11-01-18 Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States and alleged corruption of the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States // la presunta corrupción de la oficina del Secretario de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos // 涉嫌贪污了对美国最高法院书记办公室

  

  Scotus _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _____ _ _ William Windsor

Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States and alleged corruption of the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States


No signed orders and decisions can be found in the paper SCOTUS files; false and deliberately misleading dockets are published online by the office of the clerk; false and deliberately misleading letters are mailed by the office of the clerk.

Los Angeles, January 18 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, released records and correspondence regarding records of the Supreme Court of the United States, and alleged corruption of the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court.  Human Rights Alert has previously filed request for investigation of Staff Attorney Danny Bickell for alleged public corruption and deprivation of rights through the issuance of invalid letters with no authority, noticing parties of "denial" of their applications or petitions to the Supreme Court. [1]  Further evidence has been previously provided of alleged corruption of Clerk of the Court William Suter himself. [2]  Such evidence includes records, previously issued by the office of the clerk in Windsor v Maid of the Mist. [3-5]  Similar false records were issued by the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States in other cases as well, including, but not limited to, Fine v Sheriff and Taitz v McDonald. [6-13]

False and deliberately misleading court records are commonplace today in the United States

The pattern is similar in all courts which were examined:

• Judges issue deliberately invalid orders and judgments - with invalid certification by the judges and/or invalid authentication/attestation by the clerks.
• False and deliberately records are published online, to create the false perception of valid court actions.

There are some technical differences, depending on the specific court.

Records of the Supreme Court of the United States are no exception

The situation in SCOTUS is the same as in other state and US courts:

• False and deliberately misleading dockets are published online by the SCOTUS, were various decisions and orders are listed.
• Upon inspection of the paper court files of SCOTUS, no records are found of valid decisions or orders of the Court in numerous cases, which were listed in the online dockets.
• SCOTUS most likely secretly established a case management system.  In such case management system, it is likely that the justices sign digitally, by logging in and placing their votes.  It is likely that similar to all other courts, which were examined, the justices consider the records in the case management system the true, valid records of the court.  That is the likely explanation why one cannot find signed orders in the SCOTUS paper files.
• Like all other courts, which were examined, SCOTUS never published Rules of Court to establish the new procedures, involving its electronic case management system by law, in alleged violation of Due Process rights and the Rule Making Enabling Act. Moreover, the public has no access to the records in the case management system, in alleged violation of First Amendment rights.
• The office of Clerk William Suter routinely issues letters to parties, purportedly notices of orders or decision of SCOTUS, which are served with no record of the decision or order itself. Moreover, the letters are typically signed in a deliberately misleading, invlaid manner, by William Suter himself, by "Staff Attorney Danny Bickell" (not a deputy clerk), or other unauthorized court personnel.

Therefore, the public cannot tell which of the orders and decisions of SCOTUS, which are listed in the online dockets, are valid and effectual, and which ones are null and void.

The proposed solution involves actions by US Congress and vigilance by the public at large

The proposed solution is three-fold:

1) Restoring key provisions of the Salary Act of 1919   the clerks of the US courts under the authority of the US Attorney General.
At the time, conditions in the US courts were described in the US Congress as "a burlesque", and the Salary Act was credited as a key measure for restoration of integrity of the US Courts.  It restored the role of the clerks as checks and balances vis a vis judicial corruption, which was their reason for existence since the late middle ages.  However, by the mid 20th century the clerks were again placed under the authority of the judiciary.

2) Enactment of federal rules for electronic court records.
The evidence shows that the clerks of the courts today do not deem themselves accountable for the integrity of electronic court records, both the case management systems of the courts and the online public access systems.  The systems were implemented over the past two-three decades in both state and federal courts. In the process, a sea-change was introduced in court procedures, which had been established for centuries, and were the core of Due Process. However, all courts that were examined, without exception, failed to publish Rules of Courts pertaining to the new procedures, in alleged violation of Due Process rights.  Moreover, all courts that were examined deny public access to various records in the electronic case management systems in alleged violation of First Amendment rights. Therefore, the US Congress should perform its duties and establish the systems by law.  Implicit in such laws should be the requirement for publicly and legally accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of such systems prior to their implementation.

