11-01-14 Burlesque in the US Courts - Hijacking of the US Government //Burlesque en los EE.UU. Tribunales - Secuestro de Gobierno de los EE.UU. // 滑稽戏在美国法院-劫持美国政府

 

  More on Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius, Log Cabin Republicans  USA, SEC v BAC - collapse of the frameworks of democratic government

Careful review of the litigation records in the three cases would lead one to conclude that senior US officers are actively undermining the stated goals of the US government.
______
The press release [linked below] focuses on three specific, high-visibility cases in the US courts:

• Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius,
• Log Cabin Republicans  USA,
• SEC v BAC

The press release describes the "burlesque" in the US courts.  However, if one reviews the records carefully, one must conclude that senior US officers are ready, willing, able participants in the "burlesque" in each of the cases.  In two of the cases, US agencies were the Defendants, and in the third a US agency was the Plaintiff.

The three cases pertain to President Obama's central stated policies:

• Prevail in wars that the Armed Services are engaged in,
• Restore honest and effective banking regulation, and
• Implement health-care reform,

Therefore, one must conclude that senior US officers are actively undermining his presidency...

Not that one could conclude that similar officers were loyal to the Bush Presidency; this is not partisan, it is collapse of the frameworks of democratic government.

In that respect, one should recall that Senator Leahy, Chair of the US Senate Judiciary Committee, called already two years ago for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission". 

However, Truth and Reconciliation Commissions are instituted after tyrannies of various kinds are deposed.  Here, Leahy called for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, while such forces are still in power...  In fact, if one agrees that Senator Leahy is no dummy, one must conclude that Senator Leahy declared that the US government was hijacked...
____
At 04:08 AM 1/14/2011, John Doe wrote:
Joe -

Hope all is well with you. Thanks for taking the time to e-mail me. Keep up the good work. You are helping make a difference.

John Doe

Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:42:56 Joseph Zernik wrote

---

Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:42:56
To: jz12345@earthlink.net
From: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court - Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - Appears as Deliberately Invalid Litigation

Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court - Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - Appears as Deliberately Invalid Litigation

The docket of the case reveals records that are inconsistent with litigation conducted in compliance with the US law.  The clerk of the court and US Department of Justice Freedom of Information Office were requested to provide copies of the electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the clerk of the records in the case.

See the complete Press release at:
[1] 11-01-13 Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court - Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law - Appears as Deliberately Invalid Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46836277/

11-01-13 Press Release: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius in the US District Court – Constitutional Challenge to the Obama Health Care Law – Appears as Deliberately Invalid Litigation // El presunto fraude en los EE.UU. Tribunal de Justicia en litigios de Obama plan de salud // 据称在美国的欺诈诉讼法院在奥巴马医疗计划

The docket of the case reveals records that are inconsistent with litigation conducted in compliance with the US law.  The clerk of the court and US Department of Justice Freedom of Information Office were requested to provide copies of the electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the clerk of the records in the case.

US Judge Henry Hudson

Los Angeles, January 13 � Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have filed requests for records in the litigation of Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia under � the constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law.

Requests were filed with:
�        The Clerk of the US District Court, Fernando Galino, [[i]] and
�        The US Department of Justice Freedom of Information Office.[[ii]]

The requests have been filed, since the litigation records [[iii]] revealed serious defects, which raised serious concerns that the case was conducted as deliberately invalid litigation: [[iv]]
�        No valid summons was found in the case docket, only summons, which was missing the seal of the court. The US law requires that the summons be issued with a signature of the clerk of the court and under the seal of the court. Absent valid summons, the litigation is invalid from its start.=
�        No valid record of execution or waiver of execution of the service of summons was found in the docket.  Absent valid execution within the time prescribed by law, the case should have been dismissed by the court.
�        US Judge Henry Hudson was listed as Presiding Judge in the case.  However, no valid Assignment Order for Judge Henry Hudson was found in the case docket.  Without a valid Assignment Order, a judge has no authority to preside in a specific case.
�        The Minutes, which were found in the case docket, listed no name of a Deputy Clerk, and should therefore be deemed invalid.
�        The case was reported as terminated, and was listed as terminated in the case docket, but no valid Judgment was found in the docket, and no Judgment was listed in the Judgment Index of the Court.

In addition, request was filed with Clerk of the US Court Fernando Galino to certify the docket of the case. [[v]]

The litigation docket, as it appears in the online public access system of the court (PACER) makes it impossible for the public to distinguish between court records and litigation that are valid and effectual and ones that are null and void.  The reason for the ambiguity is that all electronic certificates of authentication/ attestation by the clerks are excluded from the system. Therefore, the requests, which were filed with the Clerk and the US Department of Justice Freedom of Information Office, are primarily for the electronic certificates (NEFs � Notices of Electronic Filing) in the case.

Human Rights Alert (NGO) has recently provided evidence of conduct of invalid litigation in two other high visibility cases:
�        Log Cabin Republicans v USA � pertaining to the �Don�t Ask, Don�t Tell� Policy.  The case is now pending before the US Court of Appeals, 9^th Circuit.  The Clerk of the US District Court, Central District of California, refused to certify the PACER docket in the case, and also refused to provide copies of the certificates of authentication/attestation of the purported judgment in the case.
Human Rights Alert filed a Motion to Intervene in the appeals, claiming that the appeal should be dismissed. [[vi]]
�        SEC v Bank of America Corporation  - pertaining to the taking by bank executives of ~$5 billions in bonuses as part of the Merrill Lynch- Bank of America merger, while providing stockholders false reports in the matter.  Human Rights Alert claimed that the invalid litigation in the case was conducted in the case to cover-up alleged criminality by senior Bank of America and US officers, including BofA President Brian Moynihan and Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke.
Human Rights Alert filed a request for impeachment of Judge Jed Rakoff, who appeared as presiding judge in the case.  [[vii]]

In both Log Cabin Republicans v USA and SEC v Bank of America Corporation the PACER dockets were inexplicable as dockets of litigation conducted in compliance with the law of the United States.

Human Rights Alert has also proposed a three-fold approach for correcting the conditions that are today found in the US courts:
�        Restoring key provisions of the Salary Act of 1919, which placed the clerks of the US courts under the authority of the US Attorney General.
At the time, conditions in the US courts were described in the US Congress as "a burlesque", and the Salary Act was later credited as a key measure in restoring the integrity of the US Courts.  It restored the role of the clerks as checks and balances vis a vis judicial corruption, which was the reason for existence of the clerks since the late middle ages.  However, by the mid 20th century the clerks were again placed under the authority of the judiciary.
�        Enactment of federal rules for electronic court records.
The evidence shows that the clerks of the courts today do not deem themselves accountable for the integrity of electronic court records.  The online public access and case management systems of the courts (PACER and CM/ECF) were implemented over the past couple of decades in both state and federal courts. In the process, a sea change was introduced in court procedures, which had been established for centuries, and were the core of Due Process. However, all courts that were examined, without exception, failed to publish Rules of Courts pertaining to the new procedures, in alleged violation of Due Process rights.  Moreover, all courts that were examined deny public access to various records in the electronic case management systems in alleged violation of First Amendment rights. Therefore, the US Congress should perform its duties and establish the systems by law.  Implicit in such laws should be the requirement for publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of such systems prior to their implementation.
�        Keeping a �watchful eye� on the US court.
The public at large and computing professionals, in particular, must assume their civic duties in ongoing monitoring the integrity of electronic court records. The common law right to inspect and to copy judicial records was reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) as inherent to the First Amendment.  In doing so, the US Supreme Court said that the right was necessary for the public "to keep a watchful eye on government".  Today, the public must keep a watchful eye particularly on electronic court records.  No other measures could substitute for public scrutiny of court records in safeguarding the integrity of the courts and Human Rights in the Digital Era.

