Monday, May 17, 2010

10-05-16 Non-Cases of Los Angeles Superior Court // No asuntos de Los Ángeles Tribunal Superior // Non-Cases von Los Angeles Superior Court



Marina v LA County (BS108420) and Sturgeon v LA County (BC351286) - US Supreme Court and California Court of Appeals to review non-cases of the Los Angeles Superior Court

What media reports, such as AHRC - below, and most observers failed to realize is that the legal battles on both cases that are subject of the news report at hand represent the deep seated corruption of the Los Angeles Superior Court - based on conduct of cases that the court itself never deemed valid court cases in the first place.

To wit - in both Marina v LA County - the case in which Richard Fine was purported to be arrested, and in Sturgeon v LA County - the case that purported to review the "not permitted" payments to Los Angeles County judges, judges and referees presided with no Assignment and Appointment Orders.

To wit - in both cases the purported judgments were never authenticated and never entered by the Court as required by California Code in order to make such judgments "effectual for any purpose."[1]

To wit - in both cases the Los Angeles Superior Court refuses to allow access to the Registers of Actions - the definitive court records of the cases.

Therefore, purported habeas corpus on the arrest and false imprisonment of Richard Fine - at the US District Court in Los Angeles, as well as purported appeal at the California Court of Appeal, 4th District were conducted out of compliance with fundamental rules and laws - with no dockets for the cases that the respective court purported to review.

The ongoing denial of access to court records in Los Angeles County courts, in disregard of First Amendment rights was alleged as fundamental violation of Human Rights in ratified International Law in report filed with the UN in April 2010, scheduled for review as part of Universal Periodic Review (first time ever) of Human Rights in the US in November 2010. [2]

The jurisdiction of review courts pertaining to judgments that was never entered is of course dubious at best.  Such fact is likely to be the explanation of the conduct of the Sheriff and the Los Angeles Superior Court in refusing to respond to the review courts at all. The review courts - the California Court of Appeals, 4th District, and the US Supreme Court - have developed their own avenue to respond in kind unsigned, unauthenticated decisions

Its full blown  display of the  United States "alternative justice system" in action!

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

LINKS:
[1] Search for entered judgments in Marina v LA County and in Sturgeon v LA County in the judgment archives of Los Angeles Superior Court:
[2]  April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:
a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Filed-UPR-Report-with-the-United-Nations
b) Submission:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s
c) Appendix:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/10-04-19-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Appendix-for-Submission-to-the-United-Nations-for-the-2010-UPR-of-the-United-States-s
d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29867561/10-04-13-UPR-Tool-Kit-Urban-Justice-Center-USA-provided-by-UN-office-of-High-Commissioner-for-Human-Rights



An Article
California Judges Losing Ground In Fight To Save Their Illegal Payments:

May 16, 2010

By Full Disclosure Watch (View author info)

Los Angeles, California -Full Disclosure Network presents a nine minute video news update on the long protracted legal battle involving a David and Goliath fight to stop judicial, bias, bribery, conflict of interest and corruption in the California Courts.

FEATURING TWO DAVIDS WHO TOOK ON JUDICIAL GOLIATH

Richard I. Fine
, jailed taxpayer advocate Attorney
Sterling Norris, Judicial Watch public interest attorney
and activist Fred Sottile who describes the circumstances of the two cases both involving Los Angeles County
.
Richard I. Fine vs Sheriff Leroy Baca, L A County and Sturgeon vs County of Los Angeles that have now reached the highest courts and are expected to be resolved within the next few days after an extraordinary legal battle against all odds. Here are some of the particulars:

THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010

U S SUPREME COURT CONFERENCE HEARING
Richard I. Fine vs Sheriff Leroy Baca, L A County
Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Re: Appeal on Writ of Habeas Corpus)
SHERIFF BACA THROWS IN THE TOWEL AT U S SUPREME COURT

Both Richard Fine and Sterling Norris are very positive regarding the new developments that hold promise they will win in both their cases based on the following two documents:

Sheriff Baca declined to respond (see waiver here) in the U S Supreme Court on Richard I. Fine'sPetition for Writ of Certiorari that could free him from solitary "Coercive Confinement" in the L A County Men's Central Jail. He has been held there for fourteen months even though he has never been charged or convicted of a crime.

L A County and Superior Court Judges Association failed to respond in the Judicial Watch Sturgeon vs County of L. A. case causing the California 4th District Court of Appeals send this notice to respond that the case will be decided on the opening brief and oral argments presented by Judicial Watch if they do not respond by Friday May 21, 2010.

View Comments (0) | Post a comment

For more information, please check out the articles listed below:

  Theodore Boutrous - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
   Sterling E. Norris
   Richard I. Fine
   Free Richard Fine Website
   Judicial Watch - Tom Fenton - President
   Please join this emergency show tonight, as Judge Yaffe throws homeowners attorney Richard Fine in jail today without cause - Justice4Us - Dr. Shirley Moore
   Atty Richard Fine, Imprisoned for Freedom Fighting - Brooke Kelley
   The Fine Pursuit of Exposing Corruption - Janet Levy
  Richard Fine Files Federal Suit Against California State Bar and the State Bar Court - AHRC News Services
  Attorney Richard Fine resume and some of his unique cases with societal impact - AHRC News Services
  CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS SHOWN BY COURT RECORDS DEMONSTRATES LA JUDGES TARGETED RICHARD I. FINE FOR UPHOLDING CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND SEEKING TO ENFORCE U.S. CONSTITUTION - AHRC News Services
  Attorney Richard Fine Challenges State Bar Action as a Gross Violation of First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech and to Petition the Government to Redress Grievances - Richard I. Fine
  RICHARD I. FINE FILES COMPLAINT WITH FBI TO INVESTIGATE RETALIATION AGAINST HIM FOR EXPOSING AND PROSECUTING UNCONSTITUTIONAL PAYMENTS BY LA COUNTY TO LA COUNTY JUDGES - Richard I. Fine
  Former U. S Prosecutor, While Battling Illegal County Payments to Los Angeles County Judges, Falls Victim To Identity Theft and Mail Fraud - AHRC News Services
  RICHARD FINE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS ANTI SLAPP MOTION AGAINST THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - Richard I. Fine
  Attorney Richard Fine files suit against judges - Gary Walker
  CALIFORNIA JUDGES ON THE TAKE ..SAYS RICHARD FINE ON YOU TUBE VIDEO - Disclosure Watch - Dr. Shirley Moore
  False Imprisonment of Richard Fine in California -Appeal for Protection under International Law - Joseph Zernik
  APPEAL FOR DONATIONS FOR APPEAL TO UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT - Mardi L. Mason
  Lawyer takes a stand from his cell - Victoria Kim
  The Best Courts Money Could Buy - Free Richard Fine
  Commissioner Shaw of the 9th. Circuit Court of Appeals Issues A Stay On Disbarment of Richard Fine - Tom Shapinsky
  Letter to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices regarding California Court Corruption and the Financial Crisis - American Homeowners Resource Center
  U. S . HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY A JOKE? - Full Disclosure Watch
  Elwood Lui - Jones Day

No comments: