10-05-15 Alleged Honest Services Fraud at the US District Court, Vermont // Presunta Fraude de Honestos Servicios en el EE.UU. Tribunal de Distrito de Vermont // Angebliche Honest Services Betrug bei der US District Court, Vermont

RE: Huminski v Rutland Police Dept (1:99-cv-160) – Alleged Honest Services Fraud at the US District Court in Vermont The case of Huminski v Rutland Police Department, from the US District Court, Vermont, detailed below, surprisingly mimicked in great detail the case of Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County at the US District Court, Central District of California, where Attorney Kevin McCormick engaged in false appearances for Judge David Yaffe, while not Counsel of Record in the case, where the Judicial Council of California, which retained Attorney McCormick for such false appearances, insisted on referring to the case using a false caption, corrupting the name of first Defendant as "Sheriff of Los Angeles Court", [1] and were invalid NEFs were produced by the Court for all Minutes, Orders, Judgment, and Mandate served in the case. [2] Service of Minutes and Orders with invalid NEFs - missing the Court Stamps - were previously documented in Huminski v Rutland Police Dept et al, as well. [3] LINKS: [1] Correspondence with California Judicial Council in re: Engagement of Kevin McCormick in the habeas corpus of Richard Fine. http://www.scribd.com/doc/28645522/10-03-19b-Richard-Fine-Dr-Zernik-Mr-Carrizosa-Corresponde-in-re-Case-Caption   http://www.scribd.com/doc/28787678/10-03-22-Richard-Fine-Final-Response-by-Mr-Carrizosa-California-Judicial-Council-Re-Case-Caption-s [2] See Human Rights Alert Filing with the United Nations, linked as [3] , in letter to Attorney Bertrand, below. [3] Huminski v Rutland Police Dept (1:99-cv-160) –  Letter to Prof Fallon, Harvard Law School, regarding two NEFs served on Huminski with no Court Stamps. http://www.scribd.com/doc/25112472/10-01-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Pollice-Department-et-al-199-cv-160-Letter-to-Prof-Fallon-Harvard-Law-in-re-Two-false-Huminski-NEFs-bearing-no-court . -----Forwarded Message----- From: jz  Sent: May 15, 2010 4:50 AM To: bertrand@kenlanlaw.com, Feedback@kenlanlaw.com, 1-802-775-1581@metrofax.com Cc: joseph zernik , dlc@clearyshahi.com, plynn@IYlmlawvt.com, mking@lynnlawvt.com, mpatane@atg.state.vt.us, angelav@atg.state.vt.us, cgoldstein@atg.state.vt.us, rhooker@atg.state.vt.us, hthomas@lynnlawvt.com, aspears@lynlawvt.com, s_huminski@live.com Subject: Huminski v Rutland Police Dept (1:99-cv-160) – February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ objection to Huminski’s Motion for Limited Discovery and related issues. May 14, 2010  Attorney Shalmon A. Bertrand KENLAN, SCHWIEBERT, FACEY & GOSS, P.C. bertrand@kenlanlaw.com Feedback@kenlanlaw.com 1-802-775-1581@metrofax.com RE: Huminski v Rutland Police Dept (1:99-cv-160) – February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ objection to Huminski’s Motion for Limited Discovery and related issues. Attorney Bertrand: I am in receipt of your paper, referenced above, [1] and also of Judge Murtha’s Memo and Order. [2]  Some technical deficiencies appeared in both papers, where I request your assistance, which would require minimal effort at best, and would be critical in the safeguard of Human Rights at the US District Court in Vermont and beyond [3]:   1)      Your service of the February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ Objection failed to include the NEF from the US District Court Vermont’s CM/ECF. [1] As is patent in the various users’ manuals of the US district courts, the Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFs) are today the authentication instruments of the US courts.  However, since I am not authorized in CM/ECF – the Court’s case management system, at the US District Court Vermont, I was denied service and notice of such critical paper through CM/ECF by the Court itself. The record, referenced above, [1] showed the US District Court header imprint on its pages:             Case 1:99-cv-00160-jgm Document 351 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 4 It was obvious that you served Proposed Intervenor Zernik his copy of Defendant Consones’ paper after its filing at the US District Court in Vermont.  