Notice was also provided to the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
_____
LINKS
[i] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia � Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law � Request for Litigation Records from the Clerk of the Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46832863/
[ii] 11-01-14 FOIA Request in re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia � Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law � Litigation Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46833085/
[iii] 11-01-13 Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia � Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law � Litigation Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46829272/
[iv] 11-01-13 Notes in re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia � Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law � Litigation Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46830163/
[v] 11-01-13 Re: Commonwealth of Virginia v Sebelius (3:10-cv-00188) in the US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia � Constitutional challenge to the Obama Health Care Law � Request for Certification of the PACER Docket
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46834168/
[vi] 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
[vii] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
____

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  

11-01-12 RE: Rabbi Susan Leider of Temple Beth Am, Los Angeles, Endorsed the Petition: Stay the Execution of Kevin Cooper, Impose a Moratorium on the Death Penalty in California // aclaraciones en re: Aprobaciones por los líderes religiosos // 在重新澄清：由宗教领袖背书

RE: ENDORSEMENTS BY RELIGOUS LEADERS ON THE PETITION TO STAY THE EXECUTION OF KEVIN COOPER, IMPOSE A MORATORIUM ON THE DEATH PENALTY IN CALIFORNIA:
Please sign the petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/

Dear Mr Doe:

As clarification, Rabbi Susan Leider indeed endorsed the petition, but the announcement was by this writer, with no prior coordination with Rabbi Leider (as were the announcements regarding other religious leaders, who have signed the petition).

Needless to say, I concur with every word you said below, and hope that you could help recruit additional religious leaders to endorse the petition, from California and beyond.

Thanks again for Rabbi Leider for her endorsement.

JZ

11-01-12 Welcome Dominican Republic - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenida Republica Dominicana - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎多米尼加共和国- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Dominican Republic Visited January 13, 2011

11-01-12 House Republicans Remove "Civil Rights" and "Labor" From Committee Names // Los Republicanos Eliminar "Derechos Civiles" y "Trabajo" de nombres Comité // 众议院共和党删除“公民权利“和“劳动“的委员会任命

House Republicans Remove "Civil Rights" and "Labor" From Committee Names
Nadia Prupis, Truthout: "House Republicans have renamed several Congressional committees by changing or removing certain hot-button words such as 'civil rights' and 'labor' from their titles. The Education and Labor Committee became the Education and Workforce Committee, while the Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties is set to be renamed the Constitution Subcommittee."
Read the Article 

11-01-12 Welcome France - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Francia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎法国- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor France Visited January 12, 2011

11-01-12 Assange Defense in London - US Human Rights Violations... // Defensa Assange en Londres - EE.UU. Violaciónes Derechos Humanos ... // 国防部在伦敦阿桑格- 美国侵犯人权...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Information Clearing House Newsletter

News You Won't Find On CNN
January 11, 2011
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What U.S. "Justice" Signifies Around The World

By Glenn Greenwald

We have the spectacle of Julian Assange's lawyers citing the Obama administration's policies of rendition and indefinite detention at Guantanamo as a reason why human rights treaties bar his extradition to any country (such as Sweden) which might transfer him to American custody.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27245.htm

===

WikiLeaks Founder Said to Fear 'Illegal Rendition' to U.S.:

 

Lawyers acting for Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks antisecrecy group, said on Tuesday they would argue against a demand for his extradition to Sweden on the grounds that he might subsequently face "illegal rendition" to the United States, risking imprisonment at Guantánamo Bay, or even the death penalty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/world/europe/12assange.html?_r=1

11-01-12 The Dollar on the Skids - Financial Recklessness // El dólar de los patines - Imprudencia financiero // 关于走下坡路美元- 金融鲁莽

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Information Clearing House Newsletter

News You Won't Find On CNN
January 11, 2011
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

===

US Dollar 'Unstable' Reserve Currency

 

By Press TV

 