3) The public at large and in particular computing professionals must assume their civic duties in ongoing monitoring of the integrity of electronic court records.
The First Amendment right to inspect and to copy judicial records was reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) as inherent to the First Amendment.  In doing so, the US Supreme Court said that the right was necessary for the public "to keep a watchful eye on government".  Today, the public must keep a watchful eye particularly on electronic court records.  No other measures could substitute for public scrutiny of court records in safeguarding the integrity of the courts.

LINKS:
[1] 10-07-01 In re:Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell Alleging Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
[2] 10-11-25 William Suter - Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States - Evidence of Public Corruption
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44034212/
[3] 10-12-05-Windsor-v-Maid-of-the-Mist-Corporation-et-al (10-411) in-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States-Crooked-Courts-and-Order-Entered-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44817092/
[4] 10-12-10-Maid-of-the-Mist-Corporation-et-al-v-William-Windsor-1-06-cv-00714-in-the-US-District-Court-Northern-District-of-Georgia-Compiled-records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45084688/
[5] 12-12-11-Maid-of-the-Mist-Corporation-et-al-v-William-Windsor-10-10139-in-the-US-Court-of-Appeals-11th-Circuit-Compiled-Records-of-Appeal-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45080970/
[6] 10-03-22-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-Copy-of-the-Application-from-US-Supreme-Court-file-failing-to-show-note-of-its-March-12-2010-denial-by-Justice-Ken
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30306238/
[7] Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-US-Supreme-Court-online-docket-showing-March-12-2010-denial-by-Justice-Kennedy-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304940/10-04-21
[8] 10-04-22-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-Zernik-Declaration-Re-Danny-Bickell-and-Filing-at-the-US-Supreme-Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30366354/
[9] 10-07-01-In-re-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-Complaint-against-US-Supreme-Court-Counsel-Danny-Bickell-Alleging-Public-Corruption-and-Deprivation-of-Rig
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
[10] 10-08-26-Fine-v-Baca-09-A827-at-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States-Declaration-of-Joseph-Zernik-Re-Letter-dated-April-29-2010-by-Supreme-Co
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36466636/
[11] 10-04-21-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-in-the-US-Supreme-Court-List-of-Orders-for-March-8-15-2010-failing-to-show-the-March-12-2010-denial-of-Fine-v
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30306342/
[12] 10-07-21-Taitz-v-MacDonald-10-A56-at-the-US-Supreme-Court-Failure-of-Associate-Justice-Clarence-Thomas-to-dispose-of-a-matter-before-him-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34657461/
[13] 10-07-25-Taitz-v-Macdonald-10-A56-at-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-United-States-Records-of-Denial-of-the-Application-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835883/

RECENT CORRESPONDENCE WITH MR WILLIAM WINDSOR IN RE: SOCTUS DECISIONS IN WINDSOR V MAID OF THE MIST
_____

Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:59:43 +0200
To:
Subject: Re: Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States

Dear Mr Windsor:

Thank you for your note. I agree with some of your conclusions, but not all.

• The basic problem is in your opening sentence: "The United States Supreme Court issued three orders today ".
• I doubt that you would find any valid record of such "orders" issued by SCOTUS in your case.  The online docket may say so, but the online docket in not a valid court record.

Your help would be greatly appreciated:

• In providing copies of whatever records you may get by mail from the office of William Suter, Clerk of the SCOTUS.
• In gaining access to the SCOTUS files in your case, and copying any records that may be found there, which were generated by SCOTUS (usually, papers by parties are on the pocket on one side, the paper by SCOTUS on the other).  It is also important to photocopy the face page of your application(s), since the Local Rules of SCOTUS permit a justice to inscribe the denial of an application on the face page of the application.  The face page of the application may also show stamps and signatures by the office of the clerk.

Thanks again for your help in the past.

Joseph Zernik

At 07:12 PM 1/18/2011, William Windsor wrote:

The United States Supreme Court issued three orders today that give federal judges carte blanche to void the Constitution of the United States


Go to http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and search Windsor, William and/or 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690.


