Friday, May 14, 2010

10-05-14 Alleged Honest Services Fraud - US District Court - Florida // Presunta Fraude de Servicios Honestos - Tribunal de Distrito de EE.UU. - Florida // Angebliche Honest Services Fraud - US District Court - Florida


To: amendmentone@comcast.net, lawsters@googlegroups.com, lawmen@googlegroups.com
Cc: Darcy.smith@usms.ushsd.gov
Subject: US District Court, Florida - dubious Thompson's papers: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig
Date: May 14, 2010 11:46 AM


Dear Mr Thompson:

Sorry to say, it is likely that you are being duped.  However, you are in good company - some accomplished and experienced attorneys - like Richard Fine were duped in the very same manner...

For any of your filings, even if conducted via snail mail, to be an honest, valid, and effectual filings, the clerk of the court, after scanning the record into the docket in PACER must issue by email an NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) bearing a Court Stamp, which today is an RSA encrypted alphanumeric string, which is placed at the bottom of the NEF, and which appears to most naive readers a gibberish.  

However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF, you are denied the right of Notice and Service of such critical court records, which are meanwhile noticed and served on other parties in your case, who are authorized in CM/ECF.  That is inherent to the alleged routine fraud against parties who are not authorized in CM/ECF at the US courts today.

Any court minutes, orders, judgments, mandates that may be served on you by the court by USPS mail, must be authenticated in the same manner, in order that such records require "full faith and credit."  However, since you are not authorized in CM/ECF you may not receive the NEFs on court papers either.  

In case you have in your possession any paper, which was titled "Notice of Electronic Filing", it would be gratefully apprecaited if you shared such papers with this group.  Such papers could have come in response to any of your filings, or with any filings by other parties, or with any papers served on you by the US Court,  

Most likely you are not even aware which of the papers in your possession are honest, valid, and effectual court records, and which ones are not.  That is the essence of the alleged Shell Game Fraud in PACER and CM/ECF today. [1]

The way you conduct yourself at present, you are distributing court records, holding them out to be honest, valid, and effectual court records, while you may have no evidence to support such claims.  

I faced the same problem in my attempts to establish the nature of court papers in the case of the falsely hospitalized, 70 yo former US prosecutor Richard Fine - the habeas corpus at the US District Court - Central District of California, and the Petition and Appeal at the US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit.  The only remedy available to me was to press my First Amendment rights pursuant to Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978), and repeatedly request access to court records in his case - the NEFs and NDAs - to inspect and to copy. 

It took well over half a year. but when I finally gained access, it became clear that all court actions named above were merely a convoluted hoax - none of the records issued by the courts were adequately verified and/or authenticated. [1]

The same was documented in the case of Scott Huminski, [2] which - once discovered -  led him to abandon any further filing with the US courts, and resort instead to recording music clips and posting them on U-tube...
  
In short:  I suggest that at present you clearly mark records that you distribute as of ambiguous or dubious nature at best - until you gain access to the NEFs in your own case.  Once you gain access, it would be appreciated if you shared the NEFs with the public at large, including, but not limited to this group - after all - they were public records to begin with.  
Once you gain access to the NEFs, you may follow Scott Huminski's example, since you may conclude that U-tube is accessible, while you may conclude that you have been effectively denied access to the US courts through both extrinsic and intrinsic alleged fraud.

Joseph Zernik
Los Angeles County, California 

LINKS:


[1] April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:


[2] Scott Huminski's paper with no valid authentication in NEFs of the US District Court, Vermont:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27383122/04-11-05-Huminski-v-Bennington-03-7036-US-App-Ct-2nd-Unsigned-Order-Judgment-Affirming-Vermont-Court-Judgment

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25625914/10-01-22-Huminski-v-Corsones-and-Fine-v-Sheriff-Alleged-Willful-misconduct-at-US-courts-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305315/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Pd-Et-Al-Usdc-Vermont-Objection-by-Rutland-Police-Department-to-Huminski-Motion-s  

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305312/10-02-12-Huminski-v-Rutland-Police-Department-et-al-at-the-US-District-Court-Vermont-False-Memo-and-Order-served-with-no-NEF-at-all-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-02-24-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-Alleged-Fraud-by-Justice-Sotomayor-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27471018/10-02-25-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-et-al-03-7036-Repeat-request-to-access-2nd-Circuit-court-records-s

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28838352/10-03-23-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-03-7036-USCA2-Docket-Sheet-s

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Thompson 
Sent: May 14, 2010 10:46 AM
To: jz , lawsters@googlegroups.com
Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com, Bob Hurt 
Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig


Sir, I don't really know what your problem is.  If you know anything about the federal electronic court filing system, it nearly uniformly excludes nonlawyers from using it.  I am presently disbarred, if you know anything about my case. 
Having said that and explained that, I sent the filing in question to the court via mail, which I am unfairly required to do, in just one denial of equal protection.  Once we proceed further, I am going to ask the judge for an order allowing me to file electronically, as I did for years as a lawyer.
What do you want from me, then, an oath that I actually filed this thing, that will be available electronically in a few days via PACER.  Well, if that is what you want, even though I don't have the time to do this, here it is:
I solemnly swear, under  penalty of perjury, that I actually wrote, signed, and mailed to the Middle District Clerk's office my filing in Thompson v. Bar, et alia, as indicated below.
Signed, John B. Thompson
Now please don't bother me with such niggling questions again.  I have a bar to destroy. 

Jack Thompson, J.D.
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi

----- Original Message -----
From: jz
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig


Dear Mr Thomson:

Have you ever received a valid NEF for the filing?  Was the filing ever authenticated by the court?

If you were indeed authorized for electronic filing by CM/ECF, you should have received your NEF instantaneously.  Please forward the NEF, if one ever existed.

Joseph Zernik 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Thompson 
Sent: May 14, 2010 9:01 AM
To: jz , lawsters@googlegroups.com
Cc: lawmen@googlegroups.com, Bob Hurt 
Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig


Yes, of course I filed it via mail.  It's on its way to the court.  What else do you want to know?

Jack Thompson, J.D.
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi
----- Original Message -----
From: jz
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig

Hi Bob, Hi All:

Is the record that was copied below, from the US district Court in Florida an honest, valid, and effectual court record? 
Or is it merely part of the routine hoax?

Not being an attorney myself, I am repeatedly astonished by those, who are often attorneys, and who distribute what is purported to be legal records, with no valid authentication at all. By doing so, those who distribute the records are playing into the hands of corrupt practices, and amplify ambiguities in the US justice system, which is the antithesis of Due Process, and which was the core of complaint to the United Nations, of serious violations of Human Rights in the United States by the US Courts. [1] 

The United States District Courts today hold the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) [1] to be their valid authentication instruments, albeit, such practices were never published in Rules of Court in any of the US District Courts that I have examined.  Instead - such practices were only defined in CM/ECF users manuals, at times - published by third parties,which are not even directly related to the courts.  Likewise - the US Courts of Appeals hold today their NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) to be their valid authentication instruments.

No court records should be distributed by honest persons without their authentication instruments.

I would be grateful if you could inquire whether the record that was copied below had valid authentication, and inform all on this list of your findings.

Joseph Zernik
Los Angeles County, California

LINKS:

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Hurt 
Sent: May 13, 2010 4:22 PM
To: lawmen@googlegroups.com
Subject: Florida, Thompson: Jack notifies court of corruptrion in his nemesis Greenberg Traurig