Sarkozy considered the current model which uses the US dollar as the primary reserve currency as "unstable" and stressed that it "makes part of the world dependent on American monetary policy."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27239.htm

===

Wage Drop Has Been Worst In Decades

 

By William Alden

 

Wages for American workers have fallen dramatically since the financial crisis, in what will likely turn out to be the worst such plunge since the Great Depression, the Wall Street Journal reports.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27241.htm

===

Geithner Says U.S. Insolvent

 

By Michael S. Rozeff

 

The U.S. government is insolvent. Who says so? Timothy F. Geithner, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27238.htm

===

Reagan Budget Director Warns
America Has 'Reached The Point Of No Return

 

By Nathan Diebenow

 

"There are no real seriously armed enemies left in the world that can possibly justify an $800 billion national defense and security establishment, including Homeland Security."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27237.htm

 

11-01-12 Welcome Germany - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Alemania - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎德国- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Germany Visited January 12, 2011

11-01-12 Welcome the Russian Federation - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Russia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎俄罗斯联邦- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Russian Federation Visited January 12, 2011

11-01-10 Rabbi Susan Leider of Temple Beth Am, Los Angeles, Endorsed the Petition: Stay the Execution of Kevin Cooper, Impose a Moratorium on the Death Penalty in California // Rabina Susan Leider de Bet Templo Am, Los Angeles, hiza suya la petición: suspender la ejecución de Kevin Cooper, imponer una moratoria sobre la pena de muerte en California // 拉比寺贝丝苏珊莱德早上，洛杉矶，赞同该请愿书说：留在凯文库珀执行处以死刑的加州暂缓

Rabbi Susan Leider
Temple Beth Am, Los Angeles

Rabbi Susan Leider of Temple Beth Am, Los Angeles, Endorsed the Petition: Stay the Execution of Kevin Cooper, Impose a Moratorium on the Death Penalty in California

Los Angeles, January 10 - Rabbi Susan Leider of Temple Beth Am, Los Angeles, endorsed  the call upon California Governor Jerry Brown to:

• Stay the execution of Kevin Cooper
• Impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.

The petition was also endorsed by:

• Rabbi Sharon Brous, Ikar Synagogue, Los Angeles;
• Dr William Epps, Pastor of the Second Baptist Church, Los Angeles;
• Rabbi Michael Lerner, of Beyt Tikkun, Berkeley;
• Rabbi Chaim Seidler-Feller, UCLA Hillel; 
• Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz, Uri L'Tzedek (Orthodox Social Justice Movement), and Rabbi Sharon Brous, Ikar Synagogue, Los Angeles .

As noted in the petition itself, reasonable doubts remained regarding the guilt of Kevin Cooper, which led five federal judges to take issue with their colleagues' decision to put a stop to Cooper's appeals.

Corruption of the justice system in California has been repeatedly documented for over a decade in official, scholarly, and media reports:

• Thousand of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly black and Latinos - victims of court corruption in Los Angeles County, which was uncovered in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000), remain imprisoned to this date.
• The official Blue Ribbon Report (2006) recorded the Judges of the Los Angeles Court objecting to their release, since it would lead to "collapse of the justice system". 
• The official Blue Ribbon Report (2006) concluded that the Los Angeles Superior Court "must be investigated". 
• Widespread corruption of government in general, and the courts in particular, in San Bernardino County was repeatedly reported by media.
• The United Nations Human Rights Council report (2010) referred to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
• The United Nations Human Rights Council report (2010) also called upon the US to abolish the death penalty.

During his tenure as California Attorney General, prior to his election as Governor, Jerry Brown refused to take action regarding corruption of the California courts. 

One of his first decisions (December 2010) as Governor Elect was to eliminate the state's Office of Inspector General.

The petition calls upon California Governor Jerry Brown to stay the execution of Kevin Cooper and to impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.