Ladies and gentlemen, there is now no question whatsoever that the entire federal judicial system is corrupt.  My petitions were unopposed, filled with hundreds of pages of proof and sworn under penalty of perjury affidavits.  Our so-called Supreme Court says it is okay for federal judges to ignore the facts, ignore the law, ignore the Constitution, and commit as many criminals acts as they choose while hiding behind their robes.


When I began my efforts, I naively thought there would be an honest judge somewhere.  I was wrong and stupid.


I will file petitions for rehearing, and I will sue every cotton picking one of these A$$holes.   It likely won�t get me anywhere, but I want everything that I can get on a record somewhere.  I am writing to the Chief Judge at each Judicial District and Circuit in an effort to see if any of them are honest.  If honest, they have a duty to report all of the laws broken by all the judges, including the Supremes.  If they do nothing, I will sue all of them, too.


I still can�t think very clearly after all the medical problems, so I apologize for not remembering this.  Several people suggested that I file complaints with the U.S. military and a human rights organization.  If you can remind me who/where, I will get those going.


Since it is unlikely that anyone in the judiciary anywhere will do anything about this, I guess taking it to the people may be the only hope.   I will get my book written and on display at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and elsewhere ASAP.  If any of you want to write a chapter, please do so, and send it to me.  I�d like the book to be about more than my experiences.


Second, I�d like to come up with more ideas for fixing the system.  Here are the ideas I had a while back for fixing the system: http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/123-some-ideas-for-fixing-the-judicial-corruption-problem  Please send me a separate email titled Ideas for Fixing the System, and I will try to incorporate all the good ideas.


Folks, I am absolutely flabbergasted.  I lived most of my 62 years believing there was at least significant integrity in our government.  I actually believed we were protected by the Constitution.  We have a crisis of the largest possible proportions on our hands.  We definitely live in a police state.  The most corrupt of governments around the world have nothing on us!


For those who want the background, here are articles on  my website with all of my petitions and proof:


http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/127-supreme-court-says-judicial-corruption-is-not-worthy


http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/103-petition-for-recusal-of-judge-william-s-duffey-us-supreme-court


http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/104-petition-for-recusal-of-judges-of-the-eleventh-circuit-court-of-appeals-us-supreme-court


http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php/news/blog-of-william-m-windsor/105-petition-for-recusal-of-judge-orinda-d-evans-us-supreme-court


William M. Windsor

____

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

11-01-17 US and State Judges Likely among Swiss Bank Accounts Holders // EE.UU. y el Estado Jueces probable entre los titulares de cuentas de banco suizo // 美国联邦及州法官可能在瑞士银行帐户持有人

 
1) 2009 UBS-AG whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld
2) 2011 WikiLeaks Assange receiving the Swiss banking data

US and State Judges Likely among Swiss Bank Accounts Holders
Los Angeles, January 17 - in view of the pending WikiLeaks release of Swiss banking data, [[i]] Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, suggest that significant number of US and state judges are likely to be among US citizens holding numbered bank accounts in Switzerland.

Review of numerous cases in the US and state courts shows a tight alliance between judges and large financial institutions, in disregard of the judges' oaths of office, through the conduct of alleged Fraud on the Courts in litigations involving financial institutions. [[ii],[iii]] Such conduct undermines the stated US government efforts to establish honest and effectual banking regulation.

Growing body of evidence suggests that both US and state judges have accepted financial benefits from large financial institutions:

•   In 2008 Dr Zernik filed requests with California Judge Terry Friedman (Los Angeles Superior Court), US Judge Virginia Phillips, and US Magistrate Carla Woehrle (US District Court, Central District of California) for statements on the record regarding financial benefits to them or family members residing with them from such institutions (pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics).  All three refused to provide such statements.
• In 2009 whistle-blower Bradley Birkenfeld led to the discovery that an estimated 40,000 US wealthy citizens were holding Swiss numbered accounts with UBS-AG.  Birkenfeld was swiftly sentenced by a US court to years in federal prison. [[iv]]  He was never able to collect rewards provided by the False Claims Act and stated US policies, which could have amounted to billions of US dollars.  The criminal prosecution of the culprits - banking executives - was never materialized, and the US government negotiated an agreement with the Swiss government, according to which the names of the vast majority of the offenders were never released by UBS-AG.
• Regardless of mounting credible evidence of racketeering by Bank of America and its senior executives, including Brian Moynihan, US banking regulation agencies refuse to take action. [[v],[vi],[vii]]  It is claimed that conduct of such agencies is caused, at least in part, from the realization that under conditions that prevail today in the US courts, there is no way to prosecute banking executives.

