Monday, July 19, 2010

10-07-19 Responses on the Liveleak.com site to postings in re: Corruption of Judges

Liveleak.com - Redefining the Media

Complaint filed v Judge J Segal, Attorney D Pasternak, LA Superior Court - for public corruption. Liveleak Live - Current Event   


Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against John Segal – Judge, John A Clarke – Clerk, Attorney David Pasternak and others at the Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging public corruption in Re: Conduct of pretense litigation in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – real estate fraud by the Court. 
Executive Summary [1]
....

  • I admit I got through the 1st paragraph and realized I am not a juror on this case, therefore, I am not obligated to be bored to tears.
    Posted 5 hours ago by "dunedad" (R) United States
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 

  • All the politicians have been corrupt for years why not the judges too?
    Posted 4 hours ago by "BigDaddyTMN" (R) United States
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 

  • Will somebody please just fucking kill joseph zernik,
    so he will shut the fuck up?
    Posted 3 hours ago by "gmccuiston" (R) United States
    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
    Delete Comment? 

  • If my postings are so boring, why are they routinely leading guys to wishing me the afterlife in a hurry?
    I just don't get it...
    On the other hand, I appreciate the fact that my postings also attract some pleasant, friendly people with good taste, such as BidDaddy.
    Posted very recently by "jz12345" (R) United States

Sunday, July 18, 2010

10-07-18 Fraud On Court by Judge David Yaffe in the Richard Fine Case

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:58:30 +0300
To: ronald gottschalk , "Leslie Dutton"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
Cc: "Fred Sottile" , Mardi

Hi Attorney Gottschalk, Hi Ms Dutton:

Reading the news report below, it appears that Ms Dutton is still missing the point.

Judge David Yaffe was never assigned as presiding judge in Marina v LA County.  Therefore, he never had any intention to review the question, whether or not he should have recused.  Obviously, you cannot recuse when you have never been duly assigned.

In short: Marina v LA County, from the start was pretense litigation.  After all - Los Angeles County was Defendant, and was acting in violation of the law.  There was never any intention to conduct true litigation in the case.

There are numerous signs to support that claim. To name just two:
a) None of the court minutes, orders, writs, judgments in the case were ever authenticated. Therefore, they were all void, not voidable - including, but not limited to the March 4, 2009 "Judgment for Contempt". 
b) Additionally, Judge Yaffe absolutely refused to issue an Appointment Order for Commissioner Gross - because you cannot issue a valid Appointment Order in a pretense litigation.

However, the definitive proof for the claim of pretense litigation in Marina v LA County would found be in the Register of Actions (California civil docket) of Marina v LA County, which the Los Angeles Superior Court denies access to for over a year in violation of First Amendment rights.

Full Disclosure Network would do a great service to Richard Fine and to all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County by pressing for access to the Register of Action in the case.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Human Rights Alert - NGO

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

Locations of visitors to this page


WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?

*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]

[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

LINKS:
April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ronald gottschalk
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leslie Dutton-Full Disclosure
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM
Subject: L A Judge Admits Fraud On The Court: Richard I Fine
To:

Judge Admits Fraud On Court
In Richard Fine Contempt Case

July 19, 2010
[]


Judge David P. Yaffe:  "Court never intended to find as to whether Mr. Fine had standing to file a verified statement of disqualification" .....
Preview of Full Series 
 Los Angeles, CA  The Full Disclosure Network has learned that Superior Court Judge David Yaffe has admitted that court documents filed in the contempt case of Richard I Fine contained "false information".  According to new documents filed just last week Judge Yaffe has reversed himself  saying that "the Court never intended to find that Richard Fine did not have standing to challenge him from sitting on the case."

ISSUE: SHOULD JUDGE YAFFE HAVE RECUSED HIMSELF?
A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Andrew Kleinfeld issued Fine a Certificate of Appeal ability on the single issue as to whether or not the Trial Court Judge (Yaffe) should have been disqualified. Based on the new documents filed by Yaffe one could speculate that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal and the U. S. District Court might have had a different outcome had they the complete, accurate documentation been before them. 

