Last New Visitor Australia  Visited November 5, 2011 |  |
Friday, November 4, 2011
11-11-05 Welcome Australia! // Bienvenido Australia! // 欢迎澳大利亚！
11-11-04 In the US - Judges are for Sale... // En EE UU - Los jueces están a la venta ... // 法官销售...
Comment:
Finally, even main steam media dare to speak out...
jz
The Occupy Wall Street movement is shining a spotlight on how much influence big-money interests have with the White House and Congress. But people are not talking about how big money is also increasingly getting its way with the courts, which is too bad. It’s a scandal that needs more attention. A blistering new report details how big business and corporate lobbyists are pouring money into state judicial elections across the country and packing the courts with judges who put special interests ahead of the public interest.
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2011/10/31/judges-are-for-sale-and-special-interests-are-buying/#ixzz1ck0uGCsV
Finally, even main steam media dare to speak out...
jz
The Occupy Wall Street movement is shining a spotlight on how much influence big-money interests have with the White House and Congress. But people are not talking about how big money is also increasingly getting its way with the courts, which is too bad. It’s a scandal that needs more attention. A blistering new report details how big business and corporate lobbyists are pouring money into state judicial elections across the country and packing the courts with judges who put special interests ahead of the public interest.
Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2011/10/31/judges-are-for-sale-and-special-interests-are-buying/#ixzz1ck0uGCsV
11-11-04 Welcome France! //Bienvenue en France! //Bienvenido Francia! // 欢迎法国！
| Last New Visitor France Visited November 4, 2011 |  |
11-11-04 Welcome India! // Bienvenido India! // 欢迎印度！
| Last New Visitor India Visited November 4, 2011 |  |
Thursday, November 3, 2011
11-11-03 Welcome Bosnia and Herzegovina! // Bienvenido Bosnia y Herzegovina! // 欢迎波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那！
| Last New Visitor Bosnia and Herzegovina Visited November 3, 2011 |  |
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
11-11-01 Welcome the Netherlands //Bienvenidos los Países Bajos// 欢迎荷兰
| Last New Visitor Netherlands Visited November 1, 2011 |  |
11-11-01 Policing for Profit in Tennessee // Vigilancia con fines de lucro en Tennessee //
Policing For Profit Takes Cash From Innocent Drivers
Updated: June 6, 2011 10:15 PM CDT
Van Huynh
Carmina PerezBy Phil Williams
Chief Investigative Reporter
NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- Imagine being stopped on the interstate and put into handcuffs because police think you're carrying too much cash. Even worse, imagine them keeping the money you've been saving for months.
Police insist most of the cash they take is drug money.
But NewsChannel 5 Investigates discovered some innocent victims of a practice that critics call "policing for profit."
Among them: Vietnamese immigrant Van Huynh, who found his American dream in a nail salon he opened in Texarkana, Texas.
"Was that a big moment for you to become a citizen?" NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked.
"Oh, yeah," he answered in broken English. "I very happy."
Huynh came to the U.S. in 1999, becoming an American citizen seven years later.
But nothing prepared him for what he'd encounter when he got stopped by DICE -- the Dickson Interdiction and Criminal Enforcement unit.
Huynh was on his way back to Texas after a long trip to Virginia where he'd hoped to pay cash for his third nail salon.
He recalled that agents had plenty of questions: "You have any guns? You have any drugs? You have any money? You have anything? I said no, no."
Huynh admitted that he did not tell the officers that he had money "because too much cash, I don't want to have trouble because I'm in hurry on the way home."
What Huynh did not know was that DICE gets its funding -- thanks to a Tennessee law that lets police take cash off of drivers if they have reason to suspect that it's drug money.
After he gave them permission to search his vehicle, officers discovered a bag. Inside it, they found $50,000 cash wrapped in aluminum foil.
Still, Huynh thought it was his right as an American citizen to tell the police it was none of their business.
"You told them, I don't want to talk about it, I just want to go," we wanted to know.
"Yeah, yeah."
"And that didn't work, did it?"
"That didn't work."
"They took you to police headquarters?"
"Yes. Yes, sir."
"In handcuffs?"
"Yes, sir. Yes, sir."
There, inside Dickson police headquarters, detectives questioned Huynh for four hours, demanding that he prove why he was traveling with so much cash. DICE documents show that Huynh was stopped at 8:44 a.m., but the cash was not returned until after 1 p.m.
"They kept telling you this is drug money?" NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked.
"Yes, they do."
"And what did you say?"
"I said, no, that's mine."