Human Rights Alert suggests that US officials in general, and state and US judges, in particular, are likely to be among the Swiss accounts holders. Moreover, a Swiss law, which would prohibit deposits by US government officers while in office in Swiss bank accounts, is likely to materially affect restoration of US government and US financial markets integrity and stability. 

Through the pending release of both US and Swiss banking records WikiLeaks is therefore likely to support effective banking regulation in the United States, where US agencies and the US courts are acting in disregard of the law.     

LINKS:
[i] 11-01-17 Swiss Whistle Blower Hands Bank Data to WikiLeaks
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47052191/
[ii] Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[iii] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
[iv] 09-08-25 UBS AG Whistle Blower Birkenfeld Imprisoned
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47053350/
[v] 10-05-05 Countrywide, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), and its President Brian Moynihan - Compilation of Records - Evidence of Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
[vi] 10-06-11 Complaints Filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency and SEC against Countrywide, Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), and Brian Moynihan - alleging fraud on shareholders, on banking regulators, and on the US taxpayer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32907453/
[vii] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency and US Dept of Justice Inspector General
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
____

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

11-01-17 Swiss whistleblower hands bank data to WikiLeaks // Suiza manos informante datos bancarios a WikiLeaks // 瑞士银行的数据举报人手中维基解密

Swiss whistleblower hands bank data to WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks Assange receiving the Swiss banking data

(Reuters) - A former Swiss private banker handed over data on hundreds of offshore bank account holders to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Monday, saying he wanted to draw attention to financial abuses.

Rudolf Elmer, 55, headed the office of Julius Baer in the Cayman Islands until he was fired by the bank in 2002. He is scheduled to go on trial in Switzerland on Wednesday for breaching bank secrecy.

Swiss national Elmer handed Assange the data at a news conference at a media club in London. The two yellow and blue discs contain information on around 2,000 banking clients, both individuals and companies, he said, declining to reveal further details on the data.

"Working in the Cayman Islands I realized that something was wrong... I want to let our society know what I do know because it's damaging our society in a way that money is moved away by financial institutions, multinational conglomerates and high-net-worth individuals, money is hidden in offshore ventures," Elmer told a room packed with reporters.

Julius Baer has accused Elmer of embarking on a vendetta against the company. Its shares fell more than 3 percent on Monday and traders cited the WikiLeaks link as a potential factor.

VETTING INFORMATION

WikiLeaks will take at least "a couple of weeks" to vet the data before publishing it, Assange said. Vetting will be done by themselves, media organizations and other partners to protect sources.

"We have a four-year publishing history. We have never been wrong ... so far as we are aware in relation to anything we have published," said Assange, who is on bail in Britain and fighting extradition to Sweden where he faces questioning over alleged sex crimes. WikiLeaks may also hand over some of the material to Britain's Serious Fraud Office, he added.

In 2007 Elmer became one of the first whistleblowers to use WikiLeaks, which angered U.S. authorities last year by publishing hundreds of secret diplomatic cables it had obtained.

Assange said the data Elmer had provided previously about the Cayman Islands revealed "corrupt practices" and "clear asset-hiding." He said he expected similar revelations from the new data.

Julius Baer denounced Elmer for waging a campaign to discredit the bank and its customers.

"After his demands (including financial compensation) in connection with the dismissal could not be satisfied, Mr Elmer embarked in 2004 on a personal intimidation campaign and vendetta against Julius Baer," the bank said in a statement.

"The aim of his activities was and is to discredit Julius Baer as well as clients in the eyes of the public."

