12-03-07 FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only // El director del FBI: Hay que comprobar si la regla asesinato selectivo es sólo para fuera de EE.UU. // 联邦调查局局长：有，以是否定点清除规则，是美国以外唯一

Just a reminder: Pursuant to the law enacted in the wake of Edgar J Hoover's tenure as FBI Director, Robert Mueller III, was supposed to be out of office a couple of years ago...
JZ________

House of Representatives - POLITICS

FBI director: Have to check whether targeted killing rule is outside US only

By Catherine Herridge



Published March 07, 2012

FBI Director Robert Mueller on Wednesday said he would have to go back and check with the Department of Justicewhether Attorney General Eric Holder's "three criteria" for the targeted killing of Americans also applied to Americans inside the U.S.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/07/mueller-have-to-check-with-holder-whether-targeted-killing-rule-is-outside-us/#ixzz1ogimSYiJ

12-03-09 U.S. Agrees to Hand Over Control of Afghan Detainees... // EE.UU. acuerda entregar el control de los detenidos afganos ... // 美国同意向阿富汗被拘留者的控制权之手...

U.S. Agrees to Hand Over Control of Afghan Detainees
But American military leaders will still have the power to block their release.  
READ MORE: http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/03/09/the_u_s_military_will_hand_over_afghan_detainees_in_six_months.html?from=rss/&wpisrc=newsletter_slatest 

12-03-09 Welcome Italy! // Bienvenido Italia!

Last New Visitor Italy  Visited March 9, 2012

12-03-08 The US Courts Engage in Large-scale Fraud on the People // Las cortes de EE.UU. Participar en fraude a gran escala contra el pueblo // 美国法院的人民从事大规模欺诈 // В США суд Участие в крупном мошенничестве на людей

With the introduction of electronic records (PACER and CM/ECF), the US courts have ambiguated the authentication of court records to the point that even experienced attorneys cannot distinguish between valid and simulated records, while the US courts from coast to coast engage in the large-scale publication of fraudulent records.  The US legal profession, as a class is more loyal to the guild than to the US Constitution. It is unlikely that the US would emerge from the current financial and constitutional crisis, unless corruption of the US courts is addressed.                    
"Some experienced US attorneys have repeatedly disputed or doubted my opinion regarding the large-scale fraud in the US courts," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Now we have the US court provide the definitive evidence."   Today, Human Rights Alert published a docket from the US District Court, Central District of California, where  Chief Judge AUDREY COLLINS in fact admitted that a simulated, invalid court order had been published by the court. [1,2] 


Dr Zernik has previously published and presented evidence of the large-scale fraud in the US courts records in an international computer science conference and in the 2010 World Criminology Congress. [3,4]  Dr Zernik has also created an online archive of such fraudulent US court records from coast to coast. [5]  Additional evidence was independently discovered by PROPUBLICA and published both by PROPUBLICA and the NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL. [6]
Similar evidence was produced by Dr Zernik, pertaining to large-scale fraud in SUSTAIN, the case management system developed by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, now implemented in 11 states. [7] The evidence regarding large-scale fraud in the records of the California courts was part of the evidence presented by Human Rights Alert in its 2010 submission to the United Nations.  The United Nations consequently noted in its official report "corruption of the courts and the legal profession... in California." [8]
Regardless, all US law professors or computing experts, which were asked, refused to opine on the matter, including, but not limited to Harvard law Dean MARTHA MINOW, Yale law Dean ROBERT POST, and Harvard law professors YOCHAI BENKLER and RICHARD FALLON. [9] Likewise, no scholarly journal in the US, to which papers on the matter were submitted, agreed to subject them to peer-review for publication. [10] 
The evidence of fraud in the US courts records was also filed with the US COURT OF APPEALS, 9TH CIRCUIT, and the US SUPREME COURT. Both refused to rule on the matter, while continuing in litigation of cases, based on fraudulent records from the US district courts. [11]
"The legal profession in the United States, including judges, as a class, is primarily loyal to guild, not to the US Constitution," says Dr Zernik.

More recently, OCCUPY THE COURTS has focused on the role of the US courts in corruption of the US government and banking system under the current crisis. [12]
"I doubt that even the Occupiers realize how central the courts are to the current crisis," adds Dr Zernik,"The evidence suggests widespread bribing of state and US judges by the banks."  A series of California and US judges have refused to answer on requests to disclose financial benefits to them, if any, by BANK OF AMERICA, while continuing to engage in Fraud on the Court in cases involving BANK OF AMERICA. [13]
Similar conditions prevailed in the US courts a century ago, during the notorious Robber Baron Era, which led to the Great Depression.  At that time, the US courts were described by the US Congress as "a burlesque".  Consequently, laws were enacted by Congress to reform of the US courts.  Both then and now, corruption of the offices of the Clerks of the Courts, who hold the duty to safeguard the integrity of the US courts' records, was central to the corruption. [14]
"It is unlikely that the US would emerge from the current financial and constitutional crisis, unless corruption of the US courts is addressed," concludes Dr Zernik. 
###Joseph Zernik, PhD [15]____
LINKS:[1] 12-01-11 In RE: R G (2:11-mc-00284) in the US District Court, Central District of California - minutes, orders, judgments issued with invalid NEFs are invalid court records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84376206/[2] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:

Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 

(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:

        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      

        (2)  cause another to:                                                       

            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                

            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.