FALSE STATEMENTS BY THE COURT AT ISSUE
In a letter to the U S Supreme Court Dr. Fine cites two new Minute Orders filed almost two years later that describe how the Federal District Court and the U. S. Supreme Court Courts were misled by Yaffe and his attorney Kevin McCormick.  This admission is found in the  July 13, 2010 Order and another was dated June 18, 2010  but inexplicably filed some twenty-five days later on July 13, 2010 by Clerk of the Court John Clark. It was not until Richard Fine filed a "Fraud Upon The Court" action with the District Court and US Supreme Court the that new documents appeared. 
    
[]Read Full Report & Details Here

  Real News.....
Real Issues.....Real People.....



Richard Fine Appeals to U S Supreme Court
AGAIN!
Fine's letter to the Supreme Court states: "Judge Yaffe deliberately made false statements in his March 27, 2008Order that referenced and relied upon a March 18, 2008 Order and the July 13, 2010 Order confirms that no such order existed....deliberate false statements of Judge Yaffe were made to fraudulently induce any subsequent court order to rely on...and base its judgment upon such false statements."


2010-07-18 Discussion on the OAK Discussion Board // Debate sobre el tablero de la discusión OAK

Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Lynette: As for the solution - the evidence from Los Angeles County, and beyond, in the past couple of decades shows that we cannot expect it to come from the United States government. The highest level officers of the US Department of Justice are fully informed on corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California. Yet, they refuse to take action, even when prodded by US Congress. It has therefore been Human Rights Alert's policy for sometime to focus its efforts on increasing international awareness of the level of abuse that US citizens are subjected to by their own government. Hundreds of thousands of reads and downloads from Human Rights Alert were registered from over 85 nations around the globe. Between now and November 2010, our efforts should be focused on lobbying nations who sit on the Human Rights Council of the United Nations - to affect an honest and effectual report by the United Nations in its first ever review of Humane Rights in the United States. [1] We must define specific areas of abuse, such as false imprisonments - the focus of Human Rights Alert's report, the intimidation of Human Rights counsel - the focus of OAK's report, or the retaliation against whistle-blowers - the focus of ITHACA's report. With it, we must propose specific goals and effective corrective actions, which should be easily monitored, which the report would request the United States to undertake between 2010 and the next review - in 2014. It is not that such report is the end all in the matter. However, such report is very likely to get publicity, which is much wider than anything that we may be able to generate on our own. jz LINKS [1] 10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nations shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/
Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CAComment by Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, CA just now
Delete CommentDear Dr Jackson: . The case of Richard Fine was used only as an example. The vast majority of the victims are blacks and latinos, and about a third of them were estimated to have been still juveniles at the time of their false imprisonment. . As quoted in the paper forwarded to you some weeks ago: 1) Reports by PBS in 2001 related to the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000) provided various estimates of the number of those who were falsely imprisoned in Los Angeles County as 8,000 to 30,000. 2) Unofficial report by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean of the UC Irvine Law School, and renowned constitutional scholar in 2001 stated upon review of the matter: “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.” 3) Unofficial report by Prof David Burcham, Dean of Loyola Los Angeles Law School in 2001 stated: “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 4) Official report by the Blue Ribbon Review Panel stated in 2006: "Innocent people remain in prison". It also recommended "external investigation" of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which the US government so far has refused to conduct. , In view of the above, I would be grateful if you could please likewise provide the references to the "general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records." . As far as I could tell, you were making baseless statements by the seat of your pants, in a matter that is, based on solid evidence, a Human Rights disgrace of historic proportions. . Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/ http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.com/ http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/ http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
c. lynnette thomasComment by c. lynnette thomas 59 minutes ago
so, with all this blogging and boggling, exposing the issues, where is the chattering about viable solutions? I very much support the idea that comments here should be kept under the 250 word limit rule, as comments and blogs are a might different. anything more that needs said in a comment, a link can be provided to the corresponding blog. that way, we'll be able to sort through all the info with much more ease and, together, devise strategies to begin to resolve the many issues. I would love to aid in that endeavor, but get rather lost in the exhausting comments here. just some thoughts on how to streamline things here and make it more productively functional for all our purposes! :)
Dr. A. D. JacksonComment by Dr. A. D. Jackson 5 hours ago
I only stated a general proposition of accountants, historians, journalists, gumshoes, etc. checking against paper, receipts, and original records. I did not imply Richard Fine's papers were in order as I have extreme misgivings concerning his being locked up. Andrew

