The listing
in the online public access system of the Court under the petition file increasingly
appear confusing, if not false and misleading. With the docket, also
appointment record of the Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz was requested. The
underlying petition asks to compel Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of
Israel to perform his duties, relative to unchecked conduct of Israeli banks in
response to the United States FATCA. The petition alleges that Stanley Fischer
replaced his loyalty to the State of Israel and its laws with loyalty to another
nation and its laws, or with loyalty to financial institutions and their
interests.
Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Bank of Israel - Israel's Banking
Regulator and Bilderberg Member, showing off his newly acquired Israeli ID in
2005; Supreme Court of the State of Israel, FATCA.
View
as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/113303011/
View
as blog post: http://inproperinla.blogspot.co.il/2012/11/12-11-15-press-release-zernik-v-stanley.html
Jerusalem, November 15 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has forwarded a
request to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel for a certified docket in the petition
Dr Joseph Zernik v Governor
of the Bank of Israel Stanley Fischer (HCJ 7650/12).
The letter in part
says:
The listing in the online public access system of the Court under the file
name and number, referenced above, increasingly appear confusing, if not false
and misleading:
·
On October 23, 2012, only the filing of one paper
is listed under "Events"; Petitioner filed two papers on that date.
·
On November 05, 2012 the filing on an "Appeal"
is listed under "Events"; Petitioner filed no appeal in this case, where
it remains unclear where an appeal could have originated in.
·
On November 07, 2012, the filing of a "document"
is listed under "Events" with no name of Filer or any further details
regarding the nature of the paper; Petitioner filed no paper, neither was he
noticed of the filing of any paper by the Court or any other party on that date.
…
Today's letter also requests that the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court
provide a copy of her due Appointment Record.
Various court papers provide evidence that Ms Sarah Lifschitz has been
occupying the office of Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court since 2002. In 2012, the office of Administration of
Courts of the State of Israel denied a request, pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act (1988), for the Appointment Record of Sarah Lifschitz,
Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, claiming exemption for
"records of internal deliberations".
Human Rights
Alert's submission for the 2013 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in
Israel by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations is titled, "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the
electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel", and
subtitled, "A court, which refuses to certify its own records, is
certified corrupt".
The Human Rights Alert's submission, based primarily on data mining studies, documents unprecedented
corruption of the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of
Israel, starting in 2002, under Presiding Justice Aharon Barak, including but
not limited to numerous decision records, which appear certified by the late
Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen, up to five (5) years after his death.
The conduct of Bank of Israel under Governor Stanley Fischer,
documented in the underlying petition, permitted Israeli
banks to fabricate their own banking regulations in the State of Israel in
response to the US FATCA, and then attempt to extort their "US
Persons" customers to submit to such simulated banking regulations.
The petition alleges that conduct of Governor of Bank of Israel
Stanley Fischer in this matter, "undermines the sovereignty … the rule of law in the State of
Israel…" and amounts to, "replacement of his loyalty to the State of
Israel and its laws to the laws of another nation and/or the interests of
financial institutions."
Banking regulation in the State of Israel, as documented in the
petition, should also raise concern
regarding integrity and stability of the Israeli financial system itself.
Collusion
between the courts and financial institutions has been increasingly recognized
as central to the criminality underlying the financial and socio-economic
crisis in the United
States.
[1] 12-11-15 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) Request for certification of
docket and appointment record of the Chief Clerk
[2] 12-10-23 PRESS RELEASE – Petition alleges Bank of Israel Fischer
patronizes criminality at Bank HaPoalim, BM
[3] 12-10-23 Zernik v Fischer (7650/12) in the High
Court of Justice of the State of Israel – petition to compel the Governor of the
Bank of Israel to perform his duties – online public access system record on
the date of filing process
[4] 12-11-08 Zernik
v Fischer (7650/12) in the High Court
of Justice of the State of Israel – petition to compel the Governor of the Bank
of Israel to perform his duties – online public access system records
[5] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix
I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof,
of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
[6] 12-09-04 Zernik, J., "Integrity, or Lack Thereof, of the
Electronic Record Systems of the Courts of the State of Israel", Data
Analytics 1:31-38 (2012)
[7] 12-03-02 Freedom of Information request (P-29-2012) on the Administration of
Courts, in re: a) Appointment records of the Chief Clerks of the Supreme Court,
b) Certification/apostille certification procedures of the Supreme Court
[8]
12-03-06 Freedom of Information response (P-29-2012) by the
Administration of Courts, in re: a) Appointment records of the
Chief Clerks of the Supreme Court, b) Certification/apostille certification
procedures of the Supreme Court
[9] 12-03-28 Revised Freedom of Information request (P-29-2012)
on the Administration of Courts,, in re: a) Appointment records of the Chief
Clerk of the Supreme Court, and b) Certification procedures of the electronic
records of the Supreme Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/87055920/
____________
____________
לכבוד:
שרה ליפשיץ, מזכירה ראשית
בית המשפט העליון של מדינת ישראל
בפקס למשרד המזכירה הראשית - 02-6526391
בפקס למשרד מדור בלתי מיוצגים – 02-6759648
תרגום עברי, על פי בקשת המזכירה הראשית, של מכתב
שנמסר היום באנגלית.
בנידון: דר' יוסף צרניק נ נגיד בנק ישראל סטנלי
פישר (בג"ץ 7650/12) – בקשה לאישור רשימת הכתבים שהתקבלו לרישום.
תשובתכם בנידון מתבקשת בכבוד תוך 10 ימים
כבוד המזכירה הראשית שרה ליפשיץ,
הכיתובים המופיעים במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת הציבור לכתבי בית המשפט
תחת התיק הנ"ל, נראים יותר ויותר כמבולבלים, אם לא שקריים ומטעים: [1,2]
·
ביום ה-23 באוקטובר, 2012, הכיתוב תחת "אירועים" מורה שהוגש
לרישום רק נייר אחד; העותר הגיש לרישום ביום זה שני ניירות.