(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.

The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[3] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/[4] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/[5] 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
11-06-22 PRESS RELEASE Judge Guilford Refuses to Opines on Fraud in the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58486479/10-02-24 Huminski v Town of Bennington Vermont (03-7036) - Alleged Fraud by Justice Sotomayor s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10 01 22 Huminski v Corsones and Fine v Sheriff: Alleged Willful misconduct at US courts s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25625914/10-05-15 Huminski v Rutland Pollice Department et al (1:99-cv-160) Alleged Honest Services Fraud at the US District Court - Vermont
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31407137/10-02-12 Huminski v Rutland Police Department et al (1:99-cv-160)at the US District Court, Vermont: False Memo and Order- served with no NEF at all-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/11-06-30 RE: McGarry v Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod Inc et al (1:10-cv-11343) - Racketeering through Simulated Litigation in the US District Court, Massachusetts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59124169/[6] 11-04-25 Linzer D, In Gitmo Opinion, Two Versions of Reality - Pro Publica, April 25, 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59213685/10-10-11 Linzer, D. “In GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality,” The National Law Journal, October 11, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53954229/[7] 09-04-20 Prof Eliyahu Shamir's Opinion Letter re: Sustain - the Case Management System of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46069337/[8] 10-01-12 Huminski v. Rutland Police Dept, et al (1:99-cv-160) Letter to Prof Fallon, Harvard Law School, soliciting opinion regarding two false and deliberately misleading NEFs served on Plaintiff Huminski with no Court Stamps s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25291742/[8] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination  by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/[9] 10-05-02 Repeat Request for Harvard Yale Deans Opinions Re Large Scale Fraud in Us Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30791559/10-09-09 Press Release: Harvard Law Dean Martha Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Review
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37198605/11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52993968/11-04-27 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler is Provided With Additional Evidence of Large-scale Computer Fraud in the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54012043/10-01-12 Huminski v. Rutland Police Dept, et al (1:99-cv-160) Letter to Prof Fallon, Harvard Law School, soliciting opinion regarding two false and deliberately misleading NEFs served on Plaintiff Huminski with no Court Stamps s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25291742/[10] Harvard, Yale Law Journals Refuse to Review Paper Documenting Corruption of the US Justice System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37077401/[11] 11-02-09 Press Release: ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/10-04-20 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court- habeas corpus of the former US prosecutor, held for 18 months in solitary confinement in Los Angeles with no valid arrest and booking records, after he protested widespread judicial corruption.
i) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik with stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/ii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/iii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/iv) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/v) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/vi) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendices
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34050423/[12] 12-01-07 Occupy the Courts – January 20, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/77457299/[13] 11-04-12 PRESS RELEASE: Bribing of State and US Judges by Bank of America Must be a Serious Concern!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52846502/[14] 02-00-00 Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/[15] 11-07-04 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/_________________
 
Boycott the US presidential vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/ 
Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/_______Human Rights Alert (NGO)  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”  The 2010 UN UPR report called upon the United States to stop executions, restore habeas corpus and close GITMO, abolish slavery, criminalize torture...
_______ 
  Flag Counter: 133http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 762,060Followers: 1,360http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 22,066http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 664,803
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________
Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
*  "I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history," said Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School who has written articles analyzing the role of courts in the financial crisis. "I can't think of one where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Reuters (Jan 22, 2012)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79572282/* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________

12-03-08 Obama's Kill Doctrine // 奥巴马杀学说的 // Убийство Обамы доктрины // Doctrina de matar de Obama

Obama's Kill Doctrine

By Jonathan Turley

  

Trust us, Attorney General Eric Holder says -- we'll only assassinate Americans after administrative "due process." That's not how the Constitution works, buddy.  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30743.htm

12-03-08 When government's boot is on your throat... // Al inicio del gobierno es en su garganta ... // 当政府的引导，是对你的喉咙... // При загрузке правительства на горле ...

Credit: Occupy America  

BOYCOTT THE US PRESIDENTIAL VOTE! IT ONLY LEGITIMIZES THE ILLEGITIMATE...
11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/

 
SECEDE! THE US IN ITS CURRENT FORM IS SIMPLY UNMANAGEABLE...
12-01-01 Secession - A Smart Business Move!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76877453/

12-03-08 The first Occupy Wall Street.. // 第一次占据华尔街... // La primera Ocupar Wall Street .. // Первый Занимайте Уолл-стрит ..