10-07-18 Government or Private Sector? // Gobierno o del sector privado?

Friday, July 16, 2010

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

10-07-13 Contact list in re: 2010 UPR review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations // UPR revisión de los Derechos Humanos en los Estados Unidos por las Naciones Unidas


What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?*        
"Innocent people remain in prison"
*         "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
*        
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
*   
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
      Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]

[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339

Dear Cheryl:

Ms D'aniello herself is probably not the best address to forward messages to, since she is in the Petition Unit.

Better addresses are:
1) "U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights" niu@ohchr.org
2) gmagazzeni@ohchr.org
3) "Network of the NHRIs of the Americas ,Ms. Gabriela del Mar Ram�rez P�rez" secretariared@defensoria.gob.ve
4) "Will Davis - DC Public Information Office" wdavis@unicwash.org
5) UPRStates@ohchr.org
6) UPRsubmissions@ohchr.org
7) civilsocietyunit@ohchr.org
8) Lidiya Grigoreva LGrigoreva@ohchr.org
9) Bernadette Arditi BArditi@ohchr.org
10) Jessica Neuwirth neuwirth@un.org


Please make sure to copy also the US State Department on your messages to the United Nations:
1) upr_info@state.gov

Please also the US Congress Judiciary Committees:
1) �Dianne Feinstein� <1-202-228-3954@metrofax.com>
2) �Russ Feingold� <1-202-224-2725@metrofax.com>
3) �Orrin G Hatch�   <1-202-224-6331@metrofax.com>
4) �Chuck Grassley�  <1-202-224-6020@metrofax.com>
5) �Chuck Schumer� <1-202-228-3027@metrofax.com>
6) �Jon Kyl �  <1-202-224-2207@metrofax.com>
7) �Dick Durbin� <1-202-228-0400@metrofax.com>
8) �Benjamin L Cardin� <1-202-224-1651@metrofax.com>
9) �John Cornyn�  <1-202-228-2856@metrofax.com>
10) �Sheldon Whitehouse�  <1-202-228-6362@metrofax.com>
11) �Tom Coburn�   <1-202-224-6008@metrofax.com>
12) �Amy Klobuchar�  <1-202-228-2186@metrofax.com>
13) �Ted Kaufman� <1-202-228-3075@metrofax.com>
14) �Arlen Specter�  <1-202-228-1229@metrofax.com>
15) "Senator Byron Dorgan" senator@dorgan.senate.gov
16) "Senator Dorgan Staffer Rich Swayze" rich_swayze@commerce.senate.gov
17) "Senator Claire McCaskill" melissa_mann@mckaskill.senate.gov
18) "Senator Levin Subcommittee on Investigations" kata_sabenga@levin.senate.gov
19) "Senator Charles Grassley" brian_downey@finance-rep.senate.gov
20) "Senator Daniel Akaka" lisa_powell@hsgac.senate.gov
21) "Senator Johnny Isakson" Senator_Isakson@isakson.senate.gov
22) "Senator Saxby Chambliss" camilia_knowles@chambliss.senate.gov
23) "Congressman Lynn Westmoreland" chip.lake@mail.house.gov
24) "Congressman Lynn Westmoreland" jean.studdard@mail.house.gov
25) "Senator Charles Grassley" casework@grassley.senate.gov
26) "Senator Patrick Leahy" senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
27) "Senator Leahy Staffer Lydia Griggsby" lydia_griggsby@judiciary-dem.senate.gov
28) "Congressman George Miller" George.Miller@mail.house.gov


The Metrofax service is very convenient in this regard, since it is integrated with your email, and allows you to email up to 1000 pages per month for about $10.00.

