Thursday, May 26, 2011

11-05-26 Corruption of the US Court,DC // La corrupción de los EE.UU. Tribunal de Justicia en Washington, DC // 在美国首都华盛顿的腐败法庭,直流

Zernik v Melson et al – willful misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC, to cover up corruption of the Los Angeles courts by Countrywide and Bank of America
Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington conducted simulated litigation, as part of a pattern seen in the US Courts from top to bottom: Refusal to protect the rights of individuals against rampant corruption of state and US judges in collusion with large corporations and financial institutions. Corruption of the US justice system is a central cause of the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked. US Congress should perform its duties.

 

Richard J Leon, Judge
US District Court, Washington DC
Los Angeles, May 26 – in Zernik v Melson et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties, 28 USC �1361.  The petition pertained to refusal of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the rights of 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, in view of indisputable evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[i]]
The case is of particular interest, since it provides direct evidence of the tight links between corruption of the judiciary, corruption of financial institutions (Countrywide and Bank of America in this case), and patronizing of the same by FBI and US Department of Justice.
Corruption of the US justice system is a central cause of the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked. [[ii]]
The evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court is indisputable
The petition pertained to allegations of long-term, widespread corruption of the judiciary in Los Angeles County, California, and refusal of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the Human Constitutional and Civil Rights of residents of that region of the USA. [[iii]]
The evidence of racketeering by Judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court is indisputable: 
  • Retroactive immunities (�pardons�) were signed for all judges and commissioners of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles County, California, who had taken �not permitted� payments (�bribes�). [[iv]]
  • United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) issued an official Staff Report referring to �corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California�. [[v]] The report was based on evidence submitted to the HRC of large-scale false imprisonments and financial/real estate fraud by judges of the Court.
  • The International Criminal Bar posted a complaint for racketeering against the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[vi]]
  • Large-scale fraud was opined in Sustain, the case management system of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which enables the conduct of simulated litigation of cases in violation of the law. The opinion was supported by opinion of international computer science scholar. [[vii]]
  • Fraud was opined in the case management system of the Los Angeles Sheriff�s Department, which enables large-scale false imprisonments, with no legal foundation.  The opinion was reviewed and published in an international computer science journal with an Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada. [[viii]]
Financial institutions are the beneficiaries, and FBI and US Department of Justice are the patrons
The two US officers of the US Department of Justice, who were named first among Respondents were:
  • Director of US Attorneys Office Kenneth Melson, and
  • Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations Kenneth Kaiser.
Other named among Respondents included:
  • SEC officers and
  • Bank of America Corporation executives.
Key part of the evidence pertained to fraud by Bank of America and Countrywide in the courts in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond, even prior to the current financial crisis. [[ix]]
Brief Chronology of Zernik v Melson et al
The case was assigned to US Judge RICHARD LEON, who engaged in �Simulated Litigation� in collusion with the Clerk of the Court NANCY MAYER-WHITTINGTON in disregard of First Amendment and Due Process rights: [[x]]
  • Complaint (Dkt #01) [[xi]] � typically the complaint is a short document.  Here the complaint is voluminous, since it included substantial part of the evidence.  Based on Petitioner�s prior experience in the US courts, it was likely that further evidence would be excluded from the docket.  Filing the evidence with the Complaint ensured its entry into the public record.
  • Summonses (Dkt #none) � were not docketed, in apparent violation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting the litigation as Simulated Litigation from the start.
  • Motion for CM/ECF Password (Dkt #02) [[xii]] � filed together with the complaint.  Denial of access to electronic filing by pro se plaintiffs enables the abuse of rights.  Access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs) in this case is denied to this date.
  • Statement of Disqualification of Judge Leon (Dkt #03) [[xiii]] andMotion to compel FBI and US Department of Justice to provide the then imprisoned Richard Fine pen and paper (Dkt #4) [[xiv]]  � the two records were included in the docket only after protests pertaining to dishonest conduct of the court.  (see, below).  Former US Prosecutor Richard Fine was at that time held in solitary confinement with no valid legal papers for his arrest and imprisonment.  He was denied access to pen and paper, in effort to prevent him from filing his habeas corpus petition.  Fine had exposed and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles judges of �not permitted� payments (�bribes�), which required the signing of �retroactive immunities� (�pardons�) for all such judges. [[xv]]
  • Evidence of corruption of the Courts in cases involving Countrywide and Bank of America (Dkt #none) [[xvi]] � eight (8) records were duly filed on May 21, 2009.  Judge Leon held the papers in chambers and refused to permit their docketing.
  • Request for review of conduct of the clerk (Dkt #5) [[xvii]] andRequest for statement on the record by Judge Leon and Clerk Whittington (Dkt #6) [[xviii]]� were filed in protest of denial of right to file papers in court.
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Richard Leon (Dkt #7,8)[[xix],[xx]] � were mailed with no authentication (NEF � notice of electronic filing) and therefore cannot be deemed valid court records (see below).
  • �Leave to File Denied�  (Dkt #none) � later, Petitioner received by mail the face pages of his eight papers, which were never docketed, with hand inscriptions �Leave to file denied, RJL�.  [[xxi]]
  • Request for Authentication Records (NEFs) (Dkt # 9) [[xxii]] �  Judge Leon never ruled on the request, and access to the authentication records has been denied to this date.
Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the same conduct in a case pertaining to Judge Olinda Evans, US Court, Northern District of Georgia
In Windsor v Evans et al (1:10-cv-00197) in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff William Windsor filed complaint under cause of actions of Deprivation of rights under the color of law, 42 USC �1983, pertaining to conduct of US Judge Olinda Evans of the US District Court, Northern District of Georgia. [[xxiii]]
The case is of particular interest, since it provides evidence of cover up of judicial corruption, not only by Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court in Washington DC, but also by the US courts of appeals and the US Supreme Court. [[xxiv]]
The evidence shows that Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the exact same conduct in Windsor v Evans et al [[xxv]] and in Zernik v Melson et al � denial of the right to file papers in the court.
Invalid electronic systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF) are germane to such conduct
The PACER docket and other reports in this case provide additional evidence of the conduct of Simulated Litigation: [[xxvi]]
  • No event is listed in the Calendar of the Court,
  • No Judgment is listed in the Judgment Index of the Court,
  • The Petition is not listed as �terminated� in the Related Transaction Report, although the case is listed as closed.
Reports regarding fraud in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF have been previously published in the National Law Journal [[xxvii]] and in an international, peer-reviewed computer science journal with Editorial Board naming scholars from six European nations and Canada. [[xxviii]]
Request was also submitted to Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler, an expert on computers and the law, to review the evidence. [[xxix]]
US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.
The case of Zernik v Melson et al, and other similar cases in the US district courts, US courts of appeals, and Supreme Court of the United States document that the US courts have effectively established a policy, prohibiting the filing of papers, which document judicial corruption. [[xxx]]
US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.
US Congress should perform its duties.
LINKS
[i] 11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other PACER reports in Simulated Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55231462/
[ii] 11-04-21 “In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures” – Because of widespread corruption of the justice system, they are effectively immune�
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53520603/
[ii] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) – in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh. Countrywide’s Three “Recreated Letters” and a Transcript
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/
[iii] 11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
11-05-15 Racketeering complaint against David Pasternak and the Los Angeles Superior Court posted by the International Criminal Bar (ICB); international criminal indictment more likely against Rampart Judge Jacqueline A Connor.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55473264/
[iv] 09-02-14 California Senate bill providing retroactive immunities (“pardons”) for all judges who took “not permitted” payments (“bribes”).SBX2-11
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25149045/
[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession”.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[vi] 11-05-15 Racketeering complaint against David Pasternak and the Los Angeles Superior Court posted by the International Criminal Bar (ICB); international criminal indictment more likely against Rampart Judge Jacqueline A Connor.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55473264/
[vii] 09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir’s Opinion Letter re: Sustain – the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069337/
[viii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty � Online Public Prisoners� Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[ix] 10-05-05 Countrywide, Bank of America [NYSE;BAC], and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
[2] 10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein’s Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currency
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
[3] 10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeering
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
[x] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code �32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or
(2)  cause another to:
(A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or
(B)   take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[xi] 09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-1) Complaint
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56286049/
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-2) Complaint – Exhibits
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56286408/
09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #1-3) Complaint – Civil Cover sheet
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56286649/
[xii] 09-05-01 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC:(Dkt #2) Motion for CM/ECF password
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56286812/
[xiii] 09-05-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #3) Statement for Disqualification of US Judge Richard Leon
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56287315/
[xiv] 09-05-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #4) Motion to compel the imprisoned Richard Fine’s First Amendment rights by providing him pen and paper
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56287656/
[xv] 11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States – the case of Richard Isaac Fine
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
[xvi] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #1 – Evidence of corrupt practices by Countrywide and Bank of America in the US Courts – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56295907/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #2 – Fraud Expert Opinion Re: Fraud by California Judges in collusion with Countrywide, Bank of America in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296200/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #3 – Requests for Assistance by Foreign Ambassadors in re: Abuse of Rights in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296395/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #4 – Notice filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296583/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #5 – Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296879/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #6 – Additional Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297039/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #7 – Further Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297417/
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #8 – Further Evidence filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles – “leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297994/
[xvii] 09-06-03 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #5) Request for review of conduct of the clerk
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56287917/
[xviii] 09-06-08 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #06) Request for statement on the record by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk of the Court pertaining to refusal to docket papers filed in court, including statement for disqualification of Judge Richard Leon.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56288433/
[xix] 09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #07) Memorandum Opinion by Judge Richard Leon
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56289277/
09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #8) Order by US Judge Richard Leon
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56289450/
[xx] 09-06-30 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805): Fraudulent �Order� (Dkt #8) mailed by Judge Richard Leon to pro se Plaintiff -s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55230414/
[xxi] 09-06-29 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805): Fraudulent papers mailed by Judge Richard Leon to pro se plaintiff, with the inscriptions �Leave to file denied�.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55229569/
[xxii] 09-08-13 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #9) Ex Parte Request for NEFs (electronic authentication records) of orders served by the court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56289663/
[xxiii] 11-11-12 PRESS RELEASE: Maid of the Mist Corporation Et Al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, et al (1-09-Cv-01543) Simulated Litigation – Fraud in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55272776/
[xxiv] 11-02-10 Press Release: Fraud Opined in US Supreme Court Records Received by Petitioner William Windsor From the Office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48605325/
11-01-18 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist in the Supreme Court of the United States and Alleged Corruption of the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47146842/
[xxv] 11-05-26 Windsor v Evans et al (1:10-cv-00197) in the US Court, District of Columbia – Willful Misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon to cover up corruption of the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56304109/
[xxvi] 11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other fraudulent PACER reports in Simulated Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55231462/
[xxvii] 10-10-11 in GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality – The National Law Journal
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53954229/
[xxviii] Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[xxix] 11-04-27 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler is Provided With Additional Evidence of Large-scale Computer Fraud in the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54012043/
[xxx] 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39788364/
_____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States._______http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
Flag Counter:119http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 432,060Followers: 637http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp ://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views:344,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* 
“…a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* 
“…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit.”Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* 
“This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* “Innocent people remain in prison”* “…the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of…”LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* 
“…corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* 
“On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations.”Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* 
“More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning “mandatory and enforceable” ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by “recent media reports,” the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others.”More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* 
“The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition…”
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

11-05-25 Welcome India! // Bienvenido India! // 欢迎印度!

Last New Visitor

India 
Visited May 25, 2011

11-05-25 Volcker: Out of Time! // No hay tiempo // 没有时间了

The Washington Post
 Wednesday, May 25, 2011
newsletter header
News from the Fed Page
On Leadership
The conference committee also reached accord on the 'Volcker ru
Posted at 03:55 PM ET, 05/23/2011
When Volcker speaks
By Paul Light

Former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Paul A. Volcker has been relatively quiet these last few months as the U.S. and world has continued its descent into financial chaos. He exited President Barack Obama'
s now-defunct Economic Advisory Board last January, and continues to eschew press releases and op-eds.

This doesn'
t mean Volcker won't cajole and criticize, but his is a measured voice in a caldron of instant reaction. He does think banks should be banks, not derivative machines, and is a steady voice against attacks on the Fed. But he rarely talks about the many threats we face as the world economy stumbles.

Yet he recently did just that in Portland, Oregon, in a little noticedspeech titled "Out of Time." Delivered to the World Affairs Council of Oregon on May 6, the speech is a sobering call for action in a time when unemployment remains high, prices are rising, real income remains flat and wealth continues to make its way to the tiniest percentage at the top of the economic pyramid.

So what is the answer to the crisis?

Volcker offered three proposals, each one no doubt difficult to enact, but no less essential for global resilience.
...
First, Volcker argued that the world must liquidate its biggest yet most vulnerable financial institutions, and pursue coordinated action to strengthen the rest.
...
Second, Volcker argued for a significant reduction in the federal budget.
...
Third, Volcker turned to confidence in our institutions.
... 

READ THE FULL STORY:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/light-on-leadership/post/when-volcker-speaks/2011/03/18/AFfEPy9G_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_fedinsider

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

11-05-24 FEC is asked to disregard Citizens United v Federal Election Commission // Fraude en los EE.UU. Corte Suprema de Justicia // 欺诈在美国最高法院

The FEC has never been served with a valid, signed, authenticated record of the US Supreme Court Judgment, and such record has never been discovered yet.  The records of US District Court in Washington DC, in which the case originated, start with an invalid Summons, end with a Judgment that was not recorded in the Judgment Index of the Court, with an 'off the record' proceeding in between.
        

Chair Cynthia L. Bauerly Federal Election Commission, United States of America (logo). Link to FEC Home Page

Cynthia L. Bauerly
FEC Chair

Los Angeles, May 24 - in a letter to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair Cynthia Bauerly, the Commissioners, the Acting General Counsel, Acting Staff Director, and the Inspector General, the FEC was asked:
Why would the FEC not disregard the cases of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC, (1-07-cv-2240) and in the US Supreme Court, (08-805), as matters that have never been litigated and decided pursuant to the law of the United States? [[i]]
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) (08-205) was reported as one of the landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court.

"[D]ecision holding that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in election campaigns... a stunning example of judicial activism." [[ii]] 

However, based on review of US Supreme Court, US District Court, Washington DC, and FEC and US Solicitor General FOIA-response records, the request opined that Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (08-805) in the US Supreme Court and Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (1-07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, DC, were cases of Simulated Litigation. [[iii]]

  • No valid summons was ever issued or served on the FEC in the case in the US District Court, DC
  • No Judgment is listed as entered in the Judgment Index of the case in the US District Court, DC
  • No valid, duly signed and authenticated record of the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has been discovered so far.
  • There is no record to show that the Judgment of the US Supreme Court has ever been served by the Clerk of the US Supreme Court on the FEC.
The requester, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has gained substantial experience in examination of computerized records in large corporate and government systems.  His opinions in such matters have been supported by highly reputed fraud and computer science experts.  Papers he has authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in a computer-science journal and presented in international computer-science and criminology conferences. [[iv]]

Report, authored by him, and based in part on analysis of computerized court records, was incorporated into the official 2010 Staff Report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as part of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, with a reference note stating:

Corruption of the courts and the legal profession... [[v]]
The request was copied to Senator Dianne Feinstein.
_____
LINKS
[i] 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56145482/
[ii] 0-01-21 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) at the Supreme Court of the United States - opinion of Prof Chemerinsky and Wikipedia overview
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41364083/
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code; section 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[iv] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert - NGO 
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______ 
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
Locations of visitors to this page
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 431,060
Followers: 626
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http ://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 342,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner

Monday, May 23, 2011

11-05-23 Fraud in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US District Court, DC // Fraude en el Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU., Washington DC // 欺诈的美国地区法院,华盛顿特区

Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US District Court, DC - invalid court records in a case of Simulated Litigation

"It is a case of Simulated Litigation involving the Chief Judge of the US Court, Washington DC, in a landmark case - It has an invalid beginning, an invalid end, and an 'off the record' proceeding in between."


 
 
Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge
US District Court, Washington DC
View a PDF version with the records:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56106686/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56080106/

Los Angeles, May 23 - Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) (08-205) is no doubt one of the landmark decisions of the US Supreme Court.  "[D]ecision holding that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in election campaigns... a stunning example of judicial activism..." [[i]]  However, a valid and effectual copy of the February 22, 2010 Judgment of the US Supreme Court in the case - a historic document - is yet to be discovered...  [[ii],[iii]]

Today, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), published review of the litigation records of Citizens United v FEC (1:07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, Washington DC, where the case originated.

His opinion concludes that key records are invalid in the US District Court, DC, as well. [[iv]]

Invalid records in litigation of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC
"It is a case of Simulated Litigation involving the Chief Judge of the US Court, Washington DC, in a landmark case..." says Dr Zernik, "It has an invalid beginning, an invalid end, and an 'off the record' proceeding in between."
Figure 1: Invalid PACER Summons of Citizens United v FEC in the US District Court, DC.  The record fails to show the Seal of the Court.
  • Summons as executed - The record of the Summons as executed on Federal Election Commission (Dkt #15) is an invalid record, since it fails to show the Seal of Court, as required by US law. A repeat FOIA request was filed, in order to exclude the possibility that the Seal of the Court was missing as a result of photocopying or scanning. [[v]]
_________________________________________
01/10/2008     Minute Entry Proceedings held before a Three Judge Panel of Circuit Judge A Raymond Randolph and United States District Judges Royce C. Lamberth and Richard W. Roberts : Preliminary Injunction held on 1/10/2008. (Court Reporter Wendy Ricard.) (rje) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
_________________________________________
Figure 2: Invalid PACER docket notation of Minutes of the January 10, 2008 proceeding in Citizens United v FEC.  No docket number was designated, and no record of the Minutes was linked to the docket notation.
  • Minutes - No valid record at all exists for the January 10, 2008 proceeding, the only proceeding listed in the record of the case. Invalid notation was created in the docket, with no record linked to it at all. Effectively, it was an 'off the record' proceeding of the court.
 
Figure 3: Invalid, simulated record of the February 22, 2010 Judgment in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US Supreme Court, as it appears in the PACER docket of the US District Court.


Figure 4: A fake, simulated bank check record.
  • US Supreme Court Judgment - The Judgment record, as it appears in the docket of the US District Court, is unsigned, and fails to include authentication by the Clerk of the US Supreme Court. 
_________________________________________
Judgment Index Report
U.S. District Court - - District of Columbia
Report Period: 01/01/2005 - 05/23/2011

Sorry - no data for the chosen selection criteria
Judgment Index Report Selection Criteria
Case number 1:07-cv-2240
_________________________________________

Figure 5: The Citizens United v FEC entry in the Judgment Index of the US District Court, DC.
  • Judgment Index - No Judgment at all is listed in the Court's Judgment Index for the case, and the complaint is listed as never terminated in the Related Transactions Report.
Simulated litigation is today a common practice in both the state and US courts.

Simulated legal process is defined in the Texas Penal Code (section 32.48) as follows: [[vi]]

A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process.
The practice of Simulated Litigation is the most common form of corruption of judges and clerks in both the state and US courts today.  It is common in all levels of the US courts, in both obscure and high profile cases. [[vii],[viii]]

Invalid case management systems in the courts are the enabling tools of Simulated Litigation

The practice of Simulated Litigation is probably as old as the courts themselves.  Over centuries, record keeping of the courts, the core of Due Process, evolved to prevent it.  Implementation of computerized case management systems in the state and US courts, where the nature of signatures and authentication was left vague and ambiguous, is claimed to be central to the widespread practice of Simulated Litigation. [[ix]] Request for review of the evidence of fraud in the computerized records of the US District Courts and Courts of Appeals (PACER and CM/ECF) was previously forwarded to Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler, an expert on computers and the law. [[x]]

Needless to say, computer technology could have had the opposite effect, enhancing court transparency and integrity, if correctly implemented.

The author

Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience over the past decade in examination of computerized records in large corporate and government systems.  His opinions in such matters have been supported by those of highly reputed fraud and computer science experts.  Papers he authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in a computer-science journal and presented in international computer-science and criminology conferences. [[xi]]

Report, authored by Dr Zernik, and based in part on analysis of computerized court records, was incorporated into the official 2010 Staff Report of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as part of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States, with a reference note stating:
Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California. [[xii]]
________
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
________
LINKS:
[i] 0-01-21 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) at the Supreme Court of the United States - opinion of Prof Chemerinsky and Wikipedia overview
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41364083/
[ii] 11-05-17 PRESS RELEASE: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US Supreme Court - so far only a simulated Judgment record has been discovered...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55613401/
[iii] 11-05-23    RE: Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission, FEC FOIA No. 2011-46:2nd Zernik�s Reply on FEC�s 2nd FOIA Response
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56048803/
[iv] 11-05-23 Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (1-07-cv-2240) in the US District Court, DC � invalid court records in a Simulated Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56080106/
[v] 11-05-23 RE: Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission, FEC FOIA No. 2011-46:2nd Zernik�s Reply on FEC�s 2nd FOIA Response s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56048803/
[vi] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
� 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits
an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to
another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment,
or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the
document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any
action in response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with
the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a
sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[vii]    11-02-09 Press Release: 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Insists on Conducting a Pretense Appeal from a Pretense Judgment of the US District Court
                http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
[viii]     Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Simulated Litigation and Simulated Banking Regulation in the United States
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
[ix] Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[x]       11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts
                http://www.scribd.com/doc/52993968/
[xi] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[xii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
______
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert - NGO 
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______ 
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
Locations of visitors to this page
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 430,060
Followers: 622
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http ://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 341,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
*
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
_____ 

11-05-23 Welcome Italy! // Bienvenido Italia! // 欢迎意大利!

Last New Visitor

Italy 
Visited May 23, 2011