Wednesday, December 28, 2011

11-12-28 Obama's Birth Certificate: Flim Flam in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit // El fraude en los tribunales de EE.UU. // 美国法院的欺诈

US judges and clerks with no credentials issue unsigned, unauthenticated judicial records, which the US courts refuse to certify, but the public is deceived to believe are valid and effectual court records. 
The United States has developed a fully blown simulated justice system.
Like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis in its core is an integrity crisis of the United States government, and like the Great Depression before it, the current crisis is not likely to be resolved, absent reform of the US courts.

  
Shell Game                                                           The Flim Flam Man       

Following is correspondence among Ron Branson, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Gary Zerman, and Joseph Zernik regarding the recent “dismissal” of Birther Orly Taitz case at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, challenging Obama’s credentials as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, on behalf of numerous US citizens and uniformed personnel.

_______________________________________
i. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:47:53 +0200
To: Paul Andrew Mitchell
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

I fully agree, and that is why they absolutely refuse to duly serve and notice any valid paper, and in particular, refuse to certify any record of the court.

See for example, an unrelated case:  Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
____
[1] 11-02-09 Press Release: Dont Ask, Dont Tell  the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Insists on Conducting a Simulated Appeal from a Simulated Judgment of the US District Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49070315/
_______________________________________
ii. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

At 09:45 AM 12/28/2011, you wrote:

>  There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders,
>  unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.


28 U.S.C. 1691 requires that ALL such Court "process" must exhibit the Court's official seal
and the Clerk's authorized signature:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1691.html

See all of the pertinent cases we assembled here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/stat/62/28usc1691.case.law.2.htm


And, now that the "clerks" and "deputy clerks" have either failed
or refused to produce credentials, THERE ARE NO CLERKS
authorized to sign any such "process".

That also has the necessary result that such a "court" --
where no duly authorized "clerks" can be found with proper credentials --
is rendered totally impotent because it cannot issue any "process"!!!

This conclusion is supported by the law which expressly
designates the "court" as the legal custodian of the
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 U.S.C. 3331.
See 5 U.S.C. 2906:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html

When such "clerks" refuse to produce credentials of which they
are the legal custodians designated as such by 2906 supra,
they render the entire court impotent, and also implicate themselves
in FELONY violation of 18 U.S.c. 1001 (for starters):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1001.html

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

_______________________________________
iii. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:59:28 +0200
To: Ron Branson, Gary Zerman , Paul Andrew Mitchell,
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Ninth Cir. Dismisses Suit Challenging Obama's Qualifications

1) The  "Dismissal" by the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
"Confidence Trick", "Flim Flam", "Shell Game" -  in the terminology of tricks and frauds, it is usually considered a short-term trick. You do it on the street corner, pack and leave. And here we have a person like you fooled for years by simulated orders of the courts ... [1]  In fact, a whole nation fooled by a "simulated justice system" for a decade or two.

2) Obama's Birth Certificate
One of the aspects that I find most fascinating in this story, (and there are numerous fascinations here :) (:), is the fact that in my studies of Public Records, and I consider the deprivation of First Amendment right to access electronic records the mother/father (not to be sexist in such nasty context) of all evils, Birth, Marriage, Divorce, and Burial Records were among the first that emerged as Public Records in the late middle ages.  Public access to Court Records has been also guaranteed in the Common Law for hundreds of years.  Prisoners' Indices followed.

3) The Medieval Digital Era
The pattern we see today, of denial of public access to valid Court Records,  Birth Records, and Booking Records, and the publication instead of patently fraudulent electronic records, is one of the hallmarks of what I call the Medieval-Digital Era. 

In the Middle Ages the frauds in the courts and in lineages and family records were infamous, not to speak of anonymous, metal masked, castle-basement prisoners. It led to the provision in the Magna Carta (1215) of trial by peers...  The "cornerstone of the Constitution of the United States".

It's 2012, and we must fight for the same rights again, to ensure public access to public records!

Joseph Zernik
____

LINKS:
[1]
"Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.

The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
_______________________________________
iv. Ron Branson wrote:

Joseph, I just looked at my Order of Dismissal filed 12/8/2011, and not only does it not have a signature, it does not even have a printed name of a person or a position. The Oder only "signs off" with the printed word "AFFIRMED" with nothing after it. We are therefore called upon to "pretend" it is verified even though it does not state.

But is not "Affirmed" supposed to be equal to "Oath or Affirmation" according to the 4th Amendment, i.e., "no warrants shall issue but ... supported by oath or affirmation." No one can imagine an oath or affirmation signed by no one. We are asked in court, "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?" Accordingly, maybe these words should be eliminated prior to taking the witness stand and testifying.

Ron Branson
_______________________________________
v. Joseph Zernik wrote:

Hi Mr Branson:

I assume that as usual, you received an unsigned order, just like the order dismissing the challenge to Obama's qualifications..

Have you ever tried to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copy of any of the orders in your cases before the Court?

I have tried, but never got any.

There is no way that I know of to explain the refusal of a court to provide certified copies of its own orders, unless the Court itself does not consider them valid court orders.

In that context, one should consider the data below, which I am asking those familiar with such papers to review and comment on.

In case you decide to ask the 9th Circuit for a certified copies of any decisions in your cases, I would be grateful if you email me PDFs of the requests, and the responses, if any.

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)

_______________________________________
vi. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

From: freedomfightersforamerica@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:freedomfightersforamerica@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Supreme Law Firm
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 12:24 AM
To: 123456xyz@gmail.com
Subject: [freedomfightersforamerica] 9th Circuit of known IMPOSTORS -- Pregerson / Fisher / Berzon -- "tosses" Obama birthplace challenge
 
Re:  http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/12/22/0956827.pdf

Almost forgot to mention:

David O. Carter:

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/nad.certificate.htm
(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/state.bar.record.2.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/affidavit.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/carter.david/oath.gif

(Carter's Forms administered by Terry J. Hatter, another known impostor):
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/nad.missing.credentials.htm

(no OATH OF OFFICE and no APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/nad.certificate.htm
(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/hatter.terry/state.bar.record.2.htm
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
_______________________________________
vii. Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:12 PM
Subject: 9th Circuit of known IMPOSTORS -- Pregerson / Fisher / Berzon -- "tosses" Obama birthplace challenge
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/12/22/0956827.pdf

Summary: known impostor/"robes" get routinely assigned to any case
that challenges any aspect of "public policy".

Harry Pregerson:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/nad.certificate.htm

(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/state.bar.record.2.htm


Raymond C. Fisher:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/affidavit.refused.JPG
(defective OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/nad.certificate.htm
(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/fisher/state.bar.record.2.htm

Marsha S. Berzon:
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/affidavit.refused.JPG

(defective OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/nad.certificate.htm
(no license to practice law in California)
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/state.bar.record.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/berzon/state.bar.record.2.htm

Very interesting revelations here about Harry Pregerson and Dean D. Pregerson
by the late Gary Wean, former LAPD Detective:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/pregerson/gary.wean.article.htm
(search for "Pregerson" -- all occurrences)

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#CDCA
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pregerson.dean/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/pregerson.dean/nad.missing.credentials.htm
(missing all 4 credentials!)

--
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
_______________________________________
viii. Ron Branson wrote:

At 01:45 AM 12/24/2011, Ron Branson wrote:

Pastor Wiley, I just received the announcement of the dismissing of your Ninth Circuit appeals case challenging the qualifications of Barack Obama to be president. I though I would apprise you that the I just received the dismissal of my Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. I instantly appealed the dismissal of my suit in fraud, and paid the $455 filing fee. Five days later the Court issued a noticed of intent to dismiss the Notice of Appeal. They said the issue presented on appeal was insubstantial. There was as yet any issue presented on appeal. I opposed the Order of intent to dismiss my appeal, and I received a Dec, 6, 2011 Order dismissing my Appeal, stating "The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument." They cite to U.S. v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857. But that case is inapplicable as it refers to a case wherein the Appellant filed an opening brief, citing his argument on appeal. Here, there is no opening brief, nor are there any questions presented on appeal.

Rule 3(c)(4) states, "An appeal must not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice." My Notice of Appeal follows precisely as shown in Form 1in the Appendix. This shows a preconceived plan by the Ninth Circuit to cut off the right of appeal at the Notice stage before any appeal issues can be presented. Attached is my opposition to dismissing my Notice of Appeal.

Ron Branson
_______________________________________
ix. Gary Zerman wrote:

From: Gary Zerman
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
Subject: And Another One Bites The Dust
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:17:10 -0800

To All:

If there is one case that illustrates why we have birth certificates/records and have courts of law, it is that of Barack Obama (BO).

Yet another one bites the dust.  GLZ.
____________________________________

Appeals court tosses Obama birthplace challenge

 By PAUL ELIAS | AP 4 hrs ago

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) The so-called birther movement was dealt another legal blow Thursday when a federal appeals court tossed out a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the challengers had legal standing to file the lawsuit on Jan. 20, 2009, the day Obama was inaugurated. The three-judge panel cited various reasons for disqualifying six sets of plaintiffs, who included Obama's political rivals, taxpayers and military personnel.

The birther movement has filed multiple lawsuits over the issue, so far with no success. Its leaders have lost similar challenges before the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court.

The U.S. Constitution says only "a natural born citizen" may serve as president. The challengers allege that Obama, whose father was Kenyan, was born in that African country, rather than the U.S. state of Hawaii. They claim his Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery.

The appeals court didn't address the authenticity of the birth certificate, instead ruling that the challengers couldn't show "concrete injury" from the allegations.

The taxpayers listed in the lawsuit, for instance, failed to show how the citizenship question affected any federal taxing and spending provisions.

The lawsuit was filed in 2009 by 40 plaintiffs, including conservative activists Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake, who ran for president and vice president respectively as members of the American Independent Party against Obama in 2008.

They alleged they had standing to file a lawsuit because of their interest in competing in a fair election. Libertarian Party vice-presidential candidate Gail Lightfoot was also a plaintiff.

Judge Harry Pregerson, writing for the three-judge panel, said Keyes and Drake waited too long to file their lawsuit. The election was over and Obama was already sworn in when the lawsuit was filed.

"Once the 2008 election was over and the President sworn in, Keyes, Drake, and Lightfoot were no longer 'candidates' for the 2008 general election," Pregerson wrote. "Plaintiffs' competitive interest in running against a qualified candidate had lapsed."

Orly Taitz, one of the challengers' lawyers, said she would ask the appeals court to convene a special 11-judge panel to reconsider the case. If she's turned down there, she said she would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

Taitz said she has filed similar lawsuits in five states and has two other federal appeals pending in Washington, D.C.

http://news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-tosses-obama-birthplace-challenge-191256867.html

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lawsters" group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Opposition to Order Filed Oct 25"
 2011Re Order to show cause-17-11.docm"

11-12-28 Racketeering by Bank of America // Crimen organizado por Bank of America // 敲诈勒索由美国银行

Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in RE: Racketeering by COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BET TZEDEK, California and US Judges and Clerks, and cover up by FBI and US Department of Justice
Following the reports of the untimely death of bank fraud whistleblower Tracy Lawrence, and his previously released Declaration (copied below), Joseph Zernik, PhD, provided a short Supplemental Declaration, regarding the nature of the frauds perpetrated on Dr Joseph Zernik by COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA. 
In January 2008, the New York Times published Gretchen Morgenson’s report regarding the filing of three (3) “Recreated Letters” by Countrywide’s attorneys in the US Bankruptcy Court in Pennsylvania.  The news caused the immediate collapse of Countrywide.  Hundreds of false and deliberately misleading records were produced, filed, and issued in this matter as real estate, banking and judicial and clerical records, regardless of ongoing protests.  If each of these records were counted as a Predicated Act per RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC § 1961–1968), then COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN CAVE, LLP, SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, the LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT and the other perpetrators, should all be deemed racketeers.
[]  [] []
Shell Game                                 The Flim Flam Man                Confidence Trick
View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76635531/[] []  [] []
Bank of America President BRIAN MOYNIHAN;                         

Countrywide's Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS 


December 27 -  in response to requests by readers, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), released: a short Supplemental Declaration regarding the nature of the fraud perpetrated on him by Countrywide, Bank of America, and the Courts, Law Enforcement, and Banking Regulators.Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Zernik in RE: Fraud by JAE ARRE LLOYD, COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, Judges, Clerk, Attorneys, Law Enforcement, and Banking Regulators
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, declare as follows:

1) In 2004
 I was trying to sell my property at 320 South Peck Drive,  Beverly Hills 90212 property.

2) Upon information and belief convicted felon JAE ARRE LLOYD was trying to launder his proceeds from his previous criminality through purchasing the property under the name of NIVIE SAMAAN, a straw buyer, who was penniless.

3) I refused to review NIVIE SAMAAN's offer, presented by Real Estate Salesperson MICHAEL LIBOW (COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE), without a third party arms-length prequalification letter.

4) In response I was presented by MICHAEL LIBOW with a Prequalification Letter that later was opined as fraud by nationally renowned fraud expert BOB MASTER. [1]

5) I thus assented to the contract through fraudulent induction.

6) The contract included the standard stipulation that "Buyer shall honestly and expediently seek the required mortgage loans."

7) Unbeknown to me, JAE ARRE LLOYD and NIVIE SAMAAN, jointly filed a fraudulent government-backed Uniform Residential Real Estate Loan Applications (1003), for almost $2 millions with COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, San Rafael Branch, headed by MARIA MCLAURIN. [2]
8) Unbeknown to me, the fraud was identified by Senior Underwriter DIANE FRAZIER on day one, and the mortgage never went through in a timely manner.

9) Both the records, and my communications with DIANE FRAZIER showed that later, Branch Manager MARIA MCLAURIN removed the loan applications from the due underwriter DIANE FRAZIER, and decided to approve them and present them for funding, in blatant violation of various laws, regulations, and COUNTRYWIDE's own procedures.

10) Regardless, the loans were never funded.  Their funding was "DENIED" by COUNTRYWIDE BANK.

11) During escrow it was also discovered, and later further detailed, that NIVIE SAMAAN was falsifying fax communications between her fictitious Mortgage Broker VICTOR PARKS (PACIFIC MORTGAGE CONSULTANTS),  my realtor, MICHAEL LIBOW, and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS.  Such communications should be deemed fax/wire/financial institution fraud. [3]
12) After the fax fraud was discovered, and after NIVIE SAMAAN failed to obtain the mortgage within the time stipulated, and failed to provide any explanation, or request an extension, I gave her due Notice to Buyer to Perform, and when she refused to perform, I canceled the contract pursuant to the law of California.

13) In 2005, NIVIE SAMAAN initiated simulated litigation [4] in the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,  under Samaan v Zernik 
(SC087400), under a cause of actions of "Specific Performance or Breach of Contract," where:
a) No Filing Fees were paid for the complaint, but the Clerk of the Court refused to dismiss the complaint as required by law;
b) No real estate contract was filed with the complaint, and the nature of the "breach of contract" was never detailed either, but Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR denied a Demurer pursuant to the Statute off Frauds, through a simulated Demurer proceeding that was never registered by the Court.
c) All subsequent payments were listed a "Journal Entry", where in other cases of the same Court they are listed as "Motion Fees", "Notice Fees", "Stipulation Fees", etc; and the Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY and the Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE refused to disclose the ultimate designation of these "Journal Entry" funds;
d) No judge presided with a due Assignment Order;
e) No minutes, orders, or judgment were duly served and noticed, or authenticated;
f) Fraudulent records were repeatedly produced as evidence by NIVIE SAMAAN, MICHAEL LIBOW, COLDWELL BANKER, COUNTRYWIDE, BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN CAVE, LLP, SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, and admitted by judges, regardless of protests;
g) Judge Connor repeatedly generated fictitious minutes of proceedings that never took place in reality, and likewise, routinely created fictitious, 'off the record' notations for proceedings that were enacted in reality.
h) Countrywide, and later Bank of America routinely appeared as "Non Party", while the Court interchangeably designated them: "Plaintiff", "Defendant", "Cross Defendant", "Real Party in Interest", "Intervenor", and more... all with no legal foundation at all.
i) BRYAN CAVE LLP appeared on behalf of countrywide, while not their Counsel of Records, a practice detailed by US Bankruptcy Judge JEFF BOHM in his March 2008 Memorandum Opinion. [5]
j) No Judgment was entered
k) No Writ of Execution was issue by the clerk.
l) I was forced to leave my home under threat of forced, unlawful but credible by Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK.
m) Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK and others perpetrated the fraud in Grant Title, as opined by highly-decorated FBI veteran JAMES WEDICK (linked to previous Declaration of Joseph Zernik), in conveying the title to my lawful property to JAE ARRE LLOYD and NIVIE SAMAAN.
n) I was repeatedly intimidated by Sheriffs in the Court, to deny my First Amendment right to inspect court records in my own case. for over two years.
o) Secret court file was created, to hide particularly fraudulent court papers, such as those related to the false COUNTRYWIDE appearances.
p) COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA, together with judges of the court, enacted a charade, as if I was prohibited from communicating with the officers of COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA under a fictitious "Protective/Gag Order",  [6] which had never existed, and which COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA refused to produce, from:
i. Demanding that COUNTRYWIDE, and later BANK OF AMERICA stop the fraud against me;
ii. Demanding that COUNTRYWIDE, and later BANK OF AMERICA name their Counsel of Record;
iii  Demanding that  BANK OF AMERICA respond on Complaints of fraud by senior officers,  filed with the Audit Committees pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002).
14) COUNTRYWIDE and BANK OF AMERICA, together with BRIAN CAVE, LLP, and SHEPPARD MULLIN, LLP, and judges of the Court, enacted various other charades, where they pretended to imposed on me serious monetary sanctions, and threaten me with jail.  Later, they refused to disclose the destination of the funds, thus fraudulently collected. [7]
15) Through such conduct, I was in fact unlawfully held by the Court from 2004-2010, in what should be deemed extortion under the Color of Law.

16) in January 2007, I  filed my complaints with FBI, SEC, OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, FEDERAL RESERVE detailing the fraud on me, as an individual, on the shareholders and on the tax payers, almost a full year before the fraud was consummated.

17) No law enforcement agency has provided me protection against these frauds to this date.

18) In January 2008, the New York Times published Gretchen Morgenson’s report regarding the filing of three (3) “Recreated Letters” by Countrywide’s attorneys in the US Bankruptcy Court in Pennsylvania.  The news caused the immediate collapse of Countrywide. [8]
19) Only a small fraction of the frauds perpetrated by the various parties in this matter were outlined in instant Supplemental Declaration.  If each and every false and deliberately misleading paper filed by the various parties, and each and every false and deliberately misleading record filed and admitted as evidence, and each and every false and deliberately misleading simulated judicial and clerical record in this case were counted as a Predicated Act, pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC 1961-1968, there were hundreds of such Predicated Acts in this matter, over the period of some 5 years.  This conduct continued regardless of continued protests from early 2007 to 2010.

Signed this date: December 28, 2011, here in Jerusalem, 


__________
Joseph Zernik

LINKS
[1]
 04-09-27  Opinion Letter by Fraud Expert ROBERT MEISTER re: Prequalification Letter of NIVIE SAMAAN by VICTOR PARKS and Countrywide's Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) of NIVIE SAMAAN 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714059/ 

[2] 04-09-27  Opinion Letter by Fraud Expert ROBERT MEISTER re: Prequalification Letter of NIVIE SAMAAN by VICTOR PARKS and Countrywide's Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) of NIVIE SAMAAN 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714059/ 

[3] 04-10-18 - 20 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email Correspondence of Realtor Michael Libow with person represented as Victor Parks -- evidence of wire/fax fraud by Nivie Samaan 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31669118/ 
04-09-27 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Nivie Samaan's Fraudulent Uniform Residential Loan Applications (1003) Pertaining to Property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills,  and Their Fraudulent Underwriting by Countrywide Home Loans, Inc s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25695526/ 

[4] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. 
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
        (1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or                      
        (2)  cause another to:                                                       
            (A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or                
            (B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[5] 08-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
[6] 07-07-06 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) "Non Party" Countrywide: Ex parte application for a Protective/Gag Order s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25002347/ 

[7] 09-01-13 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400)  Bank of America and Bryan Cave LLP filing, on behalf of "Non Party" Countrywide - Notice of Motion Sanctions Contempt v Dr Zernik
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31305245/ 

[8] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Countrywide’s three "recreated letters", transcript, and news reports:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/ 

_________


[]   Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)[]  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______ 
[]  
Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,229http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* 
Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* 
About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* 
"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* 
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* 
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* 
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* 
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* 
"What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* 
"More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* 
"The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
____________________________ As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

A call for proposals, ending January 10, 2012.

#Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds - the Party!

Late August 2012

Love, Peace, Justice
[] 
Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
celebration
READ MORE:http://josephsdream2012.wordpress.com/
VIEW VIDEO:11-12-12 Oh My God, it's Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWTKQkodf7U

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

11-12-26 Declaration of Joseph Zernik in RE: Racketeering by Countrywide, Bank of America, Bet Tzedek, California and US Judges, and cover up by FBI and US Department of Justice // Declaración de José Zernik sobre Crimen Organizado de Countrywide y Bank of America // 约瑟夫Zernik宣言“,就由Countrywide和美国银行的敲诈勒索

Following the reports of the untimely death of bank fraud whistleblower Tracy Lawrence, Joseph Zernik, PhD, released the short Declaration below, in hope that We the People regain our sovereignty in a nation now held hostage by corrupt bankers, judges, clerks, and attorneys.
Massive fraud in COUNTRYWIDE was ongoing for at least a decade prior to the financial crisis.  The evidence shows that COUNTRYWIDE was operating as a corrupt organization under CEO ANGELO MOZILO and Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS.  Such conduct of  the Los Angeles-based COUNTRYWIDE was made possible through direct collusion with the LA-JR (Los Angeles Judiciary Racket).
Following the takeover of Countrywide by Bank of America, the same conduct was adopted by the latter, including Presidents KENNETH LEWIS and BRIAN MOYNIHAN.
Los Angeles County, State of California, US law enforcement and US banking regulators were fully informed of the criminality in the sub-prime industry well before the onset of the financial crisis, but all worked in concert to cover it up.  In contrast, following the eruption of the crisis, senior officers of some of the same agencies, repeatedly made false and deliberately misleading statements in various hearings before the US Congress, where they denied any evidence of criminality in the sub-prime industry.
The notion that covering up the corruption will help instill public confidence in the US financial system is delusional at best.
[] []  [] []
Bank of America President BRIAN MOYNIHAN;                         Countrywide's Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS

VIEW AS PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76540209/_______________

DECLARATION OF JOSEPH ZERNIK
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, declare as follows:

1) In December 2006, well before the eruption of the financial crisis, I learnt for the first time the name of COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ("COUNTRYWIDE").  I had no business with the Countrywide, I had no mortgage with the COUNTRYWIDE, and never had any mortgage serviced by COUNTRYWIDE.

2) In mid-December 2006 I obtained from the office of Attorney CHARLES CUMMINS (then Managing Partner in SULLIVAN WORKMAN & DEE , 800 S. Figueroa, Suite 1200, Los Angeles 90017; Tel: 213 624 5544 x223, Email: CCummings@SWDLAW.NET), who represented me at the time, copies of discovery records, including some 400 pages of banking documents from Countrywide Financial Corporation.

3) Although I had no background in the law, in banking, or in professional real estate, I realized after review of the documents that COUNTRYWIDE and its Legal Department, then headed by Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS, today President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice"), were key parties in real estate fraud perpetrated on me.

4) To rule out the possibility that it was human error, I made in late December 2006 some phone calls to  COUNTRYWIDE's Legal Department and its Custodian of Records.  Following these phone calls I became convinced that it was deliberate conduct, and not a human error.

5) I also visited around December 2006 - January 2007 the FBI office in Los Angeles and talked with the agent by phone as well.  The Duty Agent reviewed my records during my visit, and confirmed that it was fraud. Moreover, he advised me that my attorney was at fault as well, since for over a year, he had never filed on my behalf in court a counterclaim of fraud and deceit.  The Duty Agent advised me that I had to find immediately an attorney, who would file on my behalf the Fraud and Deceit counterclaim.

6) From January to June 2007 I interviewed numerous law firms in Los Angeles. None agreed to file on my behalf the Fraud and Deceit counterclaim.  One attorney explained to me that I was "radioactive", and any attorney who would agree to represent me would suffer consequences.  Another attorney explained to me that no attorney would dare to file on my behalf the Fraud and Deceit counterclaim, since the judges themselves were part of the fraud, and any attorney who would dare to do so would suffer retaliation.

7) After I confronted Attorney CHARLES CUMMINGS in this matter, he offered me a $25,000 fee waiver, if I agreed to leave his office immediately and relieve him of his duties as my counsel.

8) Further analysis of the records led me to the conclusion that the fraud was initiated in 2004, by JAE ARRE LLOYD (formerly Timothy Lloyd Morrow) (listed online today as: J.R. Lloyd - President & CEO
Beverly Hills Capital Group, 468 N. Camden Drive #255B, Beverly Hills, CA 90210; NMLS MLO Lic #236709; DRE Broker #01871179, Email: JR@JRLloyd.com), who was at the time "Loan Originator" for Countrywide, in collusion with Countrywide's San Rafael's Branch Manager MARIA MCLAURIN.