Please also feel free to copy the quotations and URLs, above, of expert opinions, supporting our claims of widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, which the United States is refusing to address for over a decade.

According the UPR protocol, the US State Department was supposed to discuss with stakeholders, who filed reports with the United Nations as part of the 2010 UPR of the United States, the claims of Human Rights violations by the US government, prior to the August 2010 deadline for a response on the reports by the US State Department.  However, the US State Department refuses to even acknowledge receipt of the reports.

Please also include in your messages any possible evidence that US authorities - in particular US law enforcement were fully aware of the complaints, and refused to take action. For example, you may copy the US Marshal Service, FBI, US Dept of Justice, and others. However, there is no significance at all to any conduct of state law enforcement agencies in this matter - unless they are the subject of alleged corruption.
1) "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" Darcy.Smith@usdoj.gov,
2) "Shell, Thomas\(USMS\)" Thomas.Shell@usdoj.gov
3) US DOJ Barbara.B.Salazar@usdoj.gov
4) US DOJ Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
5) US DOJ Roger.M.Williams@usdoj.gov
6) US DOJ dojfitzgerald ck.j.fitzgerald@doj.gov
7) US DOJ EmilyLanglie emily.langlie@usdoj.gov
8) US DOJ-IG 12026169898@metrofax.com
9) US DOJ-IG Glenn.A.Fine@usdoj.gov
10) US DOJ-IG inspector.general@usdoj.gov
11) US DOJ-IG oig.hotline@usdoj.gov
12) US Holder Eric eric.holder@usdoj.gov
13) npftf@usdoj.gov
14) H.Jarrett@usdoj.gov
15) "Civil Rights Devision" 1-202-514-0293@metrofax.com
16) "Civil Rights Devision" 1-202-514-0212@metrofax.com
17) "Division, Criminal" Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
 

From this date to November 2010, we believe that efforts should be focused on lobbying certain nations, listed in the "Road Ahead",
[2] linked below, to affect a UPR report calling upon the US to abide by ratified international law - the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 

Any help that you could provide in advising how to lobby those nations, or generate more international signatures on the petition to free Richard Fine,
[3] linked below, would be gratefully accepted.

Truly,
[]
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
Locations of visitors to this page

LINKS:
[1] April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/
[2] The Road Ahead. 
10-04-24-The-Road-Ahead-from-April-to-the-November-2010-review-of-the-US-Human-Rights-by-the-United-Nationss
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/
[3] Free Richard Fine:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

At 02:45 PM 7/13/2010, you wrote:

Thanks for that Joseph!  Since I submitted a request, I am going to write
Ms. D'aniello, too!

Cheryl Kennedy

10-07-13 Real estate and court scam in New York // Bienes inmuebles y estafa corte en New York

http://parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7786

Friday, July 2, 2010
Sunny Shue Dies Two Months After Asking For Protection From Judge Joseph Golia
New Court Court Corruption

Sunny Shue died Saturday June 26, 2010. The police reports say that he was found outside of his apartment with severe head trauma. He died several hours later in the hospital. I met Sunny several times because he and I are both interested in reforming the judiciary in New York State. We want the judges in New York State to remember who they are in service to, and what the Rule of Law really means.

On June 23, 2010 he and two others went to the judicial ethics committee with documents that Sunny says proved his allegations about Judge Golia. He said over and over again, "I got him! I got Golia!" according to one of the two people who were there with him.

Video that Sunny did on April 9 2010, asking for protection from Judge Joseph Golia.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Queens Homeowner Fights To Hold Onto Home Stolen In Deed Theft Scheme; May Lose House Anyway Despite Successful Forgery Prosecution Against Scammers
LINK

In Queens County, New York, The Black Star News reports (see below - Editor) on the story of Sun-Ming Sheu, a local resident and immigrant from Taiwan who had his home ripped off from out from under by scammers in 2001 in a straw buyer scam which utilized a forged power of attorney to complete a fraudulent transfer of the title to the house. The scammers then obtained a mortgage against the home, failed to make the mortage payments, and Sheu has been fighting off a foreclosure ever since.