Given the widespread corruption of the California government, religious leaders have been asked to spearhead the call for corrective actions.
___

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AT:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/
___



Target: California Governor Jerry Brown:
We, the undersigned call upon Governor Schwarzenegger to stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California:

1. Reasonable doubts remain regarding the guilt of Kevin Cooper
The legal effort to prevent the execution of Kevin Cooper has run its course. Unless the governor of California intervenes, Cooper is likely to be put to death next year for the brutal 1983 murders of a Chino Hills couple, their 10-year-old daughter and an 11-year-old houseguest.
Just one eyewitness survived the horrific scene, a 9-year-old boy whose throat had been sliced. His initial account of the attack is one of many disturbing contradictions that led five federal judges to take issue with their colleagues' decision to put a stop to Cooper's appeals.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/12/EDG81GP0I7.DTL#ixzz18BGZmaQA

2. Corruption of the justice system in California was well-documented for over a decade.
Official, scholarly, and media reports have documented the corruption of the justice system in California for over a decade.
Reports of the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000) established that thousands of innocent persons were falsely imprisonment for long terms through framing of evidence, extraction of confessions under torture, and perjury of police.  The victims - the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - mostly blacks and Latinos, were estimated by various groups at 10,000-30,000.  Regardless, judges of the Los Angeles Court have refuses to free the Rampart-FIPs, and the US Department of Justice refuses to take action either.

Read more: Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review; Rampart-FIPs - Rampart First Trial PBS Frontline: Rampart False Imprisonments; 06-07-15 Rampart Reconsidered: LAPD's Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006); 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action; 09-09-11-Former-San-Bernardino-County-Superior-Court-Presiding-Judge-Michael-Welch-suspect-in-real-estate-fraud-cases-under-the-guise-of-court-actions;   10-12-21 Brown to Eliminate State Office of Inspector General - Los Angeles Times

3. "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California was noted in a recent report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, which called upon the US to abolish the death penalty.As part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, official report noted %u201Ccorruption of the courts and the legal profession%u201D in California.
The United Nations Human Rights Council also called upon the United States to abolish the death penalty.

Read more: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ ;http://www.scribd.com/doc/42218232/

4.  Therefore, the Governor of California should stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.Under conditions that today prevail in the justice system in Los Angeles County and California, it is inconceivable to continue with executions.  California Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger should stop the execution of Kevin Cooper and impose a moratorium on the death penalty in California.
___
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AT:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-cooper-execution-end-death-penalty-in-caifornia/
___

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?*     "Innocent people remain in prison"*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."  
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

11-01-11 Welcome Taiwan - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Taiwan - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎台湾- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Taiwan Visited January 11, 2011

Request for Investigation, Impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick filed with US Congress pertaining to conduct of litigation of the Merrill Lynch BofA merger // Fraude en los EE.UU. Tribunales y Bancos // 欺诈在美国法院和银行

  

                        
US Judge Jed Rakoff; BofA President Brian Moynihan; SEC Chair Mary Schapiro

Request for Investigation, Impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick filed with US Congress pertaining to conduct of litigation in Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York

The US Government coerced merger of Merrill Lynch and BofA involved alleged criminality by US and BofA senior officers, including Brian Moynihan and Ben Bernanke.  US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick engaged in conduct of invalid litigation in alleged violation of the US law, and the publication of null and void court records in alleged violation of their Oaths of Office, as part of efforts to cover-up the alleged criminality by senior BofA and US officers.

Los Angeles, January 10 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD [[i]] filed with the US Congress Committees on the Judiciary, Banking Regulation, and Rules repeat request for impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick pertaining to conduct of litigation in Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation in the US District Court, Southern District of New York. [[ii]]

        New evidence was provided, derived from SEC's FOIA responses

The new request included new records, derived from Freedom of Information Act responses by SEC, as additional evidence in support of the request for impeachment: [[iii], [iv],[v]]
�         September 21, 2009 letter, as evidence of service of the complaint, but not of summons;
�         Invalid unsigned summons as to Bank of America Corporation, as summons issued by clerk;
�         Statements to the effect that there were no further responsive records pertaining to service/waiver of summons, other than the September 21, 2009 letter, no records of the unrecorded minutes, and no records of two off-the-record proceedings in the case.

