11-06-01 Fraud in the US Courts // Fraude en los EE.UU. Tribunales // 在美国法院欺诈

Sharon Scarrella Anderson 
www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com

Correspondence with Sharon Anderson in RE: Complaint pertaining to fraud in PACER and CM/ECF and discrimination against non-lawyers (pro se filers) in the US courts

William Windsor introduced me to Sharon Anderson, who has been active in protesting the fraud in PACER and CM/ECF for some years.

I am seeking input on the issue of filing a petition by a group of pro se filers, against US Attorney General Eric Holder, "To Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties", relative to corruption of the US Courts in general, and in particular regarding the fraud in the public access (PACER) and electronic filing (CM/ECF) systems in the US courts by the Administrative Office of the US Courts and discrimination against pro se filers through denial of access to CM/ECF.
____

1) Joseph Zernik wrote:
I am fully aware of the futility of seeking remedies through the US courts.  Filing a complaint is intended as a form of protest, civil disobedience, and as an attempt to educate the people and gain media attention.  Moreover, filing complaints pertaining to the corruption of the US courts themselves, often leads the courts to engage in blatant misconduct, as seen, for example, in the case of Judge Richard Leon, below.

William Windsor is very effective in getting media attention to the issues, and I hope that such filing would provide an opportunity for media attention to the issues.

The corruption of the US courts affects not only the large-scale abuse of Human Rights, but also the failure of US banking regulation. [1]  The issue of failing US banking regulation has attracted substantial attention both in the US and abroad in recent years, since it caused a world-wide crisis.

International forums are used for highlighting the issues:  [2]

• Filing with the United Nations Human Rights Council, which led to a report that stated: Corruption of the courts and the legal profession in California,
• Publication in peer-reviewed, international computer science journal,
• Presentations in the 16th World Criminology Congress.
• Communication with foreign embassies and international central banks and banking regulators.

IN SUM:
The evidence shows that corruption of the US courts is at a level that has not been seen in a century or more.  The fraudulent electronic systems are claimed to be a key enabling factor.

• The chances that filing a petition for a Writ of Mandate "to Compel a US Officer to Perform His Duties" will remedy the situation are slim.
• Filing such complaint will provide further evidence of the corruption, and help to build the pressure on the US government.
• Filing such complaint on the fundamental issue of fraud in PACER and CM/ECF will allow to get together a large group of complainants from around the country.

WHAT NEXT?
I suggest writing a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, requesting that he perform his duties, and restore the integrity of the US courts by addressing the fraud in PACER and CM/ECF and the discrimination against pro se filers.

REQUEST FOR INPUT:
Please offer suggestions regarding types of fraud that you have identified in PACER and CM/ECF. 

The issues that were identified so far, which enable the routine conduct of cases as Simulated Litigation are:

A. The Administrative Office of the US Courts has implemented fraudulent, invalid public access (PACER) and case management (CM/ECF) systems in the US courts with no legal authority at all.
1) Failure of the US courts to publish valid Rules of Courts, to establish the new court procedures, deemed effective by the US Courts following the implementation of PACER and CM/ECF.
1) Publication of simulated PACER dockets, which the clerks of the US courts refuse to certify
2) Failure to establish a legally valid and publicly recognized forms of digital signatures of judges and clerks.
3) Implementation of invalid, simulated authentication records (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing in the District Courts and NDAs - Notices of Docket Activity in the US Courts of Appeals), which replaced the Certificates of Service.
4) Elimination of the authentication records (NEFs and NDAs) from the PACER dockets, and thereby making it impossible for the public to distinguish between valid and void court records.
5) Routine failure of the US Courts to docket the summonses in the PACER docket, in apparent violation of the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure, and initiation of simulated litigation cases with no valid summonses issued or executed.
6) Publication in PACER dockets of simulated minutes, orders, and judgments, which are unsigned and/or unauthenticated.
7) Failure to establish valid authorities in CM/ECF, and thereby enabling the entry of minutes, orders, and judgments in the PACER dockets by unauthorized court personnel, who are not Deputy Clerks.
8) Enabling the appearance of attorneys, who are not Attorneys of Record, with "no communication with clients" clause.  The practice is rampant in cases involving large corporations and government officials.
9) Enabling the entry of papers in the PACER dockets by attorneys with no prior review by authorized Deputy Clerks.
10) Arbitrary and capricious denial of public access to critical court records in the various US courts (Summonses, papers filed by parties, Judgment Index, Calendars of the Courts, Corporate Parent Reports, etc)

B. Discrimination against pro se filers, related to denial of access to CM/ECF, amounts to abuse of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the People.
1) Routine denial of access to CM/ECF, which established two separate and unequal classes in access to the courts and to court records.
2) The cost and time required to file on paper by far exceed the cost of electronic filing.
3) The denial of access to CM/ECF by pro se filers enables court personnel to eliminate undesirable papers, which were duly filed by pro se filers, from the PACER dockets.
4) The denial of access to CM/ECF enables the denial of access to critical court records, which appear only in CM/ECF, in apparent violation of First Amendment and Due Process rights.

C. Fraud in the Public Access and Electronic Filing systems of the US Supreme Court undermines the foundation of the Rule of Law [3]
1) Publication of invalid simulated dockets, journal, decision, judgments by the US Supreme Court has undermined the rule of law.
2) Unauthorized personnel issue US Supreme Court notices, decisions, judgments
3) Unauthorized personnel deny the right to file papers in the US Supreme Court.

LINKS:
[1] Regarding the fraud in PACER and CM/ECF and banking regulation, see for example the fraud in SEC v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) in the US District Court, Southern District of New York:
a) 10-12-08 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation(1:09-cv-06829)  Request No 1 for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/
b) Zernik, Joseph: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation - Pretense Litigation and Pretense Banking Regulation in the United States (filed in support of Request No 1 for impeachment of US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44663232/
c) 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request No 1 for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/
[2] Regarding international publication, presentations, see:
a) 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[3] Regarding fraud in the public access and electronic filing systems of the US Supreme Court, see:
a) 11-05-23 PRESS RELEASE: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US District Court, DC  invalid court records in a Simulated Litigation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56106686/
b) 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56145482/
c) 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
d) 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell for Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/


2) At 12:43 PM 6/1/2011, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&source=hp&q=Sharons%20mn-ecf&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&fp=e33c593d9c150181&biw=758&bih=339&pf=p&pdl=3000

Sometimes its an exercise in futility access to the Courts.  www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com 
 

3) In a message dated 6/1/2011 5:39:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jz12345@earthlink.net writes:

Copied below is a note I sent to Mr Windsor in this regard.  Any comments, suggestions would be appreciated:

Another option to consider:

Filing together a Petition for a Writ of Mandate in the US District Court, DC, against US DOJ, "To Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties".  It is what I basically did last time: I claimed that USDOJ knowingly refuses to protect the People against judicial corruption.

My complaint was about California, but the issues you and others raised in Georgia, Vermont, Colorado, are the same.

In general, if we decide to go this way, I would suggest that we focus on:

a) The fraud in the PACER dockets, which permits to show invalid records (e.g. the series of certificates in your case), which effectively is denial of Access to the Court and Denial of Equal Protection.

b) The denial of FIRST AMENDMENT access to court records (e.g. - in your case, the refusal to permit you access to the certificates which had no Dkt #)

c) The denial of FIRST AMENDMENT right to file papers in court - e.g., in Judge Richard Leon's court. 

Papers, which provided direct documentary evidence of judicial corruption were "denied the right to file". I had the same experience in:

i. US District Court, Los Angeles

ii.  US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit

iii. US Supreme Court.

The advantages of framing the issues this way are:

a) That they are universal, for all US courts, and very simple, I believe.  If we take this route, we do not get into the details of the individual cases, yours, or mine, although we can incorporate them by reference to the previous complaints.

b) That there would be much more interest in the legal community in the US and abroad in such complaint, rather than a complaint that deals with the corruption and details of the corruption in this case or that with this judge or that.  PACER and CM/ECF were universally installed by the Administrative Office of the US Courts, and in my opinion it is historically unheard of - organized fraud on the people by the judiciary branch.

c) We could try to introduce expert reports on the matter, which would be much easier than introducing expert reports on the individual cases. (Although in my case in California, I had an Expert Report from an FBI veteran, who is likely the most decorated alive, and Judge Leon "denied the leave to file" the report.)  If they "deny the leave to file" reports on fraud in PACER and CM/ECF, it would be newsworthy, I believe.

4) At 12:15 PM 6/1/2011, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

                             YES  At least the e-mail is getting thro  www.lying-lawyers.blogspot.com

 

5) In a message dated 6/1/2011 5:10:53 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jz12345@earthlink.net writes:

Dear Ms Anderson:

Mr William Windsor informed me of your actions regarding electronic filing.

You may be interested in reading:

Short review regarding the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) - a core instrument of fraud in the US Courts systems (PACER and CM/ECF) [1]

Filing in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, on this matter [2]

Documentation of abuse against non-attorney filers by Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC, in Civil Rights Matters. [3]

Joseph Zernik Bio [4]

Combined, the the papers claim:

1) Discrimination - two classes, separate and unequal - have been established relative to access to the courts.

2) The US courts electronic systems (PACER and CM/ECF) are routinely used to defraud non-attorney filers, particularly in civil rights matters, through the conduct of Simulated Litigation.

The same problem is found in the state courts, but I believe that addressing the large-scale fraud in the US courts is the higher priority.