Veteran Nashville lawyer Gary Blackburn, who has filed numerous civil rights cases, says the officers' approach "suggests that the mere possession of money makes you a criminal, which is absurd."
He added that what's really outrageous about the Huynh case is that 50,000 Americans gave their lives supposedly to bring freedom to Vietnam.
"Then one of those persons comes here for freedom and is subjected to an attempted shakedown, it looks like, by police officers," Blackburn added. "No one should have to endure that."
It also happened to Carmina Perez and her 10-year-old son just after they crossed the Tennessee River into Decatur County. The two were on the way to see Perez's mother in Texas and her father-in-law in Mexico.
Perez freely admitted to the interdiction officer that she was carrying $15,000 to help her family with their medical bills.
"He kept calling me a liar," Perez told NewsChannel 5 Investigates. "He kept saying that we Mexicans we all have a reputation of being drug smugglers, that that's what I was going to use it for. I kept telling him no."
After four hours on the side of the road, agents took Perez's money, forcing the family to cancel their trip home.
"It took me months to save that money, and it hurt me the way they treated me and the way they treated my son," she recalled. "It hurt me and it still does."
And she's not alone.
Our NewsChannel 5 investigation found case-after-case where other innocent people also had their cash taken by people who are supposed to be enforcing the law.
Shelby County: Memphis police took $32,000 from an African-American woman -- money she'd been saving for a down payment on a building that she planned to buy the next day. A state administrative law judge later called it "highly inappropriate ... to deprive a citizen of her property based simply on such speculation and conjecture."
Hamilton County: A sheriff's deputy seized $28,000 from a Vietnamese businessman -- money that the man had borrowed to buy a restaurant. A judge later ruled that was "not the proceeds from the sale of drugs."
Bradley County: Police took $20,000 from an African-American man who had won the Georgia Lottery. The man said he had been to Knoxville trying to buy a car. A judge later ruled "there was no proof that Claimant had any connection with illegal drugs."
In another case, police seized $31,000 from a Korean businessman who had collected the money as repayment of a loan. A judge later ruled that "there was no 'reasonable suspicion' or 'probable cause' to make the traffic stop."
Also, in Bradley County, a Tennessee Highway Patrol officer took $135,504from an African-American businessman who had been using cash to buy flooded properties in New Orleans. The money was returned after the state failed to pursue the case.
Monroe County: Police confiscated $17,300 from three Hispanic men. They were about to wire the money to family in El Salvador to buy a house. A judge later ruled that "there was absolutely no proof that Claimants sold any drugs."
Sullivan County: An interdiction team took $27,500 from a Hispanic man. He was transporting the money his mother had saved to Virginia, where she'd moved from California. The state later returned the money to the woman.
Gary Blackburn said those cases show there's something wrong with a system that has officers policing for profit.
"That badge is a testament that you are part of the system to protect people, it is part of the law," he added. "That badge is not a commission to seize money."
NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked Perez, "So how long did it take you to get your money back?"
"It took me about two years," she answered.
As to how many innocent people are searched and detained in the search for cash, no one knows for sure -- since most agencies claim they don't keep such records.
We asked Van Huynh, "Are you surprised that this happens in America?"
"Oh, very surprised," the Vietnamese immigrant responded.
Interdiction teams insist there are protections.
After officers take money that suspect is drug money, they have to get a judge to sign off on the seizures. Still, those judges have to take the officers' word and, as we saw in the cases we uncovered, it can often take innocent people more than a year to get their cash back.
Defense attorneys also tell me that sometimes people don't bother trying to fight the seizures because hiring an attorney might be so expensive that it's not even worth it.
E-mail: pwilliams@newschannel5.com
____WATCH VIDEO:http://www.newschannel5.com/story/14849726/policing-for-profit-takes-cash-from-innocent-victims?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=5929879SOURCE:http://www.newschannel5.com/story/14849726/policing-for-profit-takes-cash-from-innocent-victims
--
11-11-01 Obama's Birth Certificate fraud and multiplicity of Social Security numbers // El fraude de Obama Certificado de Nacimiento y de la multiplicidad de números de Seguro Social // 奥巴马的出生证明欺诈和社会安全号码的多重
A reasonable person, upon review of the facts in this matter, would surely conclude that Sheriff Joe is right, and Esquire is dead wrong!