Human Rights Alert (NGO) has previously filed requests for impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff and Ruby Krajick and detailed analysis of the litigation under Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation. [[vi],[vii],[viii]]

The requests for impeachments alleged that US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick colluded in:
�        Appearance of Judge Jed Rakoff as a Presiding Judge in the litigation with no Assignment Order and with no authority;
�        Conducting proceedings with no recorded minutes;
�        Conducting off the record proceedings;
�        Issuing rulings and orders on motions, which were never docketed;
�         Conducting the entire litigation in alleged violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
�         Construction of a false and deliberately misleading PACER docket in the case by unauthorized court personnel, and
�         Denial of access to the summons and to the electronic certificates of authentication/attestation (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing) of minutes, orders, and the judgments.

        Further evidence, not yet discovered was identified.

The request further alleged that additional evidence in support of the impeachments was likely to be found once the electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk pertaining to the minutes, pre-judgment orders, and judgment in the case are discovered.
The office of Clerk Ruby Krajick has refused repeated requests for access to the NEFs, to inspect and to copy, in alleged violation of First Amendment rights.
          
Cover-up of alleged criminality related to the merger of Merrill Lynch and BofA was the alleged motive of conduct of Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick

The matter underlying the litigation of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation is claimed of the highest public policy significance. It originated from events surrounding the merger of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America Corporation:
�         The wrongful coercion of the merger by senior US Government officers;
�        Taking of ~$5 billion in bonuses by banking executives, while providing stockholders and SEC false and deliberately misleading reports, and
�        The ouster of the then Bank of America General Counsel Timothy Mayopoulos in the midst of the merger negotiations, and his replacement by BRIAN MOYNIHAN, today Bank of America President, in order to facilitate such conduct.

The request for impeachment alleged criminality in the underlying matter by senior Bank of America officers including, but not limited to, President Brian Moynihan, and senior US officers including, but not limited to Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke in the matter.  The request for impeachment alleged that US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick engaged in false and deliberately misleading conduct in the litigation, in order to cover-up such alleged criminality.

Additional evidence of the alleged criminality related to Bank of American and President Brian Moynihan, and/or Chairman of the Federal Reserve was provided through records produced by then New York State Attorney General, [[ix]] through Dr Zernik's Affidavit in the matter, [[x]] and through complaints, previously filed, but never reviewed by SEC and the US Controller of the Currency. [[xi]]

        Additional evidence is expected this month through a WikiLeaks release

The request for impeachments has claimed that "there is no need for a WikiLeaks release in this matter, abundant reliable evidence already exists of criminality by Bank of America Corporation and its senior officers, and cover-up of the same by the US Court."  It has further claimed that unless conduct of the US courts is addressed, there is no chance of restoring honest banking regulation in the United States.

____

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/

LINKS
[i] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[ii] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
[iii] 10-09-09 SEC FOIA Response No. 10-03964-FOIA RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - a) September 21, 2009 letter evidencing service of the complaint upon Bank of America Corporation, and b) unsigned summons as the record of summons issued by clerk and summons as served
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46608559/
[iv] 10-12-17 SEC FOIA Response No. 11-01069-FOIA RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - again referring to the unsigned summons in SEC FOIA Response No. 10-03964-FOIA as the record of summons as issued by clerk
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45502385/
[v] 11-01-07 SEC's FOIA Additional Response No. 11-01069-FOIA RE: SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - clarifying that there are no records of a) the service/waiver of the summons as to Bank of America Corporation, b) the unrecorded minutes, c) the off the record proceedings.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46553546/
[vi] 10-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for Investigation, Impeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44669382/
[vii] 10-12-08 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation(1:09-cv-06829) - Request for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/
[viii] Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[ix] 09-04-23 RE: SEC v BAC (1:09-cv-06829) - State of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo Letter to US Congress and analysts' responses:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41079990/
[x] 09-09-09 SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) Dr Joseph Zernik's Affidavit and Appendices in opposition to settlement-then-pending-before the court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26910915/
[xi] 10-06-11 Complaints Filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency and SEC against Countrywide, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), and Brian Moynihan - alleging fraud and extortion on Dr Zernik, fraud on shareholders, on banking regulators, and on the US taxpayer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/

11-01-08 Jeremy Marks - Abused for Viedotaping Police Abuse in Los Angeles // Jeremy Marcas - Abuso de Viedotaping abusos de la policía en Los Angeles // 杰里米马克斯- 对于Viedotaping在洛杉矶警察滥用权力的滥用

US police wage war on cameras

SOURCE: http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-police-videotaping-cameras-freedom/

Today’s high tech world has made it a lot easier to videotape police, but it may have also made it more dangerous.

Cell phone video captured a tense confrontation at a bus stop between a student and a Los Angeles police officer last May. The incident landed 18 year-old Jeremy Marks in jail facing a possible seven year prison sentence.The problem, as the video shows, Marks did not have any physical contact with the officer. Marks’ crime was simply videotaping the police officer.

The video shows Marks standing near the police officer with his cell phone out.He was arrested a short time later and was stuck in jail because his family could not afford the $155,000 bail set by the judge.

A Google engineer, who heard the story, stepped in and paid for Marks’ bail so he could spend Christmas with his family.

This is not the first time that someone has faced major legal trouble after capturing a police officer on video.

Last April, Anthony Graber posted a video on You Tube, which showed a Maryland police officer pulling a gun on him. Days later, Graber was arrested and faced up to 16 years in prison for recording a cop. The official charges were violating wiretapping laws and possession of an intercept device.

Law enforcement is citing decades old laws to address technology that has only been around for a few years, leaving people uncertain of when recording becomes a crime.

http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-police-videotaping-cameras-freedom/

11-01-08 Welcome Malaysia - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Malaysia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎马来西亚- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Malaysia Visited January 9, 2011

11-01-08 US Judge, US Representative Shot // Juez de EE.UU., Representante de EE.UU. Asesinado // 美国法官，美国代表铅球

----------------------------------------
Breaking News Alert: Gunman who shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords purchased gun legally, law enforcement sources say
January 8, 2011 7:59:08 PM
----------------------------------------
According to law enforcement sources, Jared Loughner, the alleged Arizona gunman who shot Rep. Giffords and killed five others, including Federal judge John M. Roll, used a Glock 19, a semi-automatic pistol that was legally purchased on Nov. 30 at Sportman's Warehouse in Tucson.
http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/6041ZA/WLBRRR/9KDTNA/P2WUS5/XWILX/N9/h
For more information, visit washingtonpost.com
---------------------------------------

U.S. District Judge John Roll, the chief federal judge in Arizona, also was confirmed dead.
Update: Federal Judge, Congressional Aide, Child killed in shooting - NewsChannel 9 WSYR

Federal Judge JRoll faced death threats in 2009 after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit, the Arizona Republic reported John Roll Killed In Arizona Shooting | TPMMuckraker

Federal Judge John Roll Killed In Arizona Shooting | TPMMuckraker

When Roll ruled the case could go forward, Gonzales said talk-radio shows cranked up the controversy and spurred audiences into making threats. In one afternoon, Roll logged more than 200 phone calls. Callers threatened the judge and his family. They posted personal information about Roll online.
"They said, 'We should kill him. He should be dead,' " Gonzales said.
><>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Judge Roll in 2009, faced death threats after presiding over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed by illegal immigrants against an Arizona rancher. After Judge Roll ruled the case would be certified, threats came from talk-radio shows which fueled controversy and spurred audiences into making threats against the judge^[2].