09-12-13 - Entwurf Forderungen zur Klage gegen die US-Regierung in Interamerican Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte - Costa Rica

Willkommen! Ab jetzt auch in Deutsch!
Diese Seite ist für die Dokumentation von Menschenrechtsverletzungen in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika gewidmet, insbesondere - Missbrauch durch weit verbreitete Korruption der Gerichte.
Dieser Text wurde durch die maschinelle Übersetzung erzeugt. Ich wäre für jeden, wäre ein besserer deutscher Sprache die Übersetzung der ursprünglichen englischen Fassung auf produzieren dankbar:

Entwurf
Ansprüche auf Beschwerde gegen die US-Regierung in Interamerikanische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

Sheriff Lee Baca_ _ _ _ _ Attorney Richard Fine

1) US-Regierung erlaubte die laufenden falsche, willkürliche Inhaftierung von Richard Fine in Los Angeles, Kalifornien - ohne Gewähr, keine Überzeugung, keine Verurteilung. Rechtsanwalt Richard Fine, 70 Jahre, ehemaliger US-Staatsanwalt, gegen Korruption gerichtlichen Aktivist, ist in Einzelhaft gehalten, unter falschen Krankenhausaufenthalt, seit 4. März 2009, weniger als zwei Wochen nach dem 20. Februar 2009 Unterzeichnung durch den Gouverneur von Kalifornien, der um Verzeihung alle Richter für das fehlerhafte Verhalten von Richard Fine ausgesetzt.

US Secret Service _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FBI

2) US-Regierung erlaubte die falsche, willkürliche Inhaftierung von Tausenden in Los Angeles, Kalifornien - der Rampart-FIP (Fälschlicherweise Inhaftierte Personen) - fast ausschließlich Schwarze und Latinos, ein volles Jahrzehnt, nachdem die weit verbreitete Korruption, die die falschen Überzeugungen und falsch geführt Verurteilung in den Rampart Skandal Untersuchung dokumentiert (1998-2000). Unwiderlegbare Beweise war in beiden Medien-Berichten, z. B.PSSFrontline - falsche Verhaftungen - und in den offiziellen Berichte der Regierung - zB Blue Ribbon Review Panel-Bericht (2006).

3) US-Regierung nahm den 10 Millionen, die auf gleichen Schutz im Bezirk Los Angeles wohnte, und ließ die weit verbreitete Korruption der Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County - mit den besten Beweis der angeblichen Betrieb der Equity / Enterprise Track wurde in der Gericht:
Die LA Superior Court regelmäßig miteinander vermischt reale True Court Track Fällen, und eine Schein-Fällen und zu vertuschen, das Gericht verbarg die Laufzettel und keinen Zugang zu den gerichtlichen Akten. Die Richard Fine Fall wurde von der Schein-track - theEquity / Unternehmen Track:
a) "Equity" bezieht sich auf die Erkenntnisse aus einer Reihe von Fällen -, dass der vorsitzende Richter hielten sich in einem "Equity Court", die nicht unter Kalifornien oder US-amerikanischem Recht (und damit die Vergeblichkeit der Bemühungen um eine Disqualifikation)!
b) "Enterprise" - die Bezeichnung für ein solches Verhalten ist in Bezug auf RICO Unternehmen ..
Der beste Beweis für die Existenz der Equity / Enterprise Track at theCalifornia Superior Court, County of Los Angeles kam der folgenden Optionen:
a) Die Gebühren erhoben Equity / Unternehmen Track Fälle wurden als "Journal Entry" aufgeführt, und der Schreiber des Gerichts - John A. Clarke, und dem Vorsitzenden Richter des Gerichts - Charles McCoy, verweigerte die Antwort, wie die endgültige Benennung solcher"Journal Entry"-Fonds war.
b) Keine gültige und wirksame Anordnungen oder Entscheidungen wurden immer in Equity / Enterprise Trackcases ausgestellt, sondern nur "false auf ihren Gesichtern" Aufträge und Urteile. Dass die angebliche Grund, warum es keinen Haftbefehl und keine Reservierung Papiere für Richard Gut, und warum alle Aufträge und Entscheidungen in seinem Fall waren "false auf ihren Gesichtern war". [1] Diese Aufträge und die Urteile waren sie bezeichneten Art Kozinski Betrugsbekämpfung.
c) Keiner der vorsitzende Richter im Equity / Enterprise Track immer im Besitz einer gültigen Zuteilung Auftrag, und auch nach Bewegungen vor dem Vorsitzenden Richter, weigerte er sich, diese Zuteilung Befehle zu erteilen.
d) Auch wenn die Spezialität der Equity / Enterprise Track wurde geltend gemacht, die in Immobilien-und Finanzinstitut Betrug, [2] Das Ergebnis war immer - Betrug bei der Übertragung des Eigentums. [3] Das Gericht nie erteilt hat, gelten, wirksam, ehrlich Grant Deeds, weil keine Schrift von Hinrichtungen entweder ausgestellt wurden.
Der Betrieb des Systems der doppelten Länge - True Court Track vs Equity / Enterprise Track war die einzige plausible Erklärung für die Verweigerung des Zugangs zu den Laufzettel (California - Register der Aktionen) in Los Angeles County, Kalifornien.

