los Angeles County - are another manifestation of the same basic fraud scheme. The case of Richard Fine in its essence is the same type of fraud at the Superior Court. None of the court records in the case was adequately verified and authenticated. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case. The clerk of the Superior Court denies access to the docket of the case, and refuses to certify the case as a case of the Superior Court of California. The case of Richard Fine gained publicity, but again - it is a very common fraud scheme in Los Angeles County, California. . 4) What have the experts said over the past decade about the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles? Conduct at the Courts in Los Angeles County, California, as noted above, according to my research goes back to 1974, and is tightly tied to technology changes, with no matching changes in the Local Rules of Court. Of particular significance is the failure of the Los Angeles Superior Court to maintain a Judgment Book, where according to California Code judgments must be entered in order to be "effectual for any purpose". The court continues to publish false and deliberately misleading Local Rules of Court stating that it maintains such Judgment Books in the Clerk's Office of each district of the court. Official and unofficial reports over the past decade stated: * "Innocent people remain in prison" * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * "…judges tried and sentenced a stagggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * "This is conduct a associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… andd judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/ http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents

Betsy Combier
Richard H. StricklandComment by Richard H. Strickland 14 hours ago
Dr. Zernik: I read that the Federalist Papers the US Constitution is based on say the first priority of government protection is the right to own real property without interference. I am not an attorney but it sounds like you may need a change of venue. Like I said I’m not an attorney and I’m not giving out legal advice I’m just saying what it looks like to me as a non attorney and I could be wrong. Please email me the address of the property taken so I can research the chain of title. As a long time real estate broker I've never heard of this happening before. When you acquired the property was title insured by a title company, and if so which one? Maybe you have a claim against the title company. Another question: was title transferred since it was taken from you and if so what were the tax implications since it sounds like they got it for free? In the overview of the Joint Submission for Review of America's Human rights Record sponsored by OAK the main point is "the Rule of Law cannot be accomplished without citizen oversight." This is also a main component of candidate for CA Governor Meg Whitman’s plan for the future of CA. I spoke with a person that said she will be on the citizen oversight committee when Whitman is governor. You should take this up with her. She works out of an office in Covina, CA, not too far from San Dimas, CA, where you're located. Was it is an accident of fate OAK's submission will be taken up by the United Nations in November 2010 which happens to coincide with the November 2010 CA election for governor or was it planned this way from the very beginning? If so it seems Christmas may come in November this year instead of December for those that stand to benefit from this inquiry (but I'm not an astrologist either). Richard Strickland
Comment by Betsy Combier 16 hours ago
The stories of Richard Fine and the California Court System is very important to the public's awareness of how far the corrupt judicial system will go to silence/harm those who speak out about violations of law, ethics, justice. See my latest two articles on Parentadvocates.org: http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7789 and, http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7788 I want to say I am a huge fan of Dr. Zernik!!!