ISRAEL:
Attorneys from a non-existent law-firm appeared as Public Defenders
for whistle-blower Rafi Rotem...
The
typical response by Israeli attorneys - "You are focusing on
immaterial procedural details..." If it didn't look like the
Defendant was going to end up in prison, it would be funny...
The
sign on 2 Bloch Street, of a law-firm that never existed... but two
of its attorneys appeared in court as Public Defenders for the
whistle-blower Rafi Rotem, and one of them purportedly consented for
conduct of a criminal prosecution with no witnesses...
Whistle-blower
Rafi Rotem in one of the many false arrests by Israeli police
Tel-Aviv
Judge Yael Pradelsky permitted a series of unauthorized attorneys to
appear as Public Defenders for whistle-blower Rafi Rotem. She is
suspected for faking a protocol and decision that permitted admitting
evidence with no witnesses in this criminal prosecution...
National
Public Defender Yoav Sapir - so far refuses to respond on demands to
take actions to stop the charade..
Tel-Aviv
Public Defender Elkana Leist: "We checked with the Defendant,
and he had no complaints"... Defendant says nobody from the
Public Defenders' office ever talked with him...
_____
OccupyTLV,
September 17 - for over a decade, the Israeli courts have abused Rafi
Rotem, the Tax Authority whistle-blower. [i,ii]
Today, he is homeless and penniless.
Now, he is also criminally prosecuted for "insulting public servants".
A series of policemen, who routinely falsely arrested him, beat him up, humiliated him, and denied him equal protection, filed complaints that he insulted them... [iii] And in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, Judge Yael Pradelsky's conduct is not much different...
In a hearing on May 26, 2014, a person identified in the Protocol only as "Attorney Sadeh", with no first name and no law-firm, with no certificate of counsel of record, no statement on the record of his full name or authority, appeared as Public Defender. [iv]
According to the same Protocol, this person initiated (but with no filing of a Motion) or consented to conduct of the prosecution, including admission of evidence with no witnesses, without the knowledge of the Defendant and without Defendant’s consent.
In fact, Defendant did not even know about it, until I conducted inspection of the court records in this file. Defendant did not remember any of it taking place in court either. I was present there, and I heard none of it...
In short, it is likely to be a falsified Protocol and Decision by Judge Yael Pradelsky. Such conduct is common in Israel today, and judges face no disciplinary action for it...
On top, the Protocol and Decision were never served by the Court...
And the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify these records "True Copy of the Original"... [v]
And Attorney Sadeh refuses to respond on a written request by Defendant to review the Protocol and seek corrections if it is incorrect... [vi]
Rafi Rotem, the Defendant, was under the impression that Attorney Sadeh was a real Public Defender, since he was an attorney from the law-firm of Attorney Neil Simon, who Rotem thought was a duly authorized Public Defender. However, none of these notions had any documentary support in the court file.
So on September 16, 2004, i decided to go and check...
In the lobby of the building on 2 Bloch Street I photographed the signed, shown above. A similar sign is posted also on the third floor:
Barkan & Simon
Law Office
Attorney Nir Barkan
Attorney Neil Simon
Attorney Itzik Sadeh
In the office there was only one person, who identified himself as Attorney Nir Barkan. He adamantly denied the existence of the law-firm of Barkan & Simon, whose sign hangs near the entrance door of the office he was sitting in...
LINKS
Now, he is also criminally prosecuted for "insulting public servants".
A series of policemen, who routinely falsely arrested him, beat him up, humiliated him, and denied him equal protection, filed complaints that he insulted them... [iii] And in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court, Judge Yael Pradelsky's conduct is not much different...
In a hearing on May 26, 2014, a person identified in the Protocol only as "Attorney Sadeh", with no first name and no law-firm, with no certificate of counsel of record, no statement on the record of his full name or authority, appeared as Public Defender. [iv]
According to the same Protocol, this person initiated (but with no filing of a Motion) or consented to conduct of the prosecution, including admission of evidence with no witnesses, without the knowledge of the Defendant and without Defendant’s consent.
In fact, Defendant did not even know about it, until I conducted inspection of the court records in this file. Defendant did not remember any of it taking place in court either. I was present there, and I heard none of it...
In short, it is likely to be a falsified Protocol and Decision by Judge Yael Pradelsky. Such conduct is common in Israel today, and judges face no disciplinary action for it...
On top, the Protocol and Decision were never served by the Court...
And the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify these records "True Copy of the Original"... [v]
And Attorney Sadeh refuses to respond on a written request by Defendant to review the Protocol and seek corrections if it is incorrect... [vi]
Rafi Rotem, the Defendant, was under the impression that Attorney Sadeh was a real Public Defender, since he was an attorney from the law-firm of Attorney Neil Simon, who Rotem thought was a duly authorized Public Defender. However, none of these notions had any documentary support in the court file.