(Editing by Noah Barkin)

11-01-17 US Dollar as International Currency - "Product of the Past" // EE.UU. dólar como moneda internacional - "producto del pasado" // 美元作为国际货币 -“对过去的产品“

Regardless of financial recklessness by the US government, the Chinese government is doing its best to affect soft landing, rather than a crash of the US economy and the US Dollar.
Of note, the  report, copied below, which featured prominently in international media, was difficult to find or absent from US media. The same is true of the reports of the signing in December 2010 of an agreement by China and Russia, not to denominate any international trades in US Dollar any longer, but by either nations currency.
JZ

'A product of the past': China's president says dollar should no longer be world's top currency

By DANIEL BATES 
Last updated at 4:44 PM on 17th January 2011

• Comments (40)
• Add to My Stories

China’s president today raised grave questions over the future of the dollar by claiming it should no longer be used as the world’s reserve currency.

Hu Jintao said that using the American currency as the default for international trade and investment was a ‘product of the past’.

In unusually frank comments he said that even though the arrangement had stood in place since the end of Second World War, now was the time to reassess.

Tense: President Obama and China's President Hu Jintao hold a meeting at the G-20 summit in Seoul last November. The two men meet again in Washington this week

The statement will be seen as another sign of growing Chinese confidence after the Asian giant emerged relatively unscathed from the financial crisis.

America by comparison is more than $14 trillion in debt, a sizeable chunk of it financed by the Chinese.

Tomorrow Mr Hu and Mr Obama are due to meet for talks at the White House in which the so-called ‘currency wars’ will be among the topics up for discussion.

China claims that America keeping its interest rates low is causing inflation around the world, including to its own currency, the yuan.

America argues that it must do so to encourage the U.S. economy to grow, which will be good news for China and the rest of the world.

U.S. officials also claim China is deliberately keeping the yuan lower than it should be, which is harming competitiveness for poorer countries.

In the interview Mr Hu issued a veiled attack when he said that U.S. monetary policy ‘has a major impact on global liquidity and capital flows and therefore, the liquidity of the U.S. dollar should be kept at a reasonable and stable level’.

But he added: ‘The current international currency system is the product of the past’.

Elsewhere Mr Hu sought a more conciliatory tone and tried to paper over some of the differences that have divided the U.S. and China of late.

‘There is no denying that there are some differences and sensitive issues between us,’ he said.

‘We both stand to gain from a sound China-U.S. relationship, and lose from confrontation.’

And he admitted that it it is unlikely the yuan will take over from the dollar any time soon.

‘It takes a long time for a country's currency to be widely accepted in the world,’ he said.

It is unusual for Mr Hu to speak to foreign media and only responded to written questions asked by the Wall St Journal and the Washington Post that were handed to him by his foreign ministry.

The last time he spoke to the American media was in 2008, whilst his latest comments to Western media in general were to a French and Portugese newspaper in November last year.

Tensions between Beijing and Washington have recently flared over China’s refusal to condemn North Korea for its attack on the South.

Chinese officials reacted with fury when the White House congratulated Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

In addition, the first clear pictures recently emerged of China’s prototype stealth fighter in a further sign of the country’s growing military power.

The photographs apparently showed the J-20 making a high speed taxi test, which is one of the last steps before a test flight.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1347984/A-product-past-Chinas-president-says-dollar-longer-worlds-currency.html#ixzz1BLXC1nGS

11-01-18 An End in Sight to Foreclosure Fraud in the Courts of Maryland? // Un final a la vista de Fraude ejecución de una hipoteca en los tribunales de Maryland? // 在马里兰州法院尾视线赎欺诈？

Maryland seems to be following Massachusetts in putting an end to foreclosure fraud in the courts.

In California, where the number of such foreclosures is much higher, the courts go on with the looting...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Information Clearing House Newsletter

News You Won't Find On CNN
 January 17, 2011
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10,000 GMAC Foreclosures Stopped in Maryland:

In a major ruling Friday, a coalition of nonprofit defense lawyers and consumer protection advocates in Maryland successfully got over 10,000 foreclosure cases managed by GMAC Mortgage tossed out.
 http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/01/16/10000-gmac-foreclosures-stopped-in-maryland/

...if the Ibanez case, which questions the right for banks to foreclose at all, can be broadly applied, those rates will drop even further. And Georgetown Law Professor Adam Levitin thinks may be the case.