Would you or others, copied on this message, be interested in joining a filing in the US District Court, DC, for a Writ of Mandate "to compel US Officer to Perform His Duties" against US DOJ in this matter?

Please let me know.

Truly,

  

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

___

LINKS:

[1] 11-05-20 NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) in the US Courts Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/55862403/

[2] 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/

[3] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC � master of the �Leave toe to file denied�

http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/

[4] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/

____

Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC - master of the 'Leave to File Denied'
See under:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/

11-06-01 Welcome Belgium! // Bienvenido Bélgica! // 欢迎比利时！

Last New Visitor Belgium  Visited June 1, 2011

11-06-01 Abolish the Death Penalty in California! // Abolición de la Pena de Muerte en California! // 在加利福尼亚州废除死刑！

California’s Unusually Cruel Punishment

Professor Bill Ong Hing, who served on the California Commission for the Fair Administration of Justice(CCFAJ), argued recently that California’s death penalty should be abolished because of its intractable problems:

The death penalty is too costly, the possibility is high that a person who has been wrongfully convicted will be put to death, capital punishment inordinately affects communities of color, the imposition of the death penalty varies greatly from county to county within the same state, a low income defendant faces a troubling disadvantage when charged with a capital offense, the death penalty forecloses any possibility of healing and redemption, and the death qualification juror requirement inherently and unjustly biases the process against the defendant.

READ THE FULL STORY:

http://my.firedoglake.com/lovechilde/2011/05/25/californias-unusually-cruel-punishment/ 

11-05-30 The US needs to learn from Russia! // Los EE.UU. tiene que aprender de Rusia! // 美国需要学习俄罗斯！

In Russia, Prisons for Police Thrive

By ANDREW E. KRAMER
Published: May 28, 2011

NIZHNY TAIGIL, Russia - Like a scene from a felon's daydream, all the inmates at a prison compound here in western Russia - some 2,000 of them - are former policemen, prosecutors, tax inspectors, customs agents and judges.

Maxim Marmur for The New York Times

The cafeteria at the prison compound in Nizhny Taigil, Russia.  More Photos �
READ THE FULL STORY:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/world/europe/29prisons.html

11-05-30 Welcome Switzerland! // Bienvenida a Suiza! // 欢迎瑞士！

Last New Visitor Switzerland  Visited May 30, 2011

11-05-30 Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC – master of the “Leave to File Denied” // Juez de EE.UU. Richard Leon // 美国法官理查德莱昂

Judge Leon keeps papers duly filed by plaintiffs in civil rights matter up to a couple of months in chambers, then mails them back with hand-inscriptions “Leave to File Denied, RJL”. It is a convenient procedure, employed when the papers provide evidence or arguments that Judge Leon does not like, particularly in matters related to judicial corruption. It is part of Simulated Litigation practices.
US Congress should perform its duties… 
____
VIEW PDF VERSION WITH THE RECORDS AT:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/

  

Richard J Leon, Judge

US District Court, Washington DC

Los Angeles, May 30 – “US Judge Richard Leon interprets the US Constitution in a peculiar way,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO). “If your evidence or your arguments are not his cup of tea, he simply keeps the papers in chambers, and refuses to let the clerk docket them”. 

The practice appears to be reserved as a special treatment for pro se litigants, who come to court in attempt to protect their rights against judicial corruption and abuse by large corporations.

In Windsor v Olinda Judge Leon 'denied the leave to file' a Motion for his own disqualification…

In Windsor et Evans et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff William Windsor filed complaint under cause of actions of Deprivation of rights under the color of law, 42 USC §1983, pertaining to alleged Fraud on the Court by US Judge Olinda Evans of the US District Court, Northern District of Georgia, as part of Simulated Litigation. [[i],[ii]]  

Figure 1: Five (5) papers with “Leave to file Denied, RJL” in Windsor v Evans et al

“At times Judge Leon held the papers in chambers up to two months,” says Windsor, “The papers disappeared, and I had no way to know where they went, until he mailed them back, with ‘Leave to File Denied, RJL’. In my opinion it should be considered collusion of Judge Leon and Clerk of the Court Nancy Mayer-Whittington.”

In Zernik v Melson et al, Judge Leon 'denied the leave to file' the Opinion Letter of highly decorated Fraud Expert...

In Zernik v Melson et al in the US Court, District of Columbia, pro se Plaintiff filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties, 28 USC §1361. The petition pertained to refusal of FBI and US Department of Justice to protect the rights of 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, in view of indisputable evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[iii]]

Figure 2: A total of nine (9) papers with “Leave to file Denied RJL” in Zernik v Melson et al. 

“He is very methodical,” says Zernik. 

In this case Judge Leon ‘denied the leave to file’ of: 
Letter of a highly decorated FBI veteran, a Fraud Expert, who opined regarding conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court “fraud being committed’, and recommended “investigation should be immediately instituted”. [[iv]] 

March 2008 Memorandum Opinion of the Honorable Jeff Bohm in the Case of Borrower Parsley, where Judge Bohm documented and rebuked the fraudulent litigation practices of Countrywide (today a subsidiary of Bank of America), and recorded that the corporation promised to cease such conduct. [[v]] 


Five (5) papers, which had been previously filed in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas, under the Case of Borrower Parsley, [[vi]] and which provided evidence that Countrywide and Bank of America nevertheless continued to engage in Fraud on the Courts. 
Once the evidence was excluded from the record, Judge Leon issued a Simulated Order, purporting to dismiss Zernik’s Petition, and stated that the petition simply originated in a “contentious litigation”.

“It is a very effective way to address judicial corruption,” says Zernik, “you suppress the evidence of its existence…”

The case also documents the tight links between corruption of large financial institutions and corruption of the US courts, as inherent to the ongoing financial crisis.

Conduct of the clerks is inherent to corruption of the courts, as are the electronic record systems of the US Courts (PACER and CM/ECF)
A century ago, conditions in the US courts were described in the US Congress as “a burlesque”. Corruption of the clerks was considered inherent to the situation. The solution was removing the clerks from under the authority of the judges, and placing them under the direct authority of the US Attorney General, as part of the Salary Act (1919). [[vii]] The Salary Act is credited with restoring the integrity of the US courts at that time. However, by the mid 20th century, the clerks were again placed under authority of the judges.

“We are back in square one,” says Dr Zernik, “the idea behind the office of the clerk, for hundreds of years, was as a check and balance against judicial corruption.” Evidently, it does not work when the clerks are under authority of the same judges that they are supposed to monitor. 

“The implementation of invalid computer systems in the US courts is also central to the situation,” says Dr Zernik, who gained expertise in examining fraud in the state and US courts in recent years. [[viii]] 

The cases, described above, are of pro se litigants, who are not permitted access to the electronic filing system, and that fact, in itself, opens the way for their routine abuse in the US courts. 

However, the fraud in the computers of the US courts goes far beyond that. “The systems were designed to enable the conduct of entire cases as Simulated Litigation,” says Dr Zernik. Dr Zernik’s reports on the computers of the US courts were published in a peer-reviewed international computer science journal, and selected for presentation in the World Criminology Congress. Dr Zernik also filed his reports with Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler, and expert on computers and the law, for review. Report, authored by Dr Zernik, which was based in part on analysis of fraud in computers of the courts and prisons, was incorporated into a United Nations Human Rights Council 2010 Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [[ix]]

“Richard Leon was probably at his best as counsel during Iran-Contra, in suppressing evidence of wrongdoing by government officials,” says Zernik “but he is unfit for the bench.”

The US Congress should preform its duties...
The US Congress should perform its duties, the US courts have descended to a level of corruption that has not been seen for a century. Unless corruption of the courts is addressed, there is no chance of restoring the integrity of the financial system.

LINKS:
[i] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
§ 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits 
an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to 
another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, 
or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or 
(2) cause another to: 
(A) submit to the putative authority of the 
document; or 
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any 
action in response to the document, in compliance with the 
document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with 
the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a 
sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[ii] 11-11-12 PRESS RELEASE: Maid of the Mist Corporation Et Al v Alcatraz Media, LLC, et al (1-09-Cv-01543) Simulated Litigation - Fraud in the US Court, Northern District of Georgia
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55272776/ 
[iii] 11-05-11 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: Docket and other PACER reports in Simulated Litigation conducted by Judge Richard Leon and Clerk Nancy Mayer-Whittington
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55231462/ 
[iv] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #2 - Fraud Expert Opinion Re: Fraud by California Judges in collusion with Countrywide, Bank of America in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296200/ 
[v] Memorandum Opinion of the Hon Jeff Bohm in the Case of Borrower Parsley (05-90374) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, which were “denied leave to file” by Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court, DC:
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #1 - Evidence of corrupt practices by Countrywide and Bank of America in the US Courts - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56295907/ 
[vi] Records from the Case of Borrower Parsley (05-90374) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, which were “denied leave to file” by Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court, DC:
[1] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #4 - Notice filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296583/ 
[2] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #5 - Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56296879/ 
[3] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #6 - Additional Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297039/ 
[4] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #7 - Further Records filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297417/ 
[5] 09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #8 - Further Evidence filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56297994/ 
[vii] 02-00-00 Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/ 
[viii] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/ 
[ix] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ 
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
[] 
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
_______ 
[] 
Flag Counter: 119
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 
Total Reads: 439,060
Followers: 644
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http ://twitter.com/inproperinla 
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
Total Item Views: 350,338 
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." 
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001) 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." 
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." 
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert 
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM? 
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..." 
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/