Los Angeles, November 1 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has stated his support of the opinion, recently publish by the panel instituted by Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe, and in opposition of Esquire's opinion in the ongoing scandal surrounding the publication of fraud for Obama's long-form Birth Certificates, [i] and use of multiplicity of Social Security numbers. [ii]
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience over the past decade in analyzing fraud in government and banking records in the United States. His opinions in this matter have been adopted by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, peer-reviewed and published in computer science and criminology journals, and presented in international conferences. [iii]
"You don't need to be a rocket scientist to read the findings and the various experts reports and evaluate the facts for yourself," concludes Dr Zernik, "Mr Obama has a long and convoluted relationship with FBI and the corrupt US justice system..." [iv]
LINKS:[i] 11-06-24 Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery – Constitutional crisis galore...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
CERTIFIGATE
8:38 pm Eastern
© 2011 WND
Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birthcertificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.
Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.
The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.
The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.
Read more:http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=
April 27, 2011, 1:44 PM
By Paul Schrodt
Read more:
http://www.esquire.com/the-
_______
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1335f3903e325d05&attid=0.5&disp=emb&zw)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______
![Locations of visitors to this page]()
Flag Counter: 126http://inproperinla.blogspot.
http://inproperinla.wordpress.
http://www.liveleak.com/user/
http://www.examiner.com/x-
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Los Angeles, November 1 - Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has stated his support of the opinion, recently publish by the panel instituted by Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe, and in opposition of Esquire's opinion in the ongoing scandal surrounding the publication of fraud for Obama's long-form Birth Certificates, [i] and use of multiplicity of Social Security numbers. [ii]
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience over the past decade in analyzing fraud in government and banking records in the United States. His opinions in this matter have been adopted by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, peer-reviewed and published in computer science and criminology journals, and presented in international conferences. [iii]
"You don't need to be a rocket scientist to read the findings and the various experts reports and evaluate the facts for yourself," concludes Dr Zernik, "Mr Obama has a long and convoluted relationship with FBI and the corrupt US justice system..." [iv]
LINKS:[i] 11-06-24 Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery – Constitutional crisis galore...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Sheriff Joe's posse delivers promised Obama surprise
Panel probing eligibility for 2012 ballot wants to see original birth certificate
Posted: October 31, 20118:38 pm Eastern
© 2011 WND
Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birthcertificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.
Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.
The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.
The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.
Read more:http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=
April 27, 2011, 1:44 PM
What the Hell Is a Long-Form Birth Certificate?
It proves that Obama was born here. Again. A handy guide.By Paul Schrodt
Read more:
http://www.esquire.com/the-
_______
Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______
http://inproperinla.wordpress.
http://www.liveleak.com/user/
http://www.examiner.com/x-
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Monday, October 31, 2011
11-10-30 Growing militarization of police in the United States: Oakland Police Violated 2004 Agreement // La creciente militarización de la policía en los Estados Unidos // 警方在美国日益军事化
The very fact that there was an "agreement" between police and the People, already in 2004, is a sign of the times... Recognizing the true nature of the situation, the People are negotiating "agreements" with police as to how much the police would oppress them, which police violates at will...
Submitted by mark karlin on Sat, 10/29/2011 - 11:42am.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
As the medical condition of Marine Iraq war veteran Scott Olsen appears to have improved, he is becoming the Neda Agha-Soltan - the martyr of the Iranian Green Revolution - of the "Occupy" struggle for economic justice.
What occurred this week in Oakland - including the wounding of Olsen - shouldn't have happened. In June of 2004, the Oakland Police Department reached an agreement to refrain from using the kind of bloody and militarized tactics that they employed earlier this week.
According to a November 2004 San Francisco Chronicle article:
- Oakland police will no longer indiscriminately use wooden or rubber bullets, Taser stun guns, pepper spray and motorcycles to break up crowds, under an agreement announced Friday....
- The new policy settles part of a federal class-action lawsuit filed by 52 people who claimed their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly were violated as they targeted two shipping companies with contracts tied to the war in Iraq.
- "What we've done is create a comprehensive policy that really provides a much more sensible, reasoned approach to managing demonstrations and crowds," said Rachel Lederman of the National Lawyers Guild in San Francisco.
Lederman is referring to a 2003 Oakland police riot against anti-Iraq war demonstrators that resulted in the serious wounding of many protesters. In fact, according to ThinkProgress, "the demonstrators were not without recourse. They took the city to court, and Oakland eventually awarded $2 million to 58 demonstrators for police abuses."
You would think that after signing an agreement and paying out taxpayer money to "compensate" for abusive police practices, the Oakland Police Department would learn how to behave in a civilized fashion when dealing with people exercising their First Amendment rights.
Meanwhile, the Oakland School Board voted on Wednesday night, this week, to close five elementary schools, in large part due to budget constraints. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the Oakland school district officials say that the school closings will save about $2 million a year, about what the Oakland Police Department paid out to protesters it abused in 2003.
****
SOURCE:
http://blog.buzzflash.com/
OAKLAND / Agreement reached on crowd-control tactics
November 06, 2004|Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff WriterOakland police fired nonlethal projectiles at several hundred people protesting the war on Iraq at the Port of Oakland in 2003.
Chronicle photo by Liz Hafalia
Oakland police will no longer indiscriminately use wooden or rubber bullets, Taser stun guns, pepper spray and motorcycles to break up crowds, under an agreement announced Friday.
The changes followed criticism and lawsuits against police for their tactics at a large demonstration against the Iraq war outside the Port of Oakland on April 7, 2003.
The new policy settles part of a federal class-action lawsuit filed by 52 people who claimed their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly were violated as they targeted two shipping companies with contracts tied to the war in Iraq.
"What we've done is create a comprehensive policy that really provides a much more sensible, reasoned approach to managing demonstrations and crowds," said Rachel Lederman of the National Lawyers Guild in San Francisco.
READ MORE:http://articles.sfgate.com/
Saturday, October 29, 2011
11-10-30 Bank Transfer Day: A Guide to Closing Your Account // cerca de su banco // 关闭您的银行
“Bank Transfer Day is gaining some serious steam. Although it’s not technically affiliated with Occupy, it’s being embraced by the movement and is the first specific call to action since the Occupy protests began.”
First Financial Bank, Mineral WellsMineral Wells is your gateway to the North Texas Hill Country. In the past, Mineral Wells was famous for its numerous, mineral water wells that were used for medicinal purposes. You can still purchase the famous water from one of the original wells. Today, Mineral Wells is still associated with our famous mineral water, where our wells run deep and so does our hospitality.
First Financial Bank (Abilene)
First Financial Bank (Cleburne)First Financial Bank (Eastland)
First Financial Bank (Hereford)
First Financial Bank (Huntsville)
First Financial Bank (Mineral Wells)
First Financial Bank (San Angelo)
First Financial Bank (Southlake)
First Financial Bank (Stephenville)
First Financial Bank (Sweetwater)
First Financial Bank (Weatherford)
COLONEL SIXX: IF THE MOVEMENT REALLY TAKES OFF IN TEXAS, THE BIG BANKS WILL BE DEALT A BIG BLOW.
IN THE SMALL TOWNS, BANK WITH THE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO STICK WITH YOU.
28 October 2011
Bank Transfer Day is gaining some serious steam. Although it’s not technically affiliated with Occupy, it’s being embraced by the movement and is the first specific call to action since the Occupy protests began.
The description and goal of Bank Transfer Day is straightforward:
If you currently have checking and savings accounts (deposit accounts) with a big bank, the organizers encourage you to remove all of your funds, close your accounts, and place your money in a new deposit account with a not-for-profit credit union.
The organizers ask that you do this by November 5. And since November 5 is a Saturday, you should definitely do it before November 5 since many big banks aren’t open on weekends.
So if you currently have a deposit account with a big bank and you want to participate in Bank Transfer Day, read the following steps. It’s a field guide that will help you accomplish this meaningful task of shifting your money from corporations that serve the 1% and put it with an organization that cares about the remaining 99%.
Bank Transfer Day can significantly impact the way banks are able to make a profit. In simplest terms, banks rely on our deposit account balances to make loans that net substantial profits. Without our deposits, banks can’t make loans. And if banks can’t make loans, they’re going to take notice. And they’re surely going to freak out.
What You Need To Do Before Walking Into Your Big Bank Branch
Go through previous big bank statements to see exactly which accounts you have. Be sure to check the names on each account. If you are closing a joint account with two holders, it makes a difference whether the word joining your names is “and” or “or.” If the account in your name is in your name andsomeone else’s, you will both need to go in and close the account. If the account is in your name orsomeone else’s, either of you can close the account. Some big banks may vary on this policy, so it’s best to call your big bank to find out exactly what you need to do prior to walking into your local branch.
1. If you have any loans with a big bank, look closely at your statements and paperwork you signed at the time of closing. There very well might be penalties that will trigger a higher interest rate if you close your checking account. Big banks excel at offering customers lower interest rates on mortgage and auto loans if you open a checking account and maintain a minimum balance. A primary checking account is a bank’s ultimate goal to securing your, ahem, loyalty. A primary checking account also leads to, on average, the opening of three additional accounts with that financial institution. Decide whether or not you can or have the willingness to pay off the outstanding loan balance. If you do not pay off the loan balance, call your bank to ask about escalating fees or rate increases by closing your checking account before walking into your local branch to close the checking account.
2. Stop using your deposit accounts ASAP. You need to allow everything to clear the accounts completely before you close them. This clearing process takes about two weeks to complete. Keep close tabs online to see which transactions are still outstanding.
3. Research non-profit credit unions. You will need a place to deposit your money, so perform this research before closing your big bank accounts. A good resource for finding credit unions is Find A Credit Union. Make your decision on which non-profit credit union you will join before walking in to the big bank branch to close your deposit accounts.What To Do When You Walk Into Your Big Bank Branch
1. Approach a branch teller and tell him/her that you would like to close your accounts. The teller might hand you off to a customer service representative due to the bank’s account opening and closing protocol. Or the teller might hand you off because they don’t want to tie up customers’ wait time in the teller line.
2. If the bank employee asks why you are closing your account, decide in advance the reason you’re going to provide. You can tell them you’re unhappy with big banks. You can tell them you’re a part of the 99%. Or you can decline to give them a reason. The most important thing is to remain focused and not do anything imprudent that will keep you from accomplishing your goal of closing your deposit accounts and walking out of the big bank branch with your money.
3. Once the account closing process begins, ask the bank employee if you have any cash reserve accounts tied to your deposit accounts. It doesn’t make sense to keep a line of credit open that was tied to your soon-to-be closed account.
4.The bank employee will ask if you would like to receive your money in the form of a check or cash. If you want to make it rain outside of the big bank branch, request to receive cash. If you don’t want to make it rain, we advise you to request a check.
5. The bank employee will either give you a confirmation letter of your accounts being closed or they will mail it to you. Once you receive the letter, keep it on file for up to five years.
6. Walk out of the big bank branch.
What To Do After You Have Closed Your Big Bank Deposit Accounts
1. Shred all remaining checks and debit cards. This is an essential step. If you mistakenly use the checks or debit cards, you will be going back to the big bank branch—except this time it will be to clean up your mess.
2. Go to the non-for-profit credit union you selected prior to closing your deposit accounts at the big bank. Open the accounts, get a new checkbook and debit card, and shake the employee’s hand, or even give him/her a hug.
3. Sync up your new deposit account information (ABA routing number and account number for checks, card number, expiration date, 3-digit security code for debit card) to any relevant accounts that require automatic payments. For example, if you automatically pay your car insurance on a monthly basis with your checking account, be sure to sync up your checking account with your car insurance company. You may also want provide your new account information for online products such as iTunes, eBay, and PayPal.
4. Stand in front of a full-length mirror. Admire yourself. You’ve earned it.
That’s all there is to it. Sounds like a lot, and perhaps it is. After all, big banks played a role in making this process difficult because it acts as a deterrent for people to withdraw their money and close their accounts. But if you stick to this guide and remain focused on your goal, you can impact meaningful and measurable change by participating in Bank Transfer Day.
The description and goal of Bank Transfer Day is straightforward:
If you currently have checking and savings accounts (deposit accounts) with a big bank, the organizers encourage you to remove all of your funds, close your accounts, and place your money in a new deposit account with a not-for-profit credit union.
The organizers ask that you do this by November 5. And since November 5 is a Saturday, you should definitely do it before November 5 since many big banks aren’t open on weekends.
So if you currently have a deposit account with a big bank and you want to participate in Bank Transfer Day, read the following steps. It’s a field guide that will help you accomplish this meaningful task of shifting your money from corporations that serve the 1% and put it with an organization that cares about the remaining 99%.
Bank Transfer Day can significantly impact the way banks are able to make a profit. In simplest terms, banks rely on our deposit account balances to make loans that net substantial profits. Without our deposits, banks can’t make loans. And if banks can’t make loans, they’re going to take notice. And they’re surely going to freak out.
What You Need To Do Before Walking Into Your Big Bank Branch
Go through previous big bank statements to see exactly which accounts you have. Be sure to check the names on each account. If you are closing a joint account with two holders, it makes a difference whether the word joining your names is “and” or “or.” If the account in your name is in your name andsomeone else’s, you will both need to go in and close the account. If the account is in your name orsomeone else’s, either of you can close the account. Some big banks may vary on this policy, so it’s best to call your big bank to find out exactly what you need to do prior to walking into your local branch.
1. If you have any loans with a big bank, look closely at your statements and paperwork you signed at the time of closing. There very well might be penalties that will trigger a higher interest rate if you close your checking account. Big banks excel at offering customers lower interest rates on mortgage and auto loans if you open a checking account and maintain a minimum balance. A primary checking account is a bank’s ultimate goal to securing your, ahem, loyalty. A primary checking account also leads to, on average, the opening of three additional accounts with that financial institution. Decide whether or not you can or have the willingness to pay off the outstanding loan balance. If you do not pay off the loan balance, call your bank to ask about escalating fees or rate increases by closing your checking account before walking into your local branch to close the checking account.
2. Stop using your deposit accounts ASAP. You need to allow everything to clear the accounts completely before you close them. This clearing process takes about two weeks to complete. Keep close tabs online to see which transactions are still outstanding.
3. Research non-profit credit unions. You will need a place to deposit your money, so perform this research before closing your big bank accounts. A good resource for finding credit unions is Find A Credit Union. Make your decision on which non-profit credit union you will join before walking in to the big bank branch to close your deposit accounts.What To Do When You Walk Into Your Big Bank Branch
1. Approach a branch teller and tell him/her that you would like to close your accounts. The teller might hand you off to a customer service representative due to the bank’s account opening and closing protocol. Or the teller might hand you off because they don’t want to tie up customers’ wait time in the teller line.
2. If the bank employee asks why you are closing your account, decide in advance the reason you’re going to provide. You can tell them you’re unhappy with big banks. You can tell them you’re a part of the 99%. Or you can decline to give them a reason. The most important thing is to remain focused and not do anything imprudent that will keep you from accomplishing your goal of closing your deposit accounts and walking out of the big bank branch with your money.
3. Once the account closing process begins, ask the bank employee if you have any cash reserve accounts tied to your deposit accounts. It doesn’t make sense to keep a line of credit open that was tied to your soon-to-be closed account.
4.The bank employee will ask if you would like to receive your money in the form of a check or cash. If you want to make it rain outside of the big bank branch, request to receive cash. If you don’t want to make it rain, we advise you to request a check.
5. The bank employee will either give you a confirmation letter of your accounts being closed or they will mail it to you. Once you receive the letter, keep it on file for up to five years.
6. Walk out of the big bank branch.
What To Do After You Have Closed Your Big Bank Deposit Accounts
1. Shred all remaining checks and debit cards. This is an essential step. If you mistakenly use the checks or debit cards, you will be going back to the big bank branch—except this time it will be to clean up your mess.
2. Go to the non-for-profit credit union you selected prior to closing your deposit accounts at the big bank. Open the accounts, get a new checkbook and debit card, and shake the employee’s hand, or even give him/her a hug.
3. Sync up your new deposit account information (ABA routing number and account number for checks, card number, expiration date, 3-digit security code for debit card) to any relevant accounts that require automatic payments. For example, if you automatically pay your car insurance on a monthly basis with your checking account, be sure to sync up your checking account with your car insurance company. You may also want provide your new account information for online products such as iTunes, eBay, and PayPal.
4. Stand in front of a full-length mirror. Admire yourself. You’ve earned it.
That’s all there is to it. Sounds like a lot, and perhaps it is. After all, big banks played a role in making this process difficult because it acts as a deterrent for people to withdraw their money and close their accounts. But if you stick to this guide and remain focused on your goal, you can impact meaningful and measurable change by participating in Bank Transfer Day.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
11-10-26 Voting machines litigation in the US Court in New York – vague and ambiguous court records suggest conduct of simulated litigation and fraud on the court // Las máquinas de votación y el fraude en los tribunales de los EE.UU.// 在法庭上，在美国的投票机器和欺诈
In Schulz et al v State of New York et al, the plaintiffs argued that their constitutional rights were violated by the use of electronic voting machines that are not open, verifiable, and transparent. At the conclusion of the 4-year litigation, US Judge Kahn found that the court had no subject matter jurisdiction. However, the litigation was commenced with invalid summons issued by the clerk of the court, numerous papers were filed by defendants as “Letter Motions”, resulting in “Order[s] on Letter Motion[s]”, no minutes were entered in the entire litigation, and the July 2011 Judgment is signed by neither a judge nor a deputy clerk and is not listed in the Judgment Index of the court. The case may be unique in showing the offices of the 50 state attorney generals colluding in the conduct of simulated litigation and fraud on the court.
![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1334239a1c5413d6&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw)
![[]](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=5c7629aba9&view=att&th=1334239a1c5413d6&attid=0.2&disp=emb&zw)
Los Angeles, October 26 - Some of the US top computer and civil rights experts have repeatedly objected to electronic voting machines, as currently implemented, for being insecure and prone to voting fraud. [i]
In Schulz et al v State of New York et al (07-cv-00943), the plaintiffs (representing themselves) alleged that electronic voting machines that are not open, verifiable and transparent violate their voting rights.
