Wednesday, October 20, 2010

10-10-20 Capital Punishment - Comments from the Lawsters group




Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:21:55 +0300
To: Zach Jaeger , lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: [Lawmen: 3943] Joseph Zernick blows whistle on US Courts for excluding judicial corruption from first amendment complaints

Do you include in "these judges" the Conference of the Supreme Court of the United States?

______________
At 02:29 PM 10/21/2010, you wrote:
The people have the right to have these judges removed immediately. Because many of them have violated the constitution, they are serving their positions illegally. I am waiting for the people to start rising up and have some balls to stand up to these bastards. We have a bunch of sheeple in this country for which I have no respect for.


                                                      Zach
______________

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:59:30 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any   Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment   Right to File Petitions
Cc: "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" , "Shell, Thomas\(USMS\)"

I remember, a few years ago, when I first started studying the Rampart scandal, and realized that in Los Angeles County alone, they have falsely convicted between 10,000-30,000 black and latinos.  Even after the truth came out in the investigation of 1998-2000, they refuse to release them to this date, and FBI and US Attorney Office colluded with the cover up.

The official excuse - it would cause collapse of the justice system...

I then decided that I needed to create a short name for these people, who are still in prison (they were sentenced to long terms, some were also tortured, some were killed).  I called them Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons).

Later the case of Richard Fine showed up, which created some awareness, he was neither black, nor latino, and even had a law degree... and a PhD from London School of Economics... and former US prosecutor to top it off...

Then I started studying the computers of the courts, and came to the conclusion that there should be, on theoretical basis alone, a second class of persons:
CBP (Castle Basement Prisoners - alluding to the medieval condition that led to the demand of the lords for Habeas Corpus) - people who are held in prisons without anybody even knowing that they are in jail.   I never identified them in LA (I had no authority to go and search the prisons - they may very well exist there).

Then I believe that I discovered them: When I started to systematically scan the records of various US District Courts, I found out a largely disproportionate number of MJ cases at the US District Court in LA. Those were cases where unidentified US agencies obtain approval from Magistrate judges in Los Angeles for the movement of cryptically identified persons and things from place to place, inside and outside the United States.

Then I concluded, on theoretical basis alone, that the US courts and some US agencies are likely to deem Los Angeles County an "Extraconstitutional Zone".  It was zany, for a person living in LA, but it was the only logical conclusion from the large body of records that I reviewed (including the CIA drug trafficking to LA, the Rampart scandal, etc).

I wrote a short posting on it in my blog about a year ago.

Then I got an anonymous email (I got quite a few of these, some amazing tips, some dysinformation), from a person who sounded like an attorney, with reference to a US Supreme Court case, that ruled that large parts of LA County did not lawfully belong to the US gov... I still do not know what to make of it.

Then I started looking more deeply into banking regulation and international banking...

It was getting darker and darker, and I got death threats (the first was explicitly on behalf of Countrywide, another one was from an attorney who was well connected to the LA Superior Court - an email from him to some people I never heard of, talking about an "Execution Disengagement", with my name in upper case letters, and talking about the need to pay in advance for the contract, and also to supply flight tickets to London, and specify the date...)

Then I was told by an ex secret service person that I was designated a "Bad Guy" by FBI, not that it meant that I was really a bad guy, he told me, only that they designated me that way...

It was getting darker and darker... and also scarier and scarier...

My landline was bugged, my cell phone was bugged, my home was bugged, a series of white vans with totally tinted windows were parked in front of my front door 24/7 for almost a year...

Suffice is to say that I designated Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR as one of the leaders of the LA-JR (allege Los Angeles Judiciary Racket). She said about me: "He is a pest, and I will treat him accordingly".  Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR, who I believe is central to both drug marketing and banking fraud in LA County sentenced a few people (I don't know the exact number) to death...

I decided that I was not ready, willing, able to touch capital punishment cases... It was simply too much...

______________
At 07:32 AM 10/21/2010, you wrote:




Psychologically, I decided that I would not be able to handle it.
____________
At 06:49 AM 10/21/2010, you wrote:

DNA has made the capital cases high profile.

The ABA also did studies of the Texas and Florida Courts and made substantive suggestions to improve them both.

The Florida Supreme Court has appointed a commission to study the situation.  They suffer from "not invented here" and want to do nothing to publicize the ABA study and keep what they study within boundaries.

As a respectful suggestion, your work may get better coverage if you expanded to death penalty cases.  The European Union financed the ABA studies.

Bill

__________
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:33:20 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: RE: 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any  Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment  Right to File Petitions
Cc: LIST US MARSHALS

Hi Bill:

I read a bit about the history of the German courts prior and during WWII. 

In recent years I have reviewed the dockets of hundreds, possibly thousands of court cases across the US, with emphasis on banking regulation and habeas corpus petitions.  However, I made a conscious decision a while ago not to touch capital punishment cases.  Not that they do not deserve attention, I simply left it for others to do.

Therefore, I would not go as far as you allude.

JZ
_____________
At 06:20 AM 10/21/2010, you wrote:

Dr. Zernik,

The American Bar Association did a film entitled "Hitler's Courts" for showing to its mid-year meeting in Miami a few years ago.  You may wish to get a copy...

Bill
____________
From: lawsters@googlegroups.com [mailto:lawsters@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of joseph zernik
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:38 PM
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
Cc: Smith, Darcy (USMS); Shell, Thomas(USMS)
Subject: 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions
 
10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions.
Posted by at No comments:

10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions.



Los Angeles, October 20 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, released records documenting that the United States courts have effectively established a policy excluding from the First Amendment right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” papers, which documented judicial corruption.  Moreover, to accomplish such policy, the records showed US judges and court personnel colluding in Fraud on the Court, and tight linkage was demonstrated between such conduct, abuse of Human Rights, and failing banking regulation in the United States. 
The series of cases originated at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and was opined as real estate fraud [[i]] by a Fraud Expert – FBI veteran, who had been decorated by US Congress, by US Attorney General, and by FBI Director.  The beneficiaries of the alleged racketeering at the Los Angeles Superior Court, led by California Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR, included Countrywide Financial Corporation, and later Bank of America Corporation.  ANGELO MOZILO (then CEO of Countrywide), SANDOR SAMUELS (then Chief Legal Counsel of Countrywide, today- Associate General Counsel of Bank of America), and BRIAN MOYNIHAN (then General Counsel, today - President of Bank of America), were all directly involved in the matter, as was DAVID PASTERNAK (former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association and former Member of the California Judicial Council). [[ii]] Regardless of the voluminous credible evidence of alleged racketeering by Countrywide, Bank of America, and judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, FBI and US Department of Justice refused to enforce the law in Los Angeles County, California, even after inquiries by the US Congress.
In contrast, official FBI policy, as stated in 2008, was "FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society…"  
Therefore, in May 2009 petition was filed at the US District Court, Washington DC - Zernik v Melson et al (1:2009cv00805), under cause of action "To Compel US Officer to Perform His Duties". Among Defendants were KENNETH KAISER (Assistant Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations), KENNETH MELSON (then Director of US Attorneys Office), and SAMUEL BEZEK (Senior Counsel at SEC).  Conduct of Judge RICHARD LEON at the US District Court, District of Columbia, was by then predictable – the US Court eliminated from the docket - with no Due Process/Fair Hearing - papers, which were duly filed, and which provided evidence of judicial corruption at the Los Angeles Superior Court. [[iii]]
At the US District Court, Central District of California, Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE had previously engaged in 2008-9 in similar conduct in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), where ten judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, ANGELO MOZILO and SANDOR SAMUELS were named among Defendants in complaint under cause of action of Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law. The evidence provide in the case effectively documented racketeering at the Los Angeles Superior Court.  At the commencement of the litigation at US District Court, Central District of California, the “Pro Se Clerk” refused to issue valid summons presented to him. Later, papers, which provided evidence of judicial corruption, were dishonestly docketed – concealed under unrelated paper and docketing text in the online PACER docket. [[iv]] When that practice was protested, the US District Court, Central District of California initiated the practice of selectively refusing to file, and selectively issuing perverted pretense “Discrepancy Notices” on certain papers with no Due Process/Fair Hearing.  The staff of the Office of the Clerk also explicitly informed Plaintiff that Magistrate CARLA WOEHRL instructed them to issue such “Notices” on any papers pertaining to allegation of judicial corruption. [[v]] Furthermore, Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE and Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS of the US District Court, Central District of California later issued a pretense “Order” - prohibiting Plaintiff from access to the US Courts in the matter. [[vi]] The records of the US District Court, Central District of California, also documented alleged Judicial Misconduct and Fraud on the Court – relative to the issuance and docketing of invalid pretense Court records by Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE and Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS in collusion with unauthorized court personnel. [4][5][6]
Conduct of the US District Court, Central District of California was therefore subject of a Petition, which was duly filed in June 2008 at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Zernik v USDC-CAC (08-72714) – purportedly reviewed by Circuit Judges STEPHEN R REINHARDT, MARSHA S BERZON and MILAN D SMITH, JR. The Petition at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, sought to Compel Due Process Rights – issuing of valid summons and engaging in honest docketing at the US District Court, Central District of California.  However, papers, which provided evidence of the denial of the right to file papers at the US District Court, Central District of California, and alleged widespread corruption at the Los Angeles Superior Court, were eliminated from the docket of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.  Only unsigned orders were issued by the Circuit Judges, which were served and noticed with no authentication/certification by the Clerk of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. [[vii]]
Later, in April 2010, similar conduct was documented at the Supreme Court of the United States, under caption of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827).  The Application, purportedly reviewed by the Conference of the Supreme Court, pertained to the imprisonment in solitary confinement of former US prosecutor Richard Fine, with no warrant and no entry of Judgment/Conviction or Sentencing, after he had exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking of “not permitted” payments (“bribes”) by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, which required the enactment of “retroactive immunities” (“pardons”) for such judges.
Papers, which were duly filed as Motion to Intervene [[viii]] at the Supreme Court of the United States under the caption, referenced above, and which documented the parallels in alleged corruption of the Superior Court of California, of the California Judicial Council, of the US District Court, Central District of California, and of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, in the Habeas Corpus Petition of Richard Fine and the cases pertaining to Dr Zernik, referenced above, were eliminated from the docket of the US Supreme Court by Court Counsel DANNY BICKELL with no authority at all. [[ix]] Furthermore, upon review of records of the file of the Application at the Supreme Court of the United States, no record was found of any judicial review at all. [[x]] Regardless, false and deliberately misleading notices of purported denial of the Application by the Conference of the Supreme Court of the United States was issued by unauthorized personnel.  Denial of the Application was likewise falsely noted in the online dockets and journal of the Supreme Court. [[xi]] Therefore, the case also demonstrated disregard of the Habeas Corpus right –  the “the cornerstone of the US Constitution” according to the late US Supreme Court Justice William Brennan Jr.
The cases in all courts involved also documented the key role of online public access systems (e.g. PACER) and computerized case management systems (e.g. CM/ECF) in enabling such conduct, through exclusion from the online public access system of the clerks’ authentication/certification records, and denial of access to such records by the courts, combined with perverted notice and service practices.  A reasonable person would conclude that today the clerks of all courts involved deemed themselves unaccountable for the validity and honesty of any of the records in the respective online public access systems.
In recent years Human Rights Alert repeatedly called upon the United States Congress to enact federal rules of online public access and case management systems, since both state and federal courts uniformly failed to publish such rules, in apparent violation of Due Process/Fair Hearings rights. [[xii]]
The cases at hand were part of evidence, which was submitted to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations as part of the first ever, 2010 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States. [[xiii]] Staff report of the HRC later noted “corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [[xiv]]
Likewise, in July 2010 Prof Laurence Tribe, in keynote address to the Annual Conference of Chief Justices of the state courts, in his capacity as Senior Counsel, US Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, warned that the state courts in the United States might become indistinguishable from courts in “third world” nations. [[xv]]
However, the evidence now released by Human Rights Alert, showed that the even the highest United States courts - National Tribunals for Protection of Rights pursuant to ratified International Law -  in fact patronized such conduct, through what must be deemed violation of the First Amendment right to file petitions, denial of Access to the Courts, denial of the Due Process/Fair Hearing rights, and Fraud on the Courts.
Moreover, combined, the cases at hand documented the tight linkage between corruption of the justice system, abuse of Human Rights, and failing banking regulation in the United States.
Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system. 

LINKS


[[i]] 07-12-17 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, David Pasternak’s Grant Deeds in re: 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, opined fraud expert and FBI veteran as fraud by James Wedick:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24991238/
See also the August 21, 2008 informal letter by fraud expert and FBI veteran James Wedick, informing Defendant Dr Zernik that FBI Special Agent, who was assigned to the case agreed with him that the case involved real estate fraud, and expressing concern that FBI would not provide Equal Protection in the case, since it would involve addressing widespread corruption of the courts in Los Angeles County, California.
08-08-21 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) Email letter by highly decorated FBI veteran, James Wedick, regarding refusal to Investigate FBI to provide Dr Zernik protection against real estate fraud:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29713733/
[[ii]] 08-05-27 Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt # 062: First Amended Complaint:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30766354/
[[iii]] a) 09-06-29 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) at the US District Court, District of Columbia – papers received by mail from US Judge Richard Leon, alleged as Denial of First Amendment rights and Judicial Fraud on the Court. - Papers Received by Mail From Judge Richard Leon - Alleged Judicial Fraud on the Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39779968/
Please note: The records in a), above, are face pages of papers, which had been duly filed by Plaintiff in Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805), and were later returned by mail to Plaintiff with Discrepancy Notice and no form of authentication/certification by an authorized Deputy Clerk.
Each of the papers was hand inscribed on its face page "Leave to file denied" with the date “6/29/09”and initials of Judge Richard Leon.
Therefore, the records are alleged as evidence of Denial of First Amendment right and Judicial Fraud on the Court by Judge Richard Leon in collusion with Deputy Clerk David Scott.
The records, which Plaintiff was thus denied the right to file at the court, included, but were not limited to papers, which documented fraud by judges of the Superior Court of California in collusion with Countrywide Financial Corporation.
No mention of these papers, or the purported denial of their filing by Judge Richard Leon was ever noted in the PACER docket of the caption referenced above.
b) 09-06-29 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) at the US District Court, District of Columbia – purported Order by Judge Richard Leon as received by mail:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39780784/
Please note: The record in (b), above, is provided as received by Plaintiff by mail from the Court.  It included no form of authentication/certification by Clerk of the Court.
Regardless, the purported “Order” was docketed (Dkt #8) in the online PACER docket as “entered”.
The Court denied repeated requests for the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings), which are today deemed by the US courts as authentication/certification by the Clerk.
Therefore, the records are alleged as evidence of Judicial Fraud on the Court by Judge Richard Leon in collusion with Deputy Clerk David Scott.
[[iv]] a) Conduct of the US District Court, Central District of California, under Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), was detailed in the Petition to the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, see Footnote [5], Below.
b) Pretense March 21, 2008 “Minutes”, issued by Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, questioning the constitutional right for unbiased judge:
08-03-21 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #014 - Judge Virginia Phillips' Minutes Denying Temporary Restraining Order:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24749680/
c) 08-06-06 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California Dkt #063 - purported Magistrate Carla Woehrle "Minutes" - contriving novel dishonest docketing rules, alleged as Fraud on the Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39776959/
Please note: The above two records of the US District Court, Central District of California are deemed as Judicial Fraud on the Court, since they were issued with no “Document Stamp” in the respective NEFs, which is required pursuant to the Court’s General Order 08-02 as authentication/certification by the Clerk, a fact that could not be discerned in the PACER docket of the US District Court.  Moreover, the pretense March 21, 2008 “Minutes” (b), above, was issued with no authority at all by MARVA DILLARD, Courtroom Deputy, and not by a Deputy Clerk, as required by law. Likewise, the pretense June 6, 2008 “Minutes” (c), above, was issued with no authority at all by Donna Thomas, who was – upon information and belief – Courtroom Deputy, fraudulently identified in the “Minutes” as a “Deputy Clerk”.  Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI, and Presiding Judge AUDREY COLLINS refused to respond on repeated requests to confirm or deny the fact, alternatively – to initiate corrective actions.
[[v]] See records of papers, which provided evidence of alleged corruption of the judges of the California Superior Court, and which were denied the filing though perverted “Discrepancy Notices” at the US District Court, Central District of California under:
09-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #105: Compiled Records of Perverted Discrepancy Notices:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39773867/
[[vi]] 09-04-24 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #106 purported Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE, denying Plaintiff access to US Courts in the matter:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39775020/
Please note: The above record of the US District Court, Central District of California, is deemed as Judicial Fraud on the Court, since it was issued with no “Document Stamp” in the respective NEF, which is required pursuant to the Court’s General Order 08-02 as authentication/certification by the Clerk, a fact that could not be discerned in the PACER docket of the US District Court.
[[vii]] 08-06-24 Zernik v USDC (08-72714) at the US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit - Alleged Fraud on the Court and Undermining of Banking Regulation:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39524541/
[[viii]] a) 10-04-20 Fine v Baca (09 A827) Motion to Intervene and related papers:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/ 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/ 
b) Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/  
c) 10-07-25 Fine v Baca (09 A827) Alleged fraud in US Supreme Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/
d) 10-07-28 Fine v Baca (09-A827) Additional Evidence for Fraud at the US Supreme Court pertaining to purported denial of the Application in Conference of the Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/ 
[[ix]] a) 04-22 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court - Dr Zernik's Declaration RE: Court Counsel Danny Bickell and Filing at US Supreme Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31430464/
b) 10-08-01 Fine v Baca (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court - Further Evidence of Fraud, Misprision of Felonies - April 29, 2010 Letter by Court Counsel Bickell Indicating "Return" of Motion to Intervene and Related Papers:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/
[[x]]10-07-28 Fine v Baca (09-A827) at the Supreme Court of the United States - Declaration of George McDermott Re: Unsigned Letter dated April 26, 2010, by Supreme unnamed Deputy Clerk re: Denial of the Application:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/
[[xi]]10-08-13 RE: Fine v Baca (09-A827), Fine v Baca (09-1250), and Fine v Baca (10-A24) at the Supreme Court of the United States - October 2009 Term Journal - validity, or lack thereof:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/36476926/
[[xii]] 01-07-31 Human Rights Alert’s Request for the Judiciary Committees to Establish Case Management and Online Public Access System of the US Courts by Law:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/
[[xiii]]10-04-19 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
[[xiv]]10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States - "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[[xv]] 10-07-26 Prof Laurence Tribe's Keynote Remarks at the Annual Conference of Chief Justices s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35916291/
Posted by at No comments:

10-10-20 HAVE YOU HAD ANY LEGAL DEALINGS WITH ATTORNEY DAVID PASTERNAK? IF SO, I AM INTERESTED IN HEARING FROM YOU!

Posted by at No comments:

10-10-20 HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN REAL ESTATE LITIGATION AT THE LOS ANGELES COURT? IF SO, I AM INTERESTED IN HEARING FROM YOU!

Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

10-10-20 Election season review - "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California and beyond, US Department of Justice, and our elected officials.

Dianne Feinstein                       Diane Watson
Los Angeles, October 20 - following the recent United Nations Human Rights Council report, which noted "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California, and in view of the upcoming elections, Human Rights Alert (NGO) called upon the voters to examine the record of our elected officials in this matter.
1) California Senator DIANNE FEINSTEIN, and California Congresswoman DIANE WATSON - staunch supporters of Equal Protection in Los Angeles County, CaliforniaCongresswoman and Diane Watson, and Senator Dianne Feinstein filed inquiries on US Department of Justice and FBI: KENNETH KAISER - FBI Assistant Director for Criminal Investigation, KENNETH MELSON - then Director of US Dept of Justice Office of US Attorneys, and later Senator Feinstein also filed inquiry on GLENN A FINE - US Department of Justice Inspector General.   [1] [2] [3]  The inquiries pertained to refusal of FBI and US Dept of Justice to investigate constituent's complaints of overwhelming evidence of racketeering by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, and refusal of US Dept of Justice to address requests for Equal Protection of the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County against the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket).
News reports also documented the uncompromised stand of Senator Feinstein in opposing the closing of the Public Corruption unit at the US Attorney's Office, Central District of California, under the Bush administration.
2) California Attorney General and Gubernatorial Aspirant JERRY BROWN - deemed unfit to hold officeParticularly troubling is the position in this matter of California Attorney General Jerry Brown, a gubernatorial aspirant, who earlier this year stated that he was "appalled by corruption".  Over the past three years the most senior staff in his office repeatedly engaged in what must be deemed cover-up of the widespread "corruption of the courts" in Los Angeles County, California.  Jerry Brown should be deemed unfit to hold public office. [4]3) California Congresswoman MAXINE WATERS - staunch supporter of Equal Protection in Los Angeles CountyThe evidence also showed Congresswoman Maxine Waters as a supporter of equal protection in Los Angeles County. Her stand in this matter goes back to the late 1990's, and her insistence on investigation of CIA drug trafficking to Los Angeles County, California.
4) California Senator BARBARA BOXER and Congressman DAVID DREIER-deemed unfit to hold officeThe offices of California Senator Boxer and  California Congressman David Dreier engaged in dishonest conduct vis a vis a constituent in response to requests for inquiries on FBI and US Dept of Justice regarding their refusal to enforce the law in Los Angeles County. Barbara Boxer and David Dreier should be deemed unfit to hold public office.
5) President BARACK OBAMA and Attorney General ERIC HOLDERThe record from the past two years also indicates that Attorney General Eric Holder has not been ready, willing, able to address the "corruption of the courts and the legal profession", and that senior officers at the US Department of Justice, who patronized the "corruption of the courts", remained in their positions under the Obama administration.  Such officials were not removed, regardless of the widely recognized compromised state of the US Department of Justice under the Bush administration, as indicated by Senator Patrick Leahy's call for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice. [6]  However, the appointment of Prof Laurence Tribe as Senior Counsel, Access to Justice Initiative, and his recent speech in that capacity to the Annual Conference of Chief Justices, where he rebuked the state courts in the United States as becoming indistinguishable from those of "third world nations", [7] suggested that there was at least a desire under Attorney General Eric Holder to affect a change.
Experience from the past several years makes it clear that our elected officials are fully aware of the state of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond.  However, conditions have emerged, where collusion of the courts, large financial institutions, and senior officers of the US Department of Justice, left US Congress and even the presidency unable to initiate corrective measures.
LINKS:[1] 10-01-19 Addendum to Complaint to Inspector General, US Dept of Justice, re: refusal to protect Los Angeles County residents against alleged racketeering by judges and financial corporations s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25445659/
10-02-26 Senator Feinstein's Inquiry on US Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn A Fine s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29659469/
[2] 10-03-02 Congressional Inquiry Re Complaint to Glenn Fine on Widespread Corruption in Los Angeles County s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27735873/
[3] 10-05-28 Repeat Complaint to DOJ Inspector General on Fraud on US Congress and Denial of Equal Protection in Los Angeles County, California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32125872/
[4] 10-03-05 Request Jerry Brown, California Attorney General, Equal Protection Under the Law
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27891438/
[5] 09-02-09 Transcript of Senator Leahy speech, calling for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission in re US Justice Department s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
[7] 10-07-26 Prof Laurence Tribe's Keynote Remarks at the Annual Conference of Chief Justices s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35916291/

Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
Human Rights Alert - NGO
 Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Locations of visitors to this page
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, October 18, 2010

10-10-19 What is pretense Judge? What is pretense Receiver, pretense Conservator, pretense Referee?

 
Judge David Yaffe_ _ _ _ _Attorney David Pasternak


Los Angeles, October 19 - the "Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket)", [1] referred to pretense Judges, pretense Receivers, pretense Conservators, pretense Referees as key feature of the LA-JR.  Reference was to Judges who preside in court cases with no Assignment Order at all, and Receivers, Conservators, and Referees, who officiate without having a valid and effectual Appointment Orders entered, as required by California law to make them "effectual for any purpose" (California Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.5).

For all those, for whom all the above is still incomprehensible, below is a simpler, pictorial explanation.

The Judge in charge of Writs and Receiverships is Judge DAVID YAFFE, who gained notoriety in the alleged false imprisonment and solitary confinement for 18 months of the 70 year old, former US prosecutor Richard Fine, for refusing to answer to a pretense "Debtor Examiner" with no Appointment Order - Commissioner MURRAY GROSS.

And most likely the most active as a pretense Receiver at the Los Angeles Superior Court is Attorney DAVID PASTERNAK, former President of the Los Angeles County Bar Association,  former Member of the California Judicial Council, and  former President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice"). [2][3] The Los Angeles Jewish/legal community was repeatedly requested to assume accountability for conduct of Bet Tzedek - one of the most prominent Jewish charities in Los Angeles, which doubles as the seat of other enterprises as well. [4]

In summer 2010 staff report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, pertaining to Human Rights in the United States, referred to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California. [5]

Human Rights Alert (NGO) is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system.

LINKS
[1] 10-10-15 Proposed Organizational Chart of the LA-JR (alleged Los Angeles Judiciary Racket) s http://www.scribd.com/doc/39383792/[2] 10-06-21-Dr-Zernik-s-Complaint-Filed-with-Us-Attorney-Office-Los-Angeles-against-Mr-David-Pasternak-for-Public-Corruption-Deprivation-of-Civil-Rights 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33354641/[3]10-08-13-RE-Karimi-v-Mithawaila-BD518503-Complaint-against-Attorney-David-Pasternak-and-the-Superior-Court-of-California-County-of-Los-Angeles 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35828312/[4] 10-10-11 Holly Fujie and Bet Tzedek - Los Angeles Jewish/legal community again asked to assume accountability for conduct of Bet Tzedek - "The House of Justice" 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39099300/
[5] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States - referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ ____________________________________________________






Outside England 's
Bristol Zoo there is a parking lot for 150 cars and
8 buses. For 25 years, its parking fees were managed
by a very pleasant attendant. The fees were 1 for
cars ($1.40), 5 for buses (about $7).

Then,
one day, after 25 solid years of never missing a day
of work, he just didn't show up; so the Zoo
Management called the City Council and asked it to
send them another parking agent.

The Council
did some research and replied that the parking lot
was the Zoo's own responsibility. The Zoo advised
the Council that the attendant was a City employee..
The City Council responded that the lot attendant
had never been on the City payroll.


Meanwhile, sitting in his villa somewhere on
the coast of Spain or France or Italy ... is a man
who'd apparently had a ticket machine installed
completely on his own and then had simply begun to
show up every day, commencing to collect and keep
the parking fees, estimated at about $560 per day --
for 25 years.

Assuming 7 days a week, this
amounts to just over $7 million dollars ....... and
no one even knows his name.
__________________
Locations of visitors to this page
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
http://pressroom.prlog.org/Human_Rights_Alert/
http://ireport.cnn.com/people/HumanRightsA?numResults=10&view=documents
_____________________________
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION CALLING UPON THE UNITED NATIONS TO ISSUE A TRUE AND EFFECTUAL 2010 REPORT ON THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES:
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ushumanrights/
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/calling-upon-the-un-human-rights-council-to-issue-an-honest-and-effectual-2010-report-on-the-us/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
*  "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*     "Innocent people remain in prison"
*     "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
*   "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*   "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."    
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*   "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/


____________________________

At 03:21 PM 10/19/2010, you wrote:
"Pretense" is also a noun. You might try "pretensive" or synonyms for "false". "Fraudulent" works.

On 10/18/2010 09:54 PM, joseph zernik wrote:
Pretender is a noun, which does not go well in conjunction as "Pretender Judge"






-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322              Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001                   jon.roland@constitution.org
------------------------------------

Pretense is also a noun, but the conjunction "Pretense Judge", "Pretense Receiver" sounds better somehow. I also considered "Judge Pretender", "Receiver Pretender", but it does not sound as good to me.

Moreover, the extension of the concept is "Pretense Litigation", "Pretense Receivership", "Pretense Conservatorship", and you can't construct those with "Pretender"...

"Pretensive" sounds excessive to me.

"False" and "Fraudulent" are generic, almost cliche's by now.

I was looking for something more specific, to describe the zoo parking attendant scenario.

Mighty writing problems... Describing corruption of this scope presents technical challenges :), any suggestions would be gratefully acknowledged...

Just to give you a hint of the scope of the corruption:
My research suggests that no Receiver or Conservator Appointment has been entered in Los Angeles County, California, the most populous in the United States (>10 million people) for at least two decades, perhaps as far back as 1974...

You may figure out now why there was the need to create secret corporations for funneling and distributing funds...

Now, you may also understand what the true issue was that led to the imprisonment of Richard Fine.  It was lost on most...  and Richard Fine himself chose not to emphasize it. Richard Fine refused to answer to a "Debtor Examiner" with no Appointment Order.  Judge Yaffe could not care less about Fine's charges of corruption, disqualifications efforts (the evidence suggests that Yaffe presided in the case with no Assignment Order, therefore, he could never be disqualified in the first place, and that is why the court to this day refuses to allow access to the Register of Actions - the California civil docket in the case),  etc.  However, the precedent of refusal to accept the authority of a pretense "Debtor Examiner" was a true threat to the foundation of the LA-JR, and could hurt the business model and corporate financial performance...

JZ
_________________

At 04:41 PM 10/19/2010, you wrote:
The queston is, "Who is master? You or the language", or something like that from Alice in Wonderland.

Wolf 


____________ 
At 05:45 PM 10/19/2010, joseph zernik wrote:

[] 
When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'
`The question is,' said Alice, `whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.'
`The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master - - that's all.'
Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. `They've a temper, some of them -- particularly verbs, they're the proudest -- adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs -- however,  I can manage the whole of them! Impenetrability! That's what I say!'
`Would you tell me, please,' said Alice `what that means?`
For the first time ever, Mr Wolfgram and moi are almost on the same page...  I compared all along conditions of the justice system in the United States to Alice in Wonderland... Mr Wolfgram prefers Through the Looking Glass... Finally - almost convergence...

JZ
____________
I forgot to add:
All signs are that the Los Angeles County system was engineered, or at least perfected, during the tenure of today's California Supreme Court Chief Justice, Ronald George in leadership positions at the Los Angeles Superior Court.  Mr George would not answer any questions on the matter.
JZ
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)