So on September 16, 2004, i decided to go and check...
In the lobby of the building on 2 Bloch Street I photographed the signed, shown above. A similar sign is posted also on the third floor:
Barkan & Simon
Law Office
Attorney Nir Barkan
Attorney Neil Simon
Attorney Itzik Sadeh
In the office there was only one person, who identified himself as Attorney Nir Barkan. He adamantly denied the existence of the law-firm of Barkan & Simon, whose sign hangs near the entrance door of the office he was sitting in...
LINKS
ii2014-05-26
Request
filed with Amnesty International in the case of persecuted Israeli
Tax Authority whistle-blower Rafi Rotem
iii
2013-06-23
Former MK, Prof Aryeh Eldad: Anti-corruption fighter has become
homeless_Haaretz
iv
2014-08-18
State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel Aviv Magistrate
Court - Notice of evidence of perversion of justice and fraud on the
court, served on Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher Grunis and
Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court Presiding Judge Zivah Hadassi Herman -
includes all court file recordshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/237093179/
v
2014-09-09
State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel Aviv Magistrate
Court - Request for certification of May 26, 2014 Protocol and
Decision by Judge Yael Pradelsky "True Copy of the
Original"http://www.scribd.com/doc/239173272/
vi
2014-09-04 State of Israel v Rafi Rotem (1074-02-13) in the Tel Aviv
Magistrate Court: Request for review of the May 26, 2014 Judge
Pradelsky Protocol and Decision forwarded to Attorney Neil Simon and
Sadeh
2014-09-17 מדינת ישראל נ רפי רותם: ראיות נוספות להונאה - עו"ד ניל סיימון ואיציק שדה
==============================================
עניינים פרוצדורלים...
[תמונות]
שלט של משרד עורכי דין ברקן & סיימון, שאינו קיים על פי עו"ד ברקן, רותם באחד ממעצרי השווא המרובים; השופטת יעל פרדלסקי; סניגור ציבורי ארצי יואב ספיר; סניגור ציבורי מחוזי (בפועל) ת"א אלקנה לייסט.
_____
מאהל המחאה ת"א, 17 לספטמבר - כבר עשור שבתי המשפט מתנכלים לרפי רותם - חושף השחיתויות ברשות המסים.
ועתה הוא עומד לתביעה פלילית על "העלבת עובדי ציבור".
בדיון ב-26 למאי, 2014 הופיע אדם שנרשם בפרוטוקול כנוכח: "עו"ד שדה, ס"צ" - ללא שם פרטי, וללא שם משרד עורכי דין.
אדם זה לא הגיש ייפוי כוח ולא מסר הודעה לפרוטוקול לגבי ייפוי כוחו כסניגור כביכול מטעם הסניגוריה הציבורית המחוזית.
על פי הפרוטוקול, אדם זה יזם ו/או נתן את הסכמתו כביכול להתנהלות על פי סעיף 144, הכולל קבלת ראיות ללא עדים.
פעולה זאת התנהלה ללא ידיעתו וללא הסכמתו של רותם.
רפי רותם אינו זוכר שנאמרו דברים אלה בשעת הדיון, וגם אני שהייתי בדיון, לא שמעתי דברים אלה. לכן יש חשש לזיוף פרוטוקול והחלטה של השופטת יעל פרדלסקי.
פרוטוקול והחלטה אלה גם לא הומצאו מעולם, ותקפותם מפוקפקת.
המזכיר הראשי מר רחמים אשר גם מסרב לאשר פרוטוקול והחלטה אלה "העתק מתאים למקור".
רותם מצוי תחת הרושם שעו"ד איציק שדה היה מוסמך כסניגורו, כיוון שהוא עורך דין במשרד עורכי דין של ניל סיימון. אולם לרושם זה אין כל בסיס בכתובים.
בביקורי אתמול במשרדו של עו"ד ניל סיימון ברחוב בלוך 2, ת"א, נמצאו בכניסה לבניין ובקומה השלישית שלטים האומרים:
____
ברקן & סיימון, משרד עורכי דין
עו"ד ניר ברקן
עו"ד ניל סיימון
עו"ד איציק שדה
____
במקום נכח רק אדם שהציג את עצמו כעורך דין ניר ברקן. הוא הכחיש בתוקף את עובדת קיומו של "משרד עורכי דין ברקן & סיימון".
שחיתות השופטים וערכי הדין היא גורם מרכזי במצב בישראל היום!
No comments:
Post a Comment