To add insult to injury, the scammers were actually busted by the New York City police, and they ultimately copped pleas to forgery. However, the mortgage lender that was duped into financing the fraudulent sale and the title insurer that issued the lender's title insurance policy have ignored the successful criminal prosecution and all the evidence produced demonstrating that the signatures on the documents in the fraudulent sale were forged, and have continued to move forward on the foreclosure of Sheu's home, acting as if the fraudulent closing was authentic. A reportedly accomodating judge, Queens Supreme Court Justice Joseph Golia, has allowed the foreclosure to proceed.

Most recently, Sheu reportedly met twice with a criminal investigator at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan in June, 2009 for a total of about four hours and discussed his case and submitted documentation. “We cannot confirm or deny that we are investigating this case,” the investigator told The Black Star News, when contacted by phone.

Alleges: "Junk Justice" System And Mortgage Fraud
by Milton Allimadi, Black Star News
LINK

The man has been fighting a foreclosure for nearly 10 years.

Sun-Ming Sheu was eating Chinese noodle soup one day nine years ago when he heard a knock on the door of his Queens house.

When Sheu stepped out, he found an agent from Tower Insurance who told him that he was there to inspect the house for its new owner. "I almost choked on my soup," Sheu recalled in an interview with The Black Star News.

Sheu says he had never sold his house.

Earlier, he had worked with Manhattan-based mortgage brokers to refinance the house, which was under the name of his brother, Ming Chien Hsu. It turns out that the mortgage broker, Yek-Yun Chiu (a.k.a. Roman Chiu) and other accomplices, had forged his brother Hsu's signature on a power of attorney and applied for a mortgage loan with Centex Home Equity.

The forged power of attorney was signed and dated February 11, 2000; Sheu's brother, Hsu, was later able to prove that he was actually in Taiwan on that date and could not have signed the document.

Sheu immediately reported the fraud to the police and obtained a complaint report #7167, on June 19, 2000, from the 109 precinct, in Queens. Sheu also reported the matter to the Queens County District Attorney's office and to the Manhattan D.A., since the fraudsters worked in Manhattan.

On June 19, 2000, Sheu faxed a copy of the police complaint he had filed, to Ed Folland, a Centex official, and B. Osterman, director of collection, at Centex, alerting them to the fraud. Sheu also spoke with both officials by phone. “Folland said he would investigate,” Sheu said.

Sheu also faxed a copy of the police complaint on the same date to Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, which provided title insurance for the May 23, 2000 closing. He also reported the fraudulent mortgage loan to Midwest Finance, which was the agent for Chase Bank of Texas, the original mortgage lender to his brother, Hsu.

Sheu said he warned Centex to recover its money, since the mortgage had been fraudulently obtained. He said he was confident things would soon be resolved once Old Republic issued him with a claim #43391, after he had written a letter to the New York Department of Insurance, complaining about the fraudulent conveyance.

The letter from Old Republic with the claim number, reviewed by The Black Star, is dated October 5, 2004, and was signed by Felice K. Shapiro, then Vice President, New York State Counsel. The claim was assigned to Timothy McLeron, then the New York State Claims counsel for Old Republic.

Rather than deal with his claim, Sheu says, Centex and Old Republic decided to pretend as if the May 23, 2000 closing was not fraudulent, even though he provided both companies with documentation.

Instead, Centex later filed a lawsuit to foreclose on the property, Sheu says. “It was like a thief suing the victim. They conspired to steal my property," Sheu claims.

Nine years later, Sheu has been foreclosed on his property by Old Republic, which substituted for Centex as plaintiff, in 2008.

Separately, officials at both Centex and Old Republic did not return phone calls and e-mail messages from The Black Star seeking comment.