The case, which was dismissed on July 7, 2011, purportedly for “lack of subject matter jurisdiction”, was commenced in 2007 by plaintiffs from all 50 states against the election of commissions of all states. In 2008, US Judge Kahn dismissed the complaints against all states but New York, concluding, “each of the Plaintiffs’ standing is limited so as to only have standing against the Individual Defendants in the Plaintiff’s own state.”
In the July 2011, Judge Kahn also dismissed the remaining complaint by the New York plaintiffs against the New York defendants “for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”, stating that “Plaintiffs have failed to establish a cognizable injury in this case, the Court finds that they lack standing to bring this case.” [ii]
However, review of the litigation record raises serious concerns that the case as a whole was conducted by the court and defendants’ attorneys as simulated litigation: [iii]
Moreover, according to Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), there is no way for the public to verify the validity of any of the records displayed in the online record systems. Ever since the implementation of the electronic record systems, the US courts have been hiding the clerk’s electronic authentication records (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing) from the public, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights. [vii]
In recent years evidence has been amassed of fraud in the US courts from coast to coast through the practice of simulated litigation, enabled by the electronic record systems of the US courts. “It’s a common charade. Any case in the US courts, involving banks or civil rights, is a suspect,” says Dr Zernik. [viii]
The fundamental problem is the same in the electronic voting machines and the electronic record systems of the courts. Paper systems, which were not infallible, but have evolved over centuries as open, verifiable and transparent, were replaced by obscure, unverified and nontransparent electronic systems.
“The tools are out there for creating open, verified and transparent systems for both the electronic voting machines and the electronic systems of the courts,” says Dr Zernik, “However, the US government has chosen to implement systems that fail to meet basic integrity standards in these two critical areas. Moreover, in both cases, the US government persists in its refusal to fix these systems, even in the face of indisputable evidence of large-scale fraud on the People.”
_______
LINKS [i] [1] 10-08-28 Common Cause: Voting Machines Report - Malfunction and Malfeasancehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[2] 10-04-19 Brennan Center for Justice Notice in Re: Unprecleared Voting Machines - violation of the voting acthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 05-00-00 Validating Voting Machine Softwarehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[4] 05-05-19 MIT-Caltech: Auditing Technology for Electronic Votinghttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 10-10-06 US Electronic Voting Machines - Made to Defraud - Wired Magazinehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[ii] July 7, 2011 Memorandum-Decision and Order (Dkt #383); in 11-10-26 Schulz et al v State of NY et al (07-cv-00943) in the US Court, Northern District of New York compiled litigation recordshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
[2] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 11-07-06 Request filed by Windsor and Zernik with US Attorney General Eric Holder for Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[4] 10-10-11 Linzer, D. “In GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality,” The National Law Journal, October 11, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[vii] 11-05-20 NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) in the US Courts Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[2] 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request No 1 for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 10-12-07 Request for Investigation and if Appropriate - Impeachment Proceedings - against TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[6] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[7] 10-04-07 Sieverding et al v. United States Government (1:09-cv-00562) in the US District Court, Washington DC in re: Arrest and Imprisonment by Federal Agencies - Alleged Impeachable Misconduct by US Judge John D Bates
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[8] 10-12-30 Lewis et al v Gleason et al (1:10-cv-01850) in the US District Court, Colorado Opinion Regarding PACER Docket and Court Records in a Civil Rights Matter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[9] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC master of the “Leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[10] 11-06-20 Requests for Investigation and Impeachment of Judge John Walter, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk Terry Nafisi, and others in the US District Court, Central District of California, in re: Fine v State Bar (2:10-cv-00048) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[11] 11-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge O’Tool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US District Court, Massachusetts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[12] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California: Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Evidence of Another Pretense Litigation by Judge Virginia Phillips
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[13] 11-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge O’Tool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US District Court, Massachusetts shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
Los Angeles, October 26 - Some of the US top computer and civil rights experts have repeatedly objected to electronic voting machines, as currently implemented, for being insecure and prone to voting fraud. [i]
In Schulz et al v State of New York et al (07-cv-00943), the plaintiffs (representing themselves) alleged that electronic voting machines that are not open, verifiable and transparent violate their voting rights.
