13-01-15 Lack of integrity of the electronic record system of the Courts in Israel, noted in the 2013 Human Rights Council Staff Report

Over the past decade, corruption was institutionalized in the Israeli courts through the development and implementation of new fraudulent electronic record systems in the courts of the State of Israel by the office of Administration of the Courts, patronized by the highest levels of the Israeli judiciary, Ministry of Justice, and Israel Bar Association. The Israeli courts' fraudulent electronic record systems copied key features of their counterpart fraudulent systems in the United States, developed and implemented a couple of decades earlier:  Invalid implementation of electronic signatures and undermining the authority and accountability of the offices of the clerks of the courts.  According to the State of Israel 2010 Ombudsman Report, the Israeli systems were developed and implemented by two US-based corporations – IBM and EDS – in violation of the law of the State of Israel. Under the tenure of Supreme Court Presiding Justice Aharon Barak and Dorit Beinisch, the courts experienced unprecedented corruption.

  [pics]

Human Rights Council of the United Nations, Supreme Court of the State of Israel

View as PDF: http://he.scribd.com/doc/120461368/

Jerusalem, January 15 -  the 2013 Human Rights Alert (HRA) submission to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the State of Israel by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was incorporated into the Human Rights Council (HRC) Staff Report. [1]  The 2013 Human Rights Alert (HRA) submission details large-scale fraud on the People in implementation of electronic record systems in the courts over the past decade,

The relevant section in the Staff Report says [red added- jz]:

3. Administration of justice, including impunity

24. HRW recommended to: conduct independent, thorough and impartial investigations into all incidents in which Israeli military or police forces may have been responsible for human rights violations, including in the Gaza Strip and; ensure adequate steps to investigate and prosecute Israeli civilians who attack Palestinians or their property.32

Similar recommendations were made by Mossawa Center. 33

25. Human Rights Alert (HRA) submission focused on  the lack of integrity of the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, District Court and Detainees Courts in Israel. 34

26.  JS3-PHROC noted that since Israel s UPR in 2008, no legislative or practical measures have been taken to ensure that trials of Palestinians in military courts conform to the minimum fair trial standards enshrined in international law. 35

Compared to the 2010 Human Rights Alert (HRA) report on the United States, the 2013 HRA report on Israel was placed almost at the top of the UN Staff Report, and it was given a special paragraph number, in a very respectable section -  "Administration of Justice", on page 4:

It should also be noted that:

·       The title of the HRA submission used understated language - "integrity or lack thereof".  The UN report found it sufficient to use the language "lack of integrity"...

·       The HRA report did NOT include case studies. It was almost entirely based on data mining and system analysis.  In later papers, I included case studies, such as the case of Moshe Silman, Stanley Fischer, which took place after the deadline.

Additional official records of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations on this matter are expected later this month or in early February, at the conclusion of the 15th Session of the Universal Periodic Review process.

READ MORE:
[1] Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner
for Human Rights in accordance with paragraph 5 of the
annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21
On the UN site:
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/180/12/PDF/G1218012.pdf?OpenElement
On Human Rights Alert archive:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/120461368/
[2] Human Rights Alert (HRA) Submission, Appendices, including case studies:
[1] 12-06-04 Human Right Alert, Submission;  2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5QWtZcjVQLWVFZ0k
[2] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert,  Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR - State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU
[3]  12-07-18 Human Right Alert, Appendix II to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Additional Responses by National Authorities/Experts, Re: ComSign, LTD - sole certifier and hacker of the digital signatures of the State of Israel".pdf
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5bjBUY0FVNGR3eXc
[4] 12-10-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix III to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, in the electronic record systems in the courts of the State of Israel - peer-reviewed and published in Data Analytics 2012"
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5MFV3dnJMdzN0VVk
[5] 12-10-11 Human Right Alert, Appendix IV to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "The case of Moshe Silman"
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5Q3loSEprNVNPVm8
[6] 12-10-15 Human Right Alert, Appendix V to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Integrity, or lack thereof, in the electronic records of the Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation Consumer Complaint procedures"
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5b2FqQ2k3MVRwUWs
[7] 12-12-18 Human Right Alert, Appendix VI to Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel - "Integrity, or Lack Thereof, in the Electronic Records of the Courts of the State of Israel  CYBERLAW 2013 paper - peer-reviewed and accepted"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/117249997/
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B8Aa2xQGbmk5U3p1aDJONUJaaXM
[8] 12-05-10 Human Rights Alert (NGO) UPR Human Rights  State of Israel, HEBREW Short Submission
http://www.scribd.com/doc/114254105/