4) US-Regierung diskriminiert werden, die 10 Millionen Einwohner von Los Angeles County, Kalifornien, in den letzten 3 Jahrzehnten - beginnend mit Sendungen von illegalen Drogen und deren Verteilung unter der Schirmherrschaft der CIA in den 1980er und 1990er Jahre, Aus-und Weiterbildung mit der Aberkennung des 10 Millionen, die in Los Angeles County leben die Rechte für:
a) faire und unparteiische Anhörung,
b) öffentliche Verhandlung bei der Strafverfolgung und
c) Nationale Gerichte zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Rechte gemäß der amerikanischen Verfassung und die Änderungen zu.

5) US-Regierung entzogen Einwohner von Los Angeles County, Kalifornien das Recht auf Eigentum, aber auch Bewohner von San Bernardino County, Kalifornien, und vielen anderen Ländern, durch die Möglichkeit der Oberste Gerichtshof von Kalifornien, Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County, und vielen anderen staatlichen Gerichten, in Immobilien Betrug neigen - auch in Absprache mit Finanzinstituten Betrug und Countrywide Bank of America Corporation.

Ken Lewis, III
6) US-Regierung entzogen US-Bürger und viele andere auf der ganzen Welt des Eigentums, durch die enormen Verluste in der aktuellen wirtschaftlichen / Integrität der Krise - und auch unter Beschäftigten und Investoren welt-weit weiterhin zu unangemessenen Risiken durch ihre Weigerung, die Durchsetzung des Rechts auf große Finanzinstitute wie die Bank of America Corporation.

Wahrlich,

Josef Zernik
I. Fußnoten
[1] Eine detaillierte Analyse einer Reihe von acht (8) falsch auf ihren Gesichtern Aufträge und Entscheidungen im Fall von Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List von acht (8) aufeinander folgenden Entscheidungen, oder ...
[2] Ähnliche finden - Routine Immobilien Finanzinstitut / Immobilien Betrug durch das Gericht auch in den benachbarten San Bernardino County, Kalifornien, wo die ehemaligen Vorsitzenden Richter des Gerichts wurde berichtet, wurden in zahlreichen solchen Fällen zu befassen gefunden.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[3] Equity / Enterprise Track: Beispiel für Betrug bei der Übertragung der Titel von der LA Superior Court, wie hoch dekoriert FBI-Veteran meinte. Der Betrug war in diesem Fall in Absprache mit Countrywide und die Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf
II. Vorangegangenen Mitteilungen in dieser Zeichenfolge
Bei 13:09 13/12/2009, you wrote:
Die Organisation Amerikanischer Staaten. Es ist die einzige internationale Gericht, das jeden Anschein zuständig ist.
III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - als Antrag auf Einleitung von Korrekturmaßnahmen.
• Jura-Fakultät
• James C Duff, Direktor, Sekretariat der US-Gerichten
• Glenn A Fine, Generalinspektor, US Dept of Justice - als Zusatz zu Beschwerde über weit verbreitete Korruption der Justiz in Los Angeles County, und die Verweigerung von FBI und US-Justizministerium leitenden Angestellten bis zu entsprechen Equal Protection, bietet statt betrügerische Antworten Anfragen vom US-Kongress.
• Weitere Inspector Generals - als Zusatz zu Beschwerden über die weit verbreitete Korruption im Los Angeles County, und die Weigerung der US-Regierung, das Gesetz durchzusetzen.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: Wie einen Antrag auf Untersuchung gemäß der US-Geheimdienst Leitbild und experimentellen primären Zuständigkeit - bei der Wahrung der Integrität des Finanzsystems - vor allem - große Computer-Systeme.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN-Hochkommissarin für Menschenrechte
• Nout Wellink, Vorsitzender, Basel Accords Ausschuss
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, wie eine Wiederholung Antrag an die Optionsscheine von HF-und NR1-Zugang - zu inspizieren und zu kopieren.
• Chines Botschafter in den USA - seit dem chinesischen Volk sind wahrscheinlich die größten Verluste hinnehmen - beraubt Einsparungen erworben durch jahrzehntelange harte Arbeit - als Folge der US-Regierung Rücksichtslosigkeit in der Verordnung von Finanzinstituten.

IV. The Usual

IN KÜRZE - Kozinski müssen zurücktreten!

"Dieser Fall nachweisen, dass das FBI alle Vorwürfe der Justiz Korruption energisch verfolgen wird, wie die öffentliche Korruption Verletzungen gehören zu den schwersten aller kriminellen Verhaltens und können den Stoff einer demokratischen Gesellschaft sind, reißen sollte", sagte John F. Pikus, Special Agent Leiter der Abteilung Albany, in eine vorbereitete Anweisung.

09-12-13 Bienvenido! Ahora también en español! Las reclamaciones de Queja contra el Gobierno de los E.U.

Este sitio está dedicado a documentar violaciones de derechos humanos en los Estados Unidos de América, en particular - los abusos a través de la corrupción generalizada de los tribunales.
Este texto ha sido generado a través de la traducción automática. Le agradecería que para nadie sería producir una mejor traducción al español del texto original en el idioma Inglés:
09-12-13- Draft claims for complaint against US Government in Interacmerican Human Rights Court - Costa Rica

Borrador
Las reclamaciones de Queja contra el Gobierno de los E.U. en la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos de
Gobierno de los E.U.

Sheriff Lee Baca_ _ _ _ _ Attorney Richard Fine

1) Permite el falso, el encarcelamiento arbitrario de Richard Fine en Los Ángeles, California - sin orden, sin convicción, y no de condena. El abogado Richard Fine, de 70 años, ex fiscal de E.U., la lucha contra la corrupción judicial activista, fue mantenido en confinamiento solitario, en virtud de la hospitalización falso, desde 4 de marzo de 2009, menos de dos semanas después del 20 de febrero 2009 firmado por el Gobernador de California de los indultos para todos los jueces de la conducta ilícita expuestas por Richard Fine.

Gobierno de los E.U.

US Secret Service _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FBI

2) Permite el falso encarcelamiento arbitrario de miles de personas en Los Angeles, California - los Rampart-FEPs (los Falsos Encarcelamientos Personas), casi exclusivamente negros y latinos, una década después de la corrupción generalizada que llevó a las convicciones falsas y falsos sentencia fueron documentados en la investigación de escándalo de Rampart (1998-2000). Prueba irrefutable fue proporcionado en los dos informes-por ejemplo, los medios de comunicación PBS-Frontline - encarcelamientos falsos - y en los informes oficiales del gobierno - por ejemplo, Blue Ribbon Panel de Revisión informe (2006).

3) Gobierno de E.U. privó a los 10 millones de personas que residían en el condado de Los Ángeles de la igualdad de protección, y permitió que la corrupción generalizada de la Corte Superior de California, condado de Los Ángeles, que fue la mejor evidencia de la supuesta operación de la / Patrimonio Neto Empresa pista en el Tribunal:
El Tribunal Superior LA habitualmente mezclados real verdadero Tribunal de Justicia los casos de pistas, y los casos de fraude, mientras que para ocultarlo, el órgano jurisdiccional ocultado expedientes y se les niega el acceso a los registros de la corte. El caso de Richard multa fue de la pista falsa - theEquity / Empresa Track:
a) La "equidad" se refiere a las pruebas de un par de casos - que los jueces consideraron que preside en un "Tribunal de Primera Instancia Equidad", no sujeto a la ley de California o de EE.UU. (de ahí la inutilidad de los esfuerzos para la descalificación)!
b) "Empresa" - la designación de tal conducta, es en referencia a las empresas RICO ..
La mejor prueba de la existencia de la / Patrimonio Neto Empresa Pista a theCalifornia del Tribunal Superior, en el condado de Los Ángeles vinieron de los siguientes:
a) Las tasas percibidas de Patrimonio / Empresa de los casos la pista han sido clasificados como "Journal Entry", y el secretario del Tribunal de Justicia - John A. Clarke, y el Magistrado Presidente del Tribunal de Justicia - Charles McCoy, se negó a contestar a lo que la designación definitiva de tales "Journal Entry" fondos era.
b) órdenes de no válido y eficaz o sentencias fueron jamás publicado en el Patrimonio / Trackcases Empresa, sólo "falsas en sus caras", resoluciones y sentencias. Esa fue la razón alegada por qué no había orden de detención y sin papeles de reserva para Richard Fine, y por qué todas las órdenes y resoluciones judiciales en su caso eran "falsas en sus caras". [1] Estas órdenes y resoluciones judiciales que son de tipo designado Kozinski Fraude. Ninguno

c) De los magistrados que presiden en el Patrimonio / Empresa pista siempre ha mantenido un pedido válido de asignación, e incluso después de mociones ante el juez, se negó a emitir Órdenes de dicha cesión fraude

d) Aunque se alegó la especialidad de la / Patrimonio Neto Empresa camino de ser en el sector inmobiliario y el fraude institución financiera [2], el resultado fue siempre - en la transmisión de la titularidad. [3] El tribunal no emitió válida, eficaz, honesta subvención hechos, porque no Mandamiento de las ejecuciones fueron expedidas.
La operación de la doble vía - True Tribunal Track vs Equidad / Empresa pista fue la única explicación plausible para la denegación de acceso a los sumarios (California - Registros de acciones) en el Condado de Los Ángeles, California.

4) Gobierno de E.U. discrimina a los 10 millones de residentes del Condado de Los Angeles, California, por las últimas 3 décadas - comenzando con los envíos de drogas ilícitas y su distribución bajo el patrocinio de la CIA en los años 1980 y 1990, y continuando con la privación de la 10 millones de personas que residen en el Condado de Los Angeles de los derechos de:
a) Feria y de la audiencia imparcial,
b) Juicio público en los procesos penales, y

c) Los tribunales nacionales para proteger los derechos humanos y los derechos de conformidad con la Constitución de E.U. y de las enmiendas a la misma.

5) Gobierno de E.U. privaban a los residentes de Los Angeles County, California del derecho a la propiedad - y también los residentes de Condado de San Bernardino, California, y muchos otros condados, al permitir que la Corte Superior de California, condado de Los Ángeles, el Tribunal Superior de de California, el Condado de San Bernardino, y muchas otras cortes estatales, a participar en el fraude de bienes raíces, incluyendo la colusión en el fraude de las instituciones financieras con Countrywide y Bank of America Corporation.

Ken Lewis, III

6) Gobierno de E.U. privados residentes en los E.U., y muchos otros en todo el mundo de la propiedad, a través de las enormes pérdidas en la actual crisis económica e integridad, y también siguió los trabajadores sujetos y los inversores en todo el mundo a riesgos irrazonables - al negarse a cumplir la ley en las principales instituciones financieras, como Bank of America Corporation.

En verdad,

Jose Zernik

I. Notas al pie
[1] El análisis detallado de una serie de ocho (8) falsas en sus órdenes de caras y las resoluciones judiciales en el caso de Richard Fine.
09-10-23 List de ocho (8) resoluciones consecutivas, o ...
[2] hallazgo similar - rutina de la institución financiera de bienes raíces / fraudes de bienes raíces por el Tribunal se encuentra también en el vecino condado de San Bernardino, California, donde el ex magistrado Presidente del Tribunal de Justicia se informó que han estado implicados en numerosos casos.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[3] Patrimonio / Empresa Track: Ejemplo de fraude en la transmisión de la titularidad por el Tribunal Superior de Los Ángeles, como opinó el veterano condecorado del FBI. El fraude en este caso estaba en connivencia con Countrywide y Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf
II. Anteriores comunicaciones de esta cadena
En 13:09 13/12/2009, you wrote:
La Organización de Estados Americanos. Es el único tribunal internacional que tenga alguna apariencia de la jurisdicción.
III. CC

• Prof. Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - como una solicitud para el inicio de acciones correctivas.
• Facultad de la escuela de Derecho
• James Duff, Director de la Oficina Administrativa de los tribunales de los E.U.
• Glenn Fine, Inspector General del Departamento de Justicia de EE.UU. - como una adición a la denuncia de la corrupción extendida del sistema de justicia en el Condado de Los Angeles y la negativa de EE.UU. funcionarios del FBI y del Departamento de Justicia de alto nivel para otorgar igualdad de protección, en lugar de proporcionar respuestas fraudulentas a las preguntas de Congreso de los EE.UU..
• Otros Inspector generales - como una adición a las quejas sobre la corrupción generalizada en el Condado de Los Angeles, y la negativa del gobierno de EE.UU. para hacer cumplir la ley.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director del Servicio Secreto de EE.UU.: En una solicitud de investigación, de conformidad con la declaración de secreto de EE.UU. Servicio de la misión y la jurisdicción primaria de investigación - en la salvaguardia de la integridad del sistema financiero - en particular - los sistemas informáticos de gran tamaño.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, Alta Comisionada de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos,
• Nout Wellink, Presidente del Comité de Acuerdos de Basilea,
• Lee Baca, Sheriff de Los Angeles, como una solicitud para acceder a la repetición de las órdenes de RF y NR1 - para inspeccionar y copiar.
• Chines embajador de los E.U. - desde que el pueblo chinos están dispuestos a mantener el más grande de las pérdidas - robo de los ahorros obtenidos a través de décadas de duro trabajo - como resultado de la imprudencia de gobierno de los EE.UU. en la regulación de instituciones financieras.

IV. The Usual

En pocas palabras - Kozinski debe renunciar!

"Este caso debería demostrar que el FBI perseguirá todas las denuncias de corrupción judicial con fuerza, como violaciónes de corrupción pública se encuentran entre los más graves de todas las conductas delictivas y se puede rasgar el tejido de una sociedad democrática", dijo John F. Pikus, agente especial a cargo de la División de Albany, en una declaración preparada.

09-12-13- Draft claims for complaint against US Government in Interamerican Human Rights Court - Costa Rica

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:57:25 -0800
To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Draft claims for complaint against US Government to Interamerican Human Rights Court, Costa Rica

Requesting comments, advise from all people of good will, good faith.

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:21:28 -0800
To: "list judicial reform"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Draft complaint to Interamerican Human Rights Court, Costa Rica

Hi K:
Thanks, enjoy, and I would appreciate any information that you may be willing to share, and also - comments, advise regarding the write-up below.

Draft

Claims for Complaint against the US Government in Interamerican Human Rights Court

Sheriff Lee Baca_ _ _ _ _ Attorney Richard Fine

1) US government permitted the ongoing false, arbitrary imprisonment of Richard Fine in Los Angeles, California - with no warrant, no conviction, and no sentencing. Attorney Richard Fine, a 70 yo, former US prosecutor, anti judicial corruption activist, was held in solitary confinement, under false hospitalization, since March 4, 2009, less than two weeks after February 20, 2009 signing by the California Governor of pardons for all judges for the wrongful conduct exposed by Richard Fine.