The case, which was dismissed on July 7, 2011, purportedly for “lack of subject matter jurisdiction”, was commenced in 2007 by plaintiffs from all 50 states against the election of commissions of all states. In 2008, US Judge Kahn dismissed the complaints against all states but New York, concluding, “each of the Plaintiffs’ standing is limited so as to only have standing against the Individual Defendants in the Plaintiff’s own state.”
In the July 2011, Judge Kahn also dismissed the remaining complaint by the New York plaintiffs against the New York defendants “for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”, stating that “Plaintiffs have failed to establish a cognizable injury in this case, the Court finds that they lack standing to bring this case.” [ii]
However, review of the litigation record raises serious concerns that the case as a whole was conducted by the court and defendants’ attorneys as simulated litigation: [iii]
- The litigation was commenced with invalid summons, bearing no seal of the court, [iv] and a civil cover sheet that failed to adequately list the plaintiffs and defendants. [v]
- Numerous papers were filed by the defendants in an invalid manner, as “Letter Motion”, or “Letter Brief”, and resulted in “Order[s] on Letter Motion[s]”;
- No minutes were entered in the entire litigation, invalid notes were listed in the docket instead, with no corresponding minute records;
- The July 2011 “Judgment” was signed by neither the judge, nor by an authorized deputy-clerk, and is not listed in the Judgment Index of the court, either.
Moreover, according to Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), there is no way for the public to verify the validity of any of the records displayed in the online record systems. Ever since the implementation of the electronic record systems, the US courts have been hiding the clerk’s electronic authentication records (NEFs Notices of Electronic Filing) from the public, in apparent violation of First Amendment rights. [vii]
In recent years evidence has been amassed of fraud in the US courts from coast to coast through the practice of simulated litigation, enabled by the electronic record systems of the US courts. “It’s a common charade. Any case in the US courts, involving banks or civil rights, is a suspect,” says Dr Zernik. [viii]
The fundamental problem is the same in the electronic voting machines and the electronic record systems of the courts. Paper systems, which were not infallible, but have evolved over centuries as open, verifiable and transparent, were replaced by obscure, unverified and nontransparent electronic systems.
“The tools are out there for creating open, verified and transparent systems for both the electronic voting machines and the electronic systems of the courts,” says Dr Zernik, “However, the US government has chosen to implement systems that fail to meet basic integrity standards in these two critical areas. Moreover, in both cases, the US government persists in its refusal to fix these systems, even in the face of indisputable evidence of large-scale fraud on the People.”
_______
LINKS [i] [1] 10-08-28 Common Cause: Voting Machines Report - Malfunction and Malfeasancehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[2] 10-04-19 Brennan Center for Justice Notice in Re: Unprecleared Voting Machines - violation of the voting acthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 05-00-00 Validating Voting Machine Softwarehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[4] 05-05-19 MIT-Caltech: Auditing Technology for Electronic Votinghttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 10-10-06 US Electronic Voting Machines - Made to Defraud - Wired Magazinehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[ii] July 7, 2011 Memorandum-Decision and Order (Dkt #383); in 11-10-26 Schulz et al v State of NY et al (07-cv-00943) in the US Court, Northern District of New York compiled litigation recordshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
[iii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
- Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
- (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
- (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
- (2) cause another to:
- (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
- (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
- (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[2] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 11-07-06 Request filed by Windsor and Zernik with US Attorney General Eric Holder for Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[4] 10-10-11 Linzer, D. “In GITMO Opinion, Two Versions of Reality,” The National Law Journal, October 11, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[vii] 11-05-20 NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) in the US Courts Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF)http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[2] 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request No 1 for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[3] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[5] 10-12-07 Request for Investigation and if Appropriate - Impeachment Proceedings - against TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[6] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[7] 10-04-07 Sieverding et al v. United States Government (1:09-cv-00562) in the US District Court, Washington DC in re: Arrest and Imprisonment by Federal Agencies - Alleged Impeachable Misconduct by US Judge John D Bates
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[8] 10-12-30 Lewis et al v Gleason et al (1:10-cv-01850) in the US District Court, Colorado Opinion Regarding PACER Docket and Court Records in a Civil Rights Matter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[9] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC master of the “Leave to file denied”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[10] 11-06-20 Requests for Investigation and Impeachment of Judge John Walter, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk Terry Nafisi, and others in the US District Court, Central District of California, in re: Fine v State Bar (2:10-cv-00048) http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[11] 11-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge O’Tool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US District Court, Massachusetts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[12] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California: Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Evidence of Another Pretense Litigation by Judge Virginia Phillips
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
[13] 11-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge O’Tool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US District Court, Massachusetts shttp://www.scribd.com/doc/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)