·
ביום ה-5 באוקטובר, 2012, הכיתוב תחת "אירועים" מורה שהוגש
לרישום "ערעור"; העותר מעולם לא הגיש לרישום כל "ערעור" בתיק
זה, ואין זה ברור מהיכן יכול היה "ערעור" לנבוע בתיק זה.
·
ביום ה-7 באוקטובר, 2012, הכיתוב תחת "אירועים" מורה שהוגש
לרישום "מסמך", ללא שם המגיש וללא כל פרטים אחרים לגבי טיב המסמך; העותר
לא הגיש לרישום כל נייר ביום זה, וכמו-כן לא הומצא לו כל נייר שהוגש לרישום על ידי
בית המשפט או צדדים אחרים ביום זה.
ראש מדור בלתי מיוצגים, עו"ד דני בן טובים טיפל עצמו בניירות
שהגיש העותר לרישום בתיק זה. מאז ההגשה לרישום
של כתב הפתיחה בתיק זה, שוחחו העותר ועו"ד בן טובים מספר פעמים לגבי נוהגי
הכיתוב/קידוד הבלתי-רגילים של העו"ד בן טובים במערכת המקוונת לניהול גישת
הציבור לכתבים. [3]
ניהול עתירה בבית המשפט הגבוה לצדק של מדינת ישראל, בה לא ניתן לעותר לברר
אל-נכון אילו כתבים התקבלו לרישום ומי הגישם, אינו תואם את זכויות האדם למשפט הוגן
ולתקנה יעילה מטעם בתי דין לאומיים המוסמכים להגנת זכויות היסוד .
לפיכך, מבקש העותר שהמזכירה הראשית תמציא אישור של רשימת הכתבים
שהתקבלו לרישום על ידי מזכירות בית המשפט בתיק העתירה הנ"ל.
העותר מקווה שהמזכירה הראשית תכלול בתשובתה הצהרה וטבלה, מעין דלהלן:
"החתומה מטה, שרה ליפשיץ, מזכירה ראשית של בית המשפט העליון,
מאשרת בזאת, בכפוף לתקנות סדר הדין בבית המשפט הגבוה לצדק, תשמ"ד-1984, שלהלן
הרשימה המלאה והנכונה של הכתבים שהתקבלו לרישום עד יום זה בתיק דר' יוסף צרניק נ
נגיד בנק ישראל סטנלי פישר (בג"ץ 7650/12)"
כותרת המסמך, כפי שהיא מופיעה על פניו
|
המגיש
|
יום הקבלה לרישום
|
יום ההגשה לרישום
|
#
|
עם זאת, מבקש העותר שהמזכירה הראשית תמציא העתק של כתב מינוייה. כתבים שונים של בית המשפט מעידים שגב' שרה
ליפשיץ מחזיקה במשרת המזכירה הראשית מאז 2002.
בשנת 2012, דחה משרד הנהלת בתי המשפט בקשה בכפוף לחוק חופש המידע התשנ"ח – 1988,
לקבלת העתק של כתב מנוייה של המזכירה הראשית, בטעמה שכתב זה פטור, תחת סעיף בחוק הנ"ל,
הנוגע למסמכים של דיונים פנימיים. [5-6]
תודה רבה על עזרתך המהירה בעניין זה.
תאריך: ה-15 בנובמבר, 2012
 |
_______________
דר' יוסף צרניק
ת"ד 31440
ירושלים 91313
קישורים
[1] 12-10-23 Zernik v Fischer
(7650/12) in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel – petition to
compel the Governor of the Bank of Israel to perform his duties – online public
access system record on the date of filing process
[2] 12-11-08 Zernik v Fischer
(7650/12) in the High Court of Justice
of the State of Israel – petition to compel the Governor of the Bank of Israel
to perform his duties – online public access system records
[3] 12-05-10 Human
Right Alert, Appendix I to Submission;
15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the
electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
[4] 12-03-02 Freedom of Information
request (P-29-2012) on the
Administration of Courts, in re: a) Appointment records of the Chief Clerks of
the Supreme Court, b) Certification/apostille certification procedures of the
Supreme Court
[5]
12-03-06 Freedom of Information response (P-29-2012) by the
Administration of Courts, in re: a) Appointment records of the
Chief Clerks of the Supreme Court, b) Certification/apostille certification
procedures of the Supreme Court
[6] 12-03-28 Revised
Freedom of Information request (P-29-2012) on the Administration of
Courts,, in re: a) Appointment records of the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court,
and b) Certification procedures of the electronic records of the Supreme Court
_____________
Joseph
Zernik, PhD
< josephzernik@humanrightsalertngo.org>
Sent from "1984", Iceland-based Internet Service Provider
_____________
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
* United States - the 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
* United States - the 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review
(UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO)
submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the
courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in
California."
* State of Israel - the 2012
submission of Human Rights Alert to the HRC, titled, "Integrity, or lack
thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of
Israel', is scheduled for review in January 2013.
[1] 12-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: "Integrity,
or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of
Israel"
_____
http://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam
Total Reads: 45,147
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 664,803+500,065
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik
Facebook Friends: 4,965
_____________________________Total Reads: 45,147
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 664,803+500,065
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
http://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik
Facebook Friends: 4,965
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* "I think it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history," said Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School who has written articles analyzing the role of courts in the financial crisis. "I can't think of one where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Reuters (Jan 22, 2012)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/79572282/
* “Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue” CNN (April 7, 2011)
* “About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013” Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..." LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations." Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?
* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago." ACLU
http://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others." More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..." Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice. Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/
____________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment