09-12-05 Where our readers come from

09-12-05 Warning Laura Lynn, who filed complaint at U.S. Dist Court, LA, about Kozinski Frauds and Culture she was likely to encounter.

Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:55:10 -0800
To: Laura Lynn
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture - Laura Lynn - you ought to be aware of that, in your case at the U.S. District, Los Angeles, where such frauds and such culture are prevalent.

Cc:

Hi Laura Lynn:
Great to hear from you.
Regarding the complaint you stated you just filed, I assume at U.S. District Court, Los Angeles:

• Please be particularly cautious if you had any dealings with Pro Se Deputy Clerk Chris Sawyer. I raised my concerns also with Supervisor of the Intake Unit, Ms Sharon McGee, a brave woman indeed, who informed me that she concurred with my concerns and that she raised them herself before the court. However, there was no evidence that any action was taken. I filed complaints against him, both with FBI and with the Clerk of the Court, Terry Nafisi. No evidence that either did anything in this regard. I alleged dishonest manipulation of court records in both my case and the case of Richard Fine. The current state of affairs: On September 18, 2009, in appearance in person at the office of the clerk, I was denied the right to access the paper record that was the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine, filed March 19 or 20, 2009, under the claim that it was shredded, less than 6 months than the day it was filed. My requests after that, to inspect and to copy any record of the shredding, remained unanswered at all...
• Please be particularly cautious if your case was referred to Magistrate Carla Woehrle. If that was the case, please let me know, it required a full lecture, too lengthy for this message. Suffice was to say that Deputy Clerk Chris Sawyer claimed his conduct was per orders from Woehrle.
• It was for the benefit of people like you that I wrote the Wikipedia entries, and particularly - posted a figure showing what an NEF in a U.S. District Court in California looked like, and what an RSA-encrypted digital signature looked like, and what it was about. Please make sure to review that short entry, which I hope to beef up shortly. If it did not appear clear, please let me know, so that I would improve the write-up, accordingly. Nothing like true fresh readers as reviewers.
• The minimum you ought to understand was that if you never received a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) with an RSA-encrypted digital signatures embedded in it, similar to the one I posted in the Wikipedia entry, you were the victim of a Kazinski Fraud at the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles, part of the Kazinski Culture prevalent in it.
• In my case, once I realized I was the victim of a Kazinski Fraud, I just abandoned the litigation at the U.S. District Court. That did not stop the court from continuing the sham court action for another half a year. If you found yourself under the same predicament, and figured out a better approach, please let me know.
• I would be gratfeful if you provided a case number, since I was particularly interested in looking into how that court handled any civil rights complaints against LA Superior Court judges.

Sincerely,

Joe Zernik

A. Linked Records:
1) Richard Fine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Isaac_Fine
2) Rampart FIPs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rampart-FIPs_(Falsely_Imprisoned_Persons)
3) NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notice_of_Electronic_Filing

B. CC
1) Prof Posner

2) Various Law School faculty
3) USDOJ-IG Glenn A Fine, as an addendum to complaint against senior officers of the USDOJ, who provided alleged fraudulent responses to U.S. Congress in Aug/Sept 2008, and refused to provide equal protection for 10 millions LA county residents.
4) U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights
5) Basel Accords Committee

C. The Usual

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement
At 20:49 04/12/2009, Laura Lynn wrote:

Mr. Roland,
My war is with LA Superior Court. But the DA's Judicial Systems Integrity Division, in the person of John Moulin, is completely useless in fighting corruption. So I turn to the FBI as much as possible. And I just filed a case in Federal Court. It is a Constitutional issue and therefore proper jurisdiction. But there are six other suits I could have filed instead. I chose my fight because it would not be in the state court. Even a simple small claims action in the State court is a waste of paper for me. I just pray the state does not influence the feds (and I demanded a jury, which may help also.)
Laura Lynn
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Jon Roland wrote:

From: Jon Roland

Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts

To: "joseph zernik"

Cc:

Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 8:06 PM

Zernik, I don't find much if any sense in your messages. If your pleadings are like your messages I find that:

(1) With you defending him, Richard Fine doesn't need more enemies; and

(2) It is no wonder you aren't getting relief from the Ninth Circuit, and Kozinski probably has nothing personal to do with that.

