The U.S. Courts have just completed a massive project of installing dual docketing systems - Pacer and CM/ECF - seperate and undqual, where the courts can segregate the parties at will. Those delegated to Pacer cannot distinguish between valid, effectual court records and the large volume of invalid, ineffectual records posted online by the courts.
In Zernik v Connor et al (2:09-cv-01550) the Clerk of the Court, Terry Nafisi, in collusion with Magistrate Carla Woehrle and Judge Virginia Phillips, allegedly engaged in the conduct of a false and deliberately miselading litigation - of claims of Civil Rights violations. The goal of such conduct was allegedly to allow continued racketeering by Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corproation, and Judges of the LA Superior Court.
In Fine v Sheriff Department of LA County (2:09-Cv-01914) the Clerk of the Court, Terry Nafisi, in collusion with Magistrate Carla Whoehrle and Judge John Warner, allegedly engaged in the conduct of a false and deliberately misleading litigation - of a habeas corpus petition. The goal of such conduct was allegedly to allow continued false jailing of Att Richard Fine.
Terry Nafisi
District Court Executive and Clerk of Court
terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov
Clerk Nafisi:
Please accept this letter as my request to access court records to inspect and to copy pursuant
to Nixon v Warner Communication, Inc (1978), where the U.S. Supreme Court re-affirmed
the Common Law and First Amendment rights to access judicial records to inspect and to
copy.
...
This request pertains specifically to NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) including any
digital stamps, or digital signatures, encrypted as series of numbers and characters, which
may be embedded in such NEFs of various records in the following cases:
1) Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550), and
2) Fine v Sheriff Department of LA County (2:09-cv-01914).
...
Enclosed is also the record of our communications in the past two months. We are yet to
cross the line where you allow those who communicate on your behalf to:
a) Identify their professional qualifications as Clerk Deputy – or not, and
b) State that they were communicating on your behalf.
....
Therefore, please be noticed - Ongoing posting of false and deliberately misleading records is
harmful. Please either have such records marked clearly as invalid, so that a layperson would
not mistake them for anything else. Alternatively – entirely remove them from the online
docket.
...
Dated: September 4, 2009
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
___/s/ Joseph Zernik_____
By: Joseph H Zernik
The complete letter to Clerk Nafisi of U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, can be viewed at:
No comments:
Post a Comment