11-02-07 Resistance rising to corruption of the courts in Florida // La corrupción de los tribunales en la Florida // 腐败在佛罗里达州法院

  

Sender: AMOJ_MAIN@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [AMOJ_MAIN] Fw: Attorneys Attack Rights of Citizen Journalists

Floida is a hotbed judicial and Bar corruption activists.  We are all not united in person, but we are united in cause, ideals and purpose.  To that end I welcome the recognition, attention and exposure provided by AMOJ and Jon Roland finally bearing fruit.  I have and will continue to share issues and actions that cross my path and have been generated wiothin the state for any intrinsic or extrinsic value whether they be the workings of "Joshua" Jack Thompson fittin' the battle of the florida Bar 'til down the walls come a tumblin' down; Les Winston of Biz radio AM 880 and the stories and achives of the corageous www.disbartheflordabar.com ; www.jaablog.jaablaw.com and the ongoing daily saga of the fraud and corruption in the Broward County Court and State Attorney's office; the writings of Bob Hurt of lawmangroups@yahoo,com the vigilence of Mark Adams

The archived lunimaries and heroes on disbarthefloridabar like Joshua Jack, Karin Huffer's Legal Abuse Syndrome, Mark Adams and many others sharing their stories with names, dates and places and mountains of true information in an effort to wake up Florida and America to this cancer need to be heard and enjoined.

This AMOJ exposure is the step I have wanted to see happen for all the years I have been contributing to it.  The ball needs to be kept rolling.
Huck

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Roland
To: liberty-list@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 1, 2011 12:36 am
Subject: [AMOJ_MAIN] Fw: Attorneys Attack Rights of Citizen Journalists

 
Please send messages on this and spread this message.

-------- Original Message --------
Attorneys Attack Rights of Citizen Journalists
http://dailycensored.com/2011/01/31/attorneys-attack-rights-of-citizen-journalists/

The Florida Bar has proposed a new rule to eliminate coverage of court proceedings by citizen journalists. The Bar’s proposed rule prohibits anyone other than an employee of a traditional media outlet or an official court reporter from using any device which can make video or audio recording from being brought into a court including laptop computers.

Check out the article and spread the news.

Please note that if you want to object to this rule, the objection must be emailed in to the attorneys at the Bar by the end of the day on Feb. 1, 2011. Their email addresses are in the article along with a suggested comment.

Carpe diem,

Mark A. Adams JD/MBA

P.S. Since some of you may not know of my work, there’s a 3 minute video about some of it at http://blip.tv/file/1672498 Also, I'm one of the featured writers on The Daily Censored which is a news blog affiliated with the premier media watchdog organization, Project Censored. See http://dailycensored.com/writers/mark-a-adams/ for more about my work.

-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322           twitter.com/lex_rex
Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001  jon.roland@constitution.org
----------------------------------------------------------

 AMOJ Board 

11-02-07 Welcome Italy - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Italia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎意大利- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Italy Visited February 7, 2011

11-02-07 Welcome Ukraine - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Ukraina - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎乌克兰- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Ukraine Visited February 7, 2011

11-02-07 Welcome Puerto Rico - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Puerto Rico - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎波多黎各- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Puerto Rico Visited February 7, 2011

11-02-07 Welcome Malaysia - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Malaysia - Visitante Mas Receiente! // 欢迎马来西亚- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Malaysia Visited February 7, 2011

11-02-06 Corruption of financial institutions and corruption of the state courts - both have deep roots in Los Angeles County, California

The US Department of Justice has treated Los Angeles County for at least three decades as an extra-constitutional zone.  On such background, synergy between the Los Angeles Superior Court and Countrywide Financial Corporation gave rise to Los Angeles County as "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."

The financial crisis and corruption of sub-prime lenders have deep roots in Los Angeles County, California:

• In the early 2000s, FBI reports distinguished Los Angeles County, California as "the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."
• That distinction is claimed to have been earned through synergy of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Los Angeles based Countrywide Financial Corporation - the leading sub-prime lender at that time.
• At least in one case, where a renowned Fraud Expert, and FBI veteran, opined real estate fraud, the evidence showed collusion by the Los Angeles Superior Court (with Judge Jacqueline Connor leading the pack), Countrywide (with Chief Legal Officer Sandor Samuels leading the pack), and later Bank or America (with Brian Moynihan leading the pack). [1,2,3]
• By January 2008, collapse of Countrywide ushered in the US and global financial crisis

Corruption of the state courts has deep roots in Los Angeles County, California:

• The Los Angeles based Sustain Technologies is wholly owned by the Los Angeles based Daily Journal - the largest legal newspaper in California, with tight ties to the California Judicial Council.
• Sustain Technologies is the maker of:
  • Sustain - the secretive courts' case management system, and
  • eCourt - the courts' online public access system
• Around 1985 Sustain was first developed and installed in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
• At that time, Ronald George, the immediate past Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, according to his official bio, served in leadership positions in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
• Based on two unpublished reports by Dr Zernik, a world-renowned computer science expert provided an opinion [4,5] supporting Dr Zernik's claims that the Sustain enables fraud by court staff, and called upon US based computer science experts to investigate the system.
• Combined, Sustain and eCourt were opined by Dr Zernik as the enabling tools for racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
• The latest report by Sustain Technologies claims: "25 Years. Two Provinces. Eleven States. Three Countries."  [6]
• Based on submission by Human Rights Alert (NGO), detailing conditions in Los Angeles County, California, the Human Rights Council of the United Nations issued in 2010 a report referring to "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California. [7]

US Dept of Justice refuses to enforce the law regardless of finding criminality in financial institutions, because of their ties to corrupt judges.

• US Department of Justice has refused to enforce the law in Los Angeles County, California for at least three decades, effectively treating it as an extra-constitutional zone [8]
• Irrefutable evidence shows criminality in both Countrywide and in the Los Angeles Superior Court. [1,2,3,9,10]
• At least in one case, a renowned fraud expert - decorated FBI veteran - tied the refusal of FBI to enforce the law on Countrywide Financial Corporation and BofA to their collusion in criminality with corrupt judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [11,12]

LINKS:
[1] 10-05-05 Countrywide Bank of America NYSE BAC and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
[2] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[3] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[4] 09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir's Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069337/
[5] 09-04-20 Prof Eli Shamir, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, directory information
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30454039/
[6] 11-02-06 Sustain Technologies - Corruption of the State Courts Has Deep Roots in Los Angeles County, California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48294934/
[7] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[8] 10-10-13 Extra Constitutional Zones - Excerpts From Discussion on the OAK Board
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39302595/
[9] [1] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/
[10] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
[11] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/
[12] 08-08-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email letter by highly decorated FBI veteran James Wedick regarding  FBI's refusal to provide Dr Zernik equal protection
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29713733/

11-02-06 Corruption of the Courts and the Legal Profession in California - from discussion group // La corrupción de los Juzgados y la Profesión Legal en California // 腐败法庭和加州法律职业

   

California former Chief Justice Ronald George



 1) Joseph Zernik wrote

Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:47:46
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: You Name ‘Em,  We’ll  Shame  ‘ Em
Cc:

[]:

More on the subject....

1) Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
Mr Carrizosa was the person who communicated with me, and inadvertently created the incriminating record regarding false engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff - the Habeas Corpus of Richard Fine - on behalf of Judge David Yaffe, where McCormick filed false declaration, false records, etc, to affect continued holding, alleged false imprisonment, of Richard Fine.

Request that was filed with Chief Justice Ronald George to initiate corrective actions remains unanswered...

2) Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)
In Zernik v Connor et al, where Zernik filed complaint against 10 judges of LASC, detailing conduct that should be deemed as racketeering, it is alleged that the California Judicial Council, chaired by Ronald George, engaged in the same pattern of conduct - engaging Attorney Sarah Overton (Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates) to falsely appear on behalf of the judges, "with no communication with clients".  Attorney Overton filed false declarations, false records, to affect continued conduct, alleged racketeering, by the LASC judges.

However, after the experience of correspondence regarding the engagement of McCormick in Fine v Sheriff, Mr Carrizosa and the California Judicial Council refused to respond at all on the subject...

Consequently, conduct of the California Judicial Council and Chief Justice Ronald George were subject of a complaint with the US Attorney's Office of Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights.

JZ

LINKS:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28323488/
10-03-13-Richard-Fine-Letter-to-Mr-Carrizosa-California-Administrative-Office-of-the-Courts-re-Alleged-Fraud-in-Appearances-of-Attorney-Kevin-McCormick

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28496726/
10-03-16-Richard-Fine-Request-for-Error-Correction-by-Carrizosa-Administrative-Office-of-the-Courts-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28640546/
10-03-19-Fine-v-Sheriff-2-09-cv-01914-Correspondence-Mr-Carrizosa-Dr-Zernik-re-Case-Caption-in-the-Habeas-Corpus

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28645522/
10-03-19b-Richard-Fine-Dr-Zernik-Mr-Carrizosa-s-Correspondence-on-behalf-of-the-California-Judicial-Council-in-re-Case-Caption-in-engagement-of-Attorney Kevin McCormick

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28787678/
10-03-22-Richard-Fine-Final-Response-by-Mr-Carrizosa-California-Judicial-Council-Re-Case-Caption-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28821400/
10-03-23-Richard-Fine-Request-Chief-Justice-Ronald-George-Investigation-Corrective-Actions-in-Conduct-of-Attorney-Kevin-McCormick-on-Behalf-of-the-California Judicial Council

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29956509/
10-04-14-Mr-Carrizosa-and-California-Judicial-Council-refuse-to-respond-regarding-engagement-of-Attorney-Sarah-Overton-by-the-Council-under-Zernik-v-Connor et al

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305381/
10-04-20-Cal-Judicial-Council-Letter-to-Zernik-Re-Request-to-Access-Records-and-for-Corrective-Actions-by-Chief-Justice-Ronald-George-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/
10-07-04-Human-Rights-Alert-Complaint-against-the-California-Judicial-Council-Chaired-by-California-Chief-Justice-Ronald-George-for-Public-Corruption

2)  G wrote

At 07:36 PM 2/6/2011, G wrote:

Joseph:

In '94 or '95, []  filed a cert petition in the USSC, In the Matter of the Verified Accusation [VA] of Attorney GARY L. ZERMAN vs. Attorneys R. BROWNE GREENE and MELVIN M. BELLI, Case No. 94-1704, which raised two (2) issues:  1) the CSC systematically summarily denying VAs, in total disregard of statutory law (B&P Code sections 6108, et. seq., particularly sec. 6109)[ and, 2) ignoring a disqualifying conflict of interest re issue no. 1, above.

As par for the course, the USSC issued two words:  Petition Denied.

[] put in the cert petition, that [] spoke with a Mr. Philip Carrizosa, who has reported on the CSC for the LA Daily Journal for 15-years, and he stated that he had seen and reviewed "hundreds" of VAs filed in the CSC over that time, but had "never" seen the CSC grant "even one", yet "many" appeared "to have merit".   Petitioner asked Mr. Carrizosa (twice) to provide a declaration to support this petition; he declined stating "my editor won't let me."14

14 Mr. Carrizosa made the same statement to attorney John DeRonde, regarding VA, S037043, that he filed against attorney Thomas Pfalzer in the CSC, which also was summarily denied despite indisputable serious attorney misconduct.  Also see Va S042880 against attorneys Donna Peizer and Sandra McNabb, which was filed in October 1994, there CSC has not acted yet, as required by sec. 6109.  See attorney Discipline and the California Supreme Court:  Transfer of Direct Review to the Courts of Appeal, (1984) 72 C.L.R. 252, 258, ft 47, which references a 1983 article by Mr. Carrizosa on the CSC."

The last I knew, Mr. Carrizosa was working for the Cal. Judicial Council.  [].    

---

3) Joseph Zernik wrote

Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 06:29:09 +0200
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: FW: You Name ‘Em, We’ll Shame ‘Em : 

Hi Gary:

You get into an interesting question: The ownership/control of the Daily Journal.  Per hearsay, the Daily Journal is controlled by the California Bar.  A few years ago, I communicated in writing and by phone with the Editor in Chief of the Daily Journal.

However, after I discovered and published the fact that the Daily Journal is the whole owner of SUSTAIN, maker of the case management system of the LA Superior Court (opined as fraud).  Nobody in Daily Journal agreed to talk with me again.

Do you have any documents regarding the presumed control of the Daily Journal by the California Bar?

JZ

4) G wrote

At 08:17 PM 2/2/2011, you wrote:

M:

Check out the article in the below link, re the proposed rule by the Florida bar.

As they say, it's not so much what you know, but who you know.  And moreover, those in power want to keep us out of the know - as in the dark to their back room brokered corrupt power deals.

Have you seen any of the info re the Dole case (mentioned in the below article), where Girardi, Lack and Miller filed a brief in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that was found to be fraudulent?  Girardi was serving on the Judicial Council, chaired by Chief Justice Ronald George when that occurred.  Miller was the Cal State Bar president and was or is an editor at the Daily Journal (legal paper of record for LA & many other Cal cities).  George was/is on the advisory board of the California Lawyer magazine, which is owned by the Daily Journal.  G.

---

5) R wrote

From: 

To: 

Subject: You Name ‘Em, We’ll Shame ‘Em: 

Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:19:08

http://theeliteones.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/you-name-em-well-shame-em-beth-jay-counsel-to-king-george/#more-14038

11-01-06 Welcome Korea - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Korea - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎韩国- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Korea, Republic of Visited February 6, 2011

11-02-05 Second request filed with US Congress for impeachment of Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick - for their conduct in litigation of Lindner v Amex

  

The US courts undermine Banking Regulation and Civil Rights during the ongoing financial crisis. Like the Great Depression before it, the ongoing financial crisis is a system-wide integrity crisis.  Unless integrity of the justice system is restored, socio-economic development and civil society conditions in the United States are unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future.
Los Angeles, February 5 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, have filed a second request  with the US Congress for impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick, both of the US District Court, Southern District of New York. [[i]] The request pertains to conduct of Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick in litigation of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228), a Civil Rights matter.  Review of the records in the case shows that the case also directly pertains to corporate and banking regulation, or lack thereof, by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The first request for impeachment of US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick was filed in December 2010, and pertained to conduct of US Judge Jed Rakoff and Clerk Ruby Krajick in litigation of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829), a Securities Fraud matter. [[ii],[iii] ,[iv],[v]]

The records and the reports from litigation of Lindner v Amex, [[vi]] document collusion by Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick, and others in the conduct of pretense litigation: 

*         Summonses were listed as issued, but were not docketed, in apparent violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summonses were listed in the docket in an invalid manner as executed, but other court records document that the court itself has never deemed the summonses as issued or served.  Access to the Summons, to inspect and to copy, is denied. Failure to serve summons should make the litigation invalid, and it should have been dismissed by the Court.  Fraud in issuance of summonses is common in the US courts today.

*         No assignment order for Judge Jed Rakoff, and no referral order for Magistrate Spenser Cott are found in the docket.  A judge with no assignment/referral order has no authority to preside and judge in a given case.

*         No court proceedings were conducted in the case, which was purportedly commenced in March 2010, and Plaintiff has been denied the right to conduct discovery in alleged violation of Due Process rights.

*         Entries were made in the docket by unnamed, unauthorized personnel.  Therefore, the docket as a whole should be considered invalid, false and deliberately misleading.

*         The docket demonstrates an arbitrary and capricious pattern of denial of public access to court records in apparent violation of First Amendment rights.

*         Public access to the Clerk's electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing) is denied. Court orders and judgments must be authenticated/attested by the Clerk in order to become valid and effectual court records. Absent access to the certificates, the People and also Plaintiff Lindner (who is not authorized to view such records either), are denied the right to distinguish, which of the records, which were published in the docket, are held by the Court itself as valid and effectual court records.  The request claims that it is likely that upon investigation it would be discovered that none of the purported orders in the case were electronically authenticated by the Clerk. Therefore, these orders are likely to be invalid.

Review of the case as a whole shows that numerous records have been meticulously generated, and a docket has been constructed and published online in a manner that would appear to the People and to pro se Plaintiff Lindner as if litigation is conducted in compliance with the law of the United States. In fact, upon careful examination, the records reveal litigation that has been conducted in a manner that is deliberately invalid from its start.

The pattern of conduct of Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick in Lindner v Amex is similar to their conduct in SEC v Bank of America.   The request for impeachment claims that combined, the conduct of Judge Jed Rakoff, Clerk Ruby Krajick, and others in Lindner v Amex and SEC v Bank of America is likely to be sufficient for their prosecution for racketeering.

Both Lindner v Amex and SEC v Bank of America also demonstrate the ways in which PACER and CM/ECF (the public online and case management systems of the US courts) enable such conduct.  The US Congress has been called upon to perform its duties and initiate corrective actions. 

The request emphasized that the two cases, and other cases across the United States, document the key role of the US courts in undermining Banking Regulation and Civil Rights during the ongoing financial crisis. Like the Great Depression before it, the ongoing financial crisis is a system-wide integrity crisis in its essence.  Unless integrity of the justice system is restored, socio-economic development and civil society conditions in the United States are unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future. [[vii]]

The request was filed with Congressman Lamar Smith, and Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairs of the Committees on the Judiciary, Congressman Spencer Bachus and Senator Christopher Dodd, Chairs of the Banking Committees, and Congressman David Dreier, Chair of the House Rules Committee.

Notice was given to the Basel Committee on international banking and the United Nations Human Rights Council.
____ 

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.

http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
LINKS                                                            [i] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/
[ii] 11-01-10 Request No 1 for investigation/impeachment of US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/ 
[iii] 10-12-08 Request No 1 for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct ofSecurities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/
[iv] Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States; filed in support of Request No 1 for impeachment of US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[v] 10-12-19 Addendum to Request No 1 for Investigation/impeachment of JUDGE RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in re: Conduct of Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/
[vi] 11-02-05 Lindner v American Express Company (1:10-cv-02228) in the US District Court Southern District of New York: PACER records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48212182/
[vii] 11-02-03 Stealing from the People: Corruption in the United States; the Big Feast: Banker, Judge, Civil Servant
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48090911/ 

11-02-05 Welcome the Russian Federation - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido la Federación de Rusia - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎俄罗斯联邦- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Russian Federation Visited February 5, 2011

11-02-04 Welcome China - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido China - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎中国 - 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor China Visited February 4, 2011

11-02-04 Welcome Canada - Last New Visitor! // Bienvenido Canada - Visitante Mas Reciente! // 欢迎加拿大- 最后的新访问者！

Last New Visitor Canada Visited February 4, 2011