It is insane to be inventing all kinds of stuff like "Kozinski frauds" and a "Kozinski culture" that have little or nothing to do with Alex Kozinski.

I see no evidence that you have established a proper cause of action in federal court. This is a state matter, and a political case there. The remedy is political. The people of California need to clean up their own courts without running off the the feds whenever things get too tough.

Can we get some sane adults on this job?

-- Jon 
-------------------------------------------------------------------  
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757  
512/299-5001    www.constitution.org    jon.roland@constitution.org  
-------------------------------------------------------------------

09-12-05 Kozinski Fraud and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - The solution? It's the comptuers, %&$#$@!

Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:12:43 -0800
To: "Bonnie Russell" , "Laura Lynn"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - The solution? IT'S THE COMPUTERS, %&$#$@!
Cc:

Hi Bonnie, Hi Laura Lynn, hi all:
My background was primarily in science, so I could surely see all the deficiencies Bonnie sees in web sites where anybody could rate judges, or enter opinions substantiated or not, and anecdotal episodes.

In support of feedback web sites:
However, I can also see why Laura Lynn sees in them an important instrument. These sites are the counter measure against the deviant culture now prevailing in the courts and elsewhere - that judges are entitled to be corrupt, and also entitled to have it never talked about.
A subset of this culture are the various perversions, of processes and procedures ranging from complaints of judicial corruptions all the way to caption designations in courts of appeals.
What sense could it ever make to participate in a procedure where you are not allowed to name the offender?
It is a violation of due process off the bat... Rules of Court must dictate the procedure for designating captions. Period. But attorneys accept the current conditions as a dogma, possibly the outcome of some revelation...
These site are important psychologically - in breaking such barriers.

However, when it comes to scientific, verifiable, fully quantitative measurement of corruption:
I proposed the definitive project to the Office of Attorney General Michael Mukasey about a year and a half ago. No response was received whatsoever, Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Diane Watson followed up with Congressional Inquiries. The proposal was apparently scary enough that it prompted alleged fraudulent, derogatory responses by Kenneth Kaiser (Assistant Director, FBI), and Kenneth Melson (Director, Office of U.S. Atty General).
My request was never presented as addressing directly the corruption issue. It was simply a request for Equal Protection - enforcement of Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) in LA County.
I believe that we are rather unique in LA County - for about a decade the court denied access to registers of actions (California dockets), including denial of access to parties and counsel in litigations, both civil and criminal. Likewise, access was also denied to Calendar of the Courts, Index of All Cases, and Index of Judgments. It was and is a serious abuse of Human, Civil, and Constitutional Rights of all 10 millions who reside in LA County.
The data is all computerized. I proposed that a Special Counsel, with limited scope of mission and limited time for his tenure, could restore public access, at least on court locations, almost overnight. However, I cautioned, that FBI must no be involved. It had to be accomplished using units of the Treasury Dept, who were trained in capturing computers of failing banks.
I could guarantee, the once access was allowed, if I were provided a team of 10 smart programmers, and minimal budget, we could compose an index, reliable, reproducible, and validated, and rank all 425 or 450 judges (whatever the number is) of the Los Angeles Superior Court on such Corruption Index within 60 days. No 200 investigators and 2-years with no final report... 60 days! The output would be a list of all judges, with their ranks on the Index, with easy reference to the makeup of the index, and the specific data that led to the ranking of each judge.
Such data should of course be later reviewed by others, independent reviewers, and amended as deemed necessary, and actions could be taken based on such data with minimal delays.
It's all there, and that was exactly why access was denied...
And that was also the reason that senior officers of the U.S. Dept of Justice found it necessary to make up fraudulent derogatory responses to U.S. congress, to justify their denial of equal protection.
That's the beauty of the Kozinski Frauds, which are the most common abuse of justice in the U.S. today;

To paraphrase the War Room battle cry: It's the computers, %&$#$@!

Joe Zernik

P.S. The same could also be of course applied in each and every U.S. Distinct court and each and every court of appeals, with minimal effort and maximal impact - the most bang for the buck!

- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CC:
1) Prof Posner

2) Various Law School faculty
3) USDOJ-IG Glenn A Fine, as an addendum to complaint against senior officers of the USDOJ, who provided alleged fraudulent responses to U.S. Congress in Aug/Sept 2008, and refused to provide equal protection for 10 millions LA county residents.
4) U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights
5) Basel Accords Committee

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

At 23:07 04/12/2009, Bonnie Russell wrote:

And you get what you pay for. The problem with "free" is content is verification, and what's missing. No case numbers, no "experts" or opposing counsel. Not knocking it per se, but seriously. Free sites are - more blathering. So you get what you pay for. Also, reporters find stuff more credible if someone puts their money where their mouth is. It's just the way it is. Not saying it's a total a bust, but seriously, if nothing is verifiable...what's the point?

----- Original Message -----

From: Laura Lynn

To:

Cc:

Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 10:25 PM

Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts

Or rate judges on www.Courthouseforum.com for free.

--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Bonnie Russell <brussell1@san.rr.com> wrote:

From: Bonnie Russell <brussell1@san.rr.com>

Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts

To:

Cc:

Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:18 PM

You nailed it, Jon. Exactly why USAjudges.com exists. Make a report, make a difference. Enough reports, reporters get interested and boom; another Luzerne County.

However Jon, most people prefer to spend their time railing against the system, or authoring reams of papers proving how "right" they are, than act.

It's really kind of strange.

----- Original Message -----

From: Jon Roland

To: Laura Lynn

Cc:

Sent:

Friday, December 04, 2009 8:55 PM

Subject: Re: Kozinski Fraud - and Kozinski Culture were the true problems - seeing no wrong and no offense in perpetrating the routine fraud in the courts

A Lawyer’s View of the Justice System, Joseph H. Delaney, July/August, 1999, issue of Analog Science Fiction and Fact, Vol. CXVIX No. 7 & 8 ”... the proportion of judges who are dishonest, who are on the take, who harbor prejudices against parties or counsel, is far greater than the lay public realizes. ... Corruption is rampant in courts at every level throughout the country. It is equally rampant among prosecutors and law enforcement people. ... The primary corrupting influence is the drug business. ... the dope interests own contemporary justice. ... There is no greater shock than to find that even with both law and the facts in your favor your constitutional rights are worthless because you can’t get the crooked regime to enforce them.”

http://www.constitution.org/abus/narc/lvjs.htm

If you don't want corrupt officials, stop voting for them. it's easy to spot them. They're the ones who get campaign donations. Only candidates without money should ever be voted for.

-- Jon      
-------------------------------------------------------------------Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757 
512/299-5001    www.constitution.org    jon.roland@constitution.org 
-------------------------------------------------------------------

09-12-05 Kitchen Monologue #3 - Kozinski must resign!

09-12-05 Requesting addition of correspondence to Dec 7, 2009 La Verne City Council meeting.

Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:24:40 -0800
To: Evelyn Clark
From: joseph zernik

Subject: Additional materials for La Verne City Council meeting on Monday, December 7, 2009

Cc: "Scott Pickwith"

Evelyn Clark, Clerk
City of La Verne
County of Los Angeles, California

RE: Additional materials for La Verne City Council meeting on Monday, December 7, 2009

Please accept the attached four page record of email exchange with La Verne Police Department Chief Pickwith, as addition to materials I already filed for the City Council meeting on Monday, December 7, 2007 (copied below for recipients who do not accept attachments).

The text in such exchange was left unchanged, but the my electronic signatures in email correspondence, which relied on passwords for email accounts, equivalent of digital signatures, were replaced here with graphic signatures, and a digital signature was added at the upper right corner of the face page.

In case you were unable to produce sufficient copies, please let me know how many copies I should bring with me to the meeting.

In case any further response was received from Chief Pickwith, I would do my best to produce copies of such response, if it would be received in a timely manner.

Thanks again for your help,

Dated: December 5, 2009
Los Angeles County, California ____/s/ Joseph H Zernik____
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750

CC:

Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice
As an addendum to complaint of widespread corruption of the justice system of Los Angeles County, California,
and refusal of senior FBI and U.S. Dept of Justice officers to provide Equal Protection in Los Angeles County, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress in August/September 2008.

Linked Records:

1) The complete record could be viewed at:

http://inproperinla.com/09-12-04-lvpd-chief-pickwith-email-correspondence-s.pdf

09-12-05 Welcome Japan and the Islamic Republic of Iran!

Good to see you joined the cluster map!

Please feel free to leave comments. An anonymous option was provided.

It would be of particular interest to hear about efforts and ways that courts were secured against corruption in your counties, and which of the measures appeared effective. In particular, I was interested to hear to what degree the various countries respected the right to access court records - to inspect and to copy. Such right was known in English speaking countries as the common law right to access court records - to inspect and to copy. It provided that any person could go to court anytime, during business hours, and request to inspect the court files, his/hers, or others'. I believe this concept, which emerged not long after the end of the middle ages, is quintessential and irreplaceable, whether in its paper or its digital form.

However, experience showed, that digital records were more tricky, the courts found ways to conceal records in the transition from paper to digital court administration.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Joe Zernik

09-12-04 More on Kozinski Frauds and Jacqueline Connor

Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:53:19 -0800
To: "Ron "
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Re: RICHARD A Posner is A Judge of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals & close personal friend of Chief Judge Kozinski. He is also a Professor of Law. You refer to him as Prof Posner. You must refer to him as Judge Posner in your postings & emails..
Bcc:
At 01:22 03/12/2009, you wrote:

http://home.uchicago.edu/~rposner/

_______________________________________________

December 4, 2009

Dear Atty Gottchalk:

Thanks for your notice, and I am glad to see that you figured out two of the four reasons that Prof Richard Posner was explicitly listed, among all law school faculty that were copied:

a) He was a scholar
b) He was a good friend of Alex Kozinski
c) He was both judicially and scholarly interested in law and economics, and the causes of the current crisis.
d) He clerked with the late William J. Brennan, Jr, author of Fay v Noia (1963), who wrote:
"The basic principle of the Great Writ of habeas corpus is that, in a civilized society... if the imprisonment cannot be shown to conform with the fundamental requirements of law, the individual is entitled to his immediate release".

In running his Kozinski Fraud on Richard Fine - Alex Kozinski allowed continued false imprisonment with not even a warrant, conviction, or sentencing.

Judge v Prof
However, for an experienced attorney, you failed to provide the foundation for the "must" in your message. I was addressing Prof Richard Posner as an academician, which he chose to be, on top of his judicial appointment. In fact, I doubt that I would have ever had any interest in communicating with him, had I not looked up his academic profile first, and publication list. My initial interest was triggered, in fact, by the Op Ed piece in The New York Times... He signed it neither a "Judge Richard Posner", nor as "Prof Richard Posner", but only as "Richard A Posner, Chicago"...
As far as honorifics go - in my opinion "Prof Posner" by far exceeded "Judge Posner". That was the spirit in which it was written, and I hope that it was similarly read. After all, I considered most of the LA Superior Court judges as criminals - members of the LA-JR (LA Judiciary Racket), as well as some of the judicial officers of the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles. e.g. Magistrate Carla Woehrle.

Obviously I was aware of Prof Posner's friendship with Alex Kozinski and his appreciation of the latter's smarts- it made Prof Posner the one, who was most likely to be able to talk Alex Kozinski into resigning. Smarts was necessary, but not sufficient for the job of Judge. It required also some level of integrity.

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

Kozinski Frauds are commonplace in the U.S. courts today
The Kozinski Fraud., perpetrated by Alex Kozinski on Richard Fine affected False Imprisonment. That fraud was part of the Kozinski Culture - a deviant culture that saw no wrong and no fault in issuing fraudulent court orders and judgments, as long as such orders were invalid and ineffectual... If a judge crossed his/her fingers behind the back... then fraud was allowed. Kozinski's immediate resignation would be the only way to demonstrate that such culture was not the accepted norm of integrity among judges in the U.S. I believe that Prof Posner realized that fact as well.

I was and am a lay person, writing in lay parlance... I was and am allowed to call a lie a lie and to call a fraud a fraud - when not a single attorneys in Los Angeles was to be found, who would go on the record in re: false imprisonment of a colleague - Richard Fine - continued to this date through the Kozinski Fraud.

My personal experience with Kozinski Frauds.
In legal records I, likewise, never signed as an Attorney. However, in a Kozinski Fraud - a fraudulent, yet invalid Court Order by a judge, who double as a top organized crime figure - Jacqueline Connor - it was ruled otherwise:

One of the forged records of the Los Angeles Superior Court, in Samaan v Zernik was an Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. It was not unique either - a similar perversion could be found in Galdjie v Darwish. The paper was signed in my name, designating me as "Attorney In Pro Per". I ,of course, would never sign with such designation. On top - the forged paper was missing my digital signature, all of which I made abundantly clear in my objection to the presence of such paper in the court file. Jacqueline Connor, who falsely and fraudulently appeared as judge in the case, ruled that it was my signature, and my paper...

In the same hearing in the same case, as trier of facts, she also ruled as authentic another forgery. Multiple signatures of Victor Parks - Pacific Mortgage Consultants loan broker, and Countrywide's "business partner" appeared in various records of Countrywide and Nivie Samaan. Not one of them was authentic. I presented samples of his authentic signatures, which were not even close to the forged signatures in the court file and in Countrywide's records. Judge Connor denied any claims of fraud in the matter. When Jacqueline Connor, one of the smartest judges of the LA Superior Court, by all accounts, decided to go criminal, and be "duped" by false evidence, she surely was persistent, and nothing could stand in her way... That was the reason that I claimed that evidence from the civil courts regarding the criminality of Jacqueline Connor, required immediate investigation of her conduct in the Rampart scandal. She was and is in fact the central figure in organized crime in Los Angeles, particularly - in control of illicit drug markets. And she was the one who perverted the First Rampart Trial (2000) as well.
___________________________
Three Victor Parks signatures.
Fraud related to such signatures was used in:
a) A prequalification letter -opined as fraud by expert - to induce assent to contract, and
b) In loan applications - to file false and fraudulent records for government-backed mortgage loans.
Judge Connor in a Kozinski Fraud ruled no fraud was found in the matter.
___________________________

A. Authentic Victor Parks hand signature in court declaration

B. Southern California forgery

__________________________

C. Northern California forgery

___________________________

Judge Jacqueline Connor, was only running through the routine of Kozinski Frauds in this case - she issued a series of fraudulent orders and a judgment, albeit - all invalid and ineffectual - to perpetrate real estate fraud. She had of course her share of false imprisonments as well. The two - Real Estate Frauds, and False Imprisonments were deemed as the LA-JR's claims to fame. After all, if Kozinski was allowed to run Kozinski frauds, why not Connor? What's good for the goose is good for the gander...

In between we had the sub-prime crisis, which was the subject of the Op Ed piece by Prof Richard Posner. He claimed that it could not be fixed, unless Banking Regulation was fixed. My comment to him was that the Sub-Prime Crisis was in fact a general Integrity Crisis, and the Courts and law-enforcement were smack in the heart of it.
I hope I made it clear enough why Prof Richard Posner was a greater show of respect than Judge Richard Posner.

Joe Zernik (in lay parlance)

CC
1) Prof Richard Posner
2) Various other law faculty
3) U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights
4) Basel Accords Committee
5) Glenn A Fine - Inspector General of the U.S. Justice Department, Investigation Division

P.S.
1) Check out new entry in Wikipedia - Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) The NEFs are the quintessential instrument of Kozinski frauds in U.S. Courts today - through their omission from PACER.
2) Check out the new "cluster map", copied below, on blog: http://www.blogger.com/
People from the frozen tundras of Russia to the rice paddies of southeastern Asia and the outback in Australia, figured out what I was writing about - rampant corruption of the U.S. judiciary. It was only among U.S. judges, attorneys, and U.S. Department of Justice, that the notion appeared to be lost... I am still seeking more readership in the southern hemisphere...

IN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.