In Ibanez, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court noted that PSA was insufficient to serve as an assignment of the loan because what was presented as the affiliated loan schedule:

“did not include property addresses, names of mortgagors, or any number that corresponds to the loan number or servicing number on the LaRace mortgage. Wells Fargo contends that a loan with the LaRace property’s zip code and city is the LaRace mortgage loan because the payment history and loan amount matches the LaRace loan.”

So how do other PSAs fare under the Ibanez metric? I’ve been looking at them, and it seems that there are lots of RMBS deals where the schedules in the PSAs are possibly insufficient to meet the Ibanez standard. And that means that there are lots of RMBS trusts that might not be able to successfully foreclose in Massachusetts or maybe in any other title theory state.

11-01-18 Welcome United Kingdon - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Reino Unido - Visitante Mas Recietne! // 欢迎联合国登- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor United Kingdom Visited January 18, 2011

10-01-17 Welcome the Russian Federation // Bienvenido Russia - Visitante Mas Reciented! // 欢迎俄罗斯联邦

Last New Visitor Russian Federation Visited January 17, 2011

11-01-17 Origins of the Robber Baron Era // Los orígenes de la era barón ladrón // 起源时代的强盗男爵

Thom Hartmann | Wal-Mart Is Not a Person
Thom Hartmann, Berrett-Koehler Publishers: "We the People are the first three words of the Preamble to the Constitution; and from its adoption until the Robber Baron Era in the late nineteenth century, people meant human beings. In the 1886 Santa Clara case, however, the court reporter of the Supreme Court proclaimed in a 'headnote‚' - a summary or statement added at the top of the court decision, which is separate from the decision and has no legal force whatsoever - that the word person in law and, particularly, in the Constitution, meant both humans and corporations."
Read the Article

11-01-17 Martin Luther King Day // Dias de Martin Luther King //马丁路德金纪念日

"In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."

11-01-17 Robbing of the American People // Robar del pueblo estadounidense // 抢劫美国人民

Home price drops exceed Great Depression:

 Zillow: Home prices fell for the 53rd consecutive month in November, taking the decline past that of the Great Depression for the first time in the prolonged housing slump, according to Zillow.
 http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70961E20110111?

===

The Foreclosure Dump:

Today's report from RealtyTrac serves as a warning to big banks, Fannie, Freddie and local communities; The foreclosure glut is coming, and they'd better be ready to get rid of that glut in a big way.
 http://www.cnbc.com/id/41059824/?

11-01-17 Welcome France - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Francia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎法国- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor France Visited January 17, 2011

11-01-15 More on Corruption of the Courts in Los Angeles, San Bernardino Counties, California // Más sobre la corrupción de los tribunales en Los Angeles, San Bernardino, California // 就在洛杉矶法院腐败更多，圣伯纳迪诺县，加利福尼亚州

 
RE: Corruption of the Courts and Corrupt Records in the California and US Courts

Dear Ms Figgs:

I am sorry, but there is nothing I can do to help.  My commitment is for discovering, archiving, and disseminating records of court corruption.

The pattern is similar in both the California and the US courts:

• Deliberately invalid summons are issued at the commencement of the litigation,
• Judges preside with no assignment orders and with no authority at all. 
• Judges later issue deliberately invalid orders and judgments - with invalid authentication/attestation.
• False and deliberately records are published online, to create the false perception of valid court actions.

However, there are some technical differences.

In the California Courts, which are your interest the following are the records I am interested in:

• Summons as issued by clerk
• Evidence of execution of summons
• Assignment Order of the judge.
• Critical Orders in the case (any order pertaining to appointment of Receiver, Debtor Examiner, Commissioner, Referree)
• Judgment
• Register of Actions (California Civil Docket - not the records that are published online and have no validity).
• Authentication/Attestation records of the above.

Regarding authentication/attestation, in the California courts these two functions are split:

• Typically the winning party authenticates through Proof of Service (which is typically deliberately invalid in such cases, e.g. listing false date, earlier than the date of the authenticated order or judgment, or unsigned)
• The attestation is through the Minutes, issued by the Clerk, stating "Judge signed this date order/judgment...".  (which is typically deliberately invalid in such cases - unsigned "Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry by the Clerk" respective to such minutes).