9) Upon information and belief JAE ARRE LLOYD had been convicted on financial crimes, related to the theft of the benefits funds of the employees of SKYLINE FUNDING CORPORATION.

10) I also talked by phone with Branch Manager MARIA MCLAURIN around that time, and she claimed that all records produced by COUNTRYWIDE were reviewed by the COUNTRYWIDE Legal Department and that the discovery was directly managed and produced by the COUNTRYWIDE's Legal Department in consultation with her.

11) Additional analysis of the discovery records, led me to the conclusion that DIANE FRAZIER (4329 Gloria Ct, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, (707) 586-1479), who was in 2004 Underwriter in COUNTRYWIDE's San Rafael Branch, was a key figure in the case.  Moreover, my analysis led me to the conclusion that she unsuccessfully tried to resist the mortgage fraud being perpetrated by JAE ARRE LLOYD and MARIA MCLAURIN.

12) In March 2007, I managed to locate DIANE FRAZIER, and spoke with her at length by phone (about an hour).

13) DIANE FRAZIER remembered in great details the case related to JAE ARRE LLOYD and MARIA MCLAURIN.  She explained to me that she had worked for well over a decade in the COUNTRYWIDE's San Rafael Branch, and in 2004 was a Senior Underwriter there. She further told me that in early 2005 she was fired, in retaliation for her resistance to the fraud in the case describe herein.  She provided me with additional details regarding the fraud in this specific case, and also described to me in detail the large-scale fraud that had been perpetrated in the underwriting of US government-backed sub-prime mortgages in the COUNTRYWIDE's San Rafael Branch in 2004 and previous years.  She described the branch as involved in massive mortgage fraud on the US government, to the tune of what amounted to billions of dollars per year in that branch alone.

14) DIANE FRAZIER, who by then was not employed by Countrywide for over two years, sounded scared, and repeatedly warned me: "You don't know who you are dealing with".

15) About a week later, I tried to call DIANE FRAZIER again, to let her know that I was going to serve on her a subpoena for deposition.  A man answered the phone and told me that COUNTRYWIDE forbade DIANE FRAZIER to talk with me, and that if I called her again: "I will come down to LA and gun you down".

16) Later, still in early 2007, I tried to subpoena DIANE FRAZIER for deposition, using the services of ABC LEGAL SERVICES, Orange County.  Their people staked the house of DIANE FRAZIER for over 24 hours, but she was nowhere to be seen.  A person, who ABC LEGAL SERVICES said answered the door, claimed that DIANE FRAZIER no longer lived there.  However, when I tried to call DIANE FRAZIER in 2010, she was again at the same phone number.

17) I have repeatedly filed with FBI and US Department of Justice complaints against those involved in this conduct (see links below), but both FBI and US Department of Justice, both in Los Angeles, California, and in Washington DC.  However, both FBI and US Department of Justice refused to provide me any protection.

18) In June 2007 I transmitted directly to Chief Legal Officer SANDOR SAMUELS and to then CEO ANGELO MOZILO requests to stop the fraud being perpetrated against me. Both refused to do so.  Instead, they retained in June 2007 the law-firm of BRYAN CAVE, LLP, to initiated a campaign of retaliation, harassment and intimidation against me, as part of which I was threatened with jailing.

19) Following the takeover of Countrywide by Bank of America Corporation, I likewise directly forwarded requests, delivered to both KENNETH LEWIS III and BRIAN MOYNIHAN, who served as Presidents of Bank of America Corporation.  I asked the to stop the fraud and retaliation perpetrated against me.  However, the retaliation was only exacerbated.

20)  In 2008 Senator DIANE FEINSTEIN and Congresswoman DIANE WATSON filed on my behalf Congressional Inquiries on then US Attorney General MICHAEL MUKASEY and FBI Director ROBERT MUELLER III, why they would not provide me Equal Protection under the law.

21) Responses to the US Congress, signed by FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigations KENNETH KAISER and then Director of the US Attorneys Office KENNETH MELSON (who later became known as a key person in the "Fast and Furious" operation), falsely claimed that I was complaining about "foreclosure procedures".

22) I have never been party to foreclosure, mortgage default, or bankruptcy procedures of any kind.

23) I later obtained from highly decorated FBI veteran JAMES WEDICK (Sacramento, California, Land Line: 916 638 3566 Cell: 916 501 2805, Fax: 916 290 0999, Email: jwedick@fraudspecialists.com) a fraud expert opinion letter in this matter. (linked below). 