A lawyer for Old Republic, Matthew Dollinger, did not respond to an e-mail message with detailed questions. A spokesman for the New York State Department of Insurance did not return a phone message and e-mail message by publication time. Similarly, a spokesman for the New York State Attorney General did not respond by publication time.

At the fraudulent closing, on May 23, 2000, two associates of the broker, Yek-Yun Chiu, participated in the scam, Sheu says. Amy Cheng, whose real name is Jin Rong Wang, acted as the “buyer” of the property. She carried multiple identifications, and used the fake one, "Amy Cheng" for the closing. Her boyfriend Jing Gao, acted as the “seller.”

The pair was later busted by police and pleaded guilty on forgery charges.

Jin Rong Wang, the supposed buyer, did not even make the required $30,000 down payment on the property, Sheu says. Yet the deal was okayed by Centex’s lawyer, Brooklyn-based attorney Jakov J. Bohensky, Sheu says.

Bohensky’s name appears on the federally-required HUD-1 document certifying that the $30,000 downpayment was made; although his signature is not on the form.

The Black Star News has also reviewed photocopies of what purports to be checks made out by Bohensky in connection with the transaction. One check, purportedly made out to Ming Chien Hsu, Sheu’s brother, is for $4,112.60; Sheu says it was also a fake check since his brother was not selling the property, and, in any case, was not even in the country and never received the check.

Another check, purportedly for $1,000 was to Jeffrey Ruan, who was supposed to have been Jing Gao’s, the “seller’s” lawyer.

A copy of what purports to be a money order for $1,000, one of several payments towards the purchase of the house, made out to Sheu’s brother, Hsu, by Amy Cheng, is drawn from Abacus Federal Savings Bank, in Chinatown. Canal Street is mispelled “Cannal Street.”

In an interview Ruan told The Black Star News that when Sheu later told him about the forgery, he wrote to Old Republic urging that the company not transfer the title pending resolution of the alleged forgery.

"What I cannot understand is how Centex's lawyer at the closing went along with this scam," Sheu says, in the interview. “He must have known it was fraudulent as the detectives said.”

Bohensky did not return a phone message from The Black Star News seeking comment.

The Black Star News spoke with one of the New York Police detectives who looked into Sheu's allegations in 2000. He said he was able to confirm that it was a forged power of attorney and that Sheu's brother, Hsu, was not in the country and could not have signed it in front of the notary public. He said bank records also showed that some purported deposits were actually never made.

Sheu also blames Midwest Finance, the agent for Chase Bank of Texas, his brother's mortgage holder, for not returning the money to Centex after he notified the company of the 2000 forgery. Contacted by The Black Star News, a Midwest official confirmed that Sheu's mortgage had been paid off; he wouldn't provide additional information.

Even after the May 23, 2000 fraudulent “closing” Sheu says, he wasn't too worried initially because he believed once he had reported the fraud to police and the DA, things would eventually be sorted out.

"It was the court system that later betrayed me," says the immigrant from Taiwan." Is this the American way?"

Acting as if the May 23, 2000 closing had been authentic, on January 10, 2001, Centex’s title insurer, Old Republic, recorded the property's deed and mortgage with the New York City Register, in Queens County. Old Republic listed Sheu’s brother, Ming Chien Hsu, as the first “party” and Jing Gao, the phony "seller" at the May 23, 2000 "closing" as the second “party.”

"This was knowingly criminal," Sheu claims.

Then on December 12, 2001, Centex filed a lawsuit against Sheu and his brother Hsu in State Supreme Court, in Queens County, seeking a default judgment on the property, arguing that Amy Cheng was not making payment on the mortgage, even though Cheng was the fictitious name of the buyer at the fraudulent May 23, 2000 closing.

So, in addition to Sheu and Hsu, Centex listed as co-defendants, the very individuals that had victimized the brothers: Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a. Amy Cheng); her boyfriend Jing Gao; and the broker who presided over the fraudulent May 23, 2000 "closing," Yek-Yun Chiu. Non of the fraudsters ever appeared in court.