Regarding authentication/attestation in the US courts,these functions are combined:

• Authentication and attestation are through the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing).  

Please see link below on how to gain access to both California and US court records. [1]

If you obtain these records for me from the clerk of the California Court in San Bernardino County, I would be glad to examine them, provide you my opinion, and post your case online.

However, you should be aware that the sheriffs collude in the corruption, and would apply force to execute invalid court orders and judgments.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
LINKS:
[1]

 Cookbook Recipe: How to examine the validity, or lack thereof, in records of the US District Courts and US Courts of Appeals, in 4 easy steps:

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2010/12/10-12-25-cookbook-recipe-invalid-cases.html

[2] Detailed instruction on how to gain access to records in the US courts:

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2010/12/10-12-05-human-rights-alert-ngo-seeks.html

Any help by pro se filers (in particular, habeas corpus filers), in documenting invalid cases in the US courts, would be gratefully received.

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345  
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____
At 11:22 PM 1/15/2011, Jacquie Figg wrote:

Sorry to trouble you again but you may also be interested to know that my discoveries shoe that the Judicial Council is laudering titles that's why they use the Unlawful Detainer Court to evict homeowners. The UD court was specifically designed for settling issues that arise from the master servant relationship, that is landlord/tenant not secured party/debtor. The difference is devastating whereas a tenant must leave the house of his master to argue title when the debtor looses possession all rights, title, lien and interests are transfered to the secured party, thus he looses he right to argue. The writ of possessioon form which is approved by Judicial Council (ej-130) is not signed by the person who performs service however, on the reverse side of the form in item 24(a)1 is a check box and if checked by the unknown person completing the form - who in my case is the liar who is stealing my property - then the Sheriff is mandated to enforce the writ yet I was never served. Because I allege wrong doing against the council I have been denied my TRO's by Jacqueling Nguyen at LA district court, because as she said I named "government officials". They have set everything up perfectly to obtain a marketable record title. I have been fighting this for two years, I'm at the end, there are a lot of us here in San Bernardino - all in pro per all denied jury trial - beceause of secret moratorium all denied authorization to file a lis pendens, in my case judge took 24 days and signed it the same day the trustees deed upon sale was recorded. This is my home and my income, I have no family and Me and 3 kids will be on the streets in a week - I have no clue where I will go. I have evidence thaty this goies even deedper that in my case I believe that I have received services (police, code enforcement, discriminatory charges on my property taxes) that were all working a depravation of my property for 15 years and was receintly put in jail for no drivers license and held on bail of $910,000, yes almost a million dollars during which time my 14 years old son was picked up from school and held in solitary for 3 days, I am afraid for our lives. I am truly at a loss, I know you have your own problems and I dont want to burden anyone but really if you have found anyone investigating these things I would really like to contact them;

Thank you for your kind consideration,

Jacquie Figg a British immigrant     

11-01-15 Corruption of the Courts, San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties, California // Corruption of the Courts, San Bernardino and Los Angeles Counties, California // 法院的腐败，圣伯纳迪诺县和洛杉矶，加利福尼亚州

  

Dear Ms Figg:

Thank you for your message.  Under conditions that today prevail  in both the State and US courts in California, I do not believe that you have any remedy.  It is broad daylight robbery under the color of law in my opinion.

It looks like last week the Supreme Court of in Massachusetts decided to put an end to the robbing of middle class Americans, [1] but the California and US courts, and US law enforcement agencies, are in collusion with the banks for all practical purposes. [2]

All I can say is: The basic duty of the common person in the Robber Baron Revival Era is to document the scope of the corruption...