US Secret Service _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FBI

2) US government permitted the false, arbitrary imprisonment of many thousands in Los Angeles, California - the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons), almost exclusively blacks and latinos, a full decade after the widespread corruption that led to the false convictions and false sentencing were documented in the Rampart scandal investigation (1998-2000). Incontrovertible evidence was provided in both media reports -e.g. PSS Frontline - false imprisonments - and in official government reports - e.g. Blue Ribbon Review Panel report (2006).

3) US Government deprived the 10 millions who resided in Los Angeles County of Equal Protection, and permitted widespread corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, which was best evidence in the alleged operation of the Equity/Enterprise Track in the court:
The LA Superior Court routinely mixed together real True Court Track cases, and sham cases, and to cover it up, the court concealed the dockets and denied access to court records. The Richard Fine case was from the sham track - the Equity/Enterprise Track:
a) "Equity" refers to the evidence from a couple of cases - that the judges considered themselves presiding in an "Equity Court", not subject to California or US law (hence the futility of efforts for disqualification)!
b) "Enterprise" - designation for such conduct, is in reference to RICO enterprises..
The best evidence for the existence of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles came from the following:
a) The fees collected from Equity/Enterprise Track cases were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke, and the Presiding Judge of the Court - Charles McCoy, refused to answer what the final designation of such "Journal Entry" funds was.
b) No valid and effectual orders or judgments were ever issued in Equity/Enterprise Track cases, only "false on their faces" orders and judgments. That was the alleged reason why there was no warrant for the arrest and no booking papers for Richard Fine, and why all orders and judgments in his case were "false on their faces". [1] Such orders and Judgments were of they type designated Kozinski Fraud.
c) None of the judges presiding in Equity/Enterprise Track ever held a valid Assignment Order, and even after motions before the Presiding Judge, he refused to issue such Assignment Orders.
d) Although the specialty of the Equity/Enterprise Track was claimed to be in real estate and financial institution fraud, [2] the outcome was invariably - fraud in conveyance of title. [3] The court never issued valid, effectual, honest Grant Deeds, because no Writ of Executions were issued either.
The operation of the double track - True Court Track vs Equity/Enterprise Track was the only plausible explanation for the denial of access to the dockets (California - Registers of Actions) in LA County, California.

4) US Government discriminated against the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County, California, for the past 3 decades, starting with shipments of illicit drugs and their distribution under the patronage of CIA in the 1980s and 1990s, and continuing with the deprivation of the 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County of the rights for:
a) Fair and impartial hearing,
b) Public trial in criminal prosecutions, and
c) National tribunals to protect human rights and rights pursuant to the US Constitution and the Amendments to it.

5) US Government deprived residents of Los Angeles County, California of the right to own property, and also residents of San Bernardino County, California, and many other counties, by permitting the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, and many other state courts, to engage in real estate fraud, including collusion in financial institutions fraud with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.

6) US Government deprived US residents, and many others throughout the world of property, through enormous losses in the current economic/integrity crisis, and also continued to subject workers and investors world-wide to unreasonable risks, by refusing to enforce the law on major financial institutions, such as Bank of America Corporation.

Truly,


J Zernik

I. Footnotes
[1] Detailed analysis of a series of eight (8) false on their faces orders and judgments in the case of Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List of eight (8) consecutive rulings, or...
[2] Similar finding - routine real estate financial institution/real estate frauds by the court were also found in the neighboring San Bernardino County, California, where the former Presiding Judge of the Court was reported to have been involved in numerous such cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[3] Equity/Enterprise Track: Example of fraud in conveyance of title by the LA Superior Court, as opined by highly decorated FBI veteran. The fraud in this case was in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf
II. Previous communications in this string

At 13:09 13/12/2009, you wrote:

The Organization of American States. It is the only international court which has any semblance of jurisdiction.

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.
• Chinese Ambassador to the US - since the Chinese people are likely to sustain the largest losses - robbed of savings earned through decades of hard work - as a result of US government recklessness in regulation of financial institutions.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

09-12-13 Alleged widespread corruption in administration of state courts- LA County as an example

Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:36:57 -0800
To: "judicial reform list"
From: joseph zernik

December 12, 2009

Hi G and judicial reform list:

Thank you for the response, I appreciate it, you helped me in improving the questionnaire. Your response, copied below, appeared to describe your local variation of the so called Kozinski Fraud. Finally - we are focused back on the cause - denial of access to court records - and variations on the Kozinski Fraud - alleged widespread fraud in the administration of state courts across the US - underlying the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case.

In this email we leave behind the Federal Courts, and the alleged large scale fraud on the American people in the operation of dual docketing systems of PACER & CM/ECF, installed by the Administrative Office of the US Courts with no authority at all, and in alleged violation of the Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC 2071 - 2077.

state courts alone are the subject of this email:

1) Requesting help in surveying integrity, or lack thereof in state courts
Could you please add Yes/No for (a) through (f) below? [1] Use more space as necessary and links to records, but please provide short overall description in the response itself. This questionnaire is about state courts only, and I am asking for the name of the state and the county as well. Thanks again, this would be great help! Please also provide additional information regarding conduct of the courts relative to verification of orders and judgments by judges (signatures and dates) or lack thereof, and attestations by clerks, or lack thereof (see comments at bottom of this email note). These two areas appear to be most common theme in the alleged widespread frauds in the administration of both federal and state courts in the US today - the so called Kozinski Fraud.

2) Refusal of US Government to perform its duties pursuant to ratified International Law
I would be grateful for responses from other states and counties... I am seeking the data for arguing before International Human Rights courts the failure and refusal of US Gov to provide Equal Protection in LA County in general, and in the case of Richard Fine in particular. Such refusal persisted even after inquiries by the Honorable Diane Watson - Congresswoman and the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator in August 2008 on FBI and US Dept of Justice.

3) Conditions in LA County, California as a detailed example for the background for the current economic/integrity crisis and the Richard Fine case
I will scan and post my correspondence with the California Superior Court. County of Los Angeles, regarding the denial of access to dockets... It is a serious violation of human rights, I believe. There is no possible explanation why an honest court would deny such access. The only plausible explanation, was in what was stated before regarding the Richard Fine case - that the LA Superior Court routinely mixed up real True Court Track cases, and sham cases, and to cover it up, the court concealed the dockets and denied access to court records. The Richard Fine case [2][3] was from the sham track - the Equity/Enterprise Track:
a) "Equity" refers to the evidence from a couple of cases - that the judges considered themselves presiding in an "Equity Court", not subject to California or US law (hence the futility of efforts for disqualification)!
b) "Enterprise" - designation for such conduct, is in reference to RICO enterprises...

4) Evidence for operation of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the LA Superior Court
The best evidence for the existence of the Equity/Enterprise Track at the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles came from the following:
a) The fees collected from Equity/Enterprise Track cases were listed as "Journal Entry", and the Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke, and the Presiding Judge of the Court - Charles McCoy, refused to answer what the final designation of such "Journal Entry" funds was.
b) No valid and effectual orders or judgments were ever issued in Equity/Enterprise Track cases, only "false on their faces" orders and judgments. That was the alleged reason why there was no warrant for the arrest and no booking papers for Richard Fine, and why all orders and judgments in his case were "false on their faces". [4] Such orders and Judgments were of they type designated Kozinski Fraud.
c) None of the judges presiding in Equity/Enterprise Track ever held a valid Assignment Order, and even after motions before the Presiding Judge, he refused to issue such Assignment Orders.
d) Although the specialty of the Equity/Enterprise Track was claimed to be in real estate and financial institution fraud, [5] the outcome was invariably - fraud in conveyance of title. [6] The court never issued valid, effectual, honest Grant Deeds, because no Writ of Executions were issued either.

The operation of the double track - True Court Track vs Equity/Enterprise Track was the only plausible explanation for the denial of access to the dockets (California - Registers of Actions) in LA County, California.

Truly,

Joe Zernik

I. Footnotes
[1] Questionnaire: Access and authenticity of state court records
Questions: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Answers for < > County, state of < >
a) Are you allowed to see your docket?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Y/N
b) Are you served by mail you minute orders?_ _ _ _ _ Y/N
c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts?_ _ Y/N
d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases?_ _ __ _ Y/N
e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments?_ _ _ _ __ Y/N
f) What type of payments are involved, if any. use more space as necessary
g) What is the typical manner in which orders/judgment are verified (signed) by judges? Please provide short description of problems in this area, if any.
h) What is the typical manner of attestation by clerks (Certificate of Service and Notice of Entry, Proof of Service, etc)? Please provide short description of problems, if any.
[2] Marina v LA County (BS109420) - Los Angeles Superior Court denied multiple requests to access the docket (Register of Actions) in this case, and Habeas Corpus petition to the US District Court, Los Angeles, and emergency petition to the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, were reviewed in the absence of such record, quintessential for providing the foundation for any other litigation records.

[3] The Richard Fine case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[4] Detailed analysis of a series of eight (8) false on their faces orders and judgments in the case of Richard Fine.
09-10-23.List of eight (8) consecutive rulings, or...
[5] Similar finding - routine real estate financial institution/real estate frauds by the court were also found in the neighboring San Bernardino County, California, where the former Presiding Judge of the Court was reported to have been involved in numerous such cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
[6] Equity/Enterprise Track: Example of fraud in conveyance of title by the LA Superior Court, as opined by highly decorated FBI veteran. The fraud in this case was in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of America Corporation.
http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf

II. Previous communications in this string
____________________________________
This is g's writing (condensed)
At 18:00 12/12/2009, G wrote:

I feel pretty lucky ....our dockets are posted for free, you can go to the courts and review the docket,
but we are not allowed to have signed orders from real judges.
All of arts or rubber stamp facsimiles from the court clerk and the orders are seldom in the file signed afterwards.

___________________________________
This is jz's writing:
Hi G:
This is important information. What you are describing is your local variation of the Kozinski Fraud. My questions are:
1) Is this all in reference to state court?
2) What is the typical form of authentication of orders and judgments in your state court?
a) Notice of service and entry of Order/Judgment by clerk?
b) Proof of Service by party?
c) Digital signatures of some sort?
Thanks for any responses on the matter.
Joe Zernik

This is jz's writing:

--- On Sat, 12/12/09, joseph zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Getting to the heart of the matter - access to court records in the digital era.

To: "Jz12345@Earthlink. Net"

Date: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 3:28 PM

Let's get to the heart of the matter, what unites us in this discussion. I am curious regarding the Common Law right to access court records, to inspect and to copy - Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978).

If you have a civil case in the Superior Court in your state and county:

Questions: Answers for LA County, California

a) Are you allowed to see your docket? NO

b) Are you served by mail you minute orders? NO

c) Do you have access to the calendar of the courts? NO

d) Do you have access to the Index of All Cases? NO

e) Do you have access to Index of Judgments? NO

f) What type of payments are involved, if any. [1]

[1] In some situations, where one would be allowed to view the docket in Los Angeles County (Register of Actions) each view may cost $25-75, depending on the size of the document, at $0.50 per page.

I am trying to figure out how usual or unusual conditions in LA County are for the USA 2009. I would be grateful if responders name the state and county, and answer each of the 5 questions, as in a questionnaire.

Joe Zernik

III. CC

• Prof Richard Posner, University of Chicago Law School - as a request for the initiation of corrective actions.
• Law school faculty
• James C Duff, Director, Administrative Office of the US Courts
• Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.
• Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.
• Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.
• NavanNaethem Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
• Nout Wellink, Chair, Basel Accords Committee
• Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

IV. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.