10-03-16 Attorney Kevin McCormick's Alleged Fraud in the Habeas Corpus Petition // Presunto fraude fiscal Kevin McCormick en la petición de hábeas corpus

To: "Interested Persons"
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Richard Fine: Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in the Habeas Corpus Petition
Cc: "McCormick, Brenda" , "McCormick, Kevin M" , "Attention: Judge David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court C/O John Clarke, Clerk" <2136217952@metrofax.com>
Attorney Kevin McCormick was alleged to have perpetrated fraud and various other criminalities in his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine.

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:36:29 -0700
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik
Subject: Richard Fine: Attorney McCormick was indeed retained by others than Judge Yaffe and the Superior Court

The response by Mr Carrizosa, copied below, on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, did not confirm the alleged fraud, but it strengthened the circumstantial evidence.  It also supported the evidence of direct involvement in the alleged fraud related to appearances of Attorney McCormick in the case by California Chief Justice Ronald George.

One should be reminded that Mr McCormick, Judge Yaffe, and the Los Angeles Superior Court refused to answer on such questions in any way at all.
~~jz

X-MSK: CML=1.001000
From: "Carrizosa, Philip"
To: joseph zernik
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:50:13 -0700
Subject: Request for information - Fine case
Thread-Topic: Request for information - Fine case
Thread-Index: AcrDBDO92C2v4gSfSS++wRJ8NDCfoACTM94g
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

Mr. Zernik,

In response to your March 13 request for clarifying information and confirmation of your five hypothetical assertions, I offer our response:

The Administrative Office of the Courts retained the Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham law firm to represent the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and Judge David Yaffe in Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles Court, Case No. CV 09-1914, pursuant to Government Code section 811.9 and rule 10.202 of the California Rules of Court, which require the AOC to manage litigation affecting the courts, including the responsibility to select legal counsel on behalf of courts and judicial officers.  Kevin McCormick is a partner in the retained law firm.

We cannot respond to your other hypotheticals.

I hope this answers your inquiry.

Philip R. Carrizosa
Office of Communications
Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor
San Francisco CA 94102-3688
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615
philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov
www.courtinfo.ca.gov
"Serving the courts for the benefit of all Californians"


From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Carrizosa, Philip
Cc: McCormick, Brenda; McCormick, Kevin M; Attention: Judge David Yaffe and the LA Superior Court C/O John Clarke, Clerk
Subject: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA

March 13, 2010

Philip R. Carrizosa
Office of Communications
Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor
San Francisco CA 94102-3688
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615
philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov

The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested.

RE: Richard Fine:  California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA

Dear Mr Carrizosa:

Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California Administrative Office of the Courts.  I again request your help.

In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles.  I further alleged that his conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2], [3]

Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated, unverified communications, which lead to the formulation of the following five (5) hypothetical assertions:
1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura.
2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not pursuant to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)  - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were pursuant to his engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts, an arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or through related entities.
4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)  - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the Courts,  and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - regarding Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914). 
Request is for confirmation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of the Courts, and the Chairman of the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above, regarding engagement of Attorney Kevin McCormick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - the habeas corpus petition.

Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhD
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

CC:
1. McCormick, Brenda - by email
2. McCormick, Kevin - by email
3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax
4. Others of Interest

LINKED:

[1]  The American Bar Association's motto is: "Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice"

[2] ABA Journal   article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-year Mark In Jail In Contempt
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/70-year-old_lawyer_hits_one-year_mark_in_jail_in_contempt_case/#comments

[3] March 13, 2010 ABA Journal article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-year Mark In Jail In Contempt, as copied:
http://inproperinla.com/10-03-13-aba-journal-article-on-richard-fine-and-comments-s.pdf