I copied your message to Janet Phelan, since she may seek your help in documenting specifics regarding the connections between San Bernardino judges and the banks.  Her contributions in that area are seminal. [3]

In cases where Bank of America and its senior officers (including, but not limited to Brian Moynihan and Sandor Samuels - former President of Bet Tzedek) were allegedly engaged in racketeering in the courts (in collusion with the courts and with Attorney David Pasternak - former President of the Los Angeles Bar Association and former President of Bet Tzedek - the House of Justice), [2] I filed requests with Judge Terry Friedman - former Executive Director of Bet Tzedek (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles), Judge Virginia Phillips and Magistrate Carla Woehrle (both from the US District Court, Central District of California) for statements on the record, whether they or family members living with them were recipients of financial benefits from Countrywide or Bank of America Corporation (pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics). 

All three refused to provide such statements.

SEC, US Controller of the Currency, FBI, and US Department of Justice refuse to investigate such matters even after Congressional Inquiries.

You should also be aware of the United Nations Human Rights Council report (2010) which summed up the situation as "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". [4]

Joseph Zernik

LINKS:
[1] 11-01-07 An End in Sight to Fraud on the Courts by US Financial Institutions? a) Mass Supreme Court Ruling Has Potential to Void Thousands of Foreclosures - WashPost; b) US Bank v Antonio Ibanez in the Mass Supreme Court - January 7, 2011 Ruling
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46913092/
[2] 11-01-05 Alleged of Criminality by Bank of America [NYSE:BAC], Misconduct in the State and US Courts, and Muzzled US Media Amount to a Robber Baron Revival Era.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46318774/
[3] 09-09-11 Former San Bernardino County Superior Court Presiding Judge Michael Welch - suspect in real estate fraud cases under the guise of court actions
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/32247118/
[4] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

At 11:02 PM 1/15/2011, Jacquie Figg wrote:

It appears I have a similar problem is there anything, anywhere relief can be sought. This is crazy. Any suggestions would be much appreciated and if there is anything I could do in return please let me know.

I live in San Bernardino. My property was foreclosed on even though no power of sale was granted in the private contract and no default existed at the time the Default notice was filed. Having exhausted my remedies with the trustee I filed a civil action for the wrongful foreclosure and initially obtained TRO’s.  TRO's were later overturned and my battles with the courts began. An unlawful detainer was secretly conducted which I discovered when the sheriff served me a copy of the Writ of Possession.  I filed for an emergency hearing and my Motion to Quash was heard in a private room by a felony judge (Steve Mapes-SEE ARTICLE BELOW) and even though no plaintiff was present he ruled against me and I was given 3 days to get out of a property I have lived in with my 4 children for 15 years. I added the judges onto the complaint and filed in district court in riverside. My case was moved to Los Angeles and my TRO were denied because the judge said I named “government official” in my complaint. I am at a loss the Sheriff has given me until the 21 January 2011. My property is also my sole source of income which I receive from the two small rentals and I have no family. Scandals regarding real estate are alleged by the NGO in both LA and San Bernardino. Where does a victim go to when the people who are suppose to provide justice are the criminals stealing from you.

Thanking you in advance, any suggestions appreciated J

Yours truly,

Jacquie A. Figg  

___________________

ARTICLE

Judges Involved in Multiple Property Reconveyances

JANET PHELAN, September 11, 2009:

"In San Bernardino County, Judge Steven Mapes ascended to the bench in 2007 and currently sits on Barstow court, following his tenure as an deputy district attorney in San Bernardino. Mapes has also been involved in the loan program, apparently going back to 1998, when he took out a loan on his home on Patricia Drive for over $155,000. He subsequently took out further loans on his property, including loans for $100,000 in 2001 and 2002, another loan for $307,500, also in 2001, one for $88,500 in 2002 and a loan in 2004 which was in excess of the value of the house, recorded at the tax assessor’s office as $427,528. This loan was taken out for a resounding $493,000.

More recently, in 2006, he again borrowed money against his property. Since 2001, Judge Steven Mapes has received seven different reconveyances on his loans.

Judge Mapes did not return calls from the Sentinel inquiring as to who was paying back these loans.

From: Janet Phelan, “Judges Involved in Multiple Property Reconveyances,” The San Bernardino County Sentinel, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, September 11, 2009. Janet Phelan is an investigative journalist. She can be contacted at janetclairephelan@yahoo.com. Reprinted in accordance with the “fair use” provision of Title 17 U.S.C. § 107 for a non-profit educational purpose."