For such filing to be honest, valid, and effectual, you should have received by email in response to your electronic filing a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the US District Court in Vermont’s CM/ECF – the Court’s case management system. In fact, you referred to that fact in your “Certificate of Service” (Dkt #351-1), where for some of the parties you stated that the authentication would be delivered “VIA CM/ECF.” Therefore, I request that you forward to me the NEF for the paper you served on me, so that I would be able to discern whether the paper that you served on me was indeed a paper that was an honest, valid, and effectual filing at the US District Court, Vermont.  Given that the NEF is an electronic record, I would be grateful if you forward it by email to . 2)      Your February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ Objection [1] failed to state the correct caption of the case at hand. The Court listed the first Defendant in the case as “Rutland City Police Department.” [2]  You entirely failed to list such Defendant, and therefore, the case caption of your paper was inadequate or invalid.  Therefore, I request that you please serve me a corrected paper, alternatively – a reasonable explanation for the erroneous case caption used by you. 3)      Your February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ Objection [1] failed to include an adequate signature box for the Counsel. Therefore, I would be grateful if you could forward me an explicit statement that you were and are Counsel of Record for Defendant Corsones in the caption of Scott Huminski, Plaintiff v. Rutland City Police Department, Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Town of Rutland, Unnamed Members of the Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Unnamed Rutland Police Officer, State of Vermont, Nancy Corsones, Karen Predom, Vermont State Police, Unnamed Vermont State Police Officer, Rutland District Court, R.J. Elrick, S. Schutt, Robert Emerick, M. Patricia  Zimmerman, Bennington County Sheriff's Department, Gary Forrest, City of Rutland, Rutland County, Defendants. (1:99-CV-160) at the United States District Court For The District Of Vermont. 4)      The Court’s February 12, 2010 Memo and Order [2] was likewise served with no authentication at all. The Court served its Memo and Order with no authentication at all.  Given that I was and am denied access to the NEFs in  CM/ECF, there was and is no way that I could discern whether the paper served on me by the Court required “full faith and credit.” Therefore, I would be grateful for your help in forwarding to me by email the NEF which you surely received by email from CM/ECF on the February 12, 2010 Judge Murtha’s Memo and Order. Your help in these matters would be greatly appreciated.  No doubt you realize that such simple technical matters are critical for the furtherance of justice and for the safeguard of the Human Rights of all who reside in the United States in view of the manner in which the US courts are today administered through PACER and CM/ECF.  Truly, ___/s/_______ Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert  CC: David L. Cleary dlc@clearyshahi.com Pietro J. Lynn plynn@IYlmlawvt.com mking@lynnlawvt.com Mark J. Patane mpatane@atg.state.vt.us angelav@atg.state.vt.us cgoldstein@atg.state.vt.us    rhooker@atg.state.vt.us Heather E. Thomas hthomas@lynnlawvt.com   aspears@lynlawvt.com Scott Huminski s_huminski@live.com LINKS: [1] February 12, 2010 Defendant Corsones’ Objection http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Sheriff-s-Department-et-al-at-the-US-District-Court-Vermont-False-Memo-and-Order-served-with-no-NEF-at-all-s [2] February 12, 2010 Judge Murtah’s Memo and Order http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Sheriff-s-Department-et-al-at-the-US-District-Court-Vermont-False-Memo-and-Order-served-with-no-NEF-at-all-s [3] April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations: a) Press Release: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Filed-UPR-Report-with-the-United-Nations b) Submission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s c) Appendix: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-for-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-United-States-s d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center: http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/10-04-13-UPR-Tool-Kit-Urban-Justice-Center-USA-provided-by-UN-office-of-High-Commissioner-for-Human-Rights -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group. To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.