The case was assigned to Justice Joseph Golia in State Supreme Court in Queens.

Judge Joseph Golia

"My nightmare was just beginning," Sheu now recalls. “It was like the thief suing the victim of the crime.”

Sheu says had Judge Golia granted him due process, including disclosure, he would have quickly exposed the fraud perpetrated against him and had the case would have been thrown out.

Instead, Judge Golia granted summary judgment in favor of Centex and foreclosed on the property on July 21, 2004, records show.

Sheu continued to complain to Centex. A September 23, 2004 letter to Sheu's brother, Hsu, by Gerry King, a customer relations officer at the company acknowledges receiving “numerous faxed letters and copies of various documents” from Sheu but adds that “it was the decision of the court that insufficient evidence to prove fraud was provided and the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a judgment of foreclosure...”

“There was no deposition; no discovery; so how could I present evidence to show fraud?” Sheu says, in the interview with The Black Star.

Sheu says even though Centex knew its May 23, 2000 originated mortgage was fraudulent, it was now using the Court system to legitimize the transaction.

The foreclosure sale was on January 28, 2005. “Centex bought the property for $1,000 from Amy Cheng, the fraudster,” Sheu says. “That was not even her real name. How can you buy property from someone who does not exist?”

A week after Centex “bought” the property, on February 2, 2005, both Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a. Amy Cheng) and Jing Gao, who had never appeared in court on the Centex case, were arrested based on the criminal forgery complaint filed by Sheu in 2000.
Sheu sent a fax to Centex’s Gerry King about the development and also informed Judge Golia. Sheu says he was appalled so he also wrote a letter to New York State Chief Administrative Judge, Jonathan Lippman, complaining about how his brother's property had been "stolen." He accused Golia of “bias” and “discrimination.”

Sheu says on February 3, 2005, Jason Garlick, an Assistant District Attorney at the Queens County DA’s office, who had prosecuted Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a Amy Cheng) and Jing Gao, called him and asked him not to contact media about his case. “Judge Golia must have called the DA’s office because I told him I was going to media,” Sheu says.

Judge Golia ordered a hearing for April, which was later moved to May 18 and 19, 2005

The order was signed by Judge Golia on March 17, 2005 and stamped with the Queens county clerk’s seal on March 23, 2005. Sheu says when he’d last checked court records on March 24, 2005, there was no such entry or copy of such an order.

In fact, Sheu says, the only order he found in the records at the time, signed by Judge Golia on March 17, 2005, and stamped with the Queens county clerk’s seal on March 23, 2005, was a denial of Sheu’s and his brother, Hsu’s motion for Judge Golia to
recuse himself.

After the May hearing, it was not until nearly a year later, on April 12, 2006, that Judge Golia returned with a ruling on the case.
Judge Golia again denied the defendants’ motion that he recuse himself; the judge cancelled the fraudulent deed of May 23, 2000 between Ming Chien Hsu and Jin Rong Wang (a.k.a Amy Cheng); he cancelled the foreclosure order filed on July 21, 2004; and, he cancelled and vacated the foreclosure sale of January 28, 2005.

Judge Golia, however, did not restore Ming Chien Hsu’s (Sheu’s brother) original 15-years $226,500 mortgage with SMI Mortgage (SMI had later assigned the mortgage to Chase Bank of Texas).

"This violated my right as a crime victim to be restored to original status," Sheu says, reading from papers he had pulled from research.

That wasn’t all.

Judge Golia awarded Summary Judgment in favor of Centex to foreclose an equitable mortgage, under the doctrine of Equitable Subrogation against the premises: he ruled that Centex had paid off the original mortgage.

"How can equitable subrogation apply to stolen property?” Sheu asks. "This means if I have a lot of money, like Centex, I can pay off anybody's mortgage anywhere without their permission and then take possession of their home and kick them out," Sheu noted, sarcastically.

Judge Golia did not return phone calls seeking comment and also didn’t respond to an e-mail message. In a phone interview, Mitchell Kaufman, Judge Golia’s law secretary claimed Sheu’s information about the fraud would not have made a difference in the case “if Centex did not know at the time” of the May 23, 2000 closing that it was based on the forged power of attorney. “Apparently Mr. Sheu is either unwilling or unable to accept the judgment of equitable subrogation.”

Sheu retorts: “Centex knew it was a fraudulent transaction. It was represented by an attorney—Bohensky and the fraudulent transaction was endorsed by Joseph Bigman, Old Republic's title agent. In any case Old Republic issued me a claim number and they still did nothing except to foreclose.”

Asked what if Centex did know, or came to know that the May 23, 2000 closing was fraudulent Kaufman said, of Sheu: “He may have a tort claim against Centex.”

Judge Golia appointed Martin Evans as referee charged with computing the amount owed to Centex by Sheu. Evans entered a judgment amount of $465,433.29 in favor of Centex.

Golia also ruled that Centex could move for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, with costs, disbursements and any additional allowance as allowed by law.

Separately, Dollinger, Gonski & Grossman, the law firm representing Centex (now representing Old Republic, since it substituted as the plaintiff), managed to get a satisfaction of mortgage document from Chase Bank of Texas, even though the mortgage was in the name of Mr. Sheu’s brother, Hsu.

Sheu said when he called Midwest, Craig K. Olson, a Vice President, told him that a lawyer from Dollinger had informed Midwest that the firm represented Sheu and his brother, Hsu.

Judge Golia issued a judgment of foreclosure sale on April 7, 2009. The foreclosure sale occurred on May 15, 2009.
On May 27, Sheu appeared before Judge Golia with Stephen Katz, an attorney, and Judge Golia denied Sheu’s motion to vacate the order for foreclosure and sale.

In his motion, Sheu said Old Republic was foreclosing on a loan “obtained by fraud and by forgery of a power of attorney,” to which Judge Golia wrote: “This assertion is intentionally misleading and disingenuous at best.”
"It is the truth," Sheu says. "It is nothing but the whole truth."

In the almost decade he's been fighting for the property, Sheu has learned a few things about the law. He pulls out information he’s researched and reads, "Part 100 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts Governing Judicial conduct. Section 100.3. Disqualification. A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or the judge has personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding."

In June 2009, Sheu met twice with a criminal investigator at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District for a total of about four hours and discussed his case and submitted documentation. “We cannot confirm or deny that we are investigating this case,” the investigator told The Black Star News, when contacted by phone.

"These seem to be issues for the Appellate Division as I am not in position, nor am I qualified, to say whether or not a Judge's decision was 'proper' or not nor am in a position to say what rule of law should have been used to decide a particular case," David Bookstaver, Communications Director for the New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration told The Black Star News.

Desperate, on June 23, 2009, Sheu again filed an order to show cause for a temporary restraining order to halt any further action even though the sale had already occurred.

He demanded that detectives Keith Ng and Kin Lee, now both retired, who both had investigated the fraudulent May 23, 2000 closing, be permitted to testify.

Judge Bernice D. Siegal, stayed any additional proceedings with respect to sale of the property, with a return hearing date of July 8, 2009.

At the July 8, hearing, Judge Golia set another hearing date for July 15, 2009, at which time Sheu was to produce cancelled checks for all payments he had made over the last nine years on the property, for taxes; insurance payments; and, utilities.

This reporter attended the July 15, 2009, hearing and observed the clearly acrimonious relationship between Judge Golia and Sheu. The Judge Golia kept shouting at Sheu, who was unable to produce receipts; Sheu on the other hand kept shouting at the judge about the May 23, 2000 fraudulent conveyance he insisted was at the root of his predicament.

“This is junk justice,” Sheu said, as he walked out of the court. "Nobody is above the law, except Judge Golia."

Note: Readers if you believe you’ve been the victim of a mortgage scam and have documentation please contact Milton@blackstarnews.com or call (212) 481-7745

Please post your comments directly online or submit them to Milton@blackstarnews.com