Credit: Occupy America 

12-03-08 Welcome France! //

Last New Visitor France  Visited March 8, 2012

12-03-08 Welcome China! // 欢迎来到中国！

Last New Visitor China  Visited March 8, 2012

12-03-08 Welcome France! //

Last New Visitor France  Visited March 8, 2012

12-03-07 Welcome India!

Last New Visitor India  Visited March 7, 2012

12-03-07 US Attorney General Eric Holder on Targeted Killings...

Part of a series of delusional speeches by AG Eric Holder on the rule of law...

_________

Wall Street JournalKey Excerpts from Holder�s Speech on Targeted Killing

BY JOE PALAZZOLO

Associated Press

Attorney General Eric Holder

Attorney General Eric Holder defended the Obama administration�s use of lethal force on suspected terrorists in a speech this afternoon in Chicago. Holder spent a good portion of it explaining the administration�s legal rationale for targeting a U.S. citizen abroad, as it did in the operation that killed the New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki, an alleged al-Qaeda operative in Yemen.

Below are excerpts from his prepared remarks.
In response to the attacks perpetrated � and the continuing threat posed � by al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, Congress has authorized the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those groups.  Because the United States is in an armed conflict, we are authorized to take action against enemy belligerents under international law.  The Constitution empowers the President to protect the nation from any imminent threat of violent attack.  And international law recognizes the inherent right of national self-defense.  None of this is changed by the fact that we are not in a conventional war.
Our legal authority is not limited to the battlefields in Afghanistan.  Indeed, neither Congress nor our federal courts has limited the geographic scope of our ability to use force to the current conflict in Afghanistan.  We are at war with a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country.  Over the last three years alone, al Qaeda and its associates have directed several attacks � fortunately, unsuccessful � against us from countries other than Afghanistan.  Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats.
�
[I]t is entirely lawful � under both United States law and applicable law of war principles � to target specific senior operational leaders of al Qaeda and associated forces.  This is not a novel concept.  In fact, during World War II, the United States tracked the plane flying Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto � the commander of Japanese forces in the attack on Pearl Harbor and the Battle of Midway � and shot it down specifically because he was on board.  As I explained to the Senate Judiciary Committee following the operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the same rules apply today.
Some have called such operations �assassinations.�  They are not, and the use of that loaded term is misplaced.  Assassinations are unlawful killings.  Here, for the reasons I have given, the U.S. government�s use of lethal force in self defense against a leader of al Qaeda or an associated force who presents an imminent threat of violent attack would not be unlawful � and therefore would not violate the Executive Order banning assassination or criminal statutes.
�
Let me be clear:  an operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al Qaeda or associated forces, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans, would be lawful at least in the following circumstances: First, the U.S. government has determined, after a thorough and careful review, that the individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; second, capture is not feasible; and third, the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles.

The evaluation of whether an individual presents an �imminent threat� incorporates considerations of the relevant window of opportunity to act, the possible harm that missing the window would cause to civilians, and the likelihood of heading off future disastrous attacks against the United States.  As we learned on 9/11, al Qaeda has demonstrated the ability to strike with little or no notice � and to cause devastating casualties.  Its leaders are continually planning attacks against the United States, and they do not behave like a traditional military � wearing uniforms, carrying arms openly, or massing forces in preparation for an attack.  Given these facts, the Constitution does not require the President to delay action until some theoretical end-stage of planning � when the precise time, place, and manner of an attack become clear.  Such a requirement would create an unacceptably high risk that our efforts would fail, and that Americans would be killed.
Whether the capture of a U.S. citizen terrorist is feasible is a fact-specific, and potentially time-sensitive, question.  It may depend on, among other things, whether capture can be accomplished in the window of time available to prevent an attack and without undue risk to civilians or to U.S. personnel.  Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack.  In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force.
Of course, any such use of lethal force by the United States will comply with the four fundamental law of war principles governing the use of force.  The principle of necessity requires that the target have definite military value.  The principle of distinction requires that only lawful targets � such as combatants, civilians directly participating in hostilities, and military objectives � may be targeted intentionally.  Under the principle of proportionality, the anticipated collateral damage must not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.  Finally, the principle of humanity requires us to use weapons that will not inflict unnecessary suffering.
These principles do not forbid the use of stealth or technologically advanced weapons.  In fact, the use of advanced weapons may help to ensure that the best intelligence is available for planning and carrying out operations, and that the risk of civilian casualties can be minimized or avoided altogether.

Some have argued that the President is required to get permission from a federal court before taking action against a United States citizen who is a senior operational leader of al Qaeda or associated forces.  This is simply not accurate. �Due process� and �judicial process� are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security. The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.

12-03-07 Welcome the Philippines!

Last New Visitor Philippines  Visited March 7, 2012