10-05-15 Welcome Lebanon - Newest Flag// Bienvenido Líbano - Nuevos Bandera // Willkommen im Libanon - Neueste Flagge

          

Newest Flag Lebanon Last Visited May 14, 2010

10-05-14 Alleged Honest Services Fraud - US District Court - Florida // Presunta Fraude de Servicios Honestos - Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU. - Florida // Angebliche Honest Services Fraud - US District Court - Florida

From: jz  [Edit Address Book]

To: amendmentone@comcast.net, lawsters@googlegroups.com, lawmen@googlegroups.com

Cc: Darcy.smith@usms.ushsd.gov

Subject: US District Court, Florida - dubious Thompson's papers: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig

Date: May 14, 2010 11:46 AM

Dear Mr Thompson: Sorry to say, it is likely that you are being duped.  However, you are in good company - some accomplished and experienced attorneys - like Richard Fine were duped in the very same manner... For any of your filings, even if conducted via snail mail, to be an honest, valid, and effectual filings, the clerk of the court, after scanning the record into the docket in PACER must issue by email an NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) bearing a Court Stamp, which today is an RSA encrypted alphanumeric string, which is placed at the bottom of the NEF, and which appears to most naive readers a gibberish.   However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF, you are denied the right of Notice and Service of such critical court records, which are meanwhile noticed and served on other parties in your case, who are authorized in CM/ECF.  That is inherent to the alleged routine fraud against parties who are not authorized in CM/ECF at the US courts today. Any court minutes, orders, judgments, mandates that may be served on you by the court by USPS mail, must be authenticated in the same manner, in order that such records require "full faith and credit."  However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF you may not receive the NEFs on court papers either.   In case you have in your possession any paper, which was titled "Notice of Electronic Filing", it would be gratefully apprecaited if you shared such papers with this group.  Such papers could have come in response to any of your filings, or with any filings by other parties, or with any papers served on you by the US Court,   Most likely you are not even aware which of the papers in your possession are honest, valid, and effectual court records, and which ones are not.  That is the essence of the alleged Shell Game Fraud in PACER and CM/ECF today. [1] The way you conduct yourself at present, you are distributing court records, holding them out to be honest, valid, and effectual court records, while you may have no evidence to support such claims.   I faced the same problem in my attempts to establish the nature of court papers in the case of the falsely hospitalized, 70 yo former US prosecutor Richard Fine - the habeas corpus at the US District Court - Central District of California, and the Petition and Appeal at the US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit.  The only remedy available to me was to press my First Amendment rights pursuant to Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978), and repeatedly request access to court records in his case - the NEFs and NDAs - to inspect and to copy.  It took well over half a year. but when I finally gained access, it became clear that all court actions named above were merely a convoluted hoax - none of the records issued by the courts were adequately verified and/or authenticated. [1] The same was documented in the case of Scott Huminski, [2] which - once discovered -  led him to abandon any further filing with the US courts, and resort instead to recording music clips and posting them on U-tube...    In short:  I suggest that at present you clearly mark records that you distribute as of ambiguous or dubious nature at best - until you gain access to the NEFs in your own case.  Once you gain access, it would be appreciated if you shared the NEFs with the public at large, including, but not limited to this group - after all - they were public records to begin with.   Once you gain access to the NEFs, you may follow Scott Huminski's example, since you may conclude that U-tube is accessible, while you may conclude that you have been effectively denied access to the US courts through both extrinsic and intrinsic alleged fraud. Joseph Zernik Los Angeles County, California  LINKS: [1] April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations: a) Press Release: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Filed-UPR-Report-with-the-United-Nations b) Submission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s c) Appendix: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-for-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-United-States-s d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center: http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/10-04-13-UPR-Tool-Kit-Urban-Justice-Center-USA-provided-by-UN-office-of-High-Commissioner-for-Human-Rights [2] Scott Huminski's paper with no valid authentication in NEFs of the US District Court, Vermont: http://www.scribd.com/doc/27383122/04-11-05-Huminski-v-Bennington-03-7036-US-App-Ct-2nd-Unsigned-Order-Judgment-Affirming-Vermont-Court-Judgment http://www.scribd.com/doc/25625914/10-01-22-Huminski-v-Corsones-and-Fine-v-Sheriff-Alleged-Willful-misconduct-at-US-courts-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305315/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Pd-Et-Al-Usdc-Vermont-Objection-by-Rutland-Police-Department-to-Huminski-Motion-s   http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Police-Department-et-al-at-the-US-District-Court-Vermont-False-Memo-and-Order-served-with-no-NEF-at-all-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-02-24-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-Alleged-Fraud-by-Justice-Sotomayor-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/27471018/10-02-25-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-et-al-03-7036-Repeat-request-to-access-2nd-Circuit-court-records-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/28838352/10-03-23-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-03-7036-USCA2-Docket-Sheet-s -----Original Message----- From: Jack Thompson  Sent: May 14, 2010 10:46 AM To: jz , lawsters@googlegroups.com Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com, Bob Hurt  Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig  Sir, I don't really know what your problem is.  