You do it this way, folks.  If your enemy pokes so much as a pinky toe out, you chop it off.  Just like this.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Hurt  • 2460 Persian Drive #70 • Clearwater, FL 33763 USA • (727) 669-5511
Lawmen • Files • Archive •  Scholarship • Jurisdictionary • GetZooks! • 3+G Free
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jack Thompson [mailto:amendmentone@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:36 AM
Subject: Notice to my federal judge of Greenberg Traurig Ponzi scheme lawsuit
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
JUDGE DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR.
JOHN B. THOMPSON,
                                       Plaintiff,
v.                                                                                                         Case No. 6:10-cv-442
THE FLORIDA BAR,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
                                       Defendants.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF A FEDERAL COURT FILING
            COMES NOW plaintiff, John B. Thompson (Thompson) and moves this court to take judicial notice of the following:
            The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law firm of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme.  Attached hereto as Exhibit A is the American Lawyer article.  Note that by going on the Internet to the following link one can access the electronic version of this article, embedded in which is a link to the actual Ponzi scheme complaint filed against Greenberg Traurig in federal court: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202458105019&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100513&kw=Ponzi%20Investor%20Suit%20Targets%20Greenberg%20Traurig%2C%20Quarles%20%26%20Brady .  It can be accessed by the PACER system as well, of course, Case 2:10-cv-01025-JWS.
            Plaintiff asks this Honorable Court to take judicial notice of the formal filing of this complaint because the allegations therein corroborate the shocking culture of corruption that permeates the Greenberg Traurig law firm, which was retained by the defendant Florida Bar because of, not in spite of, this firm-wide, top-to-bottom corruption.  The Florida Bar wanted a law firm that would be willing to do and say anything to protect its corrupted lawyer disciplinary system which the American Bar Association itself says is fatally flawed and highly susceptible to corruption.  What a surprise (not) that Greenberg Traurig has insinuated itself onto the Board of Governors of the Arizona State Bar in order that that lawyer disciplinary entity might look the other way.
            No lawyer in the Office of the Florida Attorney General, which should be representing The Florida Bar as the “official arm” of the Florida Supreme Court would be willing to do and say what The Bar’s private sector law firm, Greenberg Traurig, has done to protect The Florida Bar from Thompson’s rightful claims and the claims of others.   The Bar has Greenberg on permanent retainer to handle such claims, when it should be using the Office of the Attorney General of Florida.
            If Greenberg Traurig enters a formal appearance on behalf of The Bar in this case, then plaintiff will file a motion to disqualify that firm, as certain lawyers therein will be indispensable fact witnesses herein.  That is one reason for this request of judicial notice.
            For example, it is not a coincidence that Greenberg Traurig advised The Bar, as asserted in the First Amended Complaint, to waive all insurance coverage as to Thompson.  It was so that Greenberg Traurig, without any insurance industry oversight, would be free to violate state and federal laws to harm Thompson.   It was The Bar’s carrier that shut down The Bar’s earlier illegal acts against Thompson.  The Bar had in Greenberg Traurig, as the federal lawsuit filed in Arizona District Court indicates, a corrupted law firm, ready, willing, and able to deprive Thompson of his constitutional rights just as it is alleged to have ripped off investors in Arizona.
            The four million dollars paid Greenberg Traurig out of Florida Bar members dues over the last several years bought a lot of lawyerly corruption—unavaialbe to it if the Florida Attorney General had been properly representing The Bar.  Thompson can prove that The Bar certainly got its money’s worth of corruption from Greenberg.
            I hereby certify that a copy of this motion has been provided this 13th  day of May, 2010, to all of the parties directly, as plaintiff is waiting to hear whether they will waive formal service of the summons and first amended complaint herein.        
 
JOHN B. THOMPSON
Plaintiff pro se
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
Phone:  305-666-4366
                                                                                    amendmentone@comcast.net

Jack Thompson, J.D.
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:22 AM
Subject: Ponzi Scheme Lawsuit against Greenberg Traurig
John B. Thompson, J.D.
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
305-666-4366
amendmentone@comcast.net
May 13, 2010
Richard G. Himelrick, #004738
J. James Christian, #023614
Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
Third Floor Camelback Esplanade II
2525 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4237 rgh@tblaw.com ; jjc@tblaw.com
Andrew S. Friedman
Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C.
2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1000
Phoenix, AZ 85012 afriedman@bffb.com
Re:  New Suit against Greenberg, Traurig (Ponzi Scheme)
Dear Messrs. Himelrick, Christian, and Friedman:
I am interested to see that your law firms have now filed a federal lawsuit against, among others, the law firm of Greenberg, Traurig.  See Case No. 2:10-cv-01025-JWS, District of Arizona.http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202458105019&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100513&kw=Ponzi%20Investor%20Suit%20Targets%20Greenberg%20Traurig%2C%20Quarles%20%26%20Brady
I and others have ample information suggesting that this particular law firm has been swimming for quite sometime in a culture of corruption that makes your allegations in the aforementioned suit plausible.  When you see and can prove a lawyer lying in open court, in federal court no less, it is at least probative of what concerns your clients.
This law firm, for example, by virtue of its improper and illegal relationship with The Florida Bar, has helped turn our state’s lawyer disciplinary machinery into a means by which corrupt law firms and lawyers are protected and innocent lawyers who are whistle-blowers are targeted illegally.  The Florida Bar, as a result, looked the other way when it knew or should have known that Scott Rothstein, who authored a huge Ponzi scheme here, had insinuated himself as an operative in The Florida Bar’s disciplinary machinery to buy protection from The Bar.  The Bar was even skimming some of these Ponzi scheme monies to fund certain of its pet projects.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience, and I and others shall give you all information that we firmly believe will tend to corroborate your allegations.
Regards, Jack Thompson
Copy:  The Florida Bar
            FBI Special Agent in Charge, John Gillies, Miami Field Office (John, what did I
            tell you about Greenberg?)

Jack Thompson, J.D.
5721 Riviera Drive
Coral Gables, Florida 33146
305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it." -- Mahatma Gandhi


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)