24) Moreover, JAMES WEDICK documented in an email notice to me (linked below) that he was contacted by FBI Special Agent from the Los Angeles Branch, who agreed with JAMES WEDICK that I was a victim of fraud, and that FBI was required to provide me Equal Protection.

25) To this date, I have never been accorded Equal Protection in this and related matters by any of the numerous US and California law enforcement agencies, which I filed complaints with.

26) In late April 2010 I abruptly escaped from Los Angeles, when I realized that my life was seriously endangered.

27) The danger to my life coincided with the deadline for submission of submission of my report, on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO), to the United Nations.  The report was later incorporated into an official United  Nations report, with a note referring to: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". (see linked below)

28) Beyond the persons listed above, key figures in the fraud were:
a) California Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR (famous for her role in the Rampart Scandal, 1998-2000)
b) California Judge JOHN SEGAL
c) Then California Judge TERRY FRIEDMAN (former Bet Tzedek's Executive Director)
d) Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK (former Bet Tzedek's President and former President of Los Angeles County Bar Association)

29) Numerous other California and US judges, California and US clerks, attorneys, financial institutions, and others were involved in perpetrating the fraud.

The above declaration is made under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States, and is transmitted via my personal, secure electronic mail account.

Signed this date: December 26, 2011, here in Jerusalem,

[]
__________
Joseph Zernik

LINKS TO RECORDS:
[1]
 Complaints filed with FBI and US Attorney Office:
10-05-21 Complaint Filed with FBI Against MARIA MCLAURIN, BANK OF AMERICA [NYSE:BAC], Convicted Felon and Loan Originator JAE ARRE LLOYD and NIVIE SAMAAN.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31725728/10-05-22 FBI complaint against MICHAEL LIBOW (COLDWELL BANKER) and GAIL HERSHOWITZ (MARA ESCROW) both of Beverly Hills California for conspiracy of real estate fraud and extortion
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31772791/10-05-23 USC Credit Union FBI complaint for fraud and extortion against Vice President CHRISTINE SCHWARZ President GARY PEREZ
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31799262/
10-06-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Complaint against DAVID PASTERNAK  for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Civil Rights under the Color of Law Pursuant to US Law, and Deprivation of Human Rights Pursuant to Ratified International Law: 
  http://www.scribd.com/doc/33354641/
10-07-06 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Complaint against BRIAN MOYNIHAN, BANK OF AMERICA, and Attorneys JENNA MOLDAWSKY and JOHN AMBERG (BRYAN CAVE, LLP) - for public corruption and financial institution fraud, relative to their conduct in at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/  
10-07-12 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) Complaint against US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE and others at the US District Court, Central District of California  for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34194403/ 
10-08-09 Complaint for Public Corruption and racketeering against Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR and Others at both the Civil and Criminal Divisions of the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35592511/ 
10-08-22  Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) - Complaint against former Judge PATRICIA COLLINS, Judge LISA HART-COLE, Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK, OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL (NYSE:ORI) and others - for public corruption and racketeering by judges, financial institutions, and large law-firms in pretense proceedings at the Court. 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36266839/ 

[2] Opinion Letter of Fraud Expert JAMES WEDICK:
07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) David Pasternak: Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined as fraud by James Wedick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/
[3] Email notice by JAMES WEDICK regarding his conversation with FBI Special Agent, Los Angeles Branch:
08-08-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email letter by highly decorated FBI veteran James Wedick regarding  FBI's refusal to provide Dr Zernik equal protection
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29713733/

[4] Human Rights Alert (NGO) Submission and related United Nations report (2010)
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination  by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
____
[]   
Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/
____
Human Rights Alert (NGO)[]  
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______ 
[]  
Flag Counter: 128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ 
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ 
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,229http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 
Total Item Views: 585,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* 
Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)
* 
About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013 Bloomberg (January 2011)
* 
"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* 
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* 
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."     Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* 
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* 
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* 
"What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* 
"More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011) http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* 
"The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
____________________________ As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

A call for proposals, ending January 10, 2012.

#Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds - the Party!

Late August 2012

Love, Peace, Justice
[] 
Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
celebration
READ MORE:http://josephsdream2012.wordpress.com/
VIEW VIDEO:11-12-12 Oh My God, it's Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWTKQkodf7U