If you know anything about the federal electronic court filing system, it nearly uniformly excludes nonlawyers from using it.  I am presently disbarred, if you know anything about my case.  Having said that and explained that, I sent the filing in question to the court via mail, which I am unfairly required to do, in just one denial of equal protection.  Once we proceed further, I am going to ask the judge for an order allowing me to file electronically, as I did for years as a lawyer. What do you want from me, then, an oath that I actually filed this thing, that will be available electronically in a few days via PACER.  Well, if that is what you want, even though I don't have the time to do this, here it is: I solemnly swear, under  penalty of perjury, that I actually wrote, signed, and mailed to the Middle District Clerk's office my filing in Thompson v. Bar, et alia, as indicated below. Signed, John B. Thompson Now please don't bother me with such niggling questions again.  I have a bar to destroy.  Jack Thompson, J.D. 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005 "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi ----- Original Message ----- From: jz To: Jack Thompson ; lawsters@googlegroups.com Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com ; Bob Hurt Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:26 AM Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig Dear Mr Thomson: Have you ever received a valid NEF for the filing?  Was the filing ever authenticated by the court? If you were indeed authorized for electronic filing by CM/ECF, you should have received your NEF instantaneously.  Please forward the NEF, if one ever existed. Joseph Zernik  -----Original Message----- From: Jack Thompson  Sent: May 14, 2010 9:01 AM To: jz , lawsters@googlegroups.com Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com, Bob Hurt  Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig  Yes, of course I filed it via mail.  It's on its way to the court.  What else do you want to know? Jack Thompson, J.D. 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005 "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi ----- Original Message ----- From: jz To: lawsters@googlegroups.com Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com ; amendmentone@comcast.net Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:44 AM Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig Hi Bob, Hi All: Is the record that was copied below, from the US district Court in Florida an honest, valid, and effectual court record?  Or is it merely part of the routine hoax? Not being an attorney myself, I am repeatedly astonished by those, who are often attorneys, and who distribute what is purported to be legal records, with no valid authentication at all. By doing so, those who distribute the records are playing into the hands of corrupt practices, and amplify ambiguities in the US justice system, which is the antithesis of Due Process, and which was the core of complaint to the United Nations, of serious violations of Human Rights in the United States by the US Courts. [1]  The United States District Courts today hold the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) [1] to be their valid authentication instruments, albeit, such practices were never published in Rules of Court in any of the US District Courts that I have examined.  Instead - such practices were only defined in CM/ECF users manuals, at times - published by third parties,which are not even directly related to the courts.  Likewise - the US Courts of Appeals hold today their NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) to be their valid authentication instruments. No court records should be distributed by honest persons without their authentication instruments. I would be grateful if you could inquire whether the record that was copied below had valid authentication, and inform all on this list of your findings. Joseph Zernik Los Angeles County, California LINKS: April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations: a) Press Release: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Filed-UPR-Report-with-the-United-Nations b) Submission: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s c) Appendix: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-for-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-United-States-s d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center: http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/10-04-13-UPR-Tool-Kit-Urban-Justice-Center-USA-provided-by-UN-office-of-High-Commissioner-for-Human-Rights -----Original Message----- From: Bob Hurt  Sent: May 13, 2010 4:22 PM To: lawmen@googlegroups.com Subject: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig You do it this way, folks.  If your enemy pokes so much as a pinky toe out, you chop it off.  Just like this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Hurt  • 2460 Persian Drive #70 • Clearwater, FL 33763 USA • (727) 669-5511 Lawmen • Files • Archive •  Scholarship • Jurisdictionary • GetZooks! • 3+G Free ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Jack Thompson [mailto:amendmentone@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:36 AM Subject: Notice to my federal judge of Greenberg Traurig Ponzi scheme lawsuit IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JUDGE DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR. JOHN B. THOMPSON,                                        Plaintiff, v.                                                                                                         Case No. 6:10-cv-442 THE FLORIDA BAR, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,                                        Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF A FEDERAL COURT FILING             COMES NOW plaintiff, John B. Thompson (Thompson) and moves this court to take judicial notice of the following:             The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law firm of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme.  Attached hereto as Exhibit A is the American Lawyer article.  Note that by going on the Internet to the following link one can access the electronic version of this article, embedded in which is a link to the actual Ponzi scheme complaint filed against Greenberg Traurig in federal court: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202458105019&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100513&kw=Ponzi%20Investor%20Suit%20Targets%20Greenberg%20Traurig%2C%20Quarles%20%26%20Brady .  It can be accessed by the PACER system as well, of course, Case 2:10-cv-01025-JWS.             Plaintiff asks this Honorable Court to take judicial notice of the formal filing of this complaint because the allegations therein corroborate the shocking culture of corruption that permeates the Greenberg Traurig law firm, which was retained by the defendant Florida Bar because of, not in spite of, this firm-wide, top-to-bottom corruption.  The Florida Bar wanted a law firm that would be willing to do and say anything to protect its corrupted lawyer disciplinary system which the American Bar Association itself says is fatally flawed and highly susceptible to corruption.  What a surprise (not) that Greenberg Traurig has insinuated itself onto the Board of Governors of the Arizona State Bar in order that that lawyer disciplinary entity might look the other way.             No lawyer in the Office of the Florida Attorney General, which should be representing The Florida Bar as the “official arm” of the Florida Supreme Court would be willing to do and say what The Bar’s private sector law firm, Greenberg Traurig, has done to protect The Florida Bar from Thompson’s rightful claims and the claims of others.   The Bar has Greenberg on permanent retainer to handle such claims, when it should be using the Office of the Attorney General of Florida.             If Greenberg Traurig enters a formal appearance on behalf of The Bar in this case, then plaintiff will file a motion to disqualify that firm, as certain lawyers therein will be indispensable fact witnesses herein.  That is one reason for this request of judicial notice.             For example, it is not a coincidence that Greenberg Traurig advised The Bar, as asserted in the First Amended Complaint, to waive all insurance coverage as to Thompson.  It was so that Greenberg Traurig, without any insurance industry oversight, would be free to violate state and federal laws to harm Thompson.   It was The Bar’s carrier that shut down The Bar’s earlier illegal acts against Thompson.  The Bar had in Greenberg Traurig, as the federal lawsuit filed in Arizona District Court indicates, a corrupted law firm, ready, willing, and able to deprive Thompson of his constitutional rights just as it is alleged to have ripped off investors in Arizona.             The four million dollars paid Greenberg Traurig out of Florida Bar members dues over the last several years bought a lot of lawyerly corruption—unavaialbe to it if the Florida Attorney General had been properly representing The Bar.  Thompson can prove that The Bar certainly got its money’s worth of corruption from Greenberg.             I hereby certify that a copy of this motion has been provided this 13th  day of May, 2010, to all of the parties directly, as plaintiff is waiting to hear whether they will waive formal service of the summons and first amended complaint herein.           JOHN B. THOMPSON Plaintiff pro se 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Phone:  305-666-4366                                                                                     amendmentone@comcast.net Jack Thompson, J.D. 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005 "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi ----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Thompson To: Jack Thompson ; William S. Scott ; Mgwynnlaw@aol.com ; joefeinberg@bellsouth.net ; Jrrosskamp@aol.com ; MBSibley@Earthlink.net ; mlanson@bellsouth.net ; randydlang@yahoo.com ;lwinston@winifs.com ; bobsherin@gmail.com ; grantesq@embarqmail.com ; bob@bobhurt.com ; mhgators@bellsouth.net ; exmiamiguy@charter.net ; South Florida ; wgelin@yahoo.com ;howardroark21@gmail.com ; ow@drwunderman.com Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:22 AM Subject: Ponzi Scheme Lawsuit against Greenberg Traurig John B. Thompson, J.D. 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366 amendmentone@comcast.net May 13, 2010 Richard G. Himelrick, #004738 J. James Christian, #023614 Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. Third Floor Camelback Esplanade II 2525 East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4237 rgh@tblaw.com ; jjc@tblaw.com Andrew S. Friedman Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C. 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ 85012 afriedman@bffb.com Re:  New Suit against Greenberg, Traurig (Ponzi Scheme) Dear Messrs. Himelrick, Christian, and Friedman: I am interested to see that your law firms have now filed a federal lawsuit against, among others, the law firm of Greenberg, Traurig.  See Case No. 2:10-cv-01025-JWS, District of Arizona.http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202458105019&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100513&kw=Ponzi%20Investor%20Suit%20Targets%20Greenberg%20Traurig%2C%20Quarles%20%26%20Brady I and others have ample information suggesting that this particular law firm has been swimming for quite sometime in a culture of corruption that makes your allegations in the aforementioned suit plausible.  When you see and can prove a lawyer lying in open court, in federal court no less, it is at least probative of what concerns your clients. This law firm, for example, by virtue of its improper and illegal relationship with The Florida Bar, has helped turn our state’s lawyer disciplinary machinery into a means by which corrupt law firms and lawyers are protected and innocent lawyers who are whistle-blowers are targeted illegally.  The Florida Bar, as a result, looked the other way when it knew or should have known that Scott Rothstein, who authored a huge Ponzi scheme here, had insinuated himself as an operative in The Florida Bar’s disciplinary machinery to buy protection from The Bar.  The Bar was even skimming some of these Ponzi scheme monies to fund certain of its pet projects. Please contact me at your earliest convenience, and I and others shall give you all information that we firmly believe will tend to corroborate your allegations. Regards, Jack Thompson Copy:  The Florida Bar             FBI Special Agent in Charge, John Gillies, Miami Field Office (John, what did I             tell you about Greenberg?) Jack Thompson, J.D. 5721 Riviera Drive